Album Rescue Series (Vol 1)
Descrição do Produto
Album Rescue Series
Volume 1
Edited by Tim Dalton and Rebecca Koss
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) First published by Dalton Koss HQ in 2015 8 Brand Street Hampton Victoria 3188 Australia www.daltonkosshq.wordpress.com All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or used or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Album Rescue Series ©, Movie Rescue Series ©, Game Rescue Series ©, TV Rescue Series © and Radio Rescue Series © are all the intellectual property of Dalton Koss HQ Album Rescue Series (Volume 1) Copyright ©2015 Dalton Koss HQ All rights reserved ISBN: 978-‐1-‐326-‐41168-‐8 Content ID: 17228496
2
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
Contributors Matt Bangerter is an educator and sound editor in Melbourne, Australia. He has been continuing to work in the broadcast, location and post-‐production sound industries while working as a lecturer focusing on sound for film and TV. He is currently focusing on working as a mixing engineer for films that will be seeing online distribution. He loves watching and talking about films, television shows and comic books. Follow Matt on Twitter @Mbangerter. Andrew ‘Broady’ Broadhead is the Campus Academic Coordinator for SAE Institute in Melbourne. Broady is an audio engineer with many years of experience in mastering and live sound. Broady has been involved in audio education for over 15 years. Mat Caithness is a professional animator and educator. He has, however, never been in involved in the music industry in any way, shape or form, unless of course, you include enthusiastic punter on his resume, or take into consideration his wee contribution to the handsome volume you are currently holding in your hands. Tim Dalton is a music academic, educator, writer, broadcaster and partner at Dalton Koss HQ. With over 36 years experience in the music industry as an audio engineer, producer, tour manager, artists’ manager, entrepreneur, A&R consultant and record company executive, Tim thinks he knows a lot about the music industry. Tim has lived and worked in a number of global music cities including: Hull, Nashville, Liverpool and now happily resides in Melbourne, Australia. Tim still dreams of winning the Tour De France one day. Follow Tim on Twitter @Touringtim. Dr Ian Dixon completed his PhD on John Cassavetes at The University of Melbourne in 2011 and currently lectures at SAE Institute, Melbourne. He delivers academic addresses internationally including a plenary speech for CEA in USA. He also acts and directs for film and television (including Neighbours, Blue Heelers), writes funded screenplays and novels. Ian recently appeared in Underbelly: Squizzy on Channel 9 in Australia. His acting work can also be viewed on City Homicide, Blue Heelers, Martial Law, Guinevere Jones, Heartbreak High, Struck by Lightning, Shadows of the Heart, Rush, etc. Follow Ian on Twitter @Ianlanddixon66.
3
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) Professor Lisa Gotto, PhD is a Professor of Film History and Film Analysis at the International Filmschool Cologne, Germany (ifs). Since 2001, she has been lecturing all over the world, including universities and film academies in Berkeley, Los Angeles, Munich, Shanghai and Melbourne. Lisa's major research interests are in film history and film aesthetics, media theory, game studies and digital media culture. She has published books and articles on technological and cultural transitions in film history, on the intersections of cinema and digital media, on popular culture, video clips and video games. Follow Lisa on Twitter @lisagottolisa. Ian Hunter is a music industry A&R, artist manager, occasional novelist, magazine writer, mischief-‐maker, and general trouble causer. After an exceptionally misspent youth as a touring musician, he moved into the industry side of things in the early 00’s, working for two of the global major labels, as well as numerous successful independents. Now based in Sydney, he lectures at The Australian Institute of Music, and is part of a globally successful artist management team. Follow Ian on Twitter @Ianhunterwriter. Dr Rebecca Koss (Editor) is a full time marine scientist by trade and part time music lover. Rebecca obtained her PhD in Conservation and Environmental Management from Deakin University in 2013. Rebecca has over 15 years experience in international and national environmental policy development and implementation. When Rebecca was 19 she attended a Faith No More show at Festival Hall in Melbourne, little did she know that she would be living with the tour manager 25 years later. Rebecca knows a lot more about popular music then most marine scientists. Follow Rebecca on Twitter @Marinekossy. Jennifer Lea (Cover artwork) is a Melbourne based artist who takes photos of the world around her, draws dogs, lectures at SAE Institute and makes music. Follow Jen on Instagram @Jenni_confetti. Ragnhild Nordset is a Norwegian songwriter and performer currently based in Liverpool, UK. Over the last decade she has been working both within the acoustic and the electronic scene in Great Britain, leading and partaking in projects reaching from the core of Liverpool, to the shores of Ibiza and the musical underground of New York. Additionally, she has been involved in the UK’s biggest festivals, including Leeds, Reading and Latitude, as operations coordinator for stage production on their main stages handling productions for high caliber artists from all over the world. Follow Ragz on Twitter @Ragznordset.
4
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) Gareth Parton is a music producer, recording engineer, mixer and educator – an exiled Brit now living in Australia. He is co-‐owner of Melbourne’s hippest recording studio, ‘Los Bomberos.’ Gareth’s discography spans 20 years and boasts work with The Breeders, Foals, The Go! Team and fellow Welshman, Tom Jones! He also coordinates the audio department at SAE Institute, Melbourne. In his spare time he sleeps. Follow Gareth on Twitter @Garethparton. Adam Spellicy is a screenwriter, filmmaker and (occasional) musician based in Melbourne, Australia. In the mid-‐1990s, after a decade working as a graphic designer, copywriter and director at a number of advertising agencies, he began directing music videos and short films, which have screened at a variety of local and international festivals. Adam has more recently focused on screenwriting for features and television. Follow Adam on Twitter @AdamSpellicy. David Turner is a music producer, composer, guitarist and educator based in Melbourne, Australia. Having spent the past two decades playing in bands in South East Asia, the UK and Australia, David eventually fell into commercial composition and record production and now works out of his Los Bomberos studio in Northcote, Melbourne as well as being Senior Lecturer at the SAE Institute in audio production. David is an active record producer for independent and small labels and has music regularly played on the national radio station JJJ. A recent convert to cycling to work he hopes to never become a MAMIL. Nick Wilson has been working in the field of electronic music and sound art for decades. He has played in a selection of obscure yet legendary electronic music ensembles, produced several artistically-‐credible sound installations and is Label Manager for Australian electronic arts collective Clan Analogue. The first record he bought was the Muppet Movie soundtrack, purchased in 1979, and he acquired his first synthesizer, a Casio CZ1000, in the mid-‐1980s with money he earned working in a bakery on Saturday mornings. Following stints at RMIT, JMC Academy, Federation University and the infamous MWT Institute, Nick now teaches at SAE Institute in Melbourne. Follow Nick on Twitter @nickfakeman
5
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
Contents Forward Introduction Talk Is Cheap – Keith Richards Earthquake Weather – Joe Strummer So Alone – Johnny Thunders Tin Machine II – Tin Machine Miss America – Mary Margaret O’Hara Wonderland – Erasure Bright Phoebus – Lal and Mike Waterson Out Of Mind Out Of Sight – Models Homosapien – Pete Shelley Earth Vs. The Wildhearts – The Wildhearts Ironing The Soul – Vinny Peculiar Tonight – David Bowie Chicken Rhythms – Northside Temple of Low Men – Crowded House Infamous Angel – Iris DeMent Bleach – Nirvana Smiler – Rod Stewart Sister Feelings Call – Simple Minds Ultravox! – Ultravox Niandra LaDes – John Frusciante Give ‘Em Enough Rope – The Clash The Golden Echo – Kimbra Harlan County – Jim Ford Aerial – Kate Bush Broken English – Marianne Faithfull 13 Blues for Thirteen Moons – Silver Mount Zion Voodoo Lounge – The Rolling Stones Big Thing – Duran Duran This Is Big Audio Dynamite – Big Audio Dynamite Licensed To Ill – The Beastie Boys
6
Sara Hood Tim Dalton Tim Dalton Adam Spellicy Tim Dalton Ian Dixon Tim Dalton Lisa Gotto Tim Dalton Nick Wilson Tim Dalton Ian Hunter Tim Dalton Ian Dixon Tim Dalton Broady Tim Dalton David Turner Tim Dalton Gareth Parton Tim Dalton Matt Bangerter Tim Dalton Raghil Nordset Tim Dalton Ian Dixon Tim Dalton Mat Caithness Tim Dalton Nick Wilson Tim Dalton Tim Dalton
7 9 12 20 29 33 39 45 49 53 60 66 70 74 80 86 89 94 99 103 111 116 120 125 129 134 143 149 153 159 167 171
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
Forward By Sara Hood Last year Australia saw 11,217 new albums released, and those are just the ones that ARIA knows about. With the best will in the world they aren’t all going to get oxygen. But doesn’t your heart break when you think of all that love, sweat and tears that went into each of those records, knowing that most will disappear without trace? The reality is that the numbers aren’t on your side. Not even when you’re a Famous Face. Every time some punter decides to buy something, you are fighting with odds of more than 11,217 to one! And then there’s us punters. We get side tracked, emotional, irritated, snobby, perplexed, and distracted. Back in the day, my teenage sister sneaked out of the house telling our parents she was going to see a Shakespeare play and really went to see The Clash. She thought Joe Strummer walked on water. So why didn’t she buy Earthquake Weather, his solo album (Album Rescue Series page 20)? Too cross with him, she said. He broke up the band and then released an album she referred to as Clash Lite. She was not going to reward him by buying it or even paying any attention to it. Now with some time to calm our emotions, Album Rescue Series puts it in context. Time (and Album Rescue Series) has also allowed us to learn the back-‐story and add the poignancy of knowing he died too young. We are more forgiving now than we (and my sister) were at the time, emotions have calmed and we can appreciate the album for what it is. Similarly, artists can be ahead of their time so we just get perplexed and move on. Mary Margaret O’Hara anyone (page 39)? Or we were just too young to admit we liked something that was just not very cool, so we put our noses in the air and let it pass us by. Hint: could do with a few of those in Album Rescue Series, please. Then there are the albums that aren’t necessarily great music, but which provide insights into other bands. For example, Talk is Cheap from Keith Richards (Album Rescue Series, page 12) compared with Mick Jagger’s Primitive Cool or She’s the Boss. Read the Album Rescue Series for Talk is Cheap to find out what I mean. But at the time you wanted an album to listen to, not to ponder over, so you passed it by. I could witter on forever, but you get the point. Album Rescue Series is one of those ideas that is so obvious with hindsight that you wonder why it’s not everywhere. It’s
7
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) a book you can disappear into for hours and come up filled with joy albeit shocked to realise you just lost three days of your life. Most importantly, it gives some of that lost and almost forgotten music a second chance for glory. So it’s with great pleasure that I launch this ship Album Rescue Series. Read, enjoy, dig out some of your old recordings, re-‐live, re-‐consider and go to the website for all the other Rescues that couldn’t make it into this book. Oh! And check out your local record store to fill the gaps in your music collection. Once you’ve read this book you will have gaps! Happy listening. Sara Hood Mad Bat in Charge, Record Store Day Australia PS. Must add that I’m also finding some of the albums that apparently need rescuing a bit of a surprise. A case in point: I adored Erasure’s Wonderland. I thought it was brilliant. Quite frankly, I was too busy playing it to notice it was a flop. So let’s not forget that one man’s flop is another man’s strawberries with whipped cream on top. PPS. Thanks to Tim Dalton for inviting me to write this foreword. Tim and I have worked together for a couple of years as he kindly donates his time to be an ambassador for Record Store Day Australia, which is much appreciated.
8
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
An Introduction By Tim Dalton This Album Rescue Series book (Volume 1) almost didn’t exist until the concept morphed out of a series of unconnected events. I am very happy that this book does exist. The albums that this book rescues are all fantastic pieces of music and every single one of them is worthy of being rescued. To understand how this book came about you need some context. Upon starting a new teaching post in February 2015, I was asked if I wouldn’t mind keeping a weekly blog, which would serve as a good example to the students that I’d be teaching over the coming months. Blogs are great; I’ve always been a fan of this form of ritualistic reflective practice. Any basic teaching manual will confirm that reflection is an important prerequisite to creating meaning of new information, and to advance from surface to deep learning. As an educator with almost 20 years teaching experience within the subject area of popular music and critical thinking, I always tried to lead by example. Often with undergraduate students, I’ve found that they struggle to contextualise music and often can’t progress beyond, “I like that”, or, “I don’t like that”. Much of my contact time with students is spent coaching them in how to speak about music. When pushed further, students can rarely articulate what makes a piece of music, or any piece of art, good or bad. Almost exclusively this is a case of aesthetics and cultural appropriation. I am quite often confronted by students, and in some cases academics, who say things like, “I really hate (insert name of band or genre)”. Why do critics and scholars universally revile some popular musical forms and performers, despite these artists and genres enjoying large, scale popularity? It's a difficult question and one we try, in part, to answer with this book. I am also intrigued in how the notion of what constitutes ‘good’ or ‘bad’ music has changed over the years. This interest was fuelled further when I read Bad Music: The Music We Love To Hate (Washburne & Derno 2004) which helped kick start the Album Rescue Series project. Many albums made twenty or thirty years ago that the critics hated are now often cited as “inspirational” by current artists. Since I left school at the age of 16 in the late summer of 1979, I have worked in the music industry in a variety of roles. During this time I’ve found myself working at a number of trans global major record companies. At these organisations we only had one metric of what constituted a ‘good’ record and that was sales. Anything that shifts mega ‘units’ are fantastic albums, anything that doesn’t is a ‘bad’ album. One particular un-‐musical fabricated ‘band’ that I worked with sold millions of records in
9
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) the early 2000’s. The record company considered this a huge success while my peers poked fun at me for producing such disposable pap. In contrast, I’ve produced records that I’m immensely proud but sold next to nothing. The record companies wrote these off as appalling albums. I’ve always thought that this was a particularly financially deterministic and crash metric to judge a piece of music and it doesn’t tell the whole story. Commerciality and creativity never sit well together and this is especially true in popular music. Album Rescue Series is about saving the albums that we subjectively love but others may not love. One exercise I love undertaking with new undergraduate students is, “why we like/dislike music”. It involves finding the language to speak about music without defaulting to the like/don’t like mode. This is normally divided into two parts; the textual, the ‘stuff’ that's actually in the music such as lyrics, harmony, rhythm, melody, etc. and the contextual, ‘stuff’ like fashion, band biography, subculture, etc. This is normally a great starting point to understanding a piece of music’s form and function. Album Rescue Series grew out of this activity, and combined with my blog, provided a great tool in contextualising why I love certain albums. This publication is not strictly an academic, scholarly piece of work in the traditional sense; it’s more an articulation of passion. As I wrote my weekly blogs about the albums that I rescued, many of my colleagues took an active interest and started making suggestions about albums that they would like to see rescued next. I often replied to these comments with, “write your own album rescue”, and much to my surprise they did. This is how this book came about. Eventually I produced some author notes as guidance that went thus: -‐ “Central to the Album Rescue Series is just to have some fun. Enjoy yourself and write about an album that is personal to you. This is not academic writing so it can be personal and opinionated. The following points are designed to provide some helpful guidance. 1. Find an album that fell through the cracks e.g. when it was released the reviewers or the general public did not engage with it. This should be an album that you love or appreciate. 2. Rescue it. We don't care what metrics you use to do this; it’s totally up to you but be clear in your piece how you are measuring this album’s worth. 3. The only ‘must’ is that this album can’t be a multi million seller. You can only rescue an album that is broken. The reason being is that the only metric that record companies use to measure success is sales. 4. We are rescuing these albums because of their musicianship, writing, 10
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
5.
production, lyrics, contents or are of their time, etc. Entries need to be between 1,500 to 2,000 words in length.”
I am so pleased with the breadth, depth and eclecticism of the responses provided by my colleagues. All the contributors have gone above and beyond the original brief and I am immensely proud of their efforts. This book has been a real labour of love; a true passion project and I hope that you enjoy reading it as much as we all did writing it. There are some fabulous albums rescued in this book and I suggest that when you have finished reading you go out, preferably to an independent music shop, and buy some or all of these albums.
Tim Dalton
Hampton, Victoria 2015
11
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘Talk Is Cheap’ Keith Richards By Tim Dalton It’s an interesting process writing these Album Rescue Series (ARS) entries as no two are ever selected, researched or written the same way. Finding a piece of music to rescue is relatively easy; you simply find an album that you like, but the general public or the critics hated, and then rescue it by whatever metrics you deem appropriate. In fact a good proportion of the 11,000 plus albums that I own fit into the bracket of awkward, unloved, misunderstood, didn’t sell or are simply bizarre, so by default they are all suitable for an album rescue. To completely misquote German philosopher Martin Hiedegger, “Music speaks us, we do not speak music”. This holds true to every single piece of music that I’ve ever purchased over the years. My music collection tells you more about the type of person that I am, and my conscience state when I bought an album, then I or my psychiatrist ever could, even more so if you place these purchases in chronological order. The whole of Nick Hornby’s (1995) baby boomer book High Fidelity taps into the notion of music defining us and our life’s journey. The first step in my album rescue process is to look through my CD collection and ‘audition’ various albums. Once a suitable album has been sourced the next step is to play it continuously whilst researching. The locating and auditioning of Keith Richards’ 1988 first solo album Talk Is Cheap was a really easy choice, the research less so. As an avid reader, my primary research is normally whatever books I can lay my hands on. When Keith Richards’ released his autobiography Life in 2011, I bought it immediately and read all 630 plus pages in a matter of days. For this Album Rescue Series, I thought a good starting point would be to re-‐visit this book, which I really enjoyed during the original read. It was with some disappointment when I checked in the index to find that only three pages (529 to 532) are dedicated to this album. Considering the number pages that are given over to Richards’ Rolling Stones albums and his second 1992 solo album Main Offender, it would appear that Richards himself would be grateful for this album rescue too. Released in October 1988 on Virgin Records, Talk Is Cheap received a reasonably receptive critical reaction; many reviewers half-‐jokingly called it the best Rolling Stones album in years. Sales could have been better as it never sold anywhere near the numbers that would make Richard’s record company claim it to be anything close to a success. The Rolling Stones are huge. In astronomical terms they are equivalent to the sun and they sit at the absolute centre of the rock ‘n’ roll solar system. The sun with its dominant mass exerts the greatest gravitational force in the solar system and holds
12
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) all other objects in orbit and governs their motion. The Rolling Stones universal gravitational pull exerts an inescapable force over all objects within their gravitational field, e.g. Mick Taylor, Marianne Faithful, Brian Jones, Andrew Loog-‐ Oldham, Alan Klein, the list is extensive. This makes a truly objective analysis of Keith Richards’ solo work virtually impossible. When Rolling Stones manager Andrew Loog Oldham fired musical genius and original founding member Brian Jones from the band in 1969, the creative engine of the band defaulted to Mick Jagger and Keith Richards. This event was a major contributor to the establishment of the institution that would become ‘The Glimmer Twins’. Jagger and Richards have worked together since they first formed the band over 50 years ago in 1962. Anyone who has ever wondered what Richards’ contribution to the considerable output of The Rolling Stones could undertake some objective and scientific research. Atomic theory supports the belief that all matter is composed of tiny, indivisible elements. This theory has very deep historical roots, initially appearing thousands of years ago in Greek and Indian texts as a philosophical idea. However, it was not embraced scientifically until the 19th century, when an evidence-‐based approach began to reveal what the atomic model looked like. It was at this time that John Dalton (no relation), an English chemist, meteorologist and physicist, began a series of experiments, which would culminate in him proposing the theory of atomic compositions. Thereafter it would be known as Dalton’s Atomic Theory and would become one of the cornerstones of modern physics and chemistry. Dalton came up with this theory as a result of his research into gases. In the course of this research, Dalton discovered that certain gases could only be combined in certain proportions, even if two different compounds shared the same common element or group of elements. So for this album rescue I am going to be donning a white lab coat, safety goggles, latex gloves and undertaking some subjective, scientific subtractive and combinational analysis, something that I’m sure Professor John Dalton would be proud of. Only a fool would dispute that Keith Richards is one of the most prolific riff creators in rock history; ‘Start Me Up’, ‘Midnight Rambler’, ‘Satisfaction’, ‘Beast of Burden’, ‘Brown Sugar’, ‘Honky Tonk Women’, ‘Paint It Black’, the list goes on. Every one of these classic Rolling Stone’s songs, and virtually everything the band have recorded, is built upon Richards’ initial guitar riff foundation. What we are trying to deduce here is what other attributes does Richards contribute to The Rolling Stones? Talk Is Cheap is a vital piece of evidence that can help solve this question. Richards’ playing style is more conspicuous without the presence of Mick Jagger, whose larger-‐than-‐ life personality can often overshadow other aspects of Richards’ musical contribution. My hypothesis here is that Richards is the heart and soul of the world’s
13
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) greatest rock ‘n’ roll band while Jagger merely provides the show biz chutzpah. My first scientific step in addressing this hypothesis is to identify what The Rolling Stones might sound like without Richards. Here, I suggest listening to Mick Jagger's second 1987 solo album Primitive Cool but only in the name of scientific research because it’s an absolute disgrace; weak writing, poor musicianship, hideously overproduced and coated in the worst production excesses of the era. If you think this second album is bad then you definitely won’t want to listen to Jagger’s first 1985 solo album She’s The Boss. Both albums are beyond rescuing and would benefit from euthanasia. By 1993, Jagger starts to get the hand of solo albums with Wandering Spirit, which was a fabulous solo record, largely because of the superb production by audio alchemist Rick Rubin. Rubin understood Richards’ contributions so he went out and found a Keith Richards clone to fill the void. Simply examining Mick Jagger’s solo recording isn’t going to provide the full answer to the hypothesis, so here we apply some sub-‐atomic theory. The Rolling Stones recorded their 18th studio album Dirty Work in 1985 with producer Steve Lilleywhite. Most people agree it's a great album even if it is an album born out of the fracturing of the Glimmer Twins relationship. Everyone in The Rolling Stones, and the press, assumed that the band would tour in 1986 to support Dirty Work, but Jagger had a completely different agenda. Stones drummer Charlie Watts claimed that Jagger had folded up twenty-‐five years of history and turned his back on the band once recording was complete. Richards’, the ardent traditionalist, and Jagger, the trend jumping shape shifter, were no longer living together in perfect harmony. In his autobiography Life (2011: p.527), Richards’ claims that Jagger’s priority in touring to support Primitive Cool was deliberately designed to close down The Rolling Stones. By 1987 things were looking rocky for the Stones and there was the distinct possibility that the end of the band was imminent. The Rolling Stones didn’t tour at all from 1982 to 1989 or venture into the studio together from 1985 to 1989. Mick and Keith are well known for their public disagreements, but things got very nasty when Jagger decided to tour in support of his second solo album, rather than Stone’s album. It signalled to many a change in Jagger’s priorities from the band to his solo work. Maybe Jagger had started to believe his own hype and honestly believed he was The Rolling Stones? Or was he simply fed up of running what was in effect an international global brand and being the sole creative, due to Keith’s self-‐ enforced drug absence, within the enterprise? According to Richards’ (2011: p.520), Jagger sent letters out to the band informing them of his decision. Whatever Jagger’s reason he was perfectly entitled to do as he pleased because he’d already invested a quarter of a century’s work into the band. Richards was disheartened and finally succumbed to the idea of recording without The Rolling Stones. I’ve never met Keith
14
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) Richards but from what I’ve read, he’s a pretty laid back cat and things have to be at the extreme end of the dial before he takes any action. According to Richards’ autobiography Life (2011), Jagger has been unbearable for the last 30 years. He also described his love-‐hate relationship with Jagger as being, "like a marriage with no divorce" (2011: p.461). Richards reacted very badly to the departure of his soul mate ‘Glimmer Twin’ partner and it’s likely he was fearful of his own enforced creative solo future. Richard’s vented his anger in the press calling Jagger, “Disco boy, Jagger’s little Jerk Off Band, why doesn’t he join Aerosmith?” (2011: p.527). Richards’ even threatened to “slit his (Jagger’s) fuckin’ throat” in one press interview (ibid). Richards was confronted with a huge problem, which was largely solved, via Occam’s Razor or the Law of Parsimony. This theory dating from the Middle Ages, states that among competing hypotheses that predict equally well, the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected. At the age of 44, Richards could have taken the easy route, the route of least resistance and simply retired, he certainly was financially capable. Just after Richards kicked his heroin habit in 1978, The Rolling Stones released their greatest album Some Girls. Music had again become RIchards’ raison d’être. It was at this point that Richards became determined to make music even without Mick Jagger, although not entirely on his own. It’s ironic that when Richards quits the smack in favor of music, his long-‐term musical partner simply fucks off. Talk is Cheap might be billed as a solo album but Richards had some grade A1 premiership collaborators. The core band comprises of Waddy Wachtel (guitar), Ivan Neville (piano/keyboards), Charley Drayton (bass) and Steve Jordan (drums/producer) and became known, semi-‐jokingly, as the X-‐Pensive Winos. There are also numerous guest artists taking part, including Sarah Dash who provides the superbly appropriate duet vocals on ‘Make No Mistake’, bass virtuoso Bootsy Collins, saxophonist Maceo Parker, Bernie Worrell on organ and Mrs. Bruce Springsteen, Patti Scialfa, provides some superb vocals. Rolling Stones’ contributors include: The Memphis Horns, sax player Bobby Keys in all his Texan finery and ex-‐Stones, guitarist Mick Taylor. This band was originally assembled by Richards to back up blues veteran Chuck Berry for the not entirely successful Hail! Hail! Rock 'n' Roll documentary and concert. Drummer Steve Jordan becomes a surrogate Glimmer Twin and key collaborator when he takes on joint production and song writing duties with Richards. Between the two of them they put together a musically simple and straightforward album.
