MLP: A stress sensor goes nuclear

July 21, 2017 | Autor: D. Hilfiker-kleiner | Categoria: Humans, Animals, Cell nucleus, Myocardium, Acetylation, Physiological Stress Markers
Share Embed


Descrição do Produto

Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology 47 (2009) 423–425

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w. e l s e v i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / y j m c c

Editorial

MLP: A stress sensor goes nuclear

The sarcomeric Z-disc is one of the most complex macromolecular structures in biology [1]. Some of its constituents have important structural functions and an increasing number of recent publications point to additional, previously unexpected features. A new view is now emerging, whereby Z-disc proteins are involved as important intra- and intercellular signaling nodes [2]. Translocation of Z-disc proteins to the nucleus and probably to the M-band as well as to other compartments, their interaction with additional signaling molecules and ability to facilitate macromolecular protein complexes are only a few properties to indicate their multi-functionality. In this context it was shown, that I-band proteins such as FHL1 [3] or muscle ankyrin repeat proteins such as CARP [4] as well as the titin kinase, which is located at the sarcomeric M-band [5] are probably all involved in cardiac mechanosensation (please see for a review [6]). Titin contains specific elastic domains within its I-band region (such as the N2B, N2BA, PEVK and Ig domains) and as such might serve as a sarcomeric length sensor. In contrast, the sarcomeric Z-disc might serve as a tension sensor. A better understanding of these emerging novel physiological roles of Z-disc proteins has been achieved using a variety of genetically altered animal models, such as mouse and zebrafish as well as Drosophila. Even more insights might be provided with the use of reductionist approaches by precisely analyzing one particular protein in the setting of cardiomyocyte cell culture systems, where preload and afterload conditions can be modified. One of these proteins is muscle LIM protein (MLP, also known as cysteine rich protein 3 (CSRP3)), which has been discovered as a myogenic factor and was first described in 1994 [7]. MLP is a LIM only protein, it consists of 194 amino acids which constitute two LIM domains each followed by a glycine rich domain. Soon after its initial description the protein became important for cardiovascular research when it was demonstrated in 1997 [8] that MLP deficient animals developed hypertrophy followed by a dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) phenotype — at this time the first genetically altered mouse model for this devastating disease. Perhaps even more important is that human MLP mutations are able to cause human forms of cardiomyopathy [9– 13]. The precise mechanisms by which MLP mutations cause these diseases are still less clear. In this context it was shown that additional ablation of phospholamban (PLB) in MLP−/− animals, which exhibit normal or enhanced SR-calcium ATPase function [14], rescues the heart-failure phenotype (i.e. no heart failure in PLB and MLP double knock-out animals) [15]. It was also shown that MLP−/− cardiomyocytes are defective in brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) induction upon mechanical stimulation whereas endothelin or phenylephrine were still able to induce BNP expression in these cells [12]. Based on these, as well as additional data [12], it was suggested that the primary defect is not located in the downstream pathway for gene induction but in the initial sensing of the stretch stimulus. Thus, MLP was 0022-2828/$ – see front matter © 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.07.012

suggested to be part of a macromolecular, cardiac mechanical stretch sensor. In this context, MLP was found to be present in different cellular compartments, including the sarcomeric Z-disc/I-band of different species such as Drosophila [16], rat [12,17] and mouse [8,18–19], the costamere (where β1-spectrin interacts with MLP) [20], intercalated disc (where N-RAP interacts with MLP) [21] and the cytoplasm (where actin interacts with MLP) [7] as well as the nucleus [17] (please see Fig. 1). It might be of interest to elucidate, which MLP pool shuttles into the nucleus and/or whether all of these different MLP pools are able to exchange information with the nucleus (into and out of the nucleus?). Recently Geier et al. found MLP mostly cytoplasmic and not at the Z-disc [22] and challenged as well a disease causing role for the 10T → C (Trp4Arg) MLP variant [12]. However, the largest pedigree presented in this paper is not informative (due to the presence of hypertension in some members) and several individuals were called “not affected”, in contrast to current guidelines [23]. Nevertheless, the paper by Geier et al. highlights the need for more research in this field. Previously, Boateng et al. demonstrated quite elegantly that MLP in cardiac myocytes is present in two different molecular forms [17]: the oligomeric form, which is present at the sarcolemma and the cytoskeleton versus the monomeric form, which they found exclusively in the nucleus. The carboxyterminal end of the MLP protein was required for this process, thus it is possible that the carboxyterminal target of the monoclonal MLP antibody used by Geier et al. is protected by oligomerization (“masked epitope”). After myocardial infarction and pressure overload in animals as well as in failing human hearts nuclear MLP levels in the myocardium increased at the expense of non-nuclear MLP. In failing human hearts almost no MLP was detectable outside the nucleus. In their current work Boateng et al. extend on their previous research by providing unequivocal evidence for nucleo-cytoplasmic shuttling of MLP on the basis of the putative nuclear localization signal (NLS) – and also by providing significant insight into the functional properties of nuclear MLP [24] – important evidence which has been missing up to now. They used cell permeable synthetic peptides containing the putative nuclear localization signal (RKYGPG) of MLP and were able to inhibit any further shuttling of this protein, thus clearly documenting functionality of this (up to now only hypothesized) NLS. In addition, inhibition of nuclear translocation prevented the increased protein accumulation usually seen under phenylephrine treatment of isolated cardiomyocytes, thus pointing to an important role of MLP in the control of hypertrophy after agonist stimulation. Interestingly, cyclic strain of myocytes after prior NLS treatment resulted in disarrayed sarcomeres, an observation that has also been made in vivo in cardiomyocyte cytoarchitecture of MLP knock-out mice [7]. Increased protein synthesis and brain natriuretic peptide

