PHYSICIST\'S CONSCIENCE . Hiroshima and Nagasaki

PHYSICIST'S CONSCIENCE . Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Has an ordinary physicist the right to criticize the "giants of physics"?
Has he the right not to criticize them?
The author submits an absolutely new theory, that represents a revolution in physics. In general knowledge he brings a new view on safety of atomic power stations, other calculations of energy and speed of elementary particles, their radii of force range, other relations for the construction of atomic power stations, the nuclear reactions.
This theory is the product of 25 years of work.
The author remembers the documentary film about the Bikini Island. The naiveté whith which the soldiers, officers, scientists expected the A-bomb explosion, the expressions of grandiosity, the feelings of pride that they were there, the carelessness of the radiation, the swimming after the explosion, and the results putting out of countenance ending with cancer, the immense growth of extremities, their rupture - the consequent amputation of the legs, the high growth of arms, until death, also a certainty of scientists, that nothing could happen (signatures of scientists, the agreement with the production of bombs and their experimental test in presence of a large number of soldiers) - all these facts witness that it was an ignorance of people, of regular soldiers as well as scientists (including A. Einstein), the ignorance originating in a wrong or inconsequent theory, which made a qualitative point to the justice though, but did not give the quantitative point to it as is shown inTable 5 of this work. It clearly shows that the values of total energy calculated by Einstein are substantially lower as those calculated in our theory for all particle velocities, even for the lower ones.
At the speed of 0,1c = v, there are the differences even by 0,0007mc2, which keep on increasing.
For v = 0,5c this difference in the direction of motion is
and for v = 0.99c even
so that in fact the energies in nuclear reactions have been substantially higher than the current theory of A. Einstein assumes.
It results in the incorrect determination of energies even in nuclear reactors and thus in the insufficient protection design, what leads to breakdowns of atom power stations (USA, FRG, UKRAINE, RUSSIA) and risky, often caraless behaviour of highly educated people of former AS of USSR, enormous impacts caused by irradiation of population because of the ignorance of people in high positions and the consequent disinformation of population. To be able to avoid the breakdowns, it is necessary to consider our equation for energy calculation and not the Einstein's one. It involves all activities concerning calculation of energy of particles (accelerators, reactors,...). We will thus help substantially to prevent tragedies of the human race caused by ignorance.

Einstein's theory of relativity can not explain ...

Form of the Interference Field is Non-Linear

Form of Intensity of the Moving Charge Electric Field is Asymmetrical.

Kinetic Energy of a Charge Moving at the Velocity of V Has Two Different Values

Kinetic energy against direction of motion as wave Tkin ad = mc2[ln "1+v/c"- (v/c)/(1+v/c)]

Kinetic energy in direction of motion as particle Tkin id = mc2[ln"1-v/c"+ (v/c)/(1-v/c)]

Three Objections to Modern Physics

Neutrino Oscillations

Nuclear Fusion

Great Table of Elementary Particles

Yukawa potential

.The 4th Maxwell's equation,

Lorentz equals without the help of Space-Time,

Confinement of quarks





A particle moving in a transmission medium.

Kinetic energy of a particle ( charge) moving at the velocity of v has two different values:

Kinetic energy of a particle ( charge)

Tkin id =mc^2 [ln "1-v/c"+ (v/c) / (1-v/c) ] in direction of motion of a particle ( charge)
 
It is realy as Newton´s kinetic energy, 

where v is velocity of a particle ( charge) .

Kinetic energy of a particle ( charge) Tkin ad = mc^2 [ln "1+v/c"- (v/c) / (1+v/c) ] against direction of motion of a particle ( charge) 

It is realy as Maxwell´s electromagnetic wave energy,

where v is velocity of a particle ( charge).
Corrected Third Newton's law of motion :
All movements in physics are based on principle of action - reaction and on velocity of stable particles ( e-, p+,n0, D, He-3, α ).
Action, as a motion of stable charged particles ( e-, p+,n0, D, He-3, α ), is characterized speeds up in source along ellipse or quasi- elipse ( excentricity e –> 0 ).
Action creates unstable particles ( leptons μ , τ , baryons, mesons ), bosons W +, W-, Z (= particles = β electrons moving at nearly the speed of light )in direction of motion of stable particles ( e-, p+,n0, D, He-3, alfa ).
Reaction creates into transmission medium, the electromagnetic waves, as unstable "particles" - neutrínos νe, νμ, ντ , mesons π0, π+ , π- , η , K and gamma rays (=waves of extremely high frequency >1019 Hz ) - against direction of motion of stable particles ( e-, p+,n0, D, He-3, alfa ).
Accompanying activity of reaction on movement of stable particles in the transmission medium are waves, or "unstable particles" respectively , i.e. neutrinos and mesons.

