Phytotaxa 230 (3): 267–273 www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press
Article
ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition)
PHYTOTAXA
ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition)
http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.230.3.5
A new species of Amitostigma (Orchidinae, Orchidaceae) from India Avishek Bhattacharjee
Central National Herbarium, Botanical Survey of India, Acharya Jagadish Chandra Bose Indian Botanic Garden, Howrah 711 103, India; e-mail:
[email protected]
Abstract Amitostigma pathakianum, a new species of the family Orchidaceae is described from Arunachal Pradesh, India. Key words: Amitostigma pathakianum, Amitostigma trifurcatum, Arunachal Pradesh, Ponerorchis
Introduction The orchid genus Amitostigma Schlechter (1919: 91) was established by Schlechter based on the type of ‘Mitostigma Blume’ (1856: 189), as it was an illegitimate name [later homonym of Mitostigma Decaisne (1844: 507), Apocynaceae]. Amitostigma is represented by c. 30 species (Pridgeon et al. 2001: 247; Chen et al. 2009: 124), mainly distributed in East Asia and adjacent areas. Most of the species of the genus (c. 22 spp.) are found in China, with 21 endemic species, which suggests the Chinese region as the centre of diversity of Amitostigma. Amitostigma is closely allied to Ponerorchis Reichenbach (1852: 227) and at times it becomes difficult to make clear cut distinction between them and as a result several species have been interchanged between these two genera. Amitostigma can be distinguished from Ponerorchis by having naked viscidia (viscidia enclosed in bursicle in Ponerorchis) and two slightly raised lateral stigma lobes along with a small central lobe (one concave stigma lobe in Ponerorchis). However, exceptions have been recorded in a few species within both genera. Jin et al. (2014: 46) mentioned that it was almost impossible to assign some species such as Amitostigma yuanum Tang & Wang (1940: 26), A. farreri Schlechter (1924: 378), and Ponerorchis nana (King & Pantling 1898: 304) Soó (1966: 353), either to Amitostigma or Ponerorchis based on morphological characters. They also proposed to merge Amitostigma under Ponerorchis based on plastid matK, rbcL and nuclear ITS. However, the confusion was amplified when Tang et al. (2015) referred East Asian Amitostigma alliance to Hemipilia Lindley (s.l.) (1835: 296) based on two nuclear (nrITS, low-copy Xdh) and four chloroplast (matK, psbA-trnH, trnL-trnF, trnS-trnG) DNA markers. Another closely related genus is Chusua Nevski (1935: 753) which Hunt (1971) and Pearce & Cribb (2002) treated separately, whereas Vermeulen (1972), Pridgeon et al. (2001), Bateman et al. (2003), Chen et al. (2009) included in the synonymy of Ponerorchis. Tang et al. (2015) treated Chusua (along with Amitostigma, Ponerorchis) under Hemipilia. In the present treatment I am following Pridgeon et al. (2001) and Chen et al. (2009) by treating Amitostigma as distinct genus due to the characters of its viscidia and stigma-lobes and describing a new species under Amitostigma (A. pathakianum) which was collected in the Upper Siang district of Arunachal Pradesh, India. Amitostigma puberulum (King & Pantlling 1898: 304) Tang & Wang (1936: 6), a combination based on Orchis puberula King & Pantling (1898: 304), had been reported from India. However, O. puberula is now widely accepted as a species of Ponerorchis, viz. P. puberula (King & Pantl.) Vermeulen (1972: 30). Therefore, the present communication also constitutes first report of any true-member of the genus Amitostigma in India.
Accepted by Cássio van den Berg: 27 Sept. 2015; published: 13 Oct. 2015
267