15
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) Where this album excels is in the top notch playing, as you would expect from such a stunning band of musicians. Sonically this album is superb as it hails from a time when big production budgets resulted in access to the world’s greatest recording studios. The tracks ‘Take It So Hard’ (2), ‘Struggle’ (3) and ‘Whip It Up’ (9) are riff perfect Richards’ classics. Track ten, ‘Locked Away’ is emotionally intelligent without being maudlin and worldly while sounding adult and contemporary. The main point of Talk Is Cheap is the music, nothing more; Richards obviously didn't want to fret about anything but the groove. While Jagger's solo work sounded like Mick with some studio musicians, Richards had assembled a band, found a productive song writing partner and surrogate ‘Glimmer Twin’ in Steve Jordan, and created a record that was free of frills. This is an album of free expression and enjoyment; Richards sounds like he’s playing for himself, having a ball and loving every moment of it. Because the X-‐pensive Winos are hand picked by Richards, they have a different work ethic from the Stones, which forces Richards to focus on the music. What resulted was a solid album built on fundamentals rather than style. The brilliance of Keith Richards is his ability to serve the song, and the band, with his playing. Richards is an expert collaborator with a simplistic but unique tone, a fabulous sense of rhythm, an uncanny ability to turn the beat around and the proficiency to move around inside the structure of the song with those signature soulful riffs. Richards’ guitar playing is not fancy or lightning fast with impressive technique, but it doesn’t need to be because he’s got Waddy Wachtel for that. It’s all about those simple glorious infectious grooves and some basic but timeless song writing. Richards and Bob Dylan would appear to agree on the fact that you know when you have a great song because you can strip away all the production and play it with an acoustic guitar and a voice. Dylan describes this as “a song is anything that can walk by itself” (Heylin, 2010), a song that is strong enough to get up and walk around on its own. All the songs on Talk Is Cheap have legs, in fact, the songs are so good they can do star jumps. This album shouldn’t come as a shock because Richards had served notice on the 1978 Stones album Some Girls with his solo written track ‘Before They Make Me Run’. Richards was busted for heroin in February 1977 at Toronto airport and the criminal charges and prospect of a prison sentence loomed over the Some Girls recording sessions and endangered the future of The Rolling Stones. It would appear that Richards is reactive and not pro-‐active to situations as the recording of this track demonstrates. According to Elliot Martin’s book The Rolling Stones: Complete Recording Sessions (2002: p.263), Richards recorded this song in five days without sleeping. Originally entitled ‘Rotten Roll’, the song was recorded in Paris at the Pathé Marconi studio in March 1978 during one of Mick Jagger's prolonged absences from the Some Girls recording sessions. That's not to
16
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) say that Jagger didn’t have a right not to be present, he’d carried the band, and Richards, single-‐handed for the last decade. Talk Is Cheap, returned Richards’ musical focus and for the first time in a decade put him back in the position of playing what he wanted to play and not what the crowd expected to hear. This is a luxury that most musicians don’t have and Richards’ millionaire international rock star status is one reason he could make such a unique and engaging piece of work. Talk Is Cheap is definitely not a period Stones album, it isn’t the Stones at all, but is an expression of Richards’ fondness for traditional rockabilly, soul and at times hints of funk. Surprisingly, there is not a whole lot of blues in it explicitly, but it does lurk in the background. I guess the blues are saved for Rolling Stones albums? Track seven, ‘How I Miss You’, is as close to a Rolling Stones simulacrum as it’s possible to get. A rocker of a song with a deep heart felt cry out to long lost friend such as Anita Pallenberg, Gram Parson or even Mick Jagger? Richards and his co-‐songwriter and producer, Steve Jordan, put together a collection of songs that display all these loves of Richards in an honest, straightforward and simple way. Talk Is Cheap is an island of simple solid rock ‘n’ roll granite in a featureless shallow sea of late 1980’s post modern glitter; to my ears this album sounds even better today than it did back then. If I were to pick one track from this album to serve as an indicative example of the whole album it would have be track two ‘Take It So Hard’. It starts with the hallmark Richards’ rough-‐n-‐ready riff that clearly signals that he has reclaimed his mojo, which had been begrudgingly on loan to Jagger through most of the 70s and 80s. The loose but very attuned X-‐pensive Winos jump in with a hard-‐driving groove and Richards sings the tune with all of Jagger’s swagger and sneering attitude, even if he doesn’t quite have Jagger’s flair. Moreover, there are enough ad-‐libs in this track to tell you he’s definitely having fun. Waddy Watchel’s guitar solo in the break is a leitmotif originally authored a couple of decades earlier by Richards, but Watchel reappropriates and reinvents it here in this album. Naturally this solo fits a Keith Richards’ song perfectly. All the tracks on this album are simple and I don’t mean this as a criticism. Upon its release many critics claimed the simple attributes of Talk Is Cheap were its main problem, because simple attributes, no matter how well mastered, always remain simple. This criticism completely misses the point. This album needs rescuing because simple is always good, simple works, simple is agile, simple is clever, simple is confidence, simple focuses the mind and simple lets you see the wood without the trees in the way. Simple is not a criticism, simple is about doing one small thing incredibly well, Richards’ style, as opposed to doing lots of things not so well, for example, Jagger style. This album displays a simple but
17
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) expert mastery over the music that Richards loves to play, a mastery which he displays on his second solo album Main Offender (1992) but which is not fully displayed on any Rolling Stones records. As 19th century French writer Stendhal wrote in his 1830 work Le Rouge et le Noir (The Red and Black), “Only great minds can afford a simple style”. Evidence of how simple Richards’ likes to make it can be seen in his guitar choice. Six strings is one too many, five strings work great especially with open G tuning. Richards’ prominent guitar of choice over the years has been a Fender Telecaster. This guitar is all about being a tradesman and coming to a job tooled up. Telecasters aren’t about flash or showing off; they are about getting the job done. Look at other well-‐known Telecaster players: Bruce Springsteen, Joe Strummer, George Harrison, Syd Barret or Graham Coxon and you’ll see my point. Keith Richards’ Talk Is Cheap is definitely the greatest Fender Telecaster record ever made. Talk Is Cheap is a wonderful album because it features for the first time Richards' second instrument, his voice. With this second instrument, Richards wonderfully expresses his experiences, while his first instrument, the guitar, so wonderfully expresses his endurance. His voice is unique, most people hate it, a few love it and as he rightly states (2011: p.534), “Pavarotti it ain’t, but then I don’t like Pavarotti’s voice”. For the first time Richards is writing material that he wants to write and not in collaboration with Jagger and for a different audience. Richards’ is not prolific in his solo output; he barely averages a solo album every 17.5 years. As George Bernard Shaw once said, “I’m sorry this letter is so long, I didn’t have time to make it shorter”. To return to my original hypothesis, this analysis has proven that as a primary component of The Rolling Stones, Richards is the engine driver and without him the machine does not move. During Richards’ heroin sabbatical (which could have been one of his productive periods), Jagger carried him, as any good partner should, until Richards was well enough to work again. In many ways Jagger’s semi-‐selfish actions of concentrating on his solo work pushed a refocused Richards into making Talk Is Cheap. Mick Jagger broke from The Rolling Stones to try and be a rock star and largely failed while Richards was pushed into making a record he never wanted to make. Neither Jagger nor Richards sold anywhere near the amount of solo records as they expected to, but that's not the point. Jagger explored the territory solo and came back to The Rolling Stones to re-‐identify himself. Richard’s was forced out begrudgingly to explore solo territory as a junkie joke and came back as a credible musician. Whatever the circumstance I am very pleased that Richards made Talk Is Cheap and I believe that it is a significant piece of work that is well and truly worthy of an Album Rescue. Without Talk Is Cheap, The Rolling Stones would have
18
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) disappeared into the “where are they now” file. How could any Keith Richards’ record possibly be better? How could any Keith Richards’ record ever be worse? References Fox, J 2011, Life, Orion Books. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, UK. Heylin, C 2010, Revolution in the air: The songs of Bob Dylan, 1957-‐1973. Constable & Robinson Ltd, UK.
19
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘Earthquake Weather’ Joe Strummer By Adam Spellicy THE FUTURE IS REWRITTEN In the traditional rock ’n’ roll playbook there is a post-‐band-‐breakup ritual to be observed: after an appropriate grieving period the former members, having gone their separate ways, set about recording and releasing solo albums. Songs that were once torpedoed, vetoed, or simply failed to pass muster finally see the light of day, at last immune to internecine wrangling. Mick Jones took this well-‐trodden path after Joe Strummer fired him from The Clash via public communiqué in 1983. The following year he formed Big Audio Dynamite, whose mix of punk, electro pop, sampling, hip hop, dub reggae and funk was an organic update of The Clash’s genre explorations. For the next 10 years, B.A.D. would enjoy reasonable success. The hastily reconstituted Clash Mark II, on the other hand, only managed to launch one final misguided salvo before skulking off to die: 1985’s Cut The Crap -‐ which, for all the opprobrium heaped upon it, does boast the epic, defeatist state-‐of-‐the-‐nation address This Is England. Joe Strummer’s subsequent solo career, in marked contrast to that of former bandmate and songwriting partner Jones, presented as a classic case of Wilderness Years. He went off the reservation, sporadically popping his head above the parapet before promptly vanishing again. Unless one was a keen eyed aficionado of late 1980s independent film, it was a pretty effective disappearing act motivated by Strummer’s state of mind following the implosion of The Clash. Having reached the summit of rock stardom, Strummer found himself isolated and riven with remorse. In his relentless pursuit of fame he had severed many significant human bonds, becoming the very thing he had once decried. In his own prophetic words: “What’s the point in being one of the few? There’s nothing there. You can get all the Rolls Royces, all the country houses, all the servants, all the dope -‐ and there’s nothing at the end of that road… no human life or nothing.” Joe Strummer, Rude Boy (1980) Strummer’s ensuing period of itinerant soul-‐searching was contextualised within a redemptive narrative arc by Julien Temple, in his 2007 documentary, The Future Is 20
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) Unwritten. At the end of Temple’s film, Strummer devotes himself to rekindling the spark of camaraderie with those he had once spurned, around the flames of his legendary Glastonbury Festival campfires. But back to the mid-‐1980s, before such reparations had been made. Whether consciously or not, Strummer made use of the years between 1986 and 1989 to systematically dismantle his iconic persona and scatter the fragments to the four winds. This was a strategy that, to a large extent, involved Strummer subsuming his ego and identity to the will of other artists. The first was filmmaker Alex Cox, who invited Strummer to contribute two songs (‘Love Kills’ and ‘Dum Dum Club’) to the soundtrack of his 1986 film Sid & Nancy, which depicted the doomed romance between punk idols Sid Vicious and Nancy Spungen. In the first of several acting roles he would take on during this period, Strummer appeared in the music video for ‘Love Kills’ (also directed by Cox), playing an incompetent Mexican Federale opposite Gary Oldman’s Vicious in a prison-‐break superhero fantasy. Strummer already had some prior form as an actor, playing himself in Jack Hazan and David Mingay’s 1980 docu-‐drama Rude Boy. And it could, of course, be argued that “Joe Strummer” was a long-‐form role-‐play by the downwardly mobile, class-‐ conscious John Mellor -‐ one he was growing ever more weary of performing. Aside from the odd Travis Bickle-‐style Mohawk haircut, Strummer was never given to the chrysalis-‐like transformations of a Bowie or a Dylan – it was always about the music – but he would nevertheless don a variety of guises in the next few years, before emerging in his final incarnation at the turn of the century. By 1986 the wounds sustained during the breakup of The Clash were already starting to heal: Strummer co-‐produced and co-‐wrote many of the songs on Big Audio Dynamite’s second (and strongest) album, No. 10 Upping St. His role in this case was essentially that of Silent Partner, lending artistic support to former band mate Mick Jones and his new crew. In 1987 Strummer returned to acting, in Alex Cox’s next feature Straight To Hell. Surely one of the most bizarre Plan Bs ever conceived, the film came about after the collapse of a proposed Nicaraguan tour by Strummer, The Pogues and Elvis Costello, in support of the embattled Sandinista government. Augmented by an eclectic supporting cast (including Dennis Hopper, Grace Jones and Jim Jarmusch) the musicians and Cox relocated to Almeria, Spain, where they cooked up a genre-‐ colliding heist film slash ‘Paella Western’ remake of Giulio Questi’s Django Kill. 21
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) Roundly dismissed at the time as a self-‐indulgent piss-‐take, or a very expensive home movie, Straight To Hell endures as an often hilarious, anarchic, proto-‐Po-‐Mo hybrid (and quite possibly an unacknowledged influence on one Quentin Tarantino). It was during the production of Straight To Hell that Strummer connected with a musician who would take on an increasingly significant role in his subsequent creative efforts: Zander Schloss, formerly from punk band the Circle Jerks. They bonded on-‐set: Strummer was playing one of the film’s protagonists, Simms, a member of a gang of thieves who hole up in a desert town only to run afoul of the caffeine-‐addicted McManus Gang (played by The Pogues); while Schloss was cast in the minor role of local hot dog vendor Karl The Weiner Boy. Further details of the film’s eccentric ‘plot’ are probably best omitted, though it is worth noting that Strummer fully immerses himself in the role of a brooding, sexually frustrated wannabe bank robber. In addition to contributing two songs of his own to the film’s soundtrack, Strummer teamed up with Schloss to co-‐write Karl’s theme song, ‘Salsa Y Ketchup’, a rousing, double-‐entendre-‐riddled paean to sausages. Thus an unlikely yet fruitful collaboration was born. That same year Cox, on a creative roll, directed a second feature: his allegorical masterpiece Walker, penned by legendary screenwriter Rudy Wurlitzer (Two Lane Blacktop, Pat Garrett & Billy The Kid). Ostensibly an historical biopic about William Walker, the freebooter who invaded Nicaragua in the 1850s under the doctrine of manifest destiny, the film is a rabidly anti-‐American stab at President Ronald Reagan’s then-‐contemporary support for the counterrevolutionary Contras. The film is rendered all the more subversive by the fact that it was made with $800,000 of Universal Studio’s money. Confined to a furtive cameo on the periphery of the frame, all but unrecognizable beneath bushranger beard and straggly long hair, Strummer’s on-‐screen contribution to Walker is negligible. Off-‐screen, it’s another story. No longer content with dashing off a few tunes for the soundtrack, Strummer expressed a desire to compose the entire score for the film. Duly afforded the opportunity by Cox, Strummer recorded a series of 4-‐track demos using only acoustic guitar and a rudimentary keyboard. These skeletal ideas were entrusted to the prodigiously talented Zander Schloss -‐ a “show off” by his own admission -‐ who fleshed them out into lush arrangements for stringed instruments, horns and percussion. Much inspiration was apparently taken from the local music Schloss and Strummer heard in the cantinas they frequented during the film’s Nicaragua shoot. Walker’s resulting score blends folk and country with more distinctly Central American and Caribbean influences, at times echoing Bob Dylan’s minimalist 22
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) soundtrack to Sam Peckinpah’s Pat Garrett & Billy The Kid, elsewhere evoking the strident dramatics of Ennio Morricone’s Spaghetti Western themes. The Clash often experimented with musical genres beyond punk rock (dub, reggae, funk), assimilating their influences through a tight-‐knit filter. Out on his own, Strummer became an ever more inclusive musical polyglot, a twitchy World Music exponent, minus the Great White Saviour Complex. Strummer’s contribution to the actual recording is limited to lead vocals on a few lilting campfire ballads, demonstrating a remarkable degree of autonomy imparted to Schloss and his session musicians. It is sublime in its own right, but as the first full-‐length solo album by the former front man for The Clash, Walker understandably left many fans bewildered. In 1988 Strummer was commissioned to compose another soundtrack, for Marisa Silver’s independent film Permanent Record. An early test screening of this melancholy meditation on teenage suicide reportedly moved Strummer to tears. The backing band assembled for the project, fittingly dubbed The Latino Rockabilly War, comprised the rhythm section of punk/jazz outfit Tupelo Chainsex – bassist Joey Altruda and drummer Willie MacNeil – augmented by the now ubiquitous Zander Schloss on lead guitar. The songs they recorded rank among Strummer’s best solo work and display a brash, one-‐take vitality, repetitive rave-‐up ‘Trash City’ even featuring the film’s star, Keanu Reeves, guesting on scrappy rhythm guitar. A slightly altered line-‐up of this band would soon go on to create Earthquake Weather. But before they did, Joe cropped up on screen once more, skulking around a Memphis bar playing a suicidal drunk in one of three intersecting storylines that comprise Jim Jarmusch’s 1989 film Mystery Train. A role specifically written with Strummer in mind (as is Jarmusch’s casting modus operandi), his character’s repeated line: “Don’t call me Elvis!” is a succinct, significant statement of Joe’s desire to shrug off the ill-‐fitting rock star mantle. Which brings us, finally, to 1989’s Earthquake Weather. I recall buying this album eagerly upon its release. (Finally, a fully-‐fledged Joe Strummer solo album!) But after a few perplexed spins, it was consigned to some dark recess of my record collection. Scathing reviews from the time largely vindicated my initial disdain. Before we take the platter out for reconsideration, let’s pause for a moment to appreciate the front cover. As a tequila sun sets over Californian palm trees, an enigmatic silhouette stands on the edge of a swimming pool diving board, quiff hanging lank atop his uplifted head, cigarette dangling from his lower lip. A leather-‐ jacketed, bow-‐legged, cowboy-‐booted guitar slinger, Telecaster slung like a rifle at 23
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) his hip. A pomaded pirate poised to walk the plank. It’s simultaneously elegiac and defiant. Later adopted as the logo for The Joe Strummer Foundation and as Chris Salewicz notes in his biography Redemption Song, it’s “an iconic Strummer image ironically much better known than the music inside the record it was intended to herald.” Off-‐mike, Joe bellows a war cry: “LET’S ROCK AGAIN!” and the album opener ‘Gangsterville’ kicks off with no fanfare, the words and music coming thick and fast, rhythms wrestling. Strummer hollers urgently over the top of a reconfigured Latino Rockabilly War, now with Lonnie Marshall replacing Joey Altruda on bass: The Revolution came, the Revolution went Strummer summarises, with an abrupt sense of futility. Wanted: one man to lead a crusade Payment: a bullet on a big parade Then, all at once: the pounding punk thunder flips to a tipsy Caribbean sway and we’re relocated to the titular ‘Gangsterville’. The effect on Strummer’s vocal also turns on a dime, switching from mighty slap-‐back echo to tinny, crackly filter, as if emanating from a cheap transistor radio in a broken down ’57 Chevrolet. The song continues in this schizoid fashion, alternating back and forth between two distinctly opposed feels, the effect unnerving yet undeniably cinematic: the abrupt transitions from verse to chorus are like scene cuts. The lyrics equivocate every bit as much as the music; Strummer is alarmed to discover common ground with both the victims and perpetrators of political crimes: On the other hand, sitting next to an evil crew They just got down from floor 82 Been selling Indian reservations Comin’ in looking for some jazz and a little libations I like the same kind of beer I gotta get right out of here If the first track speaks of political disillusionment, the second, ‘King Of The Bayou’, immediately contradicts this position with a hopeful salute to Phillipine President Corazon Aquino, elected in the wake of the 1986 People Power Revolution that toppled Ferdinand Marcos. Here, the optimism is infectiously anthemic:
24
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) Cory is the one She’ll never ever die young Next up is ‘Slant Six’, which comes on like a Keith Richards solo number, right down to Schloss’ wiry slide guitar licks. It’s apt, then, that the song critiques the decadent trappings of rock stardom -‐ and their isolating effect -‐ that Strummer himself was struggling to avoid: You got Juan-‐Le-‐Pins You got the needle and the deep cellar wine You got the slow boat to China You own part of South Carolina What a fate: to be imprisoned at the height of your dreams An abrupt climate change comes in the form of ‘Island Hopping’, whose lazy nylon-‐ string lope, evocative of Jamaican folk, underpins a telling ode to the joys of shirking one’s duties and the lure of capitulating to wanderlust: I don’t like to do a drop of work Drive a cab, or paint the church It’s been the same since I don’t know when So I’m goin’ island hopping again Throughout the album Strummer is preoccupied with rebellion, escapism and restlessness, topics that must have felt very dear to him during these ‘lost’ years. Significantly, the majority of the song titles suggest movement, modes of transportation or destinations: ‘Slant Six’, ‘Leopardskin Limousines’, ‘Ride Your Donkey’, ‘Island Hopping’, ‘Gangsterville’, ‘Sleepwalk’, ‘Highway One Zero Street’, ‘King Of The Bayou’, ‘Shouting Street’, ‘Passport To Detroit’. The lyrics coalesce into a surreal, novelistic, globe-‐spanning travelogue, jumping to and from locations both real and fictional, rapidly juxtaposing rich and poor, cops and robbers, boardrooms and barrios, in imagery pitched somewhere between Bob Dylan’s Invisible Republic and William Burroughs’ nightmarish Interzone. Earthquake Weather marks the point where Strummer’s laissez-‐faire approach to band leadership reached both its zenith and nadir. Evidently pleased with the result of recent collaborations, he allowed his co-‐conspirators great liberty to flesh out his foggy notions, bringing their diverse musical pedigrees to bear as they discovered the arrangements through intensive jamming. Zander Schloss, for his part, revels in
25
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) this freedom, grandstanding on lead guitar, banjo and any other stringed instrument within reach as he navigates the hairpin genre curves. His hyperactive solos come off like Marc Ribot channeling J. Mascis. These musical explorations often took place with Strummer in absentia: he would take to the streets in search of real-‐life lyrical stimulus, or hunker down in a far corner of the studio in his notorious spliff bunker to pursue more inward inspirations. It’s only around the middle of the album that this otherwise fruitful regime of organized chaos threatens to skip the rails: on ‘Dizzy’s Goatee’ and ‘Leopardskin Limousines’ the grooves are tentative, the vocals delivered in an unconvincing mumble, as if something hasn’t quite gelled. And ‘Boogie With Your Children’ and ‘Sikorsky Parts’ -‐ which no amount of re-‐listening can fully redeem -‐ bear unfortunate comparison to early Red Hot Chili Peppers. This is possibly due, in no small part, to the abrupt mid-‐session replacement of Willie MacNeil with drummer Jack Irons from the aforementioned Californian funkers. Four songs on the album reveal that Strummer never fully transcended his Punk Rock Warlord persona. Nor perhaps, ultimately, did he truly wish to. ‘Shouting Street’ drives like a madman, with Schloss rapid-‐firing Chuck Berry licks from the passenger seat (complete with a shout-‐out to Jim Jarmusch); ‘Jewellers & Bums’ is an insistent thumper that could stack up against anything on The Clash’s flawless ‘London Calling’. ‘Highway One Zero Street’ (with a title that’s pure Zimmerman) effortlessly shifts gears from Mariarchi-‐Waltz time to stabbing punk to anthem rock to popping funk, unfolding like a map of intersecting ethnic neighbourhoods; and ‘Passport To Detroit’ rockets along an apocalyptic desert highway at midnight, headlights illuminating doomy portents. The sole cover version on the album, ‘Ride Your Donkey’, is a relaxed rendition of The Tennors’ Rocksteady standard, which Strummer might have first heard at the Marquee Club in the early days of London’s punk scene. Its inclusion here suggests a nostalgic trawling through past influences, and is one of the few backward glances Strummer permitted himself in his relentless forward march to a new identity. Some critics speculated that Earthquake Weather was a self-‐sabotaging attempt on Strummer’s part to wriggle out of his contract with EMI, but it’s far too complex a piece of work to have been conceived with such a cynical endgame in mind. Much was made at the time of the “muddiness” of the album’s production and it’s true there is a kitchen-‐sinky chaos to some of the mixes, but much like Strummer and Schloss’ soundtrack work the focus favours ambience over radio-‐friendly clarity. Several songs even feel like they’ve wandered in off the set of Walker: ‘Island 26
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) Hopping’, ‘Leopardskin Limousines’ and the album’s closer, ‘Sleepwalk’ (originally written for Frank Sinatra), provide gentle acoustic oases of calm amid the urgent electrical storms that dominate elsewhere. The album has a palpable sense of topography and geography, heavily populated by a multinational cast of heroes, villains and background extras, as if Strummer’s forays into film were feeding back into his songwriting. The cumulative effect of Earthquake Weather is akin to reading the screenplay and listening to the score for an unmade trans-‐national road movie, as an abstract but nonetheless coherent narrative plays out on the screen behind one’s eyes. The main character, of course, is Joe Strummer himself. No matter how hard he fought to submerge his stardom and defer to his creative associates, the resulting work bears his indelible imprint. It took another decade for Strummer to finally emerge as a solo artist in the traditional sense. With new backing outfit The Mescaleros, he released a trio of increasingly decent albums in quick succession between 1999 and 2002. The last of these, Streetcore, was completed posthumously by band mates Martin Slattery and Scott Shields, Strummer having only recorded his rhythm guitar and vocal tracks before his sudden death at age 50. And so, once again, responsibility for the realisation of Strummer’s vision fell to his collaborators but this time out of heart-‐breaking necessity rather than trusting intent. As a result, Streetcore makes for bittersweet listening: it’s the solid solo album every fan had been waiting 13 long years for but Joe was no longer around to hear it. Faced with the reality that we’ll never be graced with another, and freed from past prejudices a listener may have once brought to the material, the music Strummer made between 1986 and 1989, culminating in Earthquake Weather, now reveals itself to be richly rewarding and ripe for redemption. References Cox, A 2013, Website of filmmaker Alex Cox. Available from: www.alexcox.com [August 2015]. Excerpts from lyrics to Gangsterville, King Of The Bayou, Slant Six and Island Hopping © Joe Strummer Hazan, J & Mingay, D 1980, Rude Boy. Buzzy Enterprises/Michael White Productions. Jarmusch, J 1989, Mystery Train. JVC Entertainment Networks/Mystery Train.