Extraordinary proofs:

[32] viXra:1506.0207 submitted on 2015-06-29 01:42:05, (188 unique-IP downloads)
New Trends in Physics CD Rom /book, Elementes Pictures, Spheres in Nuclei, Forecasted Nuclei

[31] viXra:1504.0082 submitted on 2015-04-10 05:16:10, (80 unique-IP downloads)
One Blink of Electron is the Basis Amount of Kinetic Energy 6.62606957x10-34 Js

[30] viXra:1503.0056 submitted on 2015-03-07 19:18:06, (110 unique-IP downloads)
Confirmation of the Theory Under Discussion Wave-Particle Duality as Kinetic Energy Against and in Direction of Motion in Discussion Group Theoretical Physics !!!! Eureka !!!!
[29] viXra:1502.0184 submitted on 2015-02-21 05:23:36, (174 unique-IP downloads)
Einstein's Theory of Relativity Can not Explain ...


[28] viXra:1501.0199 submitted on 2015-01-21 04:39:51, (194 unique-IP downloads)
Corrected Newton´s Laws of Motion

[27] viXra:1501.0198 submitted on 2015-01-21 04:47:40, (83 unique-IP downloads)
Principles for the Theory and Its Agreement with Experiment

[26] viXra:1501.0197 submitted on 2015-01-21 04:58:33, (179 unique-IP downloads)
Wave - Particle Duality as Kinetic Energy Against and In Direction of Motion.

[25] viXra:1412.0131 submitted on 2014-12-06 14:12:09, (126 unique-IP downloads)
Improvement of Classical Physics

[24] viXra:1412.0125 submitted on 2014-12-06 02:24:29, (108 unique-IP downloads)
Kinetic Energy According to Einstein and According the Latest Knowledge

[23] viXra:1411.0533 submitted on 2014-11-21 11:33:37, (118 unique-IP downloads)
Form of Intensity of the Moving Charge Electric Field is Asymmetrical.

[22] viXra:1411.0531 submitted on 2014-11-21 11:46:11, (70 unique-IP downloads)
Form of the Interference Field is Non-Linear

[21] viXra:1411.0530 submitted on 2014-11-21 12:08:28, (74 unique-IP downloads)
Kinetic Energy of a Charge Moving at the Velocity of V Has Two Different Values

[20] viXra:1409.0090 submitted on 2014-09-12 06:18:51, (235 unique-IP downloads)
Three Objections to Modern Physics

[19] viXra:1408.0185 submitted on 2014-08-27 07:41:44, (88 unique-IP downloads)
Protons Are Perfectly Stable or Their Lifetime is Enormous

[18] viXra:1408.0133 submitted on 2014-08-20 05:06:15, (157 unique-IP downloads)
Please Read my Articles in More Detail.

[17] viXra:1405.0355 submitted on 2014-05-29 12:55:30, (113 unique-IP downloads)
Movement Principles of Ufo

[16] viXra:1405.0334 submitted on 2014-05-27 16:07:44, (192 unique-IP downloads)
Movement Principles of fast spinning bodies
[15] viXra:1405.0308 submitted on 2014-05-25 01:51:26, (113 unique-IP downloads)
Who is Right?

[14] viXra:1405.0307 submitted on 2014-05-25 01:57:30, (205 unique-IP downloads)
What is Quark?

[13] viXra:1405.0237 submitted on 2014-05-14 05:14:55, (90 unique-IP downloads)
L.vlcek Vixra, Getcited, Book, CD, Conferences 14.5.2014

[12] viXra:1404.0471 submitted on 2014-04-28 11:29:47, (118 unique-IP downloads)
Superheavy Spherical Nuclei. Island of Stability

[11] viXra:1404.0369 submitted on 2014-04-17 01:31:59, (190 unique-IP downloads)
Neutrino Oscillations

[10] viXra:1404.0279 submitted on 2014-04-16 03:58:50, (309 unique-IP downloads)
Physics is Easy

[9] viXra:1404.0273 submitted on 2014-04-16 04:09:57, (202 unique-IP downloads)
Particles, Waves and Trends in Physics

[8] viXra:1404.0268 submitted on 2014-04-16 04:16:15, (137 unique-IP downloads)
Physics is Beautiful

[7] viXra:1404.0261 submitted on 2014-04-16 04:23:08, (90 unique-IP downloads)
Introduction to my Two Articles Physics is Easy and Physics is Beautiful