424

Editorial

Fig. 1. The figure displays a putative cardiomyocyte and indicates various MLP (CSRP3) localizations. For reasons of simplicity oligomerization of MLP was not taken into account. MLP is probably localized at the sarcomeric Z-disc/I-band, at costameres as well as at intercalated discs and in the cytoplasm. It remains to be elucidated, which MLP molecules translocate into the nucleus (indicated by “?”).

(BNP) expression were also abolished when nuclear shuttling was inhibited during cyclic mechanical strain, suggesting that MLP is required for remodelling of myofilaments and altered gene expression. A direct link between BNP gene expression and MLP has been shown earlier [12] and additional research in heterozygous MLP knock-out animals after myocardial infarction pointed in the same direction [19]. Although the functional significance of nuclear MLP (especially for myocyte hypertrophy following biomechanical stress, gene expression and sarcomere assembly) has been clearly demonstrated in this study, even more questions are now arising. The most important is how a small protein-adaptor molecule like MLP can exert its actions in different cellular compartments including the nucleus. In this regard, the prohypertrophic phosphatase calcineurin was previously identified as a cytoskeletal target/interaction partner of MLP and it was demonstrated that MLP at the Z-disc is necessary for calcineurin activation in cardiac myocytes [19,25,26]. What are the nuclear targets of MLP in cardiac myocytes? The present study points to an important feed back mechanism between MLP and protein translation — while MLP cannot directly bind DNA, one could speculate that it enhances DNA binding by well characterized stress responsive cardiac transcription factors like GATA4, GATA6, AP1 or serum response factor (SRF). It has in fact been shown previously, that CSRP2, which is closely related to MLP (CSRP3), can bind GATAs and SRF and thereby synergistically enhance gene expression in smooth muscle cells [27]. By linking different transcription factor complexes, LIM proteins of the CSRP family may integrate the activities of multiple nuclear regulatory proteins in order to coordinate gene expression. It is also possible that MLP facilitates nucleo-cytoplasmic shuttling of its non-nuclear target calcineurin, which has been demonstrated to translocate to the nucleus in hypertrophied cardiac myocytes [28]. Research on MLP centered so far on putative cytoskeletal functions of this protein only. Particularly the nuclear localization sequence (NLS), first described by Fung et al. several years ago [29] which is localized within the first glycine rich domain, remained elusive. Although the interaction of MLP with different transcription factors such as MyoD, MRF4 and myogenin was shown in skeletal myocytes [30] and MLP nuclear localization following an increase in biomechanical stress was also observed in

right ventricular murine hypertrophy [31], the functional significance of this NLS remained elusive until the current report by Boateng et al. However, more work is needed to unravel the nuclear versus cytoplasmic targets of MLP. Importantly, MLP is acetylated within its NLS on position K69 [18], a modification thought to affect calcium sensitivity which might potentially be able to affect MLP's nuclear–cytoplasmic shuttling. It might also be interesting to analyze the effects of human mutations on nuclear localization and to analyze their ability to activate a specific gene program. Particularly the K69R-MLP mutation, found in an individual affected by DCM and endocardial fibroelastosis [13], is worth to be analyzed. Besides acetylation, additional potentially existing, but not yet well understood posttranslational modifications such as phosphorylation, sumoylation and/or polyubiquitinylation might well have their effects on MLP function. Last but not least, given the importance of MLP for cardiac integrity and the myocardial stress response, it might be worthwhile to consider MLP, which appears dislocated from its membrane/cytoskeletal localization in failing human myocardium, as a therapeutic target in heart failure. Maybe restoration of non-nuclear MLP in failing myocardium repairs the defects observed in myocardial stress response observed in this disease.