27
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) Pottker, N 2014, In Conversation: Zander Schloss. Available from: [August 2015] Salewicz, C 2006, Redemption Song: The Definitive Biography Of Joe Strummer. Harper Collins, London, UK.
28
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘So Alone’ Johnny Thunders By Tim Dalton One of the beauties of music is that it’s impossible to hear it all; no matter how long you live, it’s just too expansive. Despite being a life long addict to perfect pop tunes, I still come across pieces of music that stop me dead in my tracks. Earlier this week my niece Amber posted the Johnny Thunders’ song ‘You Can’t Put Your Arms Around A Memory’ on her Facebook page; this was one of those stop dead in your tracks moments. Hearing this track again after so many years made me realize that if ever an album needed a rescue it's Johnny Thunders and his 1978 release So Alone. It’s about the only thing I can do for Johnny and boy does he need it. The title of the album says it all So Alone. Thunders died 24 years ago on April 23rd April 1991. Gone but never forgotten, he is survived by his music. The cause of death was recorded as, “drug related causes”. Rather ironically the autopsy found large amounts of LSD in his system despite several of his friends confirming that he’d quit the smack. But this explanation does not explain the many rumours and urban myths surrounding Thunders' death at St. Peter’s Guest House in New Orleans, Louisiana. Fellow kindred spirit and troubled troubadour Willy DeVille lived in the hotel room next door to the one Johnny died in and described it thus in Dee Dee Ramone’s book ‘Lobotomy: Surviving The Ramones’ (2000: p.232), “I don't know how the word got out that I lived next door, but all of a sudden the phone started ringing and ringing. Rolling Stone was calling, the Village Voice called, his family called, and then his guitar player called. I felt bad for all of them. It was a tragic end, and I mean, he went out in a blaze of glory, ha ha ha, so I thought I might as well make it look real good, you know, out of respect, so I just told everybody that when Johnny died he was laying down on the floor with his guitar in his hands. I made that up. When he came out of the St. Peter's Guesthouse, rigor mortis had set in too such an extent that his body was in a U shape. When you're laying on the floor in a foetal position, doubled over -‐ well, when the body bag came out, it was in a U. It was pretty fucking awful”. Apparently his place was ransacked, what few belongs he had all gone including his passport, makeup and clothes. There was also talk, though no documented proof, of him having acute leukaemia. There’s no way of knowing the true story of Thunders’ death but there’s no denying it must of been a very sad, squalid and lonely end. The really simple and lazy way to tell this story is to deliver the archetypal rock star drugs story. You know the troubled misunderstood genius, blah blah blah. Such lives tend to be littered with self-‐destruction and the concept of rock ‘n’ roll may indeed
29
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) be defined by variable degrees of self-‐destruction. This is already well-‐trodden territory, and is articulated by far more qualified people then I. Take a look at Nick Kent's 1995 book The Dark Stuff where he does an excellent job of de-‐glamorizing the drug cult heroes of rock ‘n’ roll. Kent provides a sobering insight into the tortured lives, dysfunction and general unpleasantness of many key figures of popular music. Anyone with a voyeuristic interest in the self-‐destructive lives of rock 'n' rollers, myself included, will love this book. There is no denying or escaping the fact that Johnny’s story is a heroin related one. But please don't judge heroin addicts unless you've actually lived it yourself, keep an open mind. If you haven't lived it yourself then great job, you definitely made the correct decision. Heroin is a slow teased out death; it eats up your soul, destroys creativity and spits you out. Few people quit the smack successfully but if they do things are never quite the same again after living a life with heroin in it. Heroin is a solitary friend, who demands 100% of your attention, and when it’s gone your life is empty and worthless, you’re so alone without it. It's pure conjecture but it's highly unlikely that Thunders never conquered his heroin addiction. What is not up for discussion is that he did leave us with some incredible music stands the test of time and in all probability will last forever. In 1790 the German founding father of modern philosophy, Immanuel Kant, wrote Critique of Aesthetic Judgement, where he investigates the possibility and logical status of "judgments of taste”. In the chapter Analytic of the Beautiful, Kant states that beauty is not a property of an artwork or natural phenomenon, but is instead a consciousness of the pleasure that attends the 'free play' of the imagination and the understanding. Here is the big question; is So Alone an artefact of beauty, worthy of critical reappraisal or is just another rock ‘n’ roll album by a junkie? Even though it appears that we are using reason to decide what is beautiful, that judgment is not a cognitive judgment, and is consequently not logical, but is actually aesthetical? I would argue that our objective judgment is impaired or swayed here. This album is heavily tarnished because of who made it and their biography and not because of what it is, which is an artefact of beauty and passion. I believe that anything created out of passion and/or love must inherently be good. The wreckage that peers out of the front cover of So Alone suggests Thunders is a man on the edge, both mischievous and vulnerable. The music contained therein seems to confirm this. An incendiary cover of The Chantays' instrumental, ‘Pipeline’, mixes with the grind of ‘Daddy Rollin' Stone’, the Pistol-‐punk of ‘London Boys’ and the nonsense of the Spector girl-‐group, ‘Great Big Kiss’. The standout track is the fragile ‘You Can't Put Your Arms Round A Memory’. The title was taken from a line in the Better Living Through TV episode of the sitcom The Honeymooners, and was
30
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) written for his close friend Fabienne Shine. Considered by many, including me, to be his signature song, the ballad is said to be about Thunders’ heroin addiction. However, according to Nina Antonia's (2000) biography, Johnny Thunders: In Cold Blood, the song was written before he was even a member of the New York Dolls, and years before he became addicted to heroin. But back to Kant and how can we objectively measure if this song is any good or not? How about some scientific comparative analysis here, an item-‐by-‐item comparison of two or more comparable alternatives? Compare the original to versions by the Manic Street Preachers, Guns ‘n’ Roses, Giant Sand, Blondie or the sublime version by Ronnie Spector on her 2006 album The Last of the Rock Stars, now that’s definitely a good tune. I’ve never met Sopranos TV series producer Todd A. Kessler but he must have a similar music taste to me. He uses ‘You Can’t Put Your Arms Around A Memory’ to great effect on the closing scene and titles of episode 11 (House Of Arrest). This is not the first song from one of my Album Rescues Series that Kessler has used to great effect. As a point of reference check out how Martin Scorsese also uses this song on his 1999 film Bring Out The Dead; it’s superb. Thunders wanders from one style to another, more often than not shambolically, very often with a Jaggeresque vocal, sometimes energetic and often melodic, Thunders' music is always a little wayward but it could never be described as dull. It isn't perfect nor should it be; his duet with the Only Ones’ (definitely a future album rescue) lead singer Peter Perrett, for instance, is an absolute chaotic shambles. Throughout this album rescue series I continually use the metric of who plays on this record to measure if its any good or not e.g. for me lots of great players equals a great album. So Alone is not so different as there are some superb players on this record. Phil Lynott (Thin Lizzy) on bass, Paul Cook (Sex Pistols) on drums, Steve Cook (Sex Pistols) on guitar, Chrissie Hynde (The Pretenders), Steve Marriott (Small Faces & Humble Pie) on guitar and vocal, Walter Lure and Billy Ruth of the Heartbreakers and all pulled together by super-‐star producer Steve Lillywhite. This is an album that should appeal to anyone with a penchant for the basic of rock and roll. This album is one of the loosest, coolest, sounding rock ‘n’ roll records I've ever had the pleasure of listening to. The only time I saw Johnny Thunders play live was in London at The Marquee Club in Soho. I turned up with the rest of the voyeuristic ghouls mainly to see if Johnny could make it through the show without dying on stage. Painfully thin, even by my standards, with a ridiculous amount of eyeliner Thunders chain-‐smoked throughout the gig. He was truly fucking awesome; I couldn’t keep my eyes off him. This boy looked at Johnny and was truly mesmerized. If I remember correctly he closed the
31
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) set with a raucous version of the classic Heartbreakers’ song ‘Born To Lose’. Thunders was a unique songwriter who drew upon real life experience and sang from personal experience. Granted this was material of the darkest type but it made for a great album. If you haven’t heard So Alone, you need to because it’s one of post-‐punk great masterpieces. References Antonia, N 2000, Johnny Thunders: in cold blood, Cherry Red Books, London, UK. Kant, I 1790, Critique of Aesthetic Judgement, Public Domain. Ramone, D 2000, Lobotomy: surviving the Ramones, De Capo Press, Boston, USA.
32
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘Tin Machine’ Tin Machine By Dr Ian Dixon “Hello Humans, can you hear me thinking?” These words begin Bowie’s second Tin Machine album, critically panned as ‘second rate’. This marks Bowie’s second attempt at equanimity within a band since heading up The King Bees as Davie Jones in the mid 1960s (Trynka, 2011). In the interim, he added the moniker ‘Bowie’ (vying to outdo Mick Jagger (meaning ‘hunter’) by naming himself after a legendary hunting knife – although the story is still hotly debated) and becoming a mega-‐star (Sandford, 1996). Was forming Tin Machine an act of sheer pretension or a genuine plea to return to his roots? Indeed, for the inimitable David Bowie, self-‐conscious pretension is an active part of his stagecraft and key ingredient within his famous ‘personas’, which brings us to another quandary: where is his faithful, protective mask during the Tin Machine era? Did the 1980s, which saw him perform to audiences in the hundreds of thousands, selling albums in the tens of millions, see him emerge from behind the mask? Had he finally accepted his Reality as a household name without obfuscating his (dubious) ‘true’ self behind theatrical disguise? Or was he making Tin Machine, the band, his latest attempt at subterfuge; albeit in the guise of honest, grassroots rock ‘n’ roll? As band member, Hunt Sales, famously remarked, this was presumably the only garage band in existence with a millionaire for a lead singer (Leigh, 2014). How ironic that ‘Woody’ Woodmansey, the drummer of the Spiders from Mars, once declared Bowie as simply ‘one of the lads’ who became a star and a show-‐off and relinquished his duties lugging gear as he had done in the early days (Trynka, 2011). An assessment of the Tin Machine album in hindsight, however, highlights the successful experiment it was: his image, though tainted, lived to see many more reinventions. Consequently, both Tin Machine albums can be seen as improvisations on themes and ideas which would take another decade to perfect with the emergence of his next manifestation of (flawed) genius in albums such as Outside (1995) and Heathen (2002). Fast forward yet another decade and The Next Day (2013) appears without warning; offering up songs of radical contrast from the heartbroken Where Are We Now? to the rock lament The Stars (Are Out Tonight). So the Tin Machine experiment represents a necessary pipeline through which Bowie’s creativity passed, surged, died and re-‐emerged. We might therefore consider Tin Machine’s second album from the point of view of the music; Bowie’s fandom; the Tin Machine band; the Bowie mask; the album itself and the individual tracks as a way of rescuing the album from damnation within the Bowie lexicon.
33
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) Arguably, all the libel against Tin Machine connotes the best part of the great man’s life: the music itself. The first Tin Machine album was lambasted as a work of garage band wall-‐of-‐noise and both garage devotees and Bowie fans alike seemed baffled. For my part, I confess to greeting the first album hoping to hell it would match his seminal works of the 1970s, and after a valiant period of evangelical apologism, I resolved (along with the rest of the enclave) that it was awful. This second album was released by Polygram in Australasia in 1991 and, despite its questionable merits, ushers in a new era in music – a time when the rock giants of the 1970s were truly gone (maybe not as ‘gone’ as Syd Barrett, but gone nonetheless). New rock supergroups such as Pearl Jam and Nirvana took up the mantle. Indeed, the 70s gods of rock returned in the guise of ‘old rockers’ two decades later (De Generis, 2007), (those that had not carked it, that is). Certainly, the diehard Bowie fan really wants the second album to work, and listens intently for the expected sense of transcendence to rise. Alas, like their response Tin Machine one, the exemplary fan falls somewhere between disappointment and denial. There is, however, much that this album promises and foreshadows, echoes and reinvents: both in Bowie’s music and that of his protégés – all commendably. With hallmark screaming guitars supplied strategically by Reeves Gabrels, who also co-‐ wrote most of the material, the album provides a clarity and balance, which might betray a rookie breed of excellence… had it been anyone but Bowie in the co-‐driver’s seat. The reputedly telepathic Sales brothers, Hunt and Tony, fill out the basic line-‐ up contributing some not-‐quite-‐dirty-‐enough tunes to the song list. According to biographer Paul Trynka, all three accompanying performers on Tin Machine toured with, befriended and did copious amounts of cocaine with Bowie in preparation for this album. Produced by Tim Palmer (& Tin Machine) and mixed at Studio 301 in Sydney Australia, this album prefigures the simple rock line-‐up of the Reality tour (2003). But the cookie-‐cutter mentality to songs does not quite have that ring of authenticity, nor does Bowie adequately disappear in the background. Had Bowie read too much Marxism during his performance of the titular role in Berthold Brecht’s polemic play Baal (1982)? Did he look back in anger to find his teacher lounging in his overalls? Or was he simply in denial of his status as mega-‐star? As forerunner to much of Bowie’s subsequent work with virtuoso guitarist Reeves Gabrels, the album promises a burgeoning style, which subsequently shape-‐shifted all the way to Outside. But where The Spider’s lead guitarist Mick Ronson had been the exemplary axeman for the glam rock era and ‘crafty’ guitarist Robert Fripp had all but created Scary
34
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) Monsters’ keystone, inimitable, psychotic rock, Gabrels virtuosity just becomes annoyed, annoying and overweening. The cover art provides a first glimpse of the material to come, while simultaneously causing a cringe of trepidation. Bowie’s languid stare at the camera on the inner cover of the CD seems to deny the contrasting cover depicting four circumspect (and circumcised) Egyptian male nudes (banned in some countries). Bowie glowers with a touch of suppressed charisma as if subsuming himself in the (dubious) mentality of band solidarity were just a private joke he had not let the others in on. His look seems to say: ‘I am just visiting here’, like the space traveller Thomas Jerome Newton of The Man Who Fell to Earth (1975) or the escapee from worldly oppression, Major Tom. Once the album is in the player, the scrutiny begins in earnest: as does our attempt to recover the gems hidden in the detritus. With yet another reference to 2001: A Space Odyssey, ‘Baby Universal’ kicks the album off with a techno-‐fetishist repetition of the word: ‘baby, baby, baby…’ The hook is excellent and reeks of self-‐ referentiality: space, star babies, alien voices and a reversal of the haunting ending of ‘Diamond Dog’ (‘bra, bra, bra, bra, bra…’). ‘Baby Universal’s’ theme curiously collides two of Bowie’s notable obsessions: space and mental telepathy. Yes, Sir David, we can hear you thinking: do ‘think’ us some more. For a moment there’s real potential in this album. ‘One Shot’, written with Tony Sales, produced, mixed and engineered by Hugh Padgham (returning for another crack after Loving the Alien). There is a touch of ‘The Labyrinth’ in the song’s simplicity and screaming guitar lead (not mixed so far back as to obscure its pretensions to garage band). And yes, Gabrels peels off an awesome arpeggio or two, but does it add up to a unique song? Here the listener is privileged to hear fine musicianship hitching a ride on a less than satisfactory vehicle, which only goes to prepare us (dejection beginning to set in) for the pedestrian song: ‘You Belong in Rock n Roll’. Yet, this next track, with the whispered, haunting, low crooner tones of Bowie at his best, promises to impress. However, the song proves a mere practice-‐run for the far superior ‘Where Are we Now?’ on The Next Day. If this is rock ‘n’ roll, then it ain’t the 60s anymore. And if this is garage, they ain’t waking up the neighbours. Yet, the song actually sits nicely in the set: well arranged; some inventive SFX mixing, which creates a rush of insight for the listener; and some fine restraint on Bowie and Gabrels’ part (although seemingly vying for attention). Just when the album might have become odious, ‘If There Is Something’ (written exclusively by Chuck Ferry) arrests Gabrels’ guitars from competing with Bowie’s voice and the two elements dovetail melodiously and effectively.
35
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) ‘Amlapura’: trippy, deliberately messed up, like coming off cocaine – which according to Wendy Leigh (2014), Bowie was snorting copiously at the time of this album, having claimed to have ‘kicked’ the habit previously. The dream-‐life represented in the appropriately titled ‘Amlapura’, couched in a sound-‐reverb shell, which echoes Pink Floyd (less satisfactorily). The song also prefigures psychedelic revival bands such as The Dandy Warhols and Tame Impala, invents upon the past, only to leave us hankering for the future. And so to ‘Betty Wrong’. Scrap the tedious guitar clichés and play this on half speed and the incisive sheering chords cut through with the delightful weirdness of a David Lynch film. Indeed, the title sounds like a character from Twin Peaks (this is not such an improbable simile when you consider that in 1992, Bowie acted for Lynch in Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me and provided the title track for Lynch’s Lost Highway (1997), I’m Deranged (1995). Perhaps that’s what ‘Betty Wrong’ lacks – the essential ‘derangement’, which comes to fruition on ‘Outside’ years later. ‘Betty Wrong’s’ curiously switching bass, all-‐too-‐squeaky-‐clean, yet muffled riffs counterpoising Bowie’s smacked-‐out lyricism and affectedly exhausted vocal delivery contributes to a song, which is tonally satisfying, if not fully congealing. However, by this stage we are aching for the quintessential Bowie: the genius that invents (even steals) melodies such as ‘Somewhere Over the Rainbow’ for sublime songs like ‘Starman’ (1974) (Trynka, 2011). So with ‘You Can’t Talk’ (again written with Tony Sales), the messy grunge guitar, the driving, steam-‐train beat propels us through lyrics, which should be worth listening to, but somehow, ‘Somewhere Over the Rainbow’ just isn’t manifesting here. Is it that Bowie’s invention is too good in the chorus to deliver a sense of the holistic song – especially a garage (w)hole? Embarrassingly, the lyrics seem lazy and teenage, yet without the prerequisite youthful anger, which ought to accompany such garage fare: the genuine, raw-‐power rage, which underpinned works like ‘Scary Monsters’ (1979) and ‘Ziggy Stardust’ (1972) is simply saddened by impending middle age; nor does it bear the inspired improvisations of ‘Heroes’’ (1977) lyricism. When the tired, clichéd fade out announces a sheer lack of creativity at the song’s ending, we are left wondering where Bowie’s mask is? Is he emerging from behind the disguise to a disappointing response? Should he simply venture back behind the personas we love so much? The next track ‘Stateside’ is: Iggy Pop meets Screaming Jay Hawkins. The Hammond organ and slick lead guitar (both played by Gabrels) seems merely an excuse to scramble up the fret-‐board for a good old-‐fashioned ‘rave up’ ending (with a dash of Steve Vye xxx).
36
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) ‘Shopping for Girls’ bears a taste of ‘Lodger’ (1977) or ‘Blackout’ from the Heroes album with its inspired hatred of the world. Unfortunately, with none of the edge, nor the concessions to feminism, which shone from ‘Lodger’ (‘I guess the bruises won’t show, If she wears long sleeves, (Don’t hit her)’ (Bowie, 1979). For all its noise, the song somehow seems tame, as if washed by an all too generic chorus. Here, we observe a concession toward Bowie auteurism: we fall, yet again, into the trap of comparing this wanting album to the master’s former greats. ‘A Big Hurt’: could that be Suzy Quatro sneaking into his influences (an ironic reference to the one girl in glam rock who dressed as a boy instead of vice versa)? Perhaps only Oz-‐centricity recognises this similarity? In any case, the Sprechgesang in A Big Hurt is palpably self-‐conscious. Yet, even this is understandable for an artist such as Bowie: always deliberately self-‐conscious compared to the ‘organic’ Rolling Stones. Bowie always more interested in conveying ideas, intellectual narcissism, interplanetary tin cans and lost, remote screaming style than unadulterated rock ‘n’ roll. Perhaps this is why both Tin Machine albums suffer so: without music as vehicle for ideas, Tin Machine is just bad rock. Speaking of which, his next track, ‘Sorry’ (bearing no resemblance to The Easybeats or even The McCoy’s ‘Sorrow’ (for which Bowie recorded the definitive version) demonstrates that Bowie and Gabrels have a deft capacity for clashing styles against each another while retaining the essential ‘sense of the song’ and still rendering it as garage. The welcome acoustic twelve-‐string guitar, which opens and concludes this track, makes us wish the writers really were sorry, rather than just crooning about it. ‘Goodbye Mr Ed’ (written with Hunt Sales) sports lyrics, which again promise the Bowie that was and will be again, particularly with pop references to 1960s U.S. TV shows and classical Greek mythology alike. The parallel voices (albeit missing Bowie’s backing up his own lead: ‘the many Bowies’ as Shaar Murray put it (1981)). This track foreshadows the bleak, ironic lament of ‘Better Future’ off the Heathen album, but without the messed up innocence of Bowie’s infamous ‘Baby Grace’ vocal delivery or the bleak entropy of its strikingly accurate witness to our evolving reality post 9/11. With unwarranted feedback to finish off, Bowie improvises a screaming sax line, as if to announce, like Monty Python: ‘I’m not dead yet!’ At the conclusion of Tin Machine’s second album, the listener concedes that it is definitely an improvement on the first. But, was Bowie really ever satisfied to reside in the background? Or was it doomed from the start, implying that it simply could not be done? Indeed, there in the foldout photograph of the band, beams Bowie’s impish, wry testament: his knowing refusal at anonymity.
37
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) Look, can’t we just let Bowie off the hook (so to speak?). Just because he has provided us with genius in so many forms over so many decades, must we expect him to conquer every genre in existence? Indeed, Tin Machine II is an experiment in garage rock, which, although questionable in its own right, still gestated many an experiment to come – and with admirable delivery. The albums which stem from this one – Gabrels Bowie’s Outside, Heathen, Reality, The Next Day all bear the hallmarks of Bowie’s relinquishing genius, but then again there was a time when Bowie cut and ran from the highpoints of the past. It is, of course, the self-‐righteous indulgence of Bowie fandom to make comparisons to his former glories. Fans must therefore concede that, compared the travesties of Tonight and Never Let me Down (which for many fans spelled the death knell), it is an album with a balance of the pragmatic and the trippy; the hard-‐edged and the gilt-‐edged, the beery dance halls just a tad too sober and clean for genuine garage. Indeed, the album is a bottleneck of talent still waiting to flow and fills the hard-‐core fan with sorrow (complete with string quartet backing track). Yet, surely the clarity of Tin Machine’s production and the slick, riffing rock ‘n’ roll style (even as we cannot help our judgement) is only to be admired (if I still sound like an apologist – I am).