[6] viXra:1404.0253 submitted on 2014-04-16 04:33:01, (133 unique-IP downloads)
Orbit Radius and Speed of the Sun Around the Center of Gravity of the Solar System

[5] viXra:1404.0248 submitted on 2014-04-16 04:41:18, (80 unique-IP downloads)
Spectral line Hα

[4] viXra:1404.0246 submitted on 2014-04-16 04:47:42, (124 unique-IP downloads)
Shortened Great Table of Elementary Particles

[3] viXra:1404.0243 submitted on 2014-04-16 04:53:01, (206 unique-IP downloads)
Great Table of Elementary Particles

[2] viXra:1404.0238 submitted on 2014-04-16 05:03:33, (107 unique-IP downloads)
Movement Principles of the Fast-Spinning Bodies

[1] viXra:1404.0130 submitted on 2014-04-16 03:43:54, (151 unique-IP downloads)
Nuclear Fusion

Critical examination of fundamentals in physics 
http://www.trendsinphysics.info/

academia.edu 
https://tuke.academia.edu/LubomirVlcek


L. Vlcek, : New Trends in Physics, Slovak Academic Press, Bratislava 1996,
ISBN 80-85665-64-6.

Presentation on European Phys. Soc. 10th Gen. Conf. – Trends in Physics ( EPS 10) Sevilla ,
E 9. -13 September 1996,


http://www.trendsinphysics.info/


THE NEW COORDINATE SYSTEMS IN PHYSICS AND MAGIC NUMBERS

viXra :
http://vixra.org/author/lubomir_vlcek
http://vixra.org/author/lubomir_vlcek
 

Forecasted nuclei (quantity 42)

http://www.trendsinphysics.info/prvky/prvkyang.htm


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Every physicist thinks that he knows what a photon is

Lubomir Vlcek Comenius University , UPJŠ and TU Kosice,academia.edu, vixra, Google Scholar
Před 1 dnem
Einstein: "Every physicist thinks that he knows what a photon is, I spent my life to find out what a photon is and I still don't know it."
Einstein before his death in 1955, wrote "All the fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no closer to the answer to the question: what are light quanta? ...........

Of course, today every rascal thinks he knows the answer, but he is deluding himself," he also wrote "Every physicist thinks that he knows what a photon is, I spent my life to find out what a photon is and I still don't know it."

Riemannian Geometry. A description for the nonmathematician.

Einstein- Grossman , Hilbert, and Theory of Gravitation

There are many minimal geodesics between the north and south poles of a globe.

2 minimal geodesics lying against each other = 1 ellipse

There are very many minimal geodesics = ellipses (4,56794e+14) between the north and south poles of a globe (between the higher Bohr´s energy levels and a lower Bohr´s energy as a poles of a globe.

Electron radiates electromagnetic waves if and only if moves with acceleration from the higher Bohr´s energy levels to a lower. In atom, as a source of electromagnetic waves , them it then , when it moves from afnucleum to perinucleum along the ellipse . If the electron moves with decelerated motion, when it absorbs energy , while moving from a lower to a higher energy level, in the direction from perinukleum to afnucleum along the ellipse with of very small eccentricity . Eccentricity of the ellipse is maximal, when electron radiates head of series. Minimal, almost zero, eccentricity corresponds to edge series.

Faulty arguments leveled against classical physics - the electron is moving with acceleration along of a spiral towards the nucleus - we will find in Beiser[19] 5.7 The failure of classical physics , p.120 , Fig.5.12 : " Electron in an atom should be according to classical physics, rapidly converge to the nucleus , because as a result of its acceleration radiates energy."
Because the electron flashes 4,56794e+14 times per second, i.e. emits energy 4,56794e+14 times per second and absorbs energy 4,56794 e+14 times per second (for spectral line Hα). Electron creates in the transmission medium, electromagnetic wave 4,56794 e+14 times per second and absorbs energy 4,56794e+14 times per second (for spectral line Hα) - Beiser´s argument is unfounded.

Electron cloud is 4,56794e+14 ellipses per second (for spectral line Hα).

Electron cloud is together " photon" ?????

Einstein, for example, studied Riemannian Geometry before he developed his theories.
His equation involves a special curvature called Ricci curvature, which was defined first by mathematicians and was very useful for his work.

[19] BEISER, A.: Perspectives of Modern Physics (Czech translation) Academia, Praha 1975.

Particles, waves and trends in physics.

http://www.trendsinphysics.info/
Komentář(7)
Líbí se(3)
Ukončit sledování
Stanescu Corneliu Ioan, Joseph Michel Mbengue a Elinton Luiz Leguenza dali líbí se.