References [1] Zou P, Pinotsis N, Lange S, Song YH, Popov A, Mavridis I, et al. Palindromic assembly of the giant muscle protein titin in the sarcomeric Z-disk. Nature 2006 Jan 12;439 (7073):229–33. [2] Lange S, Ehler E, Gautel M. From A to Z and back? Multicompartment proteins in the sarcomere. Trends Cell Biol 2006 Jan;16(1):11–8. [3] Sheikh F, Raskin A, Chu PH, Lange S, Domenighetti AA, Zheng M, et al. An FHL1containing complex within the cardiomyocyte sarcomere mediates hypertrophic biomechanical stress responses in mice. J Clin Invest 2008 Dec;118(12):3870–80. [4] Miller MK, Bang ML, Witt CC, Labeit D, Trombitas C, Watanabe K, et al. The muscle ankyrin repeat proteins: CARP, ankrd2/Arpp and DARP as a family of titin filamentbased stress response molecules. J Mol Biol 2003 Nov 7;333(5):951–64. [5] Lange S, Xiang F, Yakovenko A, Vihola A, Hackman P, Rostkova E, et al. The kinase domain of titin controls muscle gene expression and protein turnover. Science 2005 Mar 31. [6] Knöll R, Hoshijima M, Chien K. Cardiac mechanotransduction and implications for heart disease. J Mol Med 2003; Dec;81(12):750–6.

Editorial [7] Arber S, Halder G, Caroni P. Muscle LIM protein, a novel essential regulator of myogenesis, promotes myogenic differentiation. Cell 1994;79(2):221–31. [8] Arber S, Hunter JJ, Ross Jr J, Hongo M, Sansig G, Borg J, et al. MLP-deficient mice exhibit a disruption of cardiac cytoarchitectural organization, dilated cardiomyopathy, and heart failure. Cell 1997;88(3):393–403. [9] Bos JM, Poley RN, Ny M, Tester DJ, Xu X, Vatta M, et al. Genotype–phenotype relationships involving hypertrophic cardiomyopathy-associated mutations in titin, muscle LIM protein, and telethonin. Mol Genet Metab 2006 May;88(1):78–85. [10] Geier C, Perrot A, Ozcelik C, Binner P, Counsell D, Hoffmann K, et al. Mutations in the human muscle LIM protein gene in families with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2003 Mar 18;107(10):1390–5. [11] Hershberger RE, Parks SB, Kushner JD, Li D, Ludwigsen S, Jakobs P, et al. Coding sequence mutations identified in MYH7, TNNT2, SCN5A, CSRP3, LBD3, and TCAP from 313 patients with familial or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Clin Transl Sci 2008 May;1(1):21–6. [12] Knöll R, Hoshijima M, Hoffman HM, Person V, Lorenzen-Schmidt I, Bang ML, et al. The cardiac mechanical stretch sensor machinery involves a Z disc complex that is defective in a subset of human dilated cardiomyopathy. Cell 2002;111(7):943–55. [13] Mohapatra B, Jimenez S, Lin JH, Bowles KR, Coveler KJ, Marx JG, et al. Mutations in the muscle LIM protein and alpha-actinin-2 genes in dilated cardiomyopathy and endocardial fibroelastosis. Mol Genet Metab 2003 Sep–Oct;80(1–2):207–15. [14] Su Z, Yao A, Zubair I, Sugishita K, Ritter M, Li F, et al. Effects of deletion of muscle LIM protein on myocyte function. Am J phys 2001 Jun;280(6):H2665–73. [15] Minamisawa S, Hoshijima M, Chu G, Ward CA, Frank K, Gu Y, et al. Chronic phospholamban-sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase interaction is the critical calcium cycling defect in dilated cardiomyopathy. Cell 1999 Oct 29;99(3):313–22. [16] Mery A, Taghli-Lamallem O, Clark KA, Beckerle MC, Wu X, Ocorr K, et al. The Drosophila muscle LIM protein, Mlp84B, is essential for cardiac function. J Exp Biol 2008 Jan;211(Pt 1):15–23. [17] Boateng SY, Belin RJ, Geenen DL, Margulies KB, Martin JL, Hoshijima M, et al. Cardiac dysfunction and heart failure are associated with abnormalities in the subcellular distribution and amounts of oligomeric muscle LIM protein. Am J phys 2007 Jan;292(1):H259–69. [18] Gupta MP, Samant SA, Smith SH, Shroff SG. HDAC4 and PCAF bind to cardiac sarcomeres and play a role in regulating myofilament contractile activity. J Biol Chem 2008 Apr 11;283(15):10135–46. [19] Heineke J, Ruetten H, Willenbockel C, Gross SC, Naguib M, Schaefer A, et al. Attenuation of cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction by muscle LIM protein-calcineurin signaling at the sarcomeric Z-disc. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005 Feb 1;102(5):1655–60. [20] Flick MJ, Konieczny SF. The muscle regulatory and structural protein MLP is a cytoskeletal binding partner of betaI-spectrin. J Cell Sci 2000 May;113(Pt 9):1553–64. [21] Ehler E, Horowits R, Zuppinger C, Price RL, Perriard E, Leu M, et al. Alterations at the intercalated disk associated with the absence of muscle lim protein. J Cell Biol 2001 May 14;153(4):763–72. [22] Geier C, Gehmlich K, Ehler E, Hassfeld S, Perrot A, Hayess K, et al. Beyond the sarcomere: CSRP3 mutations cause hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Hum Mol Genet 2008 Sep 15;17(18):2753–65. [23] Dickstein K, Cohen-Solal A, Filippatos G, McMurray JJ, Ponikowski P, Poole-Wilson PA, et al. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic

[24]

[25] [26]

[27]

[28]

[29]

[30]

[31]

425 Heart Failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association of the ESC (HFA) and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). Eur Heart J 2008 Oct;29(19):2388–442. Boateng SY, Senyo SE, Qi L, Goldspink PH, Russell B. Myocyte remodelling in response to hypertrophic stimuli requires nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of muscle LIM protein. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2009 Apr 16. Heineke J, Molkentin JD. Regulation of cardiac hypertrophy by intracellular signalling pathways. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006 Aug;7(8):589–600. Jeong D, Kim JM, Cha H, Oh JG, Park J, Yun SH, et al. PICOT attenuates cardiac hypertrophy by disrupting calcineurin-NFAT signaling. Circ Res 2008 Mar 28;102 (6):711–9. Chang DF, Belaguli NS, Iyer D, Roberts WB, Wu SP, Dong XR, et al. Cysteine-rich LIM-only proteins CRP1 and CRP2 are potent smooth muscle differentiation cofactors. Dev Cell 2003 Jan;4(1):107–18. Hallhuber M, Burkard N, Wu R, Buch MH, Engelhardt S, Hein L, et al. Inhibition of nuclear import of calcineurin prevents myocardial hypertrophy. Circ Res 2006 Sep 15;99(6):626–35. Fung Wang, Liew. Characterization of a human cardiac gene which encodes for a LIM domain protein and is developmentally expressed in myocardial development. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1996 (0022-2828 TA- J Mol Cell Cardiol PG- 1203-10 SB- M). Kong, Flick, Kudla, Konieczny. Muscle LIM protein promotes myogenesis by enhancing the activity of MyoD. 1997(0270-7306 TA- Mol Cell Biol PG- 4750-60 SB- M). Ecarnot-Laubriet A, De Luca K, Vandroux D, Moisant M, Bernard C, Assem M, et al. Downregulation and nuclear relocation of MLP during the progression of right ventricular hypertrophy induced by chronic pressure overload. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2000 Dec;32(12):2385–95.

Sylvia Gunkel1 Ralph Knöll⁎ Working Group on Cardiovascular Molecular Genetics, Heart Centre, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany. E-mail address: [email protected] ⁎Corresponding author. Working Group on Cardiovascular Molecular Genetics, Heart Centre, University Medical Centre Göttingen, Georg August University, NGFN coordinator, Robert Koch Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany. Tel.: +49 551 39 5316; fax: +49 (0)551 39 13592. Jörg Heineke1 Denise Hilfiker-Kleiner Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Rebirth - Cluster of Excellence, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. 1 Both authors contributed equally. 22 April 2009

Lihat lebih banyak...

Comentários

Copyright © 2017 DADOSPDF Inc.