38
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘Miss America’ Mary Margaret O’Hara By Tim Dalton The long format essay seems to have died; something I partly blame on social media and in particular Twitter. Don’t get me wrong, I’m on Twitter (@touringtim) and I love the expediency of only having 140 characters to say the important stuff. This reductionism can be even more extreme. A friend and colleague of mine writes four word movie reviews, e.g. Whiplash “drummer learns two songs” or Apocalypse Now “Chopper, hopper acid dropper”. This got me thinking about how best to describe Miss America released by Mary Margaret O’Hara in 1988? Four words is far too easy an option, so I thought lets make this really difficult and describe this album and artist combined into one word, and that word is . . . UNIQUE. This is a classic, perfectly formed, beautiful diamond of an album that passed almost everyone by, hence its well worthy and in need of an album rescue. O’Hara is one of the most unique performers on the planet and what she does to music via the conduit of her voice is akin to the tricks a contortionist performs in the circus ring. Her timing is unconventional, her timbre idiosyncratic, her voice is expressive as it soars, falls and goes everywhere in between on this album. There are very few singers to whom she can be compared, so I won’t try. This album is one of those records that has to be heard to be believed though I doubt it will ever be fully understood, it's often bewildering, at other times bewitching but totally intriguing. Miss America remains stunning nearly 27 years on from its initial release in 1988. There's nothing else quite like it, so perhaps it's appropriate, frustrating and mysterious that O’Hara never recorded another album. I’m discounting the soundtrack for the 2002 Canadian movie Apartment Hunting, which was released without her approval. Miss America is a rare and precious because it makes you long to hear more, I’ve being playing this record since its release and still haven’t tired of it. Trying to describe this record is almost impossible, words just aren’t complex enough to fully capture or describe O’Hara ephemeral voice but I’m going to give it a try. This is an album that you can only understand through repeatedly listening to it, that's the only starting point. O’Hara was born in Toronto in the early 1960’s, the precise date is unknown, and graduated from Ontario Art College after studying painting, sculpture and graphic design. The art college route into popular music was a very common one and is superbly articulated in Simon Frith’s 1988 book Art Into Pop. With a surname derived from Irish ancestry she was one of seven children and raised a Roman Catholic. Van Morrison, Dinah Washington and the jazz records that her father would play in the
39
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) family home, shaped O’Hara’s musical taste during her formative years. She also painted, and acted, like her sister Catherine, who would go on to star in Home Alone. After playing in bands at clubs across Ontario, the acting and painting were dropped and music became her primary creative outlet. Visionary executive head of Virgin Records’ A&R department Simon Draper was blown away by her demos, and O’Hara was quickly signed in 1983. It took almost five years to make Miss America partly because of O’Hara’s perfectionism and partly due to her unconventional recording habits. Primary multi-‐ track recording was undertaken in 1984 at the rural Rockfield Studios in Monmouth, South Wales. As a residential studio this facility has played host to almost every super-‐star band from the 70s, 80s and 90’s. Queen recorded Bohemian Rhapsody there. Rolling fields full of sheep obviously have a positive effect on the creative art of record production. Sonically this studio sounds superb even by today’s standards. At the time Rockfield was stocked with the very best recording equipment available. Andy Partridge of XTC, who was also signed to Virgin Records, had raved about the demos and he took up position in the producer’s chair on the recommendation of legendary producer Joe Boyd. Straightaway, there were problems. There are stories of Partridge stopping his production duties after a single day when O’Hara’s manager fired him. The myth is she found out that he was an atheist and that Partridge's co-‐ producer on the project John Leckie (who later produced albums by XTC and The Stone Roses) was a follower of Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh, a controversial Indian guru who reportedly supported free love. I guess this was too much for a Canadian with a strict Roman Catholic upbringing or it's just another smoke screen? Tapes from this 1984 session were recorded by in-‐house engineer Paul Cobbold, but were left unfinished. The Rockfield tapes lingered or quite possibly they languished in Virgin Record’s “to difficult pile” until Canadian guitarist, composer and producer Michael Brook broke the stalemate in the summer of 1988. After Brook saw O’Hara perform at Toronto's Music Gallery, he made direct contact with Virgin and offered to help her finish the album. Virgin jumped at this opportunity. With Brook's assistance, O'Hara and her band re-‐recorded four songs in the summer of 1988 and remixed seven of the original cuts from the Rockfield sessions to finish the album. Brook was once a member of the new-‐wave band Martha and the Muffins, remember that fabulous single Echo Beach? He obviously knows a good tune when he hears one. Three of the 1988 recordings were produced by O'Hara and Brook; the rest were "constructed and conducted" and produced by O’Hara. According to an article in Canadian Composer (February 1989) she mourns the loss of the original tapes, but she is still proud of the songs that eventually emerged on Miss America. O’Hara talks about the
40
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) song ‘To Cry About’, later covered by Hull band Everything But the Girl, which tells us much about the emotional weight wrapped up in that album. "Virgin said I wrote that about my boyfriend who died. I didn't. I wrote that song in August 1980, in the bath, when we were still together." When the song was played to her boyfriend, full of lyrics about loss and timed disasters, he said it was about him, but O’Hara didn't agree. A year later in 1981, the boyfriend drowned. "And then the lyrics were obviously about him, as if I'd seen it happening”. Legendary 1960s wall of sound record producer, and now prison inmate, Phil Spector once said that a record only needed three vital elements to be perfect: -‐ 1. It must be ridiculously repetitive 2. Have a primeval beat 3. Be about sex According to Spector’s metric this record is a fail on all three accounts. This probably says more about Spector’s chutzpah than it does about the music that we are considering here. Luckily there’s another set of much more appropriate metrics as proposed by ex-‐record producer and now academic Richard James Burgess, in his 1997 book, The Art of Record Production. According to Burgess there are eight elements that are needed in equal proportions to create the perfect pop record. The recipe is thus: -‐ 1. The song 2. The vocal 3. The arrangement 4. The performance 5. The engineering 6. The Mix 7. Timelessness 8. The Heart It’s quite possible that Dr Burgess is onto something here. It has to start with the song, a narrative, the story, an exposition that has a beginning, middle and end. You know when a song is strong because it can be sung with minimal or no instrumentation and still amaze the listener. Try this simple experiment with virtually any song written by Lennon/McCartney or Bob Dylan; it works. French philosopher Roland Barthes, as always, has much to say about the vocal or more accurately “the grain of the voice” in his 1977 book Image, Music Text. Every singer perfects his or her own chant, his or her own speed, rhythm, cadence, volume and grain of voice. "The Grain", says Roland Barthes (2010: p.181), "is that materiality of the body” the voice is the most misunderstood musical instrument on the planet. Very few singers
41
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) possess the grain and the majority posses no grain at all. Mary Margaret O’Hara is the personification of the grain of the voice. Arrangements on this album, which are credited to O’Hara, are intentionally sparse, comprising guitar, drums, bass with the occasional keyboards and violin. This is done on purpose to give as much space as possible for O’Hara’s swooping, diving, twisting vocals. Everything is rigidly ‘on grid’. The current mode of production via a digital audio workstation (DAW), allows for the manipulation of the music and to place it precisely on grid. This variant of hyperreality was 20 years ahead of its time; it simply just did not exist in 1988. This level of absolute millimetre precision came from spot on playing, hence its sparseness. If the playing were any more complex than it would be impossible, without DAW technology, to get it so perfectly on grid. If you listen to the album loud (I do) and on good speakers (I have) you can hear the click track bleeding through. The click track provides the rigid architectural skeleton on which this music is built upon. I’d go as far as to stay that Miss America was probably the last great structuralist album before the onset of post modernism; this theory is definitely up for discussion but not here. The performances by O’Hara and band are sublime and it’s virtually impossible to fault. One reason why this record is worthy of reconsideration is because it captures these virtually faultless performances forever. The metric I use to judge audio engineering excellence is if it’s transparent then its good. According to this metric the engineering on this album is beyond good because it’s totally invisible. The mix adheres to the holy trinity, as instilled into all mix engineers, of PLACE, SPACE and BASS. Without an expansive explanation the mix on this album is as good as it gets hitting all three markers. Is this record timeless? Well I’m writing about it almost 30 years after it was released. Does this record have heart? Indeed it has a giant beating heart full of passion and emotion. This record starts straightforwardly enough with ‘To Cry About’. O’Hara’s distinctive voice appears over super sparse ringing electric guitar and five-‐string bass. She sings passionately of love lost, "There will be a timed disaster. There's no you in my hereafter". This song sets the scene for the whole album; it’s practically an advertisement for her voice. When the drums kick in on track two’s ‘Year in Song’ it takes us to totally different unexpected territory. The drum sound on this track is pure 1980’s with super loud punchy kick drum, massive gated reverb snare, tom-‐ toms that sound like cannons exploding and zingy cymbals. O'Hara begins the song with recognizable, but somewhat cryptic, lyrics and around halfway through she starts to free-‐associate, or to play with the lyrics in a way that a poststructuralist poet would envy. I am not sure what she is getting at or is trying to work out in this
42
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) song; it’s an enigma. Indeed she sings, “What iss [sic] the aim eh?... joy?" Possibly the aim is finding and going with the groove, letting the sense of the song take care of itself or of just getting lost in the music. By the time she's barking about "ta-‐ta music" in lines too way difficult to decode without the printed lyrics, O'Hara seems to have created her own set of self-‐expressive language. O'Hara's songs twist logic, language, time and space to fit her own unique version of the world. It's virtually impossible to know how much calculation went into these songs and performances; we just don’t know how much of the supposed spontaneity is planned or is organic. In ‘Body's in Trouble’, track three, the body is both an object and a person and it's also producing the sounds we are listening too. I’m sure Roland Barthes would love this album and especially this track. O'Hara is not explicit about the dilemma; she just pushes and pulls and plays around with the idea of forces at work. Meanwhile, the music rises, dips, bends, and breaks. Far more grounded is track four, ‘Dear Darling’, a country styled ballad that addresses the classic themes of devotion and longing. In conveying "A thing of such beauty" that "Must be called love," O’Hara proves that she’s the vocal and emotional equal of country legend Patsy Cline. By track five, she's morphed into a French chanteuse fronting an English Ska band on the bouncy, piano driven ‘A New Day’, which advises, “When your heart is sick with wonder at a long and lonely way walk in brightness 'cause it's a new day”. Sounding like the previous song's somber cousin, track five, ‘When You Know Why You're Happy’ is a slow vamp over which O'Hara meditates on knowingness and happiness. Next up is ‘My Friends Have’, which is propulsive, while ‘Help Me Lift You Up’ is its gentle flip side. ‘Keeping You in Mind’ transports us into slinky lounge-‐jazz, with a highly articulate and emotional violin solo. Then unexpectedly and from an entirely different universe comes the off-‐kilter but funky workout of ‘Not Be Alright’. This is the only track on the whole album that makes use of a synthesizer, a Yamaha DX7, which was known for the precision and flexibility of its bright, digital sounds. The lyrics of this track are insightful e.g. fourth verse, "My tail, this tail, this tail is tall. This tale is tall. Innocent to a fault." O'Hara makes it perfectly, inarguably clear that some unnamed situation will not “Just will not be alright”. Sometimes things do go wrong and everything does turn to shit and there’s absolutely nothing we can do about it. In the last track, a solitary bass accompanies her, while she offers us (or possibly herself?) the assurance that "You will be loved again" a truly beautiful sentiment on which to close the album. Miss America is not an easy listen by any means but like most difficult journeys in life the destination is worth it. I once worked in the same London building as O’Hara’s European booking agent, Boswell, who introduced me to her music and I’m forever indebted. My first encounter with O’Hara was one evening as I was finishing work when Boswell burst 43
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) into my office and skinned up a huge ‘Camberwell Carrot’ of a joint and tossed a CD of Miss America onto my desk. While we smoked the joint together he pitched his agent’s spiel at me as though I was another gullible promoter and he persuaded me to accompany him to O’Hara’s first London show. I’m not completely sure what happened during the 20 minutes it took us to get from our offices in Islington to the Town and Country Club venue in Kentish Town but something metaphysical definitely happened. We walked into the auditorium just as the second track off the album ‘The Year In Song’ kicked in. At the precise second that I first set my eyes and ears on O’Hara the tetrahydrocannabinol flooded my body and overpowered my senses. The sheer power and pure emotion that this alabaster skinned, curly red haired siren with bright red lipstick was emitting was un-‐opposable. This dangerous beautiful creature had used her enchanting voice and music to lure Boswell and I onto the rocks. Like two shipwrecked sailors we were helpless and couldn’t fight her immense siren like powers. It was a full frontal 100% attack on all of our senses; it was an out-‐of-‐body catharsis experience. On this occasion Boswell had not sold this artist short, it was totally incredible and it’s a memory that I shall forever cherish. Virgin Records dropped O’Hara after the release of Miss America, partly due to poor sales and partly because they considered her material not commercial enough. Miss America is an incredible piece of work from an artist that shone incredibly brightly but only for a few brief minutes. Maybe she was just too creative? She wrote, performed, arranged, produced, mixed and even painted the album’s artwork. She sounds like a female harbinger of Jeff Buckley; you can fully understand why she enthralled Morrissey and Michael Stipe. This is a record that everyone who truly loves music should own; it has great melodies, twisted vocals, outstanding performance, and virtuoso musicianship and in CD format it’s a sonically near perfect audio artefact. Mary Margaret O’Hara once described herself as, “an ancient baby whose cranium never quite fused together”. Chapeau! References Barthes, R 2010, The Grain Of The Voice Interview 1962 -‐ 1980, Vintage Books, London. Burgess, R 1997, The Art Of Record Production, Omnibus, London. Frith, S & Horne, H 1988, Art Into Pop, Methuen, London.
44
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘Wonderland’ Erasure By Professor Lisa Gotto It's the mid-‐eighties. I am ten years old and my teenage sister plays a song over and over; a mysterious, miraculous song that catches me instantly by its sheer beauty. Since she is the mature teenager and I am the baby sister, I’m not allowed in her room of course. So I cower in front of her door, waiting for that wonderful voice to sing and talk to me in a language I don’t know but understand right away. Melancholic that voice seems to me, soft and sad. No doubt what makes the singer so miserable: Olamu. This person, this Olamu, must have caused his bitter-‐sweet pain, I figure. I am sorry for his desolation, still I can’t wait to hear him sing of Olamu again and again. And then, when I am absolutely sure that nobody can see me, I begin to dance: slowly and hesitantly, swaying to the rhythm, more confident with every step. The tale of Olamu, its sound and feel, has set me in motion. "Pop is physical, sensual, of the body rather than the mind, and in some ways it is anti-‐ intellectual; let yourself go, don't think – feel", writes Hanif Kureshi (1995: p.19). In this enchanted moment, I purely sense the heart of the matter. I have experienced something special: my entrance into wonderland. Wonderland, Erasure's debut album was a miserable flop in 1986. ‘Oh l'Amour’, my magical song, turned out to be the third consecutive commercial failure for the band. Just like the two preceding single releases, ‘Who Needs Love Like That’ and ‘Heavenly Action’. These songs didn't crack the Top 50 in the UK, nor the Billboard Hot 100. In fact, ‘Oh l'Amour’ only reached number 85 in the UK single charts (but fared better in Germany, where it was a Top 20 success). Considering the album's disappointing chart performance, it seemed clear that this new pop duo was not supposed to have a bright future. However, Wonderland hinted at what would become central to Erasure's appeal. As a sparkling collection of catchy and soulful pop tunes, seemingly simple at first hearing, but increasingly fascinating because of their profound craftiness, Wonderland formed the nucleus of the band's gorgeous, glorious, and glamorous pop career. When Vince Clarke and Andy Bell met in 1985, their musical pasts and paths could not have been more different. Clarke had been the founding member of two paramount new wave bands and was an experienced and successful electro pop song writer. Starting with Depeche Mode, Clarke was the sole writer of their first three singles, including the breakthrough Top 10 hit ‘Just Can't Get Enough’. After leaving the band in late 1981, Clarke built an equally prominent career by forming
45
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) the duo Yazoo with Alison Moyet. Both albums, 1982’s Upstairs at Eric’s and 1983’s You and Me Both, are regarded as new wave essentials, and their hit ‘Don’t Go’ became an electro pop classic. A succeeding short-‐lived project, The Assembly, with producer Eric Radcliffe initiated a UK number four hit single, ‘Never Never’, featuring Feargal Sharkey on vocals. As an electro master-‐mind, Vince Clarke had created a whole range of synth pop hymns, all of them vibrant and vital even in today’s standards. Concurrently, Andy Bell had just begun to take his first musical steps. While selling women's shoes in Debenhams and performing in a band called The Void, Bell’s first attempt to pursue a musical career was not promising. Fameless and nameless as he was, Bell responded to an advertisement in Melody Maker looking for a vocalist to take part in a new musical project. He auditioned. Clarke was searching for the perfect pop beat and pop group, and selected Bell to be his musical other half. His choice wasn’t instantly applauded. When Wonderland was released, some critics felt that there was no artistic progression from Clarke's past, finding fault with Bell's too shrill vocals and rejecting him as a bad copy of Alison Moyet. Others were appalled by the songs' lyrics, finding them flat or banal and bemoaning a missing concept. Still others would hint at Bell's effeminate dancing style, which, in their view, lacked any sense of coolness or confidence. In a certain sense, the critics were right. Erasure is all about imitation, surface and artifice, about exaggeration and exaltation – deliberately so. Wonderland refuses any subtleties and intricacies; its tracks are either chirpy tunes (‘March Down The Line’, ‘Say What’, ‘Heavenly Action’) or overloaded tear jerkers (‘Cry So Easy’, ‘Reunion’, ‘My Heart… So Blue’) – no deep philosophy intended. The chorus of ‘Senseless’, a wonderfully self-‐referential song, expresses this state of being as, "It's alright to feel the mood/ it's alright, so good, so far/ Babe it's alright". Does it make any sense? Probably not. Does it have to make any sense? Definitely not. Seen in this way, all that Wonderland comes to stand for, its plastic pop sounds, its simplistic dance rhythms and electronic beats, its ebullient melodies, its corny cover art work, its bubble gum synth pop pleasure, are not deep flaws but a statement. Wonderland is the champ of camp. In her famous Notes on Camp, Susan Sontag (1964) defines the term as, "a certain mode of aestheticism. It is one way of seeing the world as an aesthetic phenomenon. That way, the way of camp, is not in terms of beauty, but in terms of the degree of artifice, of stylization." Camp, according to Sontag (1964), is characterized by audacious extravagance and ostentatious theatricality. Its quality as a form, style or expression lies in its capacity to ironically
46
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) comment on any notion of normality, parodying it through an aesthetic sensibility that inverts the relation of surface to depth. While Sontag (1964) developed her observations in the mid-‐sixties, Erasure's stance to camp is inextricably linked with the pop cultural media universe of the mid-‐ eighties. This can be seen most clearly in the band's music videos. Not until the age of cable and satellite and, notably, the emergence of MTV, did video evolve as a significant pop cultural form? Erasure's first music videos demonstrate a specific pleasure for this new kind of visual aesthetics, bringing together a whole range of audio-‐visual styles and modes of performance by drawing on drag and dance, televisual imagery and commercial superficiality. The music video for the debut single ‘Who Needs Love Like That?’ takes place in a mock western setting featuring Clarke and Bell in dual roles: both of them are dressed as cowboys but appear in woman's drag as well. In what looks like a garish mixture of B-‐movie location and cartoon-‐like situation, everything we perceive is a masquerade that is in excess of itself. This overplay of style also informs Erasure's second music video ‘Heavenly Action’, an outrageous science fiction parody complete with a toy-‐like spaceship, gaudy space flying suits, fantastic landscapes of planet cupid, and a bunch of child actors appearing as pink putti. Using the western and the science fiction genre as entry points, both videos revolve around a playful exposition of the fabrication of spectacle, which then becomes a self-‐conscious spectacle in its own right. The most interesting and self-‐reflexive of Wonderland's videos is ‘Oh l'Amour’. Not as flashy and flamboyant as the former clips, this video concentrates on a studio performance of Erasure, featuring not only musicians Clarke and Bell but also what lies at the heart of their synth pop endeavour, i.e. computerized sounds and aesthetics. The lead part is played by the BBC Micro, a computer system which Clarke used to compose ‘Oh l'Amour’, featuring prominently in the video to provide the song's text and graphics. The video begins with a computer screen displaying the UMI music sequencer, ready to play the music we are about to hear. In what follows, a pixelated font delivers not only the song's lyrics but also command lines of the computer program itself, resulting in a kind of hybrid poetry of sound and system. Further, the digital elements that were confined to the screen in the beginning spread through the studio's scenery as the video progresses. Bit by bit and byte by byte, the computer code seems to emancipate itself from its purely functional destination, dancing around the band or waving like a digital curtain in the background. The video lays bare the ways in which configurations of technology, music text and context take shape in specific arrangements. Programmability and pre-‐fabricated sounds are not presented as cold machinery lacking emotion and
47
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) melody but appear in perfect harmony with Bell's vocals and movements as well as with Erasure's overall sensations and sentiments. At the end of the piece, a blinking cursor erases the refrain's line ‘Oh l'Amour’ to replace it with ‘What Now?’ articulating a moment of hesitancy, an instant of tentativeness when a formation is still groping with its own limitations. What now, in 1986? A new pop duo demonstrates a specific kind of innovative strength; enabling novel developments both within synth pop sound culture and the music video form. It wouldn’t take long until Erasure's energy poured over the airwaves right into their fans' hearts; including that of a ten-‐year old girl stepping into wonderland. References Kureishi, H 1995, ‘That’s how good it was’ in The Faber Book of Pop, eds H. Kureishi and J. Savage, Faber and Faber, London, UK, p. 19. Sontag, S 1964, Notes on Camp. Available from: . [25 August 2015].
48
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘Bright Phoebus’ Lal & Mike Waterson By Tim Dalton My hometown of Hull, or more correctly Kingston upon Hull, is set become the UK City of Culture in 2017. Let the jokes, irony and underhand jibes fly, but this is not as daft as it first appears. In the forward to the book A Rumored City: new poets from Hull, Philip Larkin (1982) famously described Hull as, “a city that is in the world yet sufficiently on the edge of it to have a different resonance”. Hull is a liminal city and I’ve always adored liminal places, places on the edge, places that survive in the in-‐ between spaces. Creativity has a knack of finding a foothold in these dubious crevices. These unusual places, often deprived of the usual mainstream cultural influences, produce some of the most creative pieces of work. More often than not these pieces of great art go unnoticed, unappreciated, unloved and often sink without a trace. Hull is one of those places, as was Berlin during the Cold War. My brother Nick coined the phrase, “If you can make it in Hull, you can make it anywhere”. It's a fantastic sentiment that points towards the fact that Hull people are resourceful, resilient and tenacious folk. I left Hull many years ago to pursue a backstage career in rock ‘n’ roll music that took me around the world a number of times. But don’t mistake this for an act of hatred of the city and its surroundings it’s definitely not. Growing up in Hull during the 1970s and 80s was a unique experience and I would not have swapped the geographical location for anywhere else on the planet. Growing up in Hull was a fantastic experience, which forged me into the person I am today. I grew up in a creative, left wing bohemian household in Hull’s northern suburbs. My parents weekly frequented Hull’s folk clubs on their bicycles, mainly the ones held at city center pubs such as The Rugby and The Blue Bell. My earliest memories are of a home filled with strange but beautiful music. While my school friends argued their case for bands like Mud, Showaddywaddy, David Essex and Alvin Stardust in the playground I was left contemplating Bob Dylan, The Albion Band, Martin Carthy, Bob Davenport and The Watersons. I didn’t realise it at the time but I am now eternally thankful to my parents for this offbeat, off-‐kilter unique and unorthodox musical education. A stand out from this era was the Hull band The Watersons, comprising of siblings Mike Waterson, Lal Waterson, Norma Waterson and their cousin John Harrison. Their stark, unaccompanied closely woven traditional harmonies of their first album Frost and Fire (1965) could be heard regularly playing in the Dalton’s Strathmore Avenue household. Their greatness was nationally recognized when the weekly
49
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) music paper Melody Maker awarded it their Album of the Year, a rarity for a debut ‘folk’ album. A year later they followed this debut up with their second release A Yorkshire Garland, an album that contains the wonderful song ‘Willy Went To Westerdale’. I remember singing this song on a cycling holiday in the North Yorkshire Moors and staying at a Youth Hostel in Westerdale. On the back of these two records, The Watersons toured the UK folk club circuit. In 1968, The Watersons split up, when Norma went to work as a disc jockey for a radio station on Montserrat. My exposure to The Watersons went further than records. My parents were friends, drinking buddies and sometimes employers of the band, not as musicians but as trade’s people. Despite their critical success, The Watersons, and Mike in particular, had to carry on working their ‘day jobs’. Mike was a painter, decorator and builder by trade, a true ragged trousered philanthropist. I once came home from school to find Mike Waterson and my father inserting a second hand, reclaimed, wooden beam into the rear of the house to form an opening where a kitchen wall had once been. According to Mike, on a BBC Radio 4 interview, he was painting the inside of a bay window of a very large Victorian house in the ‘Avenues’ area of west Hull when the sunlight suddenly streamed through the windows “like a bright Phoebus”. This record isn’t a Watersons’ record, it’s Lal and Mike with a stella cast of musicians including Martin Carthy (guitar and vocals), Richard Thompson (guitar), Ashley ‘Tiger’ Hutchens (bass), Dave Mattacks (drums), Maddy Prior (vocals), Tim Heart (vocals and tambourine), Bob Davenport (vocals) and Norma Waterson (vocals). The inactivity of The Watersons allowed Lal and Mike the freedom to think outside of the box and break free of the Stalinist confines of traditional folk music. At the time this record was dismissed by folk's staunch traditionalist rearguard, which saw the record as going against the very ethos of the traditional folk scene. The album's opening Beatlesque track ‘Rubber Band’ shows that it's not all serious here. Mike's silly side is brought out, as experienced in one of the corniest lines ever written: "Just like margarine our fame is spreading". But don't be fooled, this isn't some throwaway number; it's as musically strong as any other composition on this record. ‘Winifer Odd’ (track four) tells the tale of an unlucky soul who is ultimately saved when she expects death to be imminent. It's a song that really highlights Lal's songwriting ability: "Winifer Odd Was born on one cold May morning in June, In her grandmother's bedroom, And they waited all that day for last May to come back again, But it never came".
50
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) Track two, ‘The Scarecrow’, is one of the greatest compositions of modern times. It’s only because the subject matter is so dark and scary that many artists haven’t covered this song. This song tells the tale of the poor neglected East Yorkshire scarecrow, who is witnessing the changing seasons. The song has always been renowned for its references to the dark rituals of old days, namely a child being sacrificed in return for a heavy crop yield: "As I rode out one fine spring day, I saw twelve jolly dons dressed out in the blue and the gold so gay; And to a stake they tied a child newborn, And the songs were sung, the bells was rung, and they sowed their corn". It’s possible that inspiration was taken from the beautiful Yorkshire Wolds fields and their long forgotten ghoulish secrets. At the end of the Napoleonic Wars many bushels of bones were landed at the Hull docks from the battlefields of Dresden and Waterloo. The bone mills of Hull converted these phosphate rich human remains into fertilizer, which was then spread over the Yorkshire Wolds’ green and pleasant fields. In 1822, The Observer noted that: “It is now ascertained beyond a doubt, by actual experiment on an extensive scale, that a dead soldier is a most valuable article of commerce; and, for aught known to the contrary, the good farmers of Yorkshire are, in a great measure, indebted to the bones of their children for their daily bread.” Not only did Lal and Mike push the boundaries with the writing, arrangements and performance of their material but also in its recording. During the late 1960’s the UK had the most technically advanced recording studios in the world with some of the best producers and engineers available. For some unknown reason Bright Phoebus was recorded at Cecil Sharp House, the home of the English Folk Dance & Song Society, in a makeshift studio with producer and record label owner Bill Leader. Strange that such a groundbreaking album would be recorded at an institution founded in strict historical tradition. This may be a groundbreaking album but it certainly did not make use of groundbreaking state of the art audio technology. The completed album is nothing short of a masterpiece, on a par with Sargent Peppers, Pet Sounds or Three Feet High and Rising. It nips in and out of styles, country, rock & roll, blues, jazz, folk, pop and even has its psychedelic moments on the wry ‘Magical Man’. It’s a record of many standouts, from the shear tortured beauty of ‘Child Among the Weeds’ to the rock & roll blues of ‘Danny Rose’ and the haunting ‘Fine Horseman’. There's the fabulous country twang to ‘Shady Lady’, a song that features the vocals of all three Waterson siblings plus the sublime intertwined guitar work of Richard Thompson and Martin Carthy. The sorrowful story of a drunken Lal falling down in the rain is recalled in the beautiful ‘Red Wine Promises’, which features the warm vocals of their sister Norma. This is an absolutely awesome, gob-‐smacker of a record.
