Hue Concept for GGS Project

GGS Project Concept: Resources Energy Transport Lifestyle Specific to TT Hue Resources and Production

Energy

lagoon, lakes, rivers to protect and enrich

to recharge batteries for vehicles and lights for poorest students

Afforestry and grasses

Aqua culture

Conservation Clean food of economic specialised, to plants around restaurants and waterways customers

Solar

? Integrated of attached to CALDIP VIE033 ?

Plants as biomass - biofuel + local 'wastes'

? Target west - northwest sides of Lagoons?

Transport

Sustained Change

Tourists needs; 3 milion tourist days per year; 400,000 tonnes of GHG by tourists

catalysts in Lifestyle

Walk and Xe dien, Xe dien, cycles Vehicle aircons: Clean fuel bicycle and buses and efficency, cyclo cars insulation

Boats' engines

Emissions inspect and tax

Washing water treat and re-use

Students' Students' transport, consumption, 100,000 per 100,000 per year year

?must work close with TP Hue, and the nearest district of 033?

DPI Priorities

Wind pilot, mobile equipment

? Start with VIE023 and 033 districts?

Brief responses by which to justify the focused Concept of Resources, Energy, Transport, Lifestyle RETL

Green Manufacturing

TTHue has low dependency on and low competitive potential in Mfg; but will contribute through Science and Technology

Effective use of energy and Low Carbon Economy

Economy is mainly tourism based on heritage, marine ecosystems, education: so Concept must focus here for most cost-effective contribution to: A. Green Growth Strategy; B. Kyoto style adaptations to climate change; C. Hue City needs and plans for sustainable tourism and revenue from tourists; D. green linkages of marine resources and livelihoods to the economic base of tourism.

Green Lifestyle

Changes in lifestyle depend on policies and relative prices; and on leadership by advocates. Leaders and catalysts are among 100,000 students and their choices in consumption & recreation. The RETL Concept must require and active role from students

Waste management City and TTHue are well advanced on services and plans. Landfill sites should be resolved by local agencies. RETL Concept to contribute by reducing waste generation, and perhaps by a few local burners-generators DPI Components 1a. Forest aqua Draft Concept agrees 1b. Waste Draft Concept agrees 2. Protective infras Draft Concept not include; defers it to the master plans: PERHAPS invest in one major floodway to protect heritage 3. Energy renewable Draft Concept agrees: BUT with focus on transport for tourists [who can pay for clean fuel and batteries] GGS Project Concept: Resources Energy Transport Lifestyle Specific to TT Hue Planting

Energy

Aqua economy

Tourism

Education

Lifestyle

Transport

QUESTION:, NOTES: Is the protection infras as in DPI proposal more important and cost-effective than electric transport and planting? a Is the protection infras as in DPI proposal more important and cost-effective than electric transport and planting? b The economic base is in selling cultural heritage: means that we must protect it, AND move people to 'buy' it c d e f

MAYBE invest in a CRITICAL FLOODWAY to protect specific cultural heritage assets? Maybe do Feasibility Study (FS) of Garden Houses rehabilitation and rental to Package groups? Re Garden Houses: would Lux City heritage experts 'adopt' the Garden House precinct, for restoration and uses? We could mobilise cycles of expert volunteers from EU and Australia, IF the FS is positive

GGS Concept 150331