Chris Pappas
Lubomir:

There is a very simple "Classical" approach to ground states, "allowed" energy states.

Here we may consider "classical", static and motional phenomena of 19th century physics.

Where any two "charged" particles are in relative motion, a magnetic relationship arises. Any current is attended by a magnetic field. For any imposed electromagnetive force there is a reactive, opposing electromagnetive force, consistent with Newton's consideration of Force.

We know that parallel currents may exhibit magnetic attraction or repulsion dependent upon direction.

Simply, a ground state is a state of order or balance, of stability, between an attractive and a repulsive or reactive force.

We might consider that Einstein's photo-electric effect clearly provides EMR must exceed a transition, an energization threshold, to achieve any action upon atoms and, more so, upon electronic energy states.

Simply, at the Absolute 0 of Temperature, any and all ambient EMR is of deficient frequency to result in anything but perfet reflection, Thompsom scattering, from an atom, an atomic system.

Until ambient EMR offers such high frequencies that it may affect electronic energy states, it may only contribute to atomic degrees of freedom dependent upon states of matter.

Higher frequencies exicte electronic states. Yet far higher frequencies drive ionization and state change from gases to plasmas. Only the greatest frequencies might disturb nucleonic states.

All is transition, relative.
Před 1 dnem
Líbí se(0)
Odpovědět soukromě
Nahlásit jako nevyžádanou poštu

Lubomir Vlcek
Electron radiates electromagnetic waves if and only if moves with acceleration from the higher Bohr´s energy levels to a lower. In atom, as a source of electromagnetic waves , them it then , when it moves from afnucleum to perinucleum along the ellipse .

If the electron moves with decelerated motion, when it absorbs energy , while moving from a lower to a higher energy level, in the direction from perinukleum to afnucleum along the ellipse with of very small eccentricity . Eccentricity of the ellipse is maximal, when electron radiates head of series. Minimal, almost zero, eccentricity corresponds to edge series.

Because the electron flashes (blinks) 4,56794e+14 times per second, i.e. emits energy 4,56794e+14 times per second and absorbs energy 4,56794 e+14 times per second (for spectral line Hα).

This is of 21th century physics.


Wave - particle duality elegantly incorporates kinetic energy in direction of movement (as particle or wave in the direction of movement) and kinetic energy against directions of movement (as wave against the spread of directions of movement) in relations the kinetic energy by [3] p. 51-52 :
Kinetic energy of electron
Tkin id =mc2 [ln "1-v/c"+ (v/c) / (1-v/c) ] in direction of motion of electron as particle,
where v is velocity of electron.

Kinetic energy of electron
Tkin ad = mc2 [ln "1+v/c"- (v/c) / (1+v/c) ] against direction of motion of electron as wave,
where v is velocity of electron.


For example:

Lambda hyperon 2286.46 MeV in direction of motion and pion π0 : 134.9766(6) MeV against direction of motion are in the proton at speed of proton v = 0,8022863362c

hyperon Chi c (2645)+ 2646.6MeV in direction of motion and pion π0 : 139.57018(35) MeV against direction of motion are in the proton at speed of proton v = 0,819183027c

hyperon 6,165 GeV in direction of motion and meson K- 493.7 MeV against direction of motion are in the alpha particle at speed of alpha particle v = 0,7533c

Electron in direction of motion, electron neutrino against direction of motion are in the electron at speed of electron :
from v= 0.1c to v= 0.9 c

Muon in direction of motion, muon neutrino against direction of motion are in the electron at speed of electron : v = 0.995308032046c

Tauon in direction of motion, tauon neutrino against direction of motion are in the electron at speed of electron : v = 0.99971316674c


Wave - Particle Duality as Kinetic Energy Against and In Direction of Motion.

http://vixra.org/pdf/1501.0197v1.pdf
Před 1 dnem
Líbí se(0)
Smazat

Don Bertke
I still say that what you call and electron is actually a shell of captured photons.
This view greatly simplifies the math for an atom and more easily explains the absorption and emission of photons from each atom.

Sorry Lubomir, I just cannot see how a single electron can vibrate to create a periodic EM signature and maintain its orbital mechanics. Any system that complex just does not have a definable process for the creation and maintenance of stable atoms.
Před 14 hodinami
Líbí se(0)
Odpovědět soukromě
Nahlásit jako nevyžádanou poštu

Chris Pappas
Don: Simplifying the math does not, perforce, ensure the comprehension of physical phenomena.