51
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
It's hard to imagine why this record received such a poor reception upon its release back in September 1972. Lal and Mike, and all involved in the album, believed that this record would be a huge success, the album they'd all one day be remembered for. However, due to the record's poor reception in the media, the album would end up failing to break even. Only 1,000 copies were ever pressed and a good number of these were pressed off centre making these copies ‘warble’. Due to the tightness of finances, the off centre records made it into the record shops and are now a much prized collectors item. In fact, due to the particulars of the contract, none of the artists on the album made any money from this venture and pretty soon the album slipped into obscurity. But things were to get worse. This album was very much a victim of being of its time and by its release, that time had passed. Mainstream interest in folk music dropped off in the mid 1970s and with Trailer Record’s owner Bill Leader struggling to make ends meet he was forced to sell the rights to Bright Phoebus, as well as other records on his label. The rights were eventually sold on again and ended up in the hands of the record's original distributor Dave Bulmer. In an age of postmodern revisionism why hasn’t this record received the update it so rightly deserves? An inferior CD version was re-‐issued in 2000, but this was cut from a vinyl album recording complete with crackle and pop. This record is similar to a Dutch master painting by Pieter Bruegel, albeit a long forgotten badly damaged one in an obscure gallery covered in soot and grime. Maybe Hull, the 2017 UK City of Culture, can direct some of its cultural budget towards rescuing this record and restore it to its rightful place? Late in life Mike Waterson gave clues that he knew where the master tape to Bright Phoebus was, and that he would like to see a re-‐ mastered version made available. Just in case I’ve not made myself 100% clear here, this record is a masterpiece that is in dire need of some audio restoration to return it to its original sonic condition. This is probably one of the greatest records you’ve never heard, and it comes from my hometown of Hull, and I’m immensely proud of it.
52
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘Out Of Mind Out Of Sight’ Models By Nick Wilson Amongst serious rock and pop fans, the phenomenon of a band ‘selling out’ attracts particular scorn. Music fans are still debating the point when commercial success led their favourite bands over the tipping point into artistic decline decades after the artists have entered retirement. If any artists attracted more than their fair share of derision for crimes against artistic credibility, it was the generation of bands who emerged from the post-‐punk scene of the late 1970s. Simple Minds, Public Image Ltd and The Cure are among many which spring to mind as bands that left their most dedicated fans feeling angry, disappointed and betrayed. Prior to the late 1960s, nobody had heard of ‘selling out’ in popular music. By definition, popular music was intended for a mass audience. The artistry of practitioners such as the Motown stable or The Beatles was akin to that of skilled craftsmen, fashioning a product of the highest quality that was nevertheless intended for mass consumption. If we fast-‐forward to the present day, Gen-‐Y seems to have a relatively relaxed attitude to the artistic credibility of today’s musical artists. Yes, there are sub-‐ cultures that embrace manifestations of the uncommercial. But, it is hard to be angry at those who seek to make a commercial living in music given that everyone knows the recording industry’s rivers of cash have dried up and anyone who can work out a way to make a living deserves some kudos. In the mid-‐to-‐late 1960s the concept of artistry, as something distinct from the craft of commercial songwriting, began entering the modern pop landscape. Songwriters such as Brian Wilson, John Lennon and Paul McCartney expanded their harmonic and sonic vocabulary, exploring such areas as the classical avant-‐garde and the studio as an instrument. Their work remained pop but it came wrapped in layers of complexity. Musical virtuosos such as Jimi Hendrix and Eric Clapton expanded the possibilities of rock musicianship and drew inspiration from musical styles of a more authentic era where blues hadn’t been corrupted by rock’n’roll. In the meantime, a new generation of rock musicians were studying at Britain’s tertiary art schools, bringing their conceptual training to new musical projects that aimed to elevate rock music beyond straight entertainment, with artists such as The Who, Roxy Music and Pink Floyd springing to mind here.
53
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) The punk revolution of the mid to late 1970s was explicitly anti-‐establishment, even while many of its practitioners had notable success in the mainstream charts, as major labels desperately searched for punk bands to sign. However, the bands whose stance was most avowedly anti-‐authoritarian, notably The Clash and the Sex Pistols, had difficulty treading the fine line between finding an audience and being accused of betraying the principles they were seen to stand for. As the 1970s drew to a close, many of its artists had become tired of punk’s three-‐ chord barrage rock template and were searching for new colours in their pallet. Thus was born ‘post-‐punk’ where punk musicians variously embraced reggae, disco, world music, krautrock, synthesizers or sonic experimentation generally. In some ways the post-‐punk generation started to resemble the prog-‐rock artists they’d professed to despise in attempting to invest rock with seriousness and uncompromising artistic intent. However, the difference here was that the post-‐punk generation was generally hostile to mainstream success and largely kept their work free of wanton displays of virtuosity. This combination of punk’s anti-‐establishment attitude with post-‐punk’s embrace of avante-‐garde sonics and rejection of traditional musical values meant that any artist seen to betray these principles would pay a heavy price when subjected to critical scrutiny. Nevertheless, this is exactly what happened to many of the era’s leading artists as the 1980s rolled around and post-‐punk morphed into new wave. Some accidentally acquired a latent pop sensibility or found that mass taste had somehow taken a liking for these new sounds. This was fine while the artists still retained their idiosyncratic charms and quirkiness, however, it wasn’t long before this started to wane. Changes in technology lead to a homogenisation of modern pop production as digital synthesizers took over the studios. Many artists developed an inclination for classic rock styles as they developed fears for the longevity of their songwriting oeuvre. The mainstream music industry was waiting, as always, to commodify any new style and round off its rough edges for mass consumption. So when James Freud, bass player for the Models, who had recently taken over lead vocal duties for two huge cross-‐over hits for the band, was spat on in a Canberra nightclub, it summarised the views of critics and long-‐time fans who found their latest work wanting when held up against the anti-‐commercial ideals of punk and the avant-‐ garde leanings of post-‐punk. The Models have been relegated to something of a historical footnote to many when looking back at the generation of bands who emerged from Melbourne’s post-‐punk scene of the late 1970s. Lacking the Bohemian cred of Nick Cave’s Berlin contingent or the rock gravitas of Hunters and Collectors, their shows today don’t quite attract
54
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) the same interest. Yet during the 1980s the Models were regarded as one of Australia’s most interesting new wave acts for whom international stardom surely beckoned. Three of their albums are contenders as Australian classics of their era, all for quite different reasons, and are surely due for re-‐evaluation. Local And/Or General, released in 1982, is a perfect amalgam of post-‐punk experimentation and new wave pop sensibility, pulling off an idiosyncratic antipodean anything-‐goes attitude in a pop art context. Follow-‐up The Pleasure of Your Company, released in 1983, upped both the sonic experimentation and pop sensibility, leading to the band’s first taste of commercial success while leaving rough edges intact. An added funk edge and percussive dimension courtesy of a new rhythm section and the contribution of producer Nick Launay propelled them firmly into the new wave era. This brings us to the Model’s follow-‐up release, Out Of Mind Out of Sight, released in 1985. Despised by the band’s long-‐time fan base, this release nevertheless was their biggest commercial success, propelling them to number #3 on the Australian pop charts. It gave them a number #2 hit single with ‘Barbados’ and a number #1 hit with the title track, which also made it into the US top-‐40 and, at the time, seemed a harbinger of imminent international stardom, particularly as it coincided with the band being taken on by INXS manager, Chris Murphy. The first track to be heard from what would become the Out of Mind Out of Sight album was the single ‘Big On Love’, released in late 1984, eight months before the actual album emerged. This track was recorded by the band in the same line-‐up as heard on the previous Pleasure of Your Company album, so in some ways, this song belongs more properly to the band’s earlier era. The prominent driving synthesizers of long-‐time band member Andrew Duffield located the track’s sound in their new wave lineage and avoided a critical or fan backlash. However, several factors pointed to a more commercial direction. The driving guitar power chords provided some pub-‐rock grit and the lyrics were more direct than Sean Kelly’s usual surrealist style. The real pointer towards a desire to make a mark on the pop scene was the recruitment of American producer Reggie Lucas. Fresh from success in producing Madonna’s debut album, Lucas reportedly demanded, “do you guys wanna be on MTV or what?” whenever any arguments over creative direction arose in the studio throughout the sessions. Lucas even insisted on usurping Kelly’s guitar-‐playing duties to give the song its rockier edge (Wallen 2013). The track was a modest commercial success, however Lucas didn’t continue his involvement with the album. If any song on Out of Mind Out of Sight deserves to be criticised as a sell-‐out it is this one, however, the backlash was yet to arrive.
55
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) Shortly after ‘Big on Love’ was released, long-‐time keyboard player Andrew Duffield was forced out of the band, with differences of opinion over artistic direction, disagreements with the new management and an unwillingness to relocate the band to Sydney all contributing to his departure. What is clear is that Duffield’s synthesizer playing and artistic input were major contributing elements to the Models’ sound over most of the band’s history. Duffield’s style can perhaps be summarised as sitting somewhere between 1970s-‐era Eno and Dave Greenfield from The Stranglers. Not only was his departure seen as a marker of changes in attitude, Out of Mind Out of Sight was destined to sound like a completely different Models album without him. The next critical figure in the outcome of Out of Mind Out of Sight was James Freud, a divisive figure in Melbourne’s post-‐punk scene history and easily mocked, both for the failure of his post-‐Models solo career and the somewhat naive image projected in his two published memoirs. Nevertheless, Freud is significant to Australia’s music history throughout this period and exhibits many of the best traits of the still-‐lauded ‘punk attitude’. He was the first musician to emerge out of Australia’s punk/post-‐ punk scene as a fully-‐fledged pop star, his first hit being the top-‐20 single ‘Modern Girl’ in 1980, several years prior to him joining the Models. In this regard he can be paralleled to overseas figures such as the UK’s Gary Numan (with whom he formed a close but short-‐lived creative partnership) or Ric Ocasek in the US, both of whom were successful in channelling their post-‐punk backgrounds into commercially accessible formats and were harbingers of the new wave sound. More than anyone else, Freud is derided by old-‐time Models fans as being responsible for the abandonment of their avante-‐garde roots and the embrace of a commercial pop direction. Following the success of this first solo album and the ‘Modern Girl’ single, Freud joined a Melbourne post-‐punk exodus to London, however subsequent work with Gary Numan failed to produce a follow-‐up. Returning to Australia, with his pop career seemingly over, Freud was keen to hook up once again with Sean Kelly (with whom he had played in an early proto-‐Models line-‐up in the late 1970s), inspired by hearing the Models’ recently released second album Local And/Or General. Given the instability in Models line-‐ups, Freud was reportedly determined to see if he could find a role in the band and reconnect with music without the pressure of being a popstar. As it happened, long-‐time bass player Mark Ferrie had recently left the band giving Freud an opening to join the line-‐up on this instrument. In this way Freud follows an unusual trajectory. Initially using post-‐punk as a vehicle to advance commercial pop ambitions in a manner that suggests opportunism over core artistic
56
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) ideals, Freud now seemingly turns his back on a pop frontman career, embracing the punk ideal that anyone could do anything so long as they had the chutzpah. Despite initial suspicion, Freud seemingly won over Models fans as the new line-‐up hit its stride. Freud’s bass playing, while by no means virtuosic, was impressive in a post-‐punk funk-‐driven sense, sitting strongly in the mix in the same manner as UK acts such as Gang of Four or local scene colleagues Hunters and Collectors. His contribution then received the requisite critical seal of approval when he made it into ‘Best Bass Player’ listings in the annual reader’s poll in RAM magazine (then Aussie equivalent of NME). However, Freud clearly had leanings as a pop frontman that were never going to lie dormant forever. When second single from Out of Mind Out of Sight ‘Barbados’ was released with Freud on vocals, old-‐time Models fans had their worst fears realised. Freud had seemingly mounted a coup, hijacking lead vocal duties, implementing a mainstream pop direction and ousting long-‐time keyboard player Andrew Duffield. It seemed to have been forgotten that Freud had already sung lead vocals on The Pleasure of Your Company’s ‘Facing the North Pole in August’, and that Duffield had in fact written the music to ‘Barbados’ as his last contribution to the band. ‘Barbados’ went straight to number #2 on the charts (only held off number #1 by ‘We Are the World’). And although Freud’s move to lead vocals on half of the album’s tracks is a significant change, he is by no means the only contributor critical to the band’s new direction. The change in sound heard on ‘Barbados’ was striking when compared to the Models’ earlier work. The clattering electronic percussion and insistent synth parts had been stripped right out, leaving a warm, open and inviting clarity that allowed melody, lyrics and emotion to come to the fore. The melody was catchy in a jingle-‐ like way yet retained a melancholy quality that subtly undermined its earworm attributes. And the sax solo following the second chorus gave it a level of confidence and sophistication that signposted a move beyond the world of underground-‐cred. This was a song that was going to lodge itself in mainstream Australian cultural consciousness. The sax solo in 1980s rock and pop has been rightly maligned as a cultural artefact, too often sprucing up second-‐rate songs with faux-‐sophistication and imparting an extra layer of schmaltz, as we can hear, for example, in tracks by INXS or Spandau Ballet. The recruitment of sax player James Valentine to the Models line-‐up signposts a point in 1980s music history where new wave acts began searching for markers of authenticity and credible musicianship. The post-‐punk movement was notable for
57
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) sonic experimentation and avant-‐garde aesthetics. Perhaps subliminally fearing that these aspects would date their work and that their lack of virtuosity as musicians was starting to show, many artists began searching for ways to adopt what they suspected were more enduring musical values: songwriting, musicianship and roots music styles. Valentine, however, had an advantage over many of his sax-‐playing rock peers – he actually had solid jazz chops and could impart those values with conviction. Apart from his contribution to ‘Barbados’, Valentine can be heard to great effect in tracks on Out of Mind Out of Sight such as ‘These Blues’ and ‘Stormy Tonight’ where his intonation, phrasing and improvisational ability shine. Sean Kelly also shines in this looser version of the Models, as roots music influences infiltrate both his singing and guitar playing. In ‘Ringing Like a Bell’ and ‘Seeing is Believing’ he breaks out of structured lyrics into R’n’B-‐flavoured improvised vocalisations, screaming and yelping with abandon. His guitar playing also loosened up, with ‘Sooner in Heaven’ being a case in point with its country flavour. Kelly’s guitar style had always had a latent twang however unlike on previous releases it was now no longer boxed in by metronomic new wave rhythms. The roots-‐driven element in the Models style that emerged on Out of Mind Out of Sight had been hinted at in their earlier work but remained submerged behind the surrealistic lyrical delivery and avant-‐garde sonics. For example, listen to the Pleasure of Your Company’s bluesy closer ‘A Rainy Day’ or their cover of ‘Telstar’ on Local and/or General. What is also striking about Out of Mind Out of Sight compared to the Models previous work is how little synthesizers are contributing to the music. There are subtle touches here and there from new recruit Roger Mason, but primarily this is an album driven by guitars, drums and brass. It is also strange in retrospect that the Models were criticised for going pop on Out of Mind Out of Sight as they had always had strong pop leanings, certainly more so than po-‐faced contemporaries like Nick Cave. For example, listen to ‘Atlantic Romantic’ from the Cut Lunch mini-‐album for a blast of post-‐punk pop. Of course, Out of Mind Out of Sight can’t be discussed without mentioning the title track. Rarely does a song come along brimming with so much confidence, the band saying they knew as soon as it was recorded that it would go straight to number one. More than any other song in this collection, it was despised by the Models’ old fanbase, however, its glam rock energy, with its exuberant blasts of saxophone underpinned by Barton Price’s powerhouse drumming, were irresistible to a far
58
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) larger audience, giving it not just the number #1 spot in the Australian charts but a respectable appearance in the US top 40. Follow-‐up single ‘Cold Fever’ didn’t quite provide the album with its fourth hit. The groove was a little too understated, the vibe darker and sleazier compared to the previous two singles. Yet imagine the Rolling Stones recording this song and it seems unfair that it didn’t make a bigger mark on the charts. The fifth and final single from the album, ‘King of Kings’, saw Sean Kelly give the most restrained yet haunting vocal performance of his career. This became the song from the album that the older fans didn’t object to, the exception that proves the rule, its melancholic and atmospheric qualities counter-‐balancing the glam pop of the title track. So where does Out of Mind Out of Sight sit in the pantheon of Australian 1980s pop? We can look at overseas artists who shifted from synth-‐driven new wave styles into more ‘authentic’ rock styles, such as Eurythmics with their Be Yourself Tonight behemoth. In comparison Models here seem far less self-‐conscious or contrived, and certainly not as over-‐produced. What comes across here instead is the enthusiasm to try out new ways of working, to follow musical instincts, to experiment with new styles and to see where they lead. In its own way isn’t this is in accordance with the spirit of punk and post-‐punk, to explore music with an ‘anything goes’ attitude? Does Out of Mind Out of Sight deserve to be lambasted as a sell-‐out by a hitherto credible band? I would argue that it is a vibrant and imaginative album full of the excitement of playing roots music and bringing these elements into a pop framework. It is historically situated in the trajectory of the post-‐punk generation of musical artists who by the mid-‐80s were searching for new pathways to carry them forward. You may mainly hear these songs today played on classic hits radio or as background while shopping in the supermarket. However, I’d urge you to listen to the whole album at loud volume and enjoy Australian 1980s pop at its best. References Wallen, D 2013, Icons: Models. Mess and Noise. Available from: . [15 July 2015]
59
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘Homosapien’ Pete Shelley By Tim Dalton I was born in 1962 in the city of Hull, or to give it its full name, Kingston upon Hull, which is located in East Yorkshire in the north east of the UK. The city of Hull sits on a vast flat barren clay wilderness called the Plain of Holderness. This Plain was one huge marsh up until 1240 when the Dominican monks established a Friary in the market town of Beverley. From across the North Sea, these Dominican monks brought in the Dutch to drain this large swathe of land to make it habitable and suitable for farming. To this day you can still see the ditches and dykes built by the Dutch to drain this great plain. Easily sourced fresh and clean water filtered through the chalk of the Yorkshire Wolds also made this area desirable for habitation. I can’t prove my theory but it’s my contention that something was added to this water during the late 1970s and 1980s. The result was a noticeable, unprecedented outbreak of artistic and musical creativity in Hull during this period the likes of which have not be seen since. Whatever was in the water during this period was obviously good stuff and did the trick. From the mid 1970s through to the late 1980s, Hull, and in particular the Polar Bear pub, seemed to attract artists and musicians from all corners of the UK. The Polar Bear pub was on a road called Spring Bank so called because this road followed the course of the original conduit that brought fresh water from the Yorkshire Wolds’ springs into the city. One person I casually befriended during 1981/2 was art student Philip Diggle from Manchester, who was studying fine art at Hull College of Art and Design. At the time, Philip was a poor starving eccentric artist (he still is) who told me one night, after way too many beers in the Polar Bear pub, “I’m drawn to action painting and I’m going to make it my vocation”. Back then this Victorian pub had a long public bar, a lounge and a very strange liminal space referred to as “the café bar”. This was a small wood paneled room that held approximately 20 odd people and was wedged between the bar and lounge. This was the city’s only arty bohemian safe spot and every night of the week it was filled with poor starving artists and musicians such as Roland Gift, Eric Golden aka Wreckless Eric, Lili-‐Marlene Premilovich who would later morph into Lene Lovich, her lover and musical partner Les Chappell and just about every other local indie band, would be record producer, fine artist, architect and other assorted creative wannabes. It was here that I made the connection that Philip Diggle was in fact the younger brother of Buzzcocks rock God guitarist Steve Diggle.
60
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) A few years earlier, I’d seen the Buzzcocks play a couple of times at the Wellington ‘Welly’ Club in Hull. Most punk bands at the time hailed from down south, specifically London. Buzzcocks were different as they came from Manchester, located a couple of hours away along the M62. Most southern punks bands that I saw live, more often than not at The ‘Welly’ club, were like peacocks e.g. lots of expensive bondage trousers, leather jackets with studs and other flamboyant touches. Bands from the north, and especially Manchester, dressed down; it was more second hand thrift shop punk as opposed to the highly stylized Vivienne Westwood/Malcolm McLaren look. The northern look was much more accessible. An Oxfam or second hand thrift stores allowed the poor working class of Hull to emulate this dressed down punk look. With their dressed down punk look, the Buzzcocks had the musical chops to match. Pete Shelley, the band’s lead singer, looked like the weedy kids at my school, the ones that got bullied and never got picked for the football team. His vocal style was quiet, limp, whiney, camp and often out of tune. It wasn’t the classic punk rock loud, proud, macho and shooty vocals you associate with this genre. Shelley was unique and he was certainly not a lead man in the classic punk rock mold like Johnny Rotten, Joe Strummer or Dave Vanian. Northerners like myself loved the Buzzcocks and Pete Shelley; we identified with them and claimed them as our own. Their 1977 Spiral Scratch EP was the first ever self-‐release punk record. It sounded fantastic and was 100% Punk Rock. Track one, side two; ‘Boredom’ was a call to arms. For me it was this record, not The Sex Pistols’ Anarchy In The UK, that signaled Punk Rock had arrived. This EP announced punk's rebellion against the status quo whilst also providing the strident musical minimalism template (the Steve Diggle guitar ‘solo’ consisting of only two notes but repeated 66 times!) that all future punk records would measure themselves against. Martin ‘Zero’ Hannett quickly recorded and mixed the music in a single day and it was perfectly insistently repetitive and energetic. Jon Savage states in England Dreaming (2001: 298) that this record was instrumental in helping establish the small record labels and scenes in both Manchester and Liverpool. Following on from this EP, the Buzzcocks released three fantastic albums; Another Music In A Different Kitchen in 1978, the superb Love Bites also in 1978 and A Different Kind of Tension in 1979. Martin Rushent expertly produced all three albums, none of which need rescuing here. For the traditional Buzzcock fans, Homosapien was a super-‐sad and disappointing event upon its release in 1981. French philosopher Jean-‐Paul Sartre maintained that the concepts of authenticity and individuality have to be earned but not learned. We need to experience "death consciousness" so as to wake up ourselves as to what is
61
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) really important; the authentic in our lives which is life experience, not knowledge. As he wrote in Being And Nothingness (1943: p.246), "We can act without being determined by our past which is always separated from us". Many artists reach this point in their careers; this is the moment when Pablo Picasso swaps expressionism for abstract cubism. Sartre would probably concur that Pete Shelley experienced his ‘death consciousness’ moment when he recorded this album. Homosapien is the moment Shelley and Rushent swap electric guitars for synthesizers; they are both acting without being determined by their collective and individual Buzzcock pasts. Much of the material contained on this album are songs that were originally intended for the Buzzcock’s fourth album. Some of the material on Homosapien even pre-‐dates the Buzzcocks and had been cryogenically stored for a number of years. This wasn’t Shelley’s first solo album as he had recorded, but not released, an album called Sky Yen way back in 1974. Some of this material was re-‐worked on Homosapien. The Buzzcocks had fully committed to recording a fourth album. It’s pure conjecture, but this album was probably set up to continue their intriguing, strange and powerful direction they had taken on their third 1979 album A Different Kind of Tension. Rehearsals for the fourth album were underway in Manchester when the record company (EMI/Fame) refused to advance the money needed to make the record. Tensions were running high, so producer Martin Rushent called a halt to rehearsals and returned to his newly built barn studio, Genetic, on his property near Reading in Berkshire. Shelley followed Rushent down to Berkshire and the two settled into Genetic studios with the intent of working on Buzzcock demos. This was no ‘home’ studio; technologically it was cutting edge and years ahead of its time. Rushent had predicted the future of record production, investing a considerable sum of money on audio equipment such as a Linn LM-‐1 Drum Computer, Roland MC-‐8 Microcomposer and a Roland Jupiter 8 keyboard with the intent of teaching himself the new art of music programming. Once Rushent had confirmed that ‘sequencing’ was the future of record production, he equipped his Genetic Studio with the very best and most expensive audio equipment. This included a MCI console, one of the first Mitsubishi Digital multi-‐track records, at an eye popping £75,000 ($153,000), a Synclavier and a Fairlight digital synthesizer, where most people would buy one or the other. Very quickly Shelley and Rushent fell in love with the sound of the ‘Linn Drum’ demos at the exact moment where mainstream electro-‐synth pop was just taking hold. Rushent used his studio as a research and development laboratory, perfecting his new way of producing records. Homosapien is the sound of one musician (Shelley), one record producer (Rushent) and lots of early, expensive computer
62
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) technology. Visionary Island Records’ A&R Executive, Andrew Lauder, heard the early demos and instantly offered Shelley a solo deal. Tired of the Buzzcock's near bankrupt financial state, Shelley abruptly disbanded the band via an insensitive lawyers' letter mailed to his band-‐mates. Virgin Records’ A&R Executive, Simon Draper, listened to the finished Homosapien album; he’d heard the future. Martin Rushent was instantly hired to produce the Human League’s 1981 hugely popular masterpiece album Dare. By the time Rushent set to work on Dare, he had perfected a new way of sequencing and programming synthesizer-‐based music. In this process, he had pioneered the technique of ‘sampling’, skills he first practiced on Homosapien. This, said Shelley, marked a departure from the baroque flourishes of the outdated progressive rock era: "Martin wasn't content that synthesizers produced weird noises; he did his best to use them to convey musical ideas. These days when you listen to music you don't even hear the synthesizers. That is due to Martin, who was at the vanguard of making electronics work for the music" (The Telegraph 2014). The Buzzcock fans' shock had barely dissipated from the unexpected news of the break up when Homosapien was released. A great number of Buzzcock fans were disappointed and disenchanted by what they perceived as Shelley jumping on to the Gary Numan synth-‐pop bandwagon. Shelley's lyrics remained just as cold, disjointed and disgruntled as they ever were on a Buzzcocks’ album, only now they're placed much more in the forefront of the soundstage instead of being just an afterthought. The album confirms that Shelley’s wry, witty, lovelorn pop songwriting ability was still perfectly intact. As you would deduce from the album’s title, this work is as narcissistic as anything that David Bowie could ever write, "Homosuperior in my interior"; it doesn’t get any more narcissistic than that. Despite the new method of computer-‐sequenced production, Rushent manages to retain the tight compressed, hard vocals of Shelley’s band work. The ten tracks on this album are magnificent, modernist abstract electronic works of art. The opening track and first single, Homosapien, was rejected by British radio due to the song’s apparent homosexual overtones, even though taken at face value, its controversial nature seems less evident. Regardless, it was a worldwide club hit, especially in gay clubs, and was the blueprint for many synth-‐pop dance tracks that followed. Tracks like the fabulous experimental ‘I Generate A Feeling’ and the relentless ‘I Don't Know What It Is’ are confirmation of this testament. If this album was a painting it could easily be one of Philip Diggle’s modernist pieces of abstract expressionism. The similarity between this album and Diggle’s paintings are very similar i.e. Diggle’s
63
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) paintings are complex 3-‐D abstractions, they go beyond texture, and some of them are inches thick as is Shelley’s music on this album. With the lack of mainstream radio play, and poor reviews, this album was largely unloved upon its release. The NME said that, "Homosapien is the first chance to examine the solo Shelley over the full range of interests and emotions but it is a disjointed album... the problem is the bulk of the raw material is too ineffectual, often embarrassing and half realised, to give the songs a focal point which binds, injects or drives them with the necessary conviction or resolution... It lacks energy, urgency and desperation, something to grab on to: the power to wake you or make you or shake you up. A shame because Shelley still has a lot to give” (NME 1981). When Homosapien was originally released, it pushed the technological envelop on all fronts. As a cassette, there were ten tracks on one side, while the other side was a computer code that could be loaded onto your Sinclair ZX Spectrum home computer. I often wonder how many people played the wrong side of the cassette on their HiFi system and heard the garbled cacophony of computer code, thinking this was the album? I bought the cassette version upon its release in January 1981, but could never get the computer graphics to work properly. My cassette version was quickly replaced by the sonically much superior CD version, which came out a few months later in June 1981. I would also suggest that this album suffered from some unwarranted homophobia. Pete Shelley was punk’s version of heavy metal band Judas Priest’s lead singer Rob Halford. When both artists came out, the press had a field day resulting in many fans deserting both artists; not that it made one iota of difference to the music. Judas Priest was still a kick-‐ass heavy metal band no matter the lead singer’s sexual preference. The one positive of Shelley’s ‘coming out’ was the attention Homosapien received by a totally new demographic that never heard of the Buzzcocks. As a stupendous club dance track, the single ‘Homosapien’, was a huge success in gay clubs around the world even if it didn’t generate high retail sales. In recent times, the genius of Philip Diggle’s modernist action paintings have been recognized by the American corporate business world who are buying his work as part of their investment portfolios. Diggle’s works can now be found hanging in the Rockefeller Centre and corporate headquarters of the Chase Manhattan Bank; both located in New York City. In many ways the Shelley/Rushent album Homosapien is similar to one of Diggle’s artworks. It can take thirty years or more for cutting edge works of art to be fully assimilated and accepted into the cultural landscape. This album was the work of two visionary artists who created a substantial work of art as
64
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) opposed to an ephemeral standardized pop record. This album is evidence of Darwin’s evolutionary theory at work. The name of the studio, ‘Genetic’ and the name of the album Homosapien are all not so coded semiotic clues as to how this album evolved from the punk rock of the Buzzcocks. Homosapien will forever be associated with the sexually charged gay scene, the smell of Amyl Nitrite and thumping bass of gay club dance floors. Too many homophobes made this album taboo and off limits. My suggestion is to get hold of the Homosapien CD, play it loud and just enjoy the fabulous music. References The Telegraph 2014, Rocks Back Pages. [24 June 2015] NME 1981, Rocks Back Pages. [24 June 2015].
65
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘Earth Vs. The Wildhearts’ The Wildhearts By Ian Hunter The early 90’s were a turbulent time. Just a few years after grunge turned the music scene on its head, so the sudden death of Kurt Cobain caused another seismic upheaval. With rock’s biggest bands still readjusting to this brave new world, and grunge’s superstars dazed and in mourning, rock badly needed an adrenaline shot. Into the vacuum poured a new breed of bands and none more talented volatile, or unhinged, as The Wildhearts. Offering a noisy alternative to the mainstream ‘Brit-‐ rock’ these disparate-‐sounding newcomers flawed both audiences and the music press with their first almighty sucker-‐punch. The bands auburn haired front man/guitarist, known to all as Ginger, for reasons too obvious to explain, had been promising to make his presence felt for a number of years. Latterly the hard living guitarist with UK Rod and the Faces, sound-‐alike’s, The Quireboys, Ginger’s lifestyle and belligerent personality had seen him fall out with the band’s new management, Sharon Osborne. Cast adrift, just as the Quireboys were about to break into the mainstream, and tour the world as support act for The Rolling Stones, it’s fair to say that the volatile man with the flame hair decided to view the situation as a call to arms, rather than the knife between the shoulder blades that it undoubtedly was. For months, the rumour mill turned with whispers of Gingers new band. Names were mentioned, line-‐ups confirmed, and still nothing happened. Then, just as the music press was about to consign all the speculation to the bin, rock radio came alive with the sound of Turning American, by The Wildhearts, and no one had expected it to sound as it did. To say that Turning American was a thinly veiled attack on Ginger’s previous band would be doing it an injustice. There was nothing veiled about it. ‘The smell of easy money and you’d follow it to death -‐ I can smell the shit upon your breath.’ As alluded to earlier, Ginger Wildheart had always found himself to be a Vegemite personality. People either loved him or hated him; and it is something that continues to this day. A belligerent, aggressive, and hugely unpredictable character, with a yo-‐ yo penchant for some of the darker indulgences of life, made being in a band with Ginger Wildheart as exciting as it was dangerous. However, right from day one of The Wildhearts, it was obvious that Ginger had a talent that the majority of his contemporaries could only weep into their Jack Daniels about.
66
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) After testing the waters with the EP’s, ‘Mondo Akimbo a Go-‐Go’, and ‘Don’t Be Happy, Just Worry’, the band’s line up finally stabilized with the release of Earth Vs. The Wildhearts. Even the album’s title betrayed Ginger’s worldview that he was always the outsider and fully prepared to fight his corner. Earth Vs. The Wildhearts hit the record stores on August 17 1993, and it had jaws hitting the pavement from the get-‐go. From the opening of ‘Greetings from Shitsville’, to the fade out of, ‘Love U til I don’t’, eleven songs later, it left the listener in no doubt that there was never any chance of a compromise. We can all think of albums we own that slowly welcome you into their world. As the more radio friendly and melodic tracks become that bit over familiar, you discover the layers and intricacies of the hidden gems. They invite you to enjoy your own journey of discovery, at your own pace and in your own way, but Earth Vs. The Wildhearts was an album with very different ideas about your listening pleasure. Like Malcolm McDowell in A Clockwork Orange, you felt as if you had been strapped to a gurney with your eyes and ears pinned back, and then psychologically assaulted by the kind of chorus melodies and hooks we generally consider to be the preserve of Lennon and McCartney, or the best of the mid sixties Motown stock writers. th
The UK’s New Musical Express (NME) reviewed it with the words; “Earth Vs. The Wildhearts is akin to being jumped by a gang of hells angels on your way home from the pub, and receiving the worst beating anyone would wish never to have; yet through the blood and exhaustion, you crawl away feeling utterly exhilarated and wanting it to happen again.” So what made this album what it was? Of course it has to start with the songs. In the twenty plus years since its release, Ginger Wildheart has continued to fuel the opinion that, somewhere in the Cayman Islands he has an offshore safety deposit box, full of killer chorus melodies and crunching guitar riffs that he can dip into whenever the mood takes him. Another defining factor is what a hybrid it is; a true Frankenstein of an album. Diamond pop melodies, guitar riffs that bands like Metallica and Slipknot would cut off an arm to have composed, and all delivered in musical arrangements and time changes that have more in common with some early seventies prog-‐rock album. They are musical elements that, on the surface, are like oil and water; they seem to have no earthly business being in the same recording studio at the same time, yet the fusion is absolute, and without there ever being a musical moment where you can separate any of them. What comes across is that Dr Gingerstein was never going to give a fuck what you, me, or anyone else thought. In the song, ‘Miles Away Girl’, he sings, “You never seem
67
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) to have any money, because the decent people never get paid.” The line is just one of the dozens of allegories within the lyrics, and a typical Ginger Wildheart statement that he really doesn’t care who you are, or how great your life has turned out; his world view is seated in the person, and not what you have. Like many great albums, Earth Vs. The Wildhearts didn’t fulfil its potential until the band had imploded in a spectacular mess of booze, bar fights, and hallucinogenic fungi. No sooner was it claiming its plaudits, and starting to dent the music charts, the party was over; at least for a while. Just like Dr Frankenstein in Mary Shelley’s book, Ginger Wildheart succumbed to the monster of his own making; famously carving his initials into the boardroom table of Mushroom Records with a flick knife, when signing the band’s deal with them. As the band’s lead guitarist once said to me, “Ginger is never happy; if he found a bar of gold in the street, he’d complain it was the wrong shape.” Earth Vs. The Wildhearts was a true monster rock album. It broke so much new ground whilst raising its hat in respect to so much that had come before it. Nirvana had become the Khmer Rouge of rock music. They had drawn a line in the sand and stamped year zero on guitar music with a battered Converse. Just as punk rock had blazed a scorched earth policy over the self-‐indulgence of seventies progressive rock, you could argue that music needed Nirvana in much the same way. However, they heralded a period where rock music became insular and sometimes dark. Kurt Cobain, Layne Stayley, Andrew Wood; the Jim Morrison’s of Grunge, dead before their time, and buried in a t-‐shirt that says ‘Everyone Loves You When You’re Dead.’ The Wildhearts debut album was the first clarion call in returning rock music to what it had once been, and should always be. It said rock music should be fun again; it should be about having a great time with your mates, and not sitting in your room contemplating your navel over a big joint of weed. It was an album that gave the finger to those who refused to acknowledge the past; Nirvana B.C, and wore its influences boldly on its sleeve. It was Metallica covering the early Beatles, or Nirvana covering Lynard Skynard, and produced by Phil Spector with a gun.
68
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) Earth Vs. The Wildhearts is a lost gem, and its legacy is rooted in that very fact. I once heard it described, as like owning a piece of banned or subversive art. Only a select group are aware of it and understand its weight and significance. Occasionally its owners might trust it to new ears, having warned them of the consequences. As Morpheus says to Neo in The Matrix, ‘Red pill or blue pill?’ There really is no turning back because you can never unheard it.
69
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘Ironing The Soul’ Vinny Peculiar By Tim Dalton From mid 2003 until early 2012 I was employed as a lecturer in Popular Music Studies at a very large metropolitan university in Liverpool in the UK. I was based in the building known as The John Lennon Art and Design Academy where we had the part-‐time musician, full-‐time beat poet and world-‐renowned wordsmith Roger McGough as our Honorary Fellow. McGough was very stately and walked around the building with an aloof air, as you would expect from a much decorated (OBE & CBE), 70-‐year ‘national treasure’ poet. He’d studied for a French degree from 1955 to 1958 in my hometown at the University of Hull. This is the very same university where misanthropic poet Philip Larkin begrudgingly worked as a librarian. Obviously there is something about Hull and the river Humber that brings out the poet in people. One day, I walked into the staff print room to find McGough on his hands and knees at the base of a large Hewlett Packard printer, as if praying. Jammed in the printer was a large A3 sheet of paper: I’m guessing this piece of jammed paper contained his latest poem? He was bright red in the face, swearing profusely, it didn’t rhyme, while pulling with all his might at the jammed page. I was incredibly impressed with how many percussive expletives he was able to shout out; he was not fazed at all by my entrance. Finally McGough rose majestically to his feet, regained his composure, pushed his glasses back up onto this bridge of his nose, straighten his striped tie and shouted one last “FUCK YOU”, then kicked the printer, slowly turned and left the room sans le papier. It was all terribly surreal. Another UK based, but much lesser known poet and musician, is Vinny Peculiar (aka Alan Wilkes). Although his poetry and music are nowhere near as well known as Roger McGough’s work, I still regard him as an unsung national treasure. In 2014, the Irish Times newspaper described Vinny as, “the missing link between Roger McGough and Jarvis Cocker but with the wittiest lyrics this side of Wreckless Eric”. Being a huge fan of all three artists this is very high praise indeed. Vinny has released eleven albums over the years but it’s the 2002 release, on Ugly Man Records, titled Ironing The Soul that I’m rescuing. Ironing The Soul is a beautiful album of kitchen sink confessional outsider pop, which is dedicated to his dead brother Melvin Wilkes (1961-‐2001). The other ten albums are definitely worth a listen but Ironing The Soul is his magnum opus. This album is a rare beast because the arbiters of style and taste (reviewers) all hailed it as a masterpiece, yet the general public still completely ignored it. Vinny didn’t get the attention he so rightly deserved with this album and I bet he loved that. The music 70
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) on this album is considered problematic because it doesn’t fit neatly into a single musical genre rather it awkwardly straddles a few. At 50 odd years old the cool kids don’t dig him, his music is too odd for the mainstream and his wit is way too intellectually challenging for most people. This album has very limited appeal abroad because it’s too quintessentially English. Over the last decade and a half he’s managed to release an original album every few years for a very small but highly appreciative audience who recognize his awkward brilliance. He’s a kind of warm hearted but much more likeable Morrissey of The Smiths. If you want his full life story then listen to track one on Ironing the Soul, ‘Flatter and Deceive’, it’s all there. Vinny was born and raised in the Worcestershire village of Catshill before his relocation to rainy Manchester in the north west of England. The music of his local church, he endured a Methodist upbringing, was his first love but 70’s Glam Rock soon put an end to all that. After flunking formal education and spending an eternity on the dole he trained as a mental health nurse and worked in long stay psychiatric hospitals with some challenging patients. Vinny ended his long-‐ standing relationship with the NHS some years ago in order that he might go and search for everything he’s still looking for. Much of Vinny’s work is autobiographical, the songs are remarkably candid, honest, witty and with a laugh out loud absurdity while at the same time they are poignant and self effacing. Ironing The Soul is a pretty unique album, the songs make you laugh then cry and think all at the same time, you really do need to hear it. Ironing The Soul is of personal interest to me as I was present during its recording at Hug Studios in Liverpool. I was working with Liverpool management and record company Hug who at the time managed the bands Space and Sizer Barker. We all shared the same manager, offices and studio complex. Sizer Barker and I were located in the downstairs studio at Hug while Vinny was recording in the upstairs studio. Over the period of a few months during 2001, I watched and listened as Vinny’s music was transformed from rough vocal and acoustic guitar demos to a fully finished album. Instrumental in this transformation was producer/engineer Rob Ferrier. Ferrier’s official title does not reflect his true role on this record. He opened the creative gates allowing Vinny to come crashing through. The true beauty of this album is that it fully captures his world of oblique, tortured punk poetry nostalgia. Ironing the Soul gives a deep insight into Vinny’s strange world because every song is stuffed to the gills with melody and eccentricity. All the songs on this album are clever, funny and wonderfully weird. As album producer, Ferrier channels all of Vinny’s eccentricity and barbed wit into something strangely compelling, and in turn transforms him into some sort of unlikely, heroic pop star, the type they just don’t seem to make anymore.
71
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) It was a very interesting to observe the creative process during the 2001 recording sessions at Hug Studios. The technical production on this album is the old fashioned analogue type, which perfectly suites the material being captured. Vinny’s guitar playing and songwriting are second to none mixing Americana chord changes and instrumentation with the ear for a good tune. Through a lens of guitars, mandolin, lap-‐steel, cheap synths, glockenspiel, egg whisk, spoons, handclaps, immaculate arrangements and compassionate production, Vinny’s music is brought to life. Throughout this album Vinny is complemented with the addition of various musicians including: ex-‐members of The Smiths, Oasis, Aztec Camera and The Fall. Ferrier’s production and arrangements complements the material perfectly. Effects are subtle; the album expands across the full audio spectrum and is beautifully dynamic in a pre-‐MP3 way. Production isn’t laid on with a trowel; it’s understated and acts in the same way as light seasoning is added to a recipe to bring out the true taste of a great meal. Track four, ‘One Great Artist’, is a fantastic example of how Vinny takes the ordinary mundane everyday events of the world and twists them into something magical and unique. I distinctly remember being in Hug Studio’s very small, shared kitchen area when some kind of semi-‐joke argument broke out about how the studio kitchen was only big enough for one great artist. Of course Vinny took this and constructed some ridiculously bizarre lyrics about great painters, “There’s only enough room in this kitchen, for one great artist and that is me”. With existential angst he also states, “I’m not afraid of dying in obscurity”, which is both very scary and totally accurate. The other band in the kitchen that day, Sizer Barker, were invited into the studio to add what the sleeve notes call “art school chorus” backing vocals on this track. Standing in the recording studio with Sizer Barker that day repeatedly shouting “One great artist” into a microphone is a memory I’ll forever cherish. There’s a fabulous anarchic elegance to Vinny Peculiar’s music, which is both thrilling and faintly unsettling. Uncut Magazine hits the nail on the head in 2014 when they wrote, “If Tony Hancock had made pop records they’d have sounded like this”. The
72
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) ten songs on Ironing The Soul are a beautiful blend of Americana, indie-‐pop and busker-‐punk, they create an almost George Formby like world of oddity and human frailty, and the self-‐deprecating veracity of his lyrics never fails to hit the intended spot. Ironing The Soul is a triumph of creativity over commerciality; the general public’s loss is our gain. This album takes an obscure view of the world and makes it a much better place and I think that that's a good enough reason to rescue this album.
73
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘Tonight’ David Bowie By Dr Ian Dixon You might remember him from such extravagant masquerades as Ziggy Stardust or the Thin White Duke; from outrageous publicity stunts such as proclaiming himself Satanist (Sandford, 1996), born again Christian (Leigh, 2014), bisexual, Nazi apologist (Trynka, 2011), even an alien. You might recall his feminine make up, his Kabuki and Kansai suits, his, “screwed up eyes and screwed down hairdo” (Bowie, 1973), his double reinstatement of the Pierrot theme (1967, 1979) or just pacing before a bulldozer surrounded by clerics of varying denominations in Ashes to Ashes (1979). That’s right! The inimitable David Bowie. In the late 1960s, Bowie’s band, The Konrads, played at weddings, was ignored and booed off stage then, in the 1980s, Bowie played to audiences in the hundreds of thousands for the Serious Moonlight tour. During the 1970s he was hounded by the press for sexual excess and conspicuous public perversion then succumbed to monogamous marital reclusiveness in the 1990s. He has played, sung, written, arranged and produced for mega-‐stars such as Lou Reed and Iggy Pop, supported lesser-‐knowns such as Mott the Hoople and generally championed bands globally for their prog rock adventuring. He’s terrified himself with the constant threat of ‘madness’ as exemplified by his beloved brother Terry’s schizophrenia. He’s slept with more people than you could poke a stick at: everyone from Marianne Faithful to Nico, Charlie Chaplin’s widow, Oona O’Neill Chaplin, transsexual Romy Haag and supermodels Winona Williams and his scintillating wife, Iman Bowie. Above all, Bowie represents the triumph of high art in popular music having firmly wedged himself into the zeitgeist with iconic songs like ‘Space Oddity’, ‘Starman’, ‘Rebel Rebel’, ‘Heroes’, ‘Fashion’ and ‘Let’s Dance’ while exemplifying the very spirit of rock creativity and its synthesis with art and literature, referencing works from Sigmund Freud’s Interpretations of Dreams to George Orwell’s 1984. David Bowie acts on stage and screen (especially noted for his exemplary physical gyrations in the stage play version of The Elephant Man in New York, 1980). He writes music in irreconcilably contrasting styles, even movie soundtracks for Nicolas Roeg’s (see Big Audio Dynamite) confusing extravaganza: The Man Who Fell to Earth (1976) and the downbeat realist drama Christiane F. in which he plays himself (as he did in far more capricious vein in Zoolander (2001)). More recently, Bowie performed in The Prestige (2006) alongside Hugh Jackman and Christian Bale (Batman, Wolverine and Ziggy Stardust on the same screen! Now that’s a film worth seeing).
74
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) This is David Bowie: inexhaustible, inspired, insecure, admirable, charismatic, a man with impeccable manners and a reputation for rapidly writing songs that go from 0 to 100 in seconds. ‘Fame’ (1976) was apparently penned with John Lennon in less than twenty minutes (Sandford, 1996)). In short, the man is a genius (antiquated modernist term though it be), which prompts the question: how did Tonight (1984) mess it all up so irrevocably? Tonight, produced by Bowie, Hugh Padgham and Derek Bramble followed the unprecedented commercial and artistic success of ‘Let’s Dance’: his top selling album in which the production smarts of disco-‐funk king Nile Rodgers met with the sharp guitar excellence of Stevie Ray Vaughan (before the latter left the tour in a helicopter: disdainful that Bowie had matched his own outrageous egotism (Sandford, 1996)). Bowie’s 16 studio album, Tonight, reached number one on the British charts. Yet, despite its commercial success fans still whisper that the success was merely off the back of ‘Let’s Dance’, which had skyrocketed Bowie’s fame. th
Tonight is the album Bowie biographer Paul Trynka called, “a perfect storm of mediocrity”’ and “leaden white reggae” (2011, p. 408), and Melody Maker (1990) refers to as “rotte”’. The album relinquished Bowie’s former acumen at predicting the market and trailed the reggae wave by some years (Leigh, 2014). Tonight, the album after Bowie’s telepathic ability to predict the market, saw him leave behind the music-‐fashion predictions that had secured his place at the top of the pops; folk-‐ rock, glam rock, theatrical grunge, techno and ambient, disco-‐funk, plastic soul and new romanticism. Tonight represented a loss of confidence on Bowie’s part and a switch to mainstream as a source of inspiration rather than underground music, which had serviced the master for over a decade. Where previous fare had included The Velvet Underground, Brian Eno’s ambient music and classical composers such as Gustav Holst, Hanns Eisler and Karlheinz Stockhausen, Tonight relied on sources from The Police, Laurie Anderson and The Thompson Twins. Relying heavily on the 1980s big drum sound, even the dance anthems of ‘Let’s Dance’ succumb to the tragedy of falling behind, but Tonight brings it home and nails the coffin shut on a decade of unprecedented reinvention and primavera excellence in popular music. 1983 was the year that dedicated Bowie journalist Charles Shaar Murray, “David’s number one cheerleader in the British pres”’ (Leigh, 2014, p. 153), stopped documenting his albums. Having said that, this album represents moments of impeccably slick production, excellence culminating in the seamless pop icon Blue Jean. Indeed, Tonight fairly defines the self-‐conscious interplay of tasteless narcissism and artistic pursuit (that’s a compliment).
75
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) However, a closer scrutiny of the individual tracks leaves us wanting for an album worthy of the Bowie oeuvre. The songs combine the would-‐be sublime with the loud ordinariness of a moribund fad. Tracks such as ‘Loving the Alien’ mix orchestral strings in the background in a fashion already exhausted by E.L.O. and Bowie chooses to ride the “leaden white reggae” wave headfirst into oblivion (Trynka, 2011, p. 408). On Tonight, lacklustre guitar riffs by the otherwise stupendous Carlos Alomar remain a sad indictment hung on Bowie. Tonight plummets his hard-‐won mega-‐stardom into the absolute mediocrity of an absolute beginner (neither was his reputation rescued by his subsequent album, Never Let me Down, which in Bowie’s own words was “apocryphally awful”: plastic emotion succumbing to pure schmaltz). Perhaps, on track two of Tonight, Bowie was offering himself advice by repeating the affirmation ‘Don’t look down’, as the resurgence of his monolithic cocaine addiction propelled his personal paranoia to sheer megalomania. Where are the incisive lyrics so prevalent in Scary Monsters? Where are the sublime melodies which saw seasoned musicians such as Mick Jagger, John Lennon, Marc Bolan consulting with a 23 year old Bowie in 1970 (Vizard, 1990)? Some say his cocaine addiction all but wiped out his former genius: a phenomenon Bowie likens to having Swiss cheese for a brain: far from decrying this fact, Bowie celebrated it when he appeared on Parkinson (2002) touted as the “Peter Pan of Rock ‘n’ Roll”. Bowie’s version of ‘God Only Knows’ is not only embarrassing, it’s one of the most disingenuous tracks in rock history. The delivery, in the words of biographer Paul Trynka, is akin to a “pub singer punting for wedding and bar mitzvah jobs” (2011, p. 408). In this sad, crooner version of The Beach Boys’ 1966 classic, jaunty epistle, Bowie experiments with his ever deepening vocal delivery: a rumbling, bass register assisted by decades of chain smoking. This quality would be exploited to far greater effect on Heathen (1999) as he had done on Diamond Dogs (1974) and Let’s Dance (1982). On Tonight’s ‘God Only Knows’, however, everything from sentimental strings to turgid tempo, the ‘big sound’ rim-‐shot drums to the super-‐charged romanticism announces that this was simply a bad choice. With this version (and to his credit), Bowie’s tongue is firmly wedged in his cheek, but the delivery is so cringe-‐ worthy nobody seems to have noticed the irony. The song begins as saccharine-‐ schmaltz with a semi-‐shouted Sprechgesang quality weaved in for good measure then descends to pure bathos. With ‘God Only Knows’, Bowie outdoes the stain on ‘Across the Universe’; his previous highpoint of pure awful on Young Americans (1975) (when teaming up with John Lennon on the inspired Fame; an iconic track not even the pretentious 1990 remix could overshadow).