From my comment in another discussion:

So many claim that QM has entirely displaced "Classical Physics" yet, it is still absolutely dependent upon "Classical" mathematical approaches.

Both Newton and Leibniz, the independent and simultaneous creators of the Calculus knew what they had wrought and why. The Calculus is a mathematics of approximation as are Probability and Statistics. At the time, the increasing complexity of the problems of Science grievously taxed the Mathematicians' ability to provide solutions by extant mathematical approaches. Attempt at solutions went from most extremely tedious to intractable.

Simply, approximate, mean solutions were better than no solutions at all. But, these creators clearly and fully understood that discrete solutions could not be had by this approach. Apparently, that understanding has been lost by many over time. Simply, application of the mathematics of approximation can only instill a mathematical uncertainty to any solution.

Calculus is a matter of linear equations. Regardless of how approximation is tightened, it cannot provide discrete solutions and linear equations cannot approach nonlinear phenomena.

The approach to nonlinearity began, at least, with Blaise Pascal. Many eminent contributors to the enhancement of linear mathematics also contributed to he slower advance of nonlinearity.

However, it required the introduction of electronic computers to best pursue and develop this as Chaos Theory. The brute number crunching capacity of these allowed iteration and recursion of simple difference equations.

Well, back in the day, even Calculus had its detractors!

The nonlinear approach provides discrete transition points. Consider such as changes of state and latent heats of state change. Consider energy and voltage in terms of discrete energization thresholds, transition points. Physics and the other Sciences are replete with such "tipping points", discrete thresholds of action. After all, that is exactly the nature of Planck's constant of action.

Quantum Physics is about discrete elements of Nature. The mathematics of approximation allow for the continued insinuation of continuousness in "theory" regarding mass while only pursuing EMR and energy states as quanta, discrete.

The mathematics of approximation are not incorrect but are incomplete in the capacity to fulsomely address physical phenomena. This was it too easy for Mach's metaphysics to be insinuated into the development of 20th century theoretical physics. SR and QM were so "infected".

Planck early warned against Mach's influence. Later in life Einstein bemoaned that he had applied Mach's principle in his development of SR.
Před 13 hodinami
Líbí se(0)
Odpovědět soukromě
Nahlásit jako nevyžádanou poštu

Chris Pappas
Lubomir's Einstein quote was somewhat earlier in life than his remark regarding Mach. Yet, far earlier, at a 1920 lecture on GR, in Leiden, he recanted his SR dismissal of an "Æther" and stated that GR could not work without it!
Před 9 hodinami
Líbí se(0)
Odpovědět soukromě
Nahlásit jako nevyžádanou poštu

Joel Levitt
Einstein and most others who grew up during the late 19th and early 20th centuries were victims of their age. Einstein had, through touch, experienced COMTACT FORCES, and, therefore, had difficulty accepting forces exerted at a distance. So, he needed something like a particle, emitted with momentum, which, in collision, was capable of transmitting momentum to other things that were distant from the emitting source. Thus, he needed PHOTON PARTICLES, but had problems with photon wave behavior. Einstein also believed that the essential nature (the Ding an Sich) of the photon was discoverable.

Today, we know that there are no contacts, at least there are none such as Einstein understood the word contact. Today, we conceive of the contact of macroscopic bodies as electrical interactions between such bodies when they are very close to each other, including their quantum mechanically described chemical interactions. We also understand that physicists don't discover the essential nature of anything. We develop mathematics that are consistent with our experimental observations and, which are useful in engineering, because they are accurately predictive.

So, finally, what is a photon? Photon is a noun that refers to some useful mathematics. We keep this often confusing noun around, because we love nouns and, also, for old times' sake.
Před 5 hodinami
Líbí se(0)
Odpovědět soukromě
Nahlásit jako nevyžádanou poštu

Lubomir Vlcek
Because the electron flashes (blinks) 4,56794e+14 times per second, i.e. emits energy 4,56794e+14 times per second and absorbs energy 4,56794 e+14 times per second (for spectral line Hα).

This is of 21th century physics.


Electron cloud is 4,56794e+14 ellipses per second (for spectral line Hα).

Electron cloud is together " photon" ?????

Electron in direction of motion, electron neutrino against direction of motion are in the electron at speed of electron :
from v= 0.1c to v= 0.9 c

Muon in direction of motion, muon neutrino against direction of motion are in the electron at speed of electron : v = 0.995308032046c

Tauon in direction of motion, tauon neutrino against direction of motion are in the electron at speed of electron : v = 0.99971316674c


We have only electron.

Photon non exist!!!!

Photon is bad term.