76
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
The eponymous track, ‘Tonight’, features steel drum and marimba rhythms (supplied by Canadian, Guy St. Onge) and played without the authenticity of Jamaican verve, even though Mr Bowie is ‘familiar’ with Jamaican culture (particularly Jamaican women) since his teen years in South London directly after the Second World War. There are, however, some exemplary backup vocals on this track, which also constitutes a beautiful synchronicity of timbre between himself and Tina Turner (the grandma and grandpa of rock together!). After the haunting excellence of ‘China Girl’ on Let’s Dance (even though Bowie ultimately despised his version), Bowie attempts again to resurrect some of the genius performance from Iggy Pop’s album The Idiot on Tonight’s next track ‘Neighbourhood Threat’. Regrettably, Bowie fails to achieve the ‘messed-‐up’ resignation of Iggy (even though Bowie had produced Pop’s album during a period of unmitigated creativity in Berlin: 1975-‐1977). Bowie himself declared the song ‘disastrous’, mentioning a plethora of different musical styles tried and failed in attempting to resurrect the song. To Bowie’s credit, however, this desperate anthem of street survival, ‘Neighbourhood Threat’, contains some perfect scintillation of bass guitar and drum combinations, notably, this time-‐tested pop music convention kicks the song off immediately. This effectively reinvents the song in a new genre, which is no small feat. In the past, my friends spent many a debauched night playing song-‐ for-‐song: Bowie-‐Pop-‐Bowie and debate the merits of the differing versions (Iggy invariably won!). ‘Neighbourhood Threat’ oscillates between glossy disco backing singers and three-‐chord guitar riffs including inspired contrapuntal movements between competing melodies as Bowie peels off, “Will you still place your bets, on the Neighbourhood Threat?” And so we arrive at ‘Blue Jean’: the listener sighs, ‘at last!’ as the album really takes off. This song represents all that could have been on this lively, but flawed album. The hit-‐parade anthem ‘Blue Jean’ employs a characteristically remote vocal delivery, yet remains a capricious interpretation, sporting lyrics such as, “She’s got a turned up nose”. This is counterbalanced against an impassioned screaming of, “Sometimes I feel like. Dancing with Blue Jean. Somebody send me!” Senseless lyrics though they may be, the subtext of being out of your head in love with someone bad for you fairly drips from the vinyl (yes, vinyl, which dates-‐stamps this particular critic irrevocably). Indeed, even the deliberately fake, ‘cracked actor’ vocal rift finds its perfect place in this hit tune. The driving double-‐time beat of the verse leads seamlessly into the middle eight and chorus. The hit retains a genuine improvisational quality floating over the slick arrangement: the superb placement of
77
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) shrieking, grunting saxophone riffs (played by the man himself) sets off the exemplary guitar solo played lovingly by long-‐time Bowie axeman, Carlos Alomar. Wouldn’t it be sublime to leave this album at this point so we won’t even have to mention ‘Tumble and Twirl’, with its impulsive 6/8 time signature and gurgling, hyper-‐romantic Robert Smith-‐type vocal delivery? The song (and alas most of the album) reminds us of the tragedy of conscious postmodern caprice believing its own hype. Indeed, ‘I Keep Forgetting’ (Leiber and Stoller’s reworking of Chuck Jackson’s original), and ‘Dancing with the Big Boys’ makes the listener want to rip the album off the player and put Scary Monsters back on (lest we keep forget that Bowie was once the giant of progressive, edgy popular music). With a decisive rim-‐shot, the album ends: the big brass nightmare is over and we are left in a welcome abyss, where the absence of noise is somehow meaningful by comparison. Is the album too clean? Did he not smoke enough ganja to render effective, dirty reggae (it was, after all, not his drug of choice (Leigh, 2014))? Was it all just a waste of space, vinyl and unsmoked ganja? Yet I resist the urge to do just that and, as I cogitate the theme of this collection: Album Rescue Series, I must acknowledge that it is the very genius of Bowie’s former glory that raises the bar for the artistic and commercial success of such a venture. Ironically, this means he is judged harshly by fans and critics. Indeed, the album represents a clash between commercialism and artistry. On reflection, the advancement in engineering is exemplary; the sound is clean and seamless to the very edge of technological capacity in the 1980s. We must pay homage to Bowie for venturing even further into new terrain creating a synthesis of reggae and white cynicism, for maintaining a modicum of intelligence within the lyricism. In the notoriously shallow zeitgeist of the 1980s it stands out as experimental (within tight, commercial parameters) and colourful. Perhaps his old buddy Christian Bale should play this album during his scathing (ironic) indictment of 80s pop in American Psycho (2000). Bowie has, and will always have, extensiveness and inclusiveness in his music; ever increasing range vocally, musically and inter-‐disciplinary influences, far from a mere follower of the market. We must acknowledge that the contemporaneous market had painted Bowie into a corner. The pressure to emulate the commercial success of Let’s Dance or the artistic excellence of Scary Monsters must have represented extraordinary insecurity for this mega-‐star. The music on Tonight is crisp, inventive, unique and (largely) unpredictable. Bowie is to be praised for continuing his experimentation with musical styles beyond mega-‐stardom. Thus, within David Bowie’s musical milieu, Tonight is an album definitely worth playing. Although other Bowie albums might be written off, there is, in Tonight: sweat behind the market
78
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) positioning; pain behind the commercialism; excellence in the production; and sheer balls in the risk.
79
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘Chicken Rhythms’ Northside By Tim Dalton Manchester is regarded as the UK’s second city after London, despite the unsubstantiated counter claims from Birmingham, and is one of the world’s greatest industrial cities. The city is famous for driving the industrial revolution, cotton production, a 36 mile (58 km) long ship canal, TV broadcasting, art, music and even providing the world with the standardisation for screws via the Whitworth Thread standard in 1841. Despite all of these great inventions and innovations, Manchester is usually known throughout the world for its two football teams Manchester United and Manchester City. I consider myself to be pretty lucky. Since the mid 1980s I have travelled the world extensively with my backstage rock ‘n’ roll career and everywhere I go I see people who have never been to Manchester wearing football shirts of these two teams. A quick search on the Internet lists over fifty active football teams in the Greater Manchester area. The problem with this style of binary reductionism is that great teams that are neither United nor City are not represented. I am not a football fan or expert by any stretch of the imagination but I’d hazard a guess that there are some great games being played by teams like Bury Football Club or Bolton Wanderers. This is the major problem with Northside’s 1991 release Chicken Rhythms on Factory Records (FAC310). Northside are in effect Accrington Stanley to The Stone Roses’ Manchester City or The Happy Mondays’ Manchester United and as such do not attract the attention they so well deserve. In the music scene that became known as ‘Madchester’ there were so many bands that it was fairly obvious that the odd one would fall between the cracks. I am absolutely sure the same thing happens in any great musical movement; think the San Francisco Sound of the late 1960s early 1970s and the two major players, The Grateful Dead and Jefferson Airplane, but what about hippie rockers Stoneground? Don’t worry, Stoneground’s 1971 eponymous album is going to feature in Album Rescue Series volume II. Manchester, and its new sound ‘Madchester’, was the dominant sound in British popular music during the late '80s and early '90s and I almost missed it. From 1985 onwards I spent very little time in my home country (the UK) as I was travelling the world as a live sound engineer with a host of well-‐known international acts. Luckily for me I had a day off in Manchester during a world tour with New York alternate jazz rappers De La Soul and so I was able to hook up with my old mate Gary ‘Mani’ Mountfield. I’d met Mani a few years earlier when he was on the stage crew at
80
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) various Manchester venues ‘humping’ band’s equipment. We were only 20 days apart in age and we took an instant liking to each other. As I’d spent so much time away from the UK with my touring activities, I had no idea that Mani had joined the band The Stones Roses as their bass player, in fact, I had no idea that he could even play bass. On this occasion I hooked up with Mani and we found ourselves in an old knackered ‘borrowed’ car heading to the town of Failsworth, famous for the production of felt hats in the 1850s, to purchase marijuana1. It was during this 3.7mile (6 km) trip, that Mani gave me the details of the new Manchester music scene that I didn’t even know existed, ‘Madchester’. Once we arrived in Failsworth, our hosts sold us dope at a greatly inflated price (mainly due to Mani’s recently found celebrity status) and then proceeded to smoke it with us. It was at this point that I first heard the album that is the subject of this album rescue: Northside’s Chicken Rhythms. Presumably, the album name comes from the use of funky, chicken-‐scratch guitars, which the band weaves into its abstract, aloof, slightly quirky brand of alternative psyche pop/rock? A major issue is that Northside were very late arrivals to the ‘Madchester’ party with their debut album release in 1991. The Happy Mondays had their first album out in 1987, The Stone Roses in 1989, Inspiral Carpets in 1990 and even fake Madchester band, The Charlatans, had released an album in 1990. The genesis of Northside came in 1990. The band formed in the North Manchester districts of Blackley and Moston by Manchester United fan Warren ‘Dermo’ Dermody (vocals) and Manchester City fan Cliff Orgier (bass). Soon joined by Michael ‘Upo’ Upton (guitar) and Paul ‘Wal’ Walsh (drums); the band was complete. The formation of Northside is the classic story of Thatcher battered austere Northern Britain; young people indulging in hedonism in hard times. The band’s formation dovetails perfectly with the introduction of the new recreational drug of Ecstasy that was sweeping the country. Up until the late 1980s, Saturday afternoons were a time of football violence. All this changed with the introduction of ‘E’ and Acid House. I am pretty sure that the Thatcher government of the time did not release that it was the introduction of cheap Ecstasy into working class areas that stopped football hooliganism dead in its tracks rather than their out of touch laws. This new regional musical movement of ‘Madchester’ was a heady fusion of Acid House dance rhythms and melodic pop distinguished by its loping beats, psychedelic flourishes, and hooky choruses. Song structures were familiar, the arrangements and attitude were modern, and even the retro-‐pop jangling guitars, swirling organs, and sharp pop sense, functioned as postmodern collages. There were two different 1
Please note that I now no longer condone the recreational use of marijuana though I do understand and fully support the use of medically prescribed marijuana.
81
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) binary approaches to constructing these collages, as evidenced by Mani’s band, The Stone Roses, on one side and the Happy Mondays on the other. The Stone Roses were a traditional guitar-‐pop band, and their songs were straight-‐ahead pop tunes, bolstered by infectious beats; it was modernized classic 1960s pop music. The other approach was the one adopted by the Happy Mondays who cut and pasted samples like rappers, taking choruses from the likes of the Beatles and LaBelle and putting them into a context of dark psychedelic dance. Despite their different approaches, both bands shared a love for Acid House music and culture, Ecstasy and their hometown of Manchester. As the name would suggest, this music was very geographically specific. It was the British press that labelled this style of music “Madchester” after a Happy Mondays song. It was also termed as "baggy", after the baggy loose fitting clothing worn by the bands and fans, in particular bell-‐bottomed jeans, tie-‐dyed or fluorescent coloured oversized sweatshirts all finished off with a fishing hat. This style of clothing mirrored the music e.g. the mix of 60s psychedelic rock with 70s funk but all within the context of late 80s Acid House. The clothing was rooted in leisure (hence the fishing hat) and was designed to be loose and easy to dance in, by makers such as Manchester’s legendary Joe Bloggs. Northside sat in the liminal space between these two schools of creativity though they did lean heavily to The Stone Roses style of production. As Factory Records had so much talent at its disposal, and because of the sheer volume of material it was releasing, there were going to be casualties. Some albums were bound to slide by without making a dent. All Factory Records releases had a unique identification number including Tony Wilson’s coffin (FAC501). Chicken Rhythms was number FAC310 and that's a lot of releases by a small cash strapped regional record company. Not for the first time in an Album Rescue do we see a superb piece of music slide into obscurity because of poor marketing. Factory Records had lots of previous form in this department. Tony Wilson and his colleagues at Factory Records always aimed at the stars but continually only just managed to hit the moon. As a creative entity, Factory Records was world class and iconic, but as a business it was a financial disaster; an abject lesson in how NOT to operate a creative business. It’s also possible that as a Factory Records act you needed the patronage of its head Tony Wilson, or as he liked to call himself later on in life, “Anthony H. Wilson”. Without Tony’s direct supervision, his favorites included e.g. Joy Division/New Order, Happy Mondays, Durutti Column and A Certain Ratio, you didn’t get the attention you deserved. As Wilson often pointed out, “I went to fucking Cambridge University you know?” he favored the bands that displayed a high level of political intellectualism and/or high art. Northside failed in both departments and this was to
82
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) their detriment. Factory Record’s artists are known for some of the most iconic cover art in the history of popular music e.g. Joy Divisions Unknown Pleasure. Peter Saville, Factory Records’ in house style guru, art director and designer was not involved with Chicken Rhythms. Instead the cover was farmed out to the second division graphic design company Central Station. The cover was an insipid, uninspired, weak collage of old birthday cards reformed as an apple. The only way to describe this album cover is appalling; it worked against the material contained on the audio recording held within. This is akin to packaging a tasty morsel of delicious food in a wrapper with a picture of dog shit on it. The old adage “never judge a book by its cover” should ring true; this cover sucked and it definitely contributed to Chicken Rhythms disappearing into relative obscurity. Factory Records even managed to botch up the barcode on the album so that any sales recorded in a chart return shop didn’t register. Northside deserve to be celebrated because they took some chances and dared to dream. One has to admire their desire to strive for some form of originality. The Lightning Seeds’ lead man, Ian Broudie, who obviously had compassion for the band and their music, expertly handled production on the album. Recorded at the residential Rockfield Studios in rural Wales the change of scenery was beneficial and provided them with some much needed fresh air. Stand out songs from the album are the infectious ‘Take 5’ with the “64-‐46 BMW” refrain directly lifted from reggae superstar Yellowman’s Nobody Move, the silly ‘Funky Munky’ and the anthem ‘Shall We Take A Trip’. Broudie and Northside form the perfect creative premier division team to produce a wonderfully dynamic album of space, place and bass. Though the material is delivered through a lens of happy up-‐tempo pop, the lyrics are somber and essentially about hoping to hope in what were desperate times. These were very hard times in Britain with the end of Thatcherism still five long years away. Through this album, Northside articulated the anxious postindustrial panic of working class youth that was sweeping the country. Mindless hedonism was portrayed as the new culture of a disenfranchised youth. Northside were a band that came along with an album that struck a cord, celebrating an era for the youth of the day. Album tracks such as ‘Shall We Take A Trip’, ‘A Change Is On Its Way’ and ‘Who’s To Blame?’ are all wonderfully optimistic. Though ‘Shall We Take A Trip’ proved to be a problematic track and single, it was immediately banned by most radio stations because of its obvious drug reference. However, it resonated with kids because of these obvious drug references. Most youngsters experiment with and/or are intrigued by drugs to some extent, it is all part of growing up. The lyrics take their inspiration from Lennon’s ‘Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds’ and LSD. The chorus line of “answers come in dreams”, clearly spell out the initials A.C.I.D. This track is full of
83
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) double entendre and was possibly a nod to Lennon’s great lyrical genius, wordplay and warped way of thinking? Damage was also inflicted to this album by what was missed off of it. Out of the Rockfield recording session were the tracks ‘Moody Place’, ‘Tour De World’ and ‘Rising Star’ all superb tracks but not collated onto the album for various reasons. ‘Moody Place’ has got one of the best bass lines ever right up there with Public Image Ltd.’s track ‘Public Image’. It’s a great song and the subject matter is about hope and trying to stay strong when it seems everyone around you is slowly going down. The lyrics are mostly about hoping for hope in desperate times, which was a common theme in the late 80s and early 90s. Most of the blame can surely be firmly placed with Factory Records for not fully understanding how the curating of this album’s material would affect sales? Imagine what this album could have achieved had it been released with a more sympathetic record company, one that could have afforded a marketing campaign and some decent cover artwork? As mentioned earlier, Northside came to the party very late, in fact, they arrived when the party was virtually over. Factory Records was overstretched financially and mismanaged operationally. Tony Wilson was now more interested in investing in his own legacy rather than facilitating decent music. Also the zeitgeist had shifted over night, it's a fast moving target at the best of times. The year 1991 saw a shift in what was seen as cool both sub-‐culturally and geographically. It’s ironic that just as the economic hard times of North West of England were abating the music upped and left. The two star teams of the Madchester scene, The Stone Roses and The Happy Mondays, had become fat and lazy with success and were more interested in recreational drug use then making music. To be precisely correct their profession was now drug use interspersed with occasional recreational music making. Into the North West British void came the sound of North West America; grunge. This new musical genre de-‐emphasized appearance, drug use and polished technique in favor of raw, angry, passionate songs that articulated the pessimism and anxiety of its young angry audience. Lyrics were no longer hedonistic and forward-‐looking but pessimistic and angry. The look was no longer baggy Joe Bloggs casuals with glow sticks and Acid House smiley faces rather it was opportunity shop, make-‐do and mend austere attire. All optimism and hedonism was stopped dead in its tracks, as was Northside’s career. Instantly the world’s music press’s front covers had pictures of Nirvana, Alice In Chains, Soundgarden and other Seattle area grunge bands. No longer was this about hedonism in hard times it was about self-‐enforced austerity in good times. Northside’s Chicken Rhythms caught and reflected the fragile moribund zeitgeist of Madchester. Though this album is long since deleted it
84
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) remains a valuable artifact of political and social history. If you can lay your hands on a copy then it’s well worth listening to this forgotten Madchester gem. References Cummins, K 2012, Manchester: Looking For The Light Through The Pouring Rain, Faber and Faber, London, UK. Middles, M 2009, Factory: The Story of the Record Label, Virgin Books, London, UK. Nolan, D 2010, Tony Wilson: You're Entitled To An Opinion, John Blake Publishing, Manchester, UK. Wilson, T 2007, The Complete Graphic Album, Thomas and Hudson, Manchester, UK.
85
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘Temple of Low Men’ Crowded House By Andrew ‘Broady’ Broadhead During it’s recording, Paul Hester joked that Crowded House should have titled their second album “Mediocre Follow Up”. Thankfully, the album that was to become the band’s lowest selling album is a long way north of mediocre. Most Brits know Crowded House via their third album Woodface due to the hit, ‘Weather With You’. Americans know them for their self-‐titled debut album and songs ‘Don’t Dream It’s Over’ and ‘Something So Strong’. In between these two successful albums lies Temple of Low Men released in 1988. Comprised of Neil Finn (guitar, lead vocal), Paul Hester (drums) and Nick Seymour (bass), Crowded House had tasted success both at home in Australia and overseas in the USA, prior to recording Temple. On ANZAC Day in 1987, the song ‘Don’t Dream It’s Over’ from their first album made number two on the Billboard singles chart; ironic for a band that could not decide if it was Aussie or Kiwi. Crowded House had morphed out of the band Split Enz that was originally founded by Tim Finn in New Zealand during the early 1970’s. Split Enz included Tim’s ‘little’ brother Neil, who was eventually allowed to join after some pestering, and drummer Paul Hester. Local success was attained and eventually Tim left allowing ‘little’ brother Neil to take the reins. Once Split Enz folded, Neil and Paul resolved to form a band together and were joined by bassist Nick Seymour; brother of Mark from Hunters and Collectors fame. Crowded House was born. The band was signed to Captiol records where producer Mitchell Froom assisted Crowded House to deliver their self-‐titled debut album in 1986. The album sold over 2 million copies with the band riding their success for some time before turning to the task of recording their follow up album. From all reports, recording sessions for Temple of Low Men were the smoothest of the band’s career. Froom was back in the producer chair with recording sessions split between Melbourne and Los Angeles. The album’s production ‘dream team’ included Bob Clearmountain mixing and Bob Ludwig mastering. However, Neil Finn’s reaction to success seemed to push him toward writing some darker material as compared to the first album. Temple of Low Men may have been a little too mature for the late 1980’s. Those who remember the release of this album will know that there was some stiff competition from the likes of Kylie Minogue and Bros; sadly of
86
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) no comparison for some. When Temple of Low Men was released it only just slid into the US Top 40 for a fortnight before sinking without a trace. At the time, the band were still undiscovered in the UK, a reflection of the album’s lackluster performance in this geographical region. Robert Christgau of the Village Voice reviewed the album and complained that Neil Finn had denied his audience the one thing he had to offer; “catchy pop hooks”. Outside of this criticism, reception of the album was favourable but sales were low. Even Springsteen was rumoured to have called up the then president of Capitol, Joe Smith demanding to know how this record could get ‘lost’ by the company despite its quality. Some albums do not survive for them to be listened to outside the decade that they were made. Temple of Low Men does not fit this category. Released in the days when you had the choice of buying albums on cassette (remember them), compact disc (remember them) or vinyl, I remember choosing the latter and I have never looked back. The sum of the album’s parts is perhaps a little dark and morose, but when listened to outside of its historical context, the album fares extremely well. Whilst some of the production techniques may sound dated, this does not degrade from the overall listening experience. Great horns and organ sections are spread throughout the album and there is a distinct lack of the cheesy 80’s synth sound. The Clearmountain ‘sheen’ is definitely there but it is not ruinous. The quality of Finn’s songwriting makes it out alive, and to these ears, has never been better. Ten songs on the album is a dead giveaway that it was released on Capitol Records (anyone remember the US versions of Beatle albums?) and without a dud track in sight. ‘Better Be Home Soon’ was the last track, but simultaneously the first single, and makes great use of a ‘Whiter Shade of Pale’-‐style organ. The Beatle-‐esque cliché often directed at Crowded House, applies in several places such as ’Kill Eye’ (Finn doing John Lennon) and ‘Into Temptation’ (Finn doing McCartney). The latter is the album’s standout track. Bob Clearmountain rated it amongst the best he’d ever mixed (Casey 2007). Froom also spoke highly of this track. Other album highlights include ‘When You Come’; the second single that sank with barely creating a ripple. This is a great track that builds to a crescendo by a driving hi-‐ hat rhythm (whatever happened to the hi-‐hat anyway?). ‘Love This Life’ is one of the lesser know gems, while ‘Sister Madly’ was the band’s attempt to “bastardize jazz” according to Finn and became a live favorite for the band. ‘Mansion In The Slums’
87
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) and ‘In The Lowlands’ hint at Neil Finn’s negative reaction to early success and fame but are nonetheless interesting and varied tracks that round out the album well. It could be argued that the commercial failure of this album ruined the band’s career in the USA. Never again would Crowded House have a solid hit in that country. Thankfully the band did move on to great success in the UK and Europe with their third and fourth albums. Success in their home countries of Australia and New Zealand was always a given. Despite being the commercial black sheep of the Crowded House canon, Temple Of Low Men is, with a quarter of century’s hindsight, an album worthy of rescue. References Casey, J 2007, Available from: . [26 August 2015]
88
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘Infamous Angel’ Iris DeMent By Tim Dalton A few years ago I was driving from Liverpool in the North West of the UK down to Ealing in West London to visit my son and his wife. As is normal when you drop off the M40 motorway onto the A40 Western Avenue the traffic comes to a complete standstill. There’s no need to be angry as these natural pauses in life can be a good thing, a time to reflect, possibly a Zen moment. It’s not often I turn on the radio but on this very rare occasion I did. I immediately fell into the middle of Let The Mystery Be by Iris DeMent. This audio epiphany has my inner voice screaming, “Who is that singing?” and as the song came to a gentle close radio DJ Stuart Maconie back announces, “That’s Iris Dement and Let The Mystery Be from the great lost country album Infamous Angel“; thank you Stuart. The big question is how come I don’t know about this album, given that I used to be a Nashville resident and I’m considered by my peers to be some type of country music expert? When I finally arrive in Ealing, I charge into my son’s house and like some kind of demented audio junkie, I garble a rushed greeting whilst simultaneously requesting the directions to the local record store. Within one hour of first hearing Iris DeMent on the radio I’m at the record store Sounds Original, 169 South Ealing Road and I own a second hand, or pre-‐loved, CD of Infamous Angel for the sum of £5.00 ($9.00). My life is now temporarily complete. This is a remarkable, greatly underrated and largely ignored debut album, released by Warner Brother in 1992. It’s one of those recordings that makes you sit back in quiet contemplative awe. Iris DeMent was born on 5th January 1961 in Paragould on the Arkansas Delta, the youngest of 14 children, but she grew up in California. DeMent and her siblings were raised as strict Pentecostals. This form of Protestant Christianity places special emphasis on a direct personal experience of God, largely through the baptism with the Holy Spirit, but also in an understanding that God is omnipresent. DeMent’s upbringing has a definite influence upon this album’s material, but not in a negative way, this album is not a happy-‐clappy Christian album though it is definitely spiritual. Her father played fiddle while her mother dreamed of singing on the Grand Ole Opry radio show from the Ryman Auditorium in Nashville. For a family that saw its fair share of hard times, music was a necessity of life and not just a pastime. Infamous Angel was Iris DeMent’s first release at the age of 31, an age at which many modern day performers have already quit the bright lights of show business. DeMent didn’t start writing music until she was 25, she is one of life’s classic late bloomers.
89
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) The exemplary studio engineering and compassionate audio production work undertaken by Jim Rooney contributes massively to the aesthetics of this recording. If anything this album is under-‐produced, which makes it a very rare beast, but that is definitely not a criticism. Instead of defaulting to the standard modern production technique of distancing the singer's voice with lonesome reverb, producer Jim Rooney eschews the audio treatments in favour of a spartan intimacy. This production approach both accentuates and isolates DeMent’s voice, so that at times, you get a sense of her delivery being tentative, as if she's unsure of her range. Without the usual sonic accompaniments and treatments her voice stands before us in its naked natural beauty. Ultimately, though, this heightened vulnerability seems to work in DeMent’s favour; even her very slight technical vocal inadequacies become endearing very quickly. The verisimilitude of this album is truly awesome; this is about as real as a recording of a performance can possibly be. Rooney is not one of the modern technological deterministic music producers. His role on this album was to merely accurately capture the sublime performances of the musicians rather than constructing some post human, hyperreality. The recording is virtually free from artificial effects, treatments and embellishment, which is very rare in the post 1956 ‘modern’ recording era. This style of production allows the performances and material to shine in their natural beauty. Album producer Rooney was one of the main pioneers in the genre that would later become known as ‘Americana’. To establish this genre he worked with artists such as Hal Ketchum, Nanci Griffiths, Bonnie Raitt, Townes Van Zandt and John Prine (who, not surprisingly, is one of DeMent’s biggest champions). Rooney collaborates perfectly with DeMent on exposing her gift for poignant, confessional songwriting and in capturing a voice that makes raw beauty seem like a brand new thing. Iris DeMent invokes the elemental magic of the Carter Family while sounding fresh and contemporary. So what’s the problem here and why do we need to rescue this near perfect recording of ten songs? Perfect it may well be but it disappeared without a trace upon its release. Maybe the problem with this album is the release date? 1992 is the year when the newly formulated genre of Americana really starts to take effect. To a large and unfortunate extent this genre inflicted irreparable and unwarranted damage to Infamous Angel and contributed massively to sending it spiralling into obscurity. The music business is all about business and as such it was happy to create a niche for the country music’s most fiscally dependable demographic e.g. the white, male Baby Boomers (me). In the early 1990s, USA radio programmers coined and started to apply the new term of “Americana”. This title became shorthand for the weather-‐ beaten, rural-‐sounding music that bands like Whiskeytown and Uncle Tupelo were
90
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) making. It was warm, retro, twangy stuff, full of finger-‐plucked beaten up Fender Telecaster guitars, vintage valve amplifiers and gnarled voices like car wheels on a gravel road. Americana bares a striking resemblance to a John Ford Western film with its expansive landscapes, poetic rose tinted version of the American West, pioneering families, male camaraderie and the all American heroes complete with their macho grandiose swagger. There’s no room for sweet little, naïve, small town Iris in this landscape. The term ‘country music’ itself is also a deeply problematic one and in the past it has being know as “country and western”, “folk music”, “old-‐time music”, “hillbilly” and “western”. According to Bill Malone (2010: p.1), “it defies precise definition, and no term (not even ‘country’) has ever successfully encapsulated its essence”. As country music (as we’ll call it here) metamorphosed into Americana, a handful of artistic traditions were unwittingly and unknowingly sacrificed; such as traditional blues, Appalachian Mountain folk and outlaw country music. They became homogenized into the relatively conservative format that is ‘Dad’ and radio friendly. In her book It Still Moves: lost songs, lost highways and the search for the next American music (1992: p.223), Amanda Petrusich hits the nail on the head when she states, “It sometimes seems like the Delta’s legacy is most present in modern hip-‐ hop”, rather than Americana, “where its basic tenets are still being perpetuated, even if the form has altered dramatically”. To misquote ex-‐Beatle John Lennon, here was a time when “a working-‐class hero really was something to be”. Americana is essentially a postmodern phenomenon and that definitely is a criticism. Artists like Iris DeMent aren’t supposed to exist anymore in this post Americana dominated cynical world. She definitely doesn’t play the sex card, eschews electrification and sings un-‐ironically about the unconditional love of her family, forgiveness and other real-‐life mysteries. Granted one benefit of Americana is that it did grant access to females who traditionally had an extremely hard time gaining access to this genre of music. DeMent continues the quiet underground gender rebellion which was started by the like of Kitty Wells, Loretta Lynn, Tanya Tucker and Tammy Wynette by providing a credible creative resistance to the dominant patriarchal hegemony. Popular female Americana artists such as Nikki Lane, Lindi Ortega, Deana Carter et al. are all highly sexualised, young, good looking and sing about pickup trucks, one night stands, booze, drugs, truck stops, seedy bars and their own success in the music business. Measured against these modern day stars DeMent’s music appears quaint, maudlin, frumpy and wonderfully old fashioned but not in a trendy retro ‘American Pickers’ postmodern way. DeMent is accompanied musically on this album by little more than her acoustic guitar, upright bass, piano, mandolin and an occasional fiddle. This is the sort of instrumentation and
91
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) arrangements you'd find on the most classic of traditional country albums, the focus being mainly on the voice and lyrics, with unobtrusive acoustic guitar and mandolin carrying most of the lead instrumental duties. The music on this album is like one of Kitty Wells’ dresses, it’s modest and sweet. This album is not a dusty sonic museum piece, though it is of its time, it just chooses to employ traditional instrumentation, arrangements and audio production as the conduit to deliver the message. This album’s concerns are largely personal such as family and tradition, and many of these songs deal with memories of DeMent’s life and loves. As she said, “I never set out to write songs about the world around me... it just kind of came about as a result of paying more attention to things”. This album explores various existential themes such as religious scepticism, small-‐town life, buying your first car, human frailty and our own fleeting mortality. Her Carter Family influence is revealed in a spirited cover of the classic ‘Fifty Miles of Elbow Room’ as well as ‘Mama’s Opry,’ a tribute to her mother, who gets to sing lead vocals on ‘Higher Ground’. These are all perfectly formed wonderful songs, but DeMent’s greater talent is the ballad. She delivers an astonishing display of balladry on this album, including ‘When Love Was Young’, ‘Sweet Forgiveness’ and ‘After You’re Gone’, a tribute to her dying father that is so profoundly affecting that I am often rendered helpless and close to tears listening to it. The critics of this album believe that it does not address the big issues in life, what Jean-‐François Lyotard calls the “emancipation narratives” (179: p.32) a system to make sense of history. DeMent does tackle some incredibly difficult subject matter on this album but she does it through the lens of small town, rural American rituals framed by her own direct experiences. Have a listen to ‘Let The Mystery Be’ a track that is almost beyond existential comprehension as it addresses the ending of our own life with what might or might not happen. Dement’s simplistic naïvety is displayed openly in the lyrics to this song, “Some say that they're comin' back in a garden, bunch of carrots and little sweet peas”. When I finish listening to this album I feel incredibly somber but refreshed in equal parts by DeMent’s charming, almost naïve, outlook on life and death. I don’t think this naïveté is an act either, DeMent claims in her liner notes that she’s never thought of herself as a great singer. She couldn’t be more wrong and listeners can thank heaven that she changed her mind, for this is an album to be cherished and played as long as one has life to listen. In a time when singer songwriter’s reputations are built by publicity, marketing and social media it’s great to hear an album by a singer songwriter who is so naïve and self deprivating of her own awesome musical ability it’s untrue. DeMent swerves popularity and celebrity to make the music she loves. The influences of the Carter
92
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) Family, Kitty Wells, Jimmie Rodgers, Loretta Lynn, Merle Haggard, Johnny Cash, and at times even Bob Dylan, can all be heard. The music on this album is organic and original. A big part of the beauty of this album is that it doesn’t do the kitsch frozen in time museum re-‐creation type of folk music. As mentioned above, this album makes use of simple traditional instrumentation and arrangements yet it is contemporary because the material is always existentially pertinent. Without Iris DeMent’s we would not have Laura Cantrell’s exquisite 2000 album Not The Tremblin Kind. Cantrell builds on the foundational work undertaken by DeMent and constructs her own sonic version of DeMent’s world. Should you buy this record if you see it in a store? Indeed yes, you should and don’t even bother looking at the sticker price. When you own this album become puritanically evangelical about it and then share it with everyone you can because life is nasty, brutish and oh so very short. References Lyotard, J 1979, The Postmodern Condition: a report on knowledge, Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK. Malone, W 2010, Country Music USA (third edition), University of Texas Press, Austin, USA. Petrusich, A 1992, It Still Moves: lost songs, lost highways and the search for the next American music, Faber and Faber, London, UK.
93
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘Bleach’ Nirvana By David Turner I grew up as an expatriate in every sense of the word. I was an artist and musician with a distinctly western approach growing up in a culturally controlled, yet burgeoning, Singapore. During these years, chewing gum was banned and rebellion was frowned upon. Feeling like an alien in a foreign land, I yearned for rebellion, culture anything that I could understand and that spoke to my displacement and apathy. I discovered this desire while walking past a television at the very seedy electronic goods fair Far East Plaza. Playing on the screen was Nirvana, midway through their now legendary Unplugged in New York performance. I was instantly mesmerised. The understatement, the alienation and beautiful melancholy of Kurt Cobain hit me like a bullet. I devoured my cassette tapes of Unplugged and Nevermind on my way to school. I wore the tapes out, listening to them while my batteries died and the pitch slowly shifted into nothingness. Diving deeper into this music, I asked my mother to buy me a copy of In Utero or Incesticide (their excellent B-‐Sides collection) but with the strict instructions not to buy Bleach. I was keenly aware even as a 12 year old of how much the production aesthetic of a record imbued it with an aura of the times. I was interested in the 1990s sound of rock production and I knew that Bleach was of a different era; the plate reverb saturated 1980s. At this time, I was only vaguely aware of the Sub Pop label it was released on. “We’re not the best, but we’re pretty good.” Sub Pop’s company motto perfectly sums up the attitude of the bands this label promoted in the late 1980s. Existing in a soup of hairspray, spandex and musicians that were focused on playing ‘lightning fast’, Sub Pop rejected the mainstream cabaret-‐acts present on the brand new MTV music video platform and focused on an authentic punk inspired and detuned version of traditional rock ‘n’ roll. Sub Pop was founded by two music obsessives, Jonathan Poneman and Bruce Pavitt. They were keenly aware of how a strong geographically located scene could impact on younger generations, finding business inspiration from labels such as Stax and Chess. Sub Pop promoted their label similar to individual artists and sought to capitalise on the ‘Seattle Sound. This geographical genre owed its evolution to local
94
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) record producer Jack Endino. Jonathan Poneman (1989) would describe this geographical scene as, “a readily happening movement in the American North-‐West which is heavy, confrontational guitar-‐based rock.” The music was characterised further by bleak subject matter, a good sense of humor and a DIY punk aesthetic that permeated the production, artwork and press shots. Sub Pop hit a chord with a public that was disillusioned by a decade of musical histrionics and vocal gymnastics. At this time, Metal Forces journalist Carl Williams (1990) pointed out that, “for the first time in years something highly original is sweeping the world…” Everett True (1990), who reported on the Seattle Sound, and specifically Nirvana, for Melody Maker wrote, “Basically this is the real thing. No rock star contrivance, no intellectual perspective, no master plan for world domination. Kurdt (sic) Cobain is a great tunesmith, although still a relatively young songwriter. He wields a riff with passion.” Nirvana’s debut album Bleach was released on June 15th 1989. It was only a moderate success for Sub Pop (it did not register on the Billboard’s Top 200) who’s other releases included Rapeman, Tad, Skinyard and Mudhoney. Recorded for US$606.17 over several sessions at Reciprocal Studios in 1988, Bleach was produced by Endino, who had recently recorded Soundgarden's Screaming Life EP. According to friend, collaborator and Melvin’s drummer Dale Crover (1993), “Cobain was really into (Soundgarden’s EP) that summer.” It was Cobain’s association with Seattle’s punk rock scene that first endeared him to Endino. Cobain was childhood friends with the Melvins’ lead singer Buzz Osbourne and drummer Dale Crovin. As Endino put it, “Any friend of the Melvins is a friend of mine” and added that, “If Dale is playing with these guys, it must be alright.” Bleach is far from a thrown together punk rock album; rather it is a carefully tailored production to fit the Sub Pop culture. One of Nirvana’s best-‐known tunes, Polly, on the album Nevermind, was initially written for Bleach but was omitted at the last minute as it did not fit the brief. Bleach also adhered Sub Pop’s visual aesthetic; the black-‐and-‐white negative cover showcasing the band playing at a tiny venue hints at a no frills affair. This no frills approach can also be found in the album’s tracking. Cobain (1990) states, “we recorded it in three days and nights and made sure there weren’t a lot of high tech effects on it. We wanted it to be as loud and in your face as possible, as raw as we could.” Cobain’s naturally competitive streak was very much present in the
95
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) production of Bleach, insisting that the band should be well prepared for the recording. Dave Grohl, who joined Nirvana a year after Bleach was released, was introduced to Cobain by the Melvins’ Buzz Osbourne. Grohl described the band’s work ethic as, “We were so prepared when recording for Nevermind began. We rehearsed in a barn and we rehearsed six days a week for four hours a day because we had nothing else to do.” Endino (1997) recalled that this work ethic translated into the recording of Bleach’s first few songs. With the Melvins’ Dale Crover on drums, Nirvana “ran through the songs instrumentally. Then Kurt said “Ok, I’ll do vocals now” and we just went through them in just one take.” This immediacy in recording approach resulted in this album being the least polished in Nirvana’s canon of work. The wall of noise, fuzz guitars and the soft-‐loud-‐soft dynamics, the band’s signature sounds, are all there, as is the melodious and aggressive bass playing. Like much of the late 1980s productions, the drums are the most affected by the times and have the uniquely long and loud reverb renown in this era. The mixes sound like they were done quickly. The passion and focus of the band is very clearly present. Despite his desire to exist within the Sub Pop community, Cobain was exploring pop and art music in an attempt to transcend the Seattle Sound. “Even to put ‘About a Girl’ on Bleach was a risk,” recalled Cobain (1994) to Rolling Stone. “I was heavily into pop. I really liked R.E.M. and I was into all kind of old ’60s stuff. But there was a lot of pressure within that social scene, the underground — the kind of thing you get in high school. And to put a jangly R.E.M. type of pop song on a grunge record, in that scene, was risky.” Cobain identified the very thing that set them apart from their Pacific Northwest contemporaries. As True (1989) would put it, “tune, chorus, harmony.” Cobain (1989) would claim that, “we’re moving towards simplicity and better songwriting all the time.” This obsession with simplistic lyrics is apparent in many of the lyrics on the album, for example, ‘School’s’ entire lyric sheet reads: Won't you believe it It's just my luck No recess You're in high school again The writing is concise, bare, and sinewy. What more needs to be said about the way Cobain felt at the time within a scene that was clicky, small and explosive. Cobain’s
96
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) disillusionment with these social pressures is also noted in the lyrics of ‘Big Cheese’ (Big Cheese…make me…go to the office) is a thinly veiled dig at Poneman who at the time was insisting that Nirvana forgo an album in lieu of another single. Much of the lyrical content is scathing social critique and abstract escapism bought on by Cobain and Krist Noveselic’s disdain for their native Aberdeen, Washington. Cobain observed (1990), “everyone was so negative and macho all the time. ..it’s very hard to deal with these social cliques, you’re always expected to be in a certain social category for different walks of life.” This escapism is represented in the band’s name. As Noveselic (1990) would claim the band’s name meant, “Being free from distraction and not being uptight.” Cobain often spoke of lyrics being secondary to the music and melody. He claimed to flit wildly from one subject to another. As a fan of Bob Dylan, I can’t help but compare this abstract sense of narrative to some of this work on Blood on the Tracks. Entire timelines can shift and distort but the central themes and feelings are ever present. ‘Floyd the Barber’ is a witty, sarcastic portrayal of the relationships of and that are filled with abuse of power told from the point of a view of a man having a shave. It mocks the platitudes of American television through the satire of a character on the Andy Griffith’s show. Upon Bleach’s release, the New Musical Express described the record album as, “the biggest, baddest sound that Sub Pop have so far managed to unearth.” In retrospect, Cobain did not regard much of the album’s writing to be up to standard, and with minimal attention given to his artier popper side, it gets very little time on the album. There is, however, a window into what would come later in his compositional style, in particular his garage pop of ‘About a Girl’. Bleach is the sound of a songwriter’s early foray into the construction of albums. Kurt Cobain (1994) described Bleach on Unplugged in New York as, “…our first album. Most people don’t own it.” It’s a record born of a geographical scene and written to represent it, only for the band to completely transcend both within two years. For this expatriate, thank god they did.
97
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) References Azerrad, M 1993, Come As You Are: The Story Of Nirvana. Doubleday. Fricke, D 1994, Success Doesn’t Suck. Rolling Stone. Gaar, GG 1997, Verse Chorus Verse: The Recording History Of Nirvana. Goldmine. Nash, R 2004, No Less Dangerous. The Independent. Available from: True, E 1989, Sub Pop: Seattle: Rock City. Melody Maker. True, E 1989, Bleacher Walls. Melody Maker. Williams, C 1990, Good Clean Fun. Metal Forces.
98
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘Smiler’ Rod Stewart By Tim Dalton Writers, such as alcoholic misanthropic poet Philip Larkin, often portray life in Hull (which is in the north east of Great Britain) during the 1970s as grim, depressing and austere. Larkin might have a point but my memories of growing up in the city and of this period of time are somewhat different mainly due to my exposure to music, but also due to lots of cycling and camping. Having hippie parents, with an amazing eclectic record collection, meant my formative years was filled with music, cycling, camping and lots of bonfires. Many a night I lay in bed with Bob Dylan, The Rolling Stones, Donavan, The Faces, Mott The Hoople and Rod Stewart seeping through the bedroom floorboards while my parents drank red wine, smoked Sobranie cocktail cigarettes and discussed Marxist philosophy with their bohemian comrades in the lounge below my bedroom. I vividly recall the first five solo albums by Rod Stewart recorded between 1969 and 1974 for Mercury Records because they all got played incessantly in the Dalton household. The last of this series of five records for Mercury Records was Smiler. The gatefold album cover, of gaudy red tartan, with some rather dubious pictures of Rod and a cast photo on the rear (which was taken at the wrap party down at the local pub in Willesden, North London) beautifully captures the spirit of the music it contained. I wonder how many joints my folks and their mates rolled on this cover? Rod’s first solo album, An Old Raincoat Won’t Ever Let You Down (1969), met with positive reviews while the next three albums Gasoline Alley (1970), Every Picture Tells A Story (1971), Never A Dull Moment (1972) receiving even higher accolades, with many music journalists claiming these albums to be instant classics; no disagreement from me here. By today’s standards any artists producing a record every year for five years straight is some achievement. So what exactly is the problem with Smiler and why did the music journalists have such an issue with it? In October 1974, Rod Stewart’s solo career had arrived at a crucial crossroads with the release of Smiler. This album came in for more vociferous criticism than his widely acclaimed four previous efforts, but still wound up serving as a springboard for even greater global successes, in terms of sales, in the years to come. This was the singer’s fifth and final solo album for Mercury Records; all of them recorded while pulling double duty as lead singer with the Faces. Smiler rubbed the more pretentious music critics up the wrong way because it often felt less like a seriously considered album of rock music and more like a bunch of friends on a piss-‐up at the local pub which had accidentally carried over into the recording studio. So what if
99
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) Smiler’s repertoire boasted an almost reckless variety of rock, pop, folk, blues and soul sources across its superstar songwriting credits, as long as all those involved had a good time? Rod didn’t write much of the material but he did act as record producer and curator of the material and sonic assets. In 1972 rock music was taking itself much too seriously, that’s one reason why punk rock came along and upset the applecart in the summer of 1976; it had too. Rock music during this period was suppose to be serious high art and not a load of ex-‐mods having a ball jamming down the pub. The album opens with the barks of Zak the dog swiftly followed by Chuck Berry’s ‘Sweet Little Sixteen’ which rocks Smiler into action with the reliable backing of the faithful Faces, only to give way to a 30-‐second harpsichord interlude courtesy of Pete Sears’ ‘Lochinvar’, before segueing into and mining the cultural capital of ‘Maggie May’ with the similar styled folk rocker ‘Farewell’. This is an absolute classic song of the Mott The Hoople syndrome variety e.g. self-‐referential songs about rock ‘n’ roll bands, virtually the metaphysics of rock. This is a classic rock ‘n’ roll song of aspirational soothsaying of the David Bowie variety. The lyrics, “Gonna be a big star some day no matter what they” proved to be 100% accurate in Rod’s case. This track being one of only three Smiler tunes bearing a Stewart co-‐writing credit, a sticking point for those who misguidedly accused Rod of laziness, along with two collaborations with Ron Wood in the foot-‐stomping ‘Sailor’ and the horn-‐laden honky tonk of ‘Dixie Toot’ (featuring the Memphis Horns) and maybe a not so cryptic pun to the new rock star drug of the era cocaine? Beyond that, the cover songs come fast and furious, including a spirited romp through Elton John and Bernie Taupin’s ‘Let Me Be Your Car’ (naturally featuring Elton on piano and co-‐vocals). This is followed by a semi-‐comedic heavy rock bashing of Australian hit makers the Easybeats’ ‘Hard Road’. Next up is a heavily orchestrated take on Bob Dylan’s ‘Girl from the North Country’, and a languid Caribbean swing through Paul McCartney’s ‘Mine for Me’. None of these cover songs bear much of a resemblance to the originals and that’s not a criticism. All this and Stewart still found time to exercise his inimitable blue-‐eyed soul talents on a double-‐whammy medley of Sam Cooke’s ‘Bring it on Home to Me’ and ‘You Send Me’, and a ballsy reworking of Aretha Franklin’s signature Goffin/King/Wexler composition, ‘(You Make Me Feel Like) A Natural Man’. This is a stellar lineup of songwriters. Isn’t the genius of this album the selection, sequencing, production and curation of the material? On top of the material, what about the ‘cast’ of players on this album? Ronnie Wood (guitar), Elton John (piano/vocals), Pete Sears (piano/harpsichord), Ian McLagan (Hammond organ), Ray Cooper (percussion), Spike Heatley (bass), Kenny Jones (drums) in addition to Caribbean steel and Dixieland jazz
100
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) bands and strings. An often-‐cited criticism of this album is that it just sounds like a load of amateur musicians jamming down the pub, maybe if the pub happens to be on Stella Street. Even if rock music’s critical establishment couldn’t agree on Smiler’s creative and artistic merits, the million-‐plus fans that bought copies of the album around the globe apparently didn’t share this uncertainty. Smiler was Rod the Mod’s parting recording for Mercury Records before he transitioned to his new recording contract with Atlantic Records and it’s a belter. Interestingly enough Rod’s change of record label also coincided with his physical relocation to Los Angeles and the Brit Ekland era of misogynistic disco influenced records, the less said about these records the better. Smiler was recorded at Morgan Studios, 169-‐171 High Road, Willesden, North West London. Out of this establishment came notable 1960 and 70’s studio recordings that included British bands and artists such as, Ten Years After, Arrows, Yes, The Kinks, Donovan, Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, Greenslade, Joan Armatrading, Cat Stevens, Paul McCartney, Jethro Tull, Black Sabbath, UFO and The Cure. This studio was also notable for having the first 24-‐track tape machine in England, and with Rod in the producer’s chair, he made good use of this new technology. Smiler is ‘track happy’, a term attributed to record producer Jerry Wexler (Burgess 2005: p.93) to describe the use of every track available simply because they are there. If there’s a track free then stick an instrument on it weather the arrangement requires it or not. Maybe this is why there are so many musicians and textures on this record? Wexler might have a point here because very occasionally the excessive overdubs do overpower and crowd Rod’s vocal melody. Smiler was of its time; there were a lot of really good albums released around the early 70s, e.g. The Rolling Stone’s Exile On Main Street (1972). In retrospect the panning by the critics was heavy-‐handed and possibly vindictive. This was the last album that Rod Stewart produced before handing over the production duties to legend with the golden ears Tom Dowd and the last time he’d use what was essentially The Faces as a backing band. The following album, Atlantic Crossing (1975), marks the start of a completely different body of work with slick costly L.A. west coast production, expensive session musicians and glitzy artwork; albums which I am certainly not going to waste a single second of my time defending. Smiler is an album that marks the end of one creative style, a signing off, before Stewart moves into a different creative style. Goodbye Great Britain hello America. By modern day standards Smiler is an A+ record and it transports me back to happy pre-‐teens times with my amazing family back in Hull, East Yorkshire. If it had not been for records
101
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) such as these I would have never entered the music the industry, an industry that I’ve enjoyed every second of in my thirty-‐year plus career. References Burgess, R 1997, The Art Of Record Production, Omnibus Press, London, UK.
102
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘Sister Feelings Call’ Simple Minds By Gareth Parton Fifteen-‐year-‐old boys are quite rightly not allowed to vote. Their brains are underdeveloped, obsessed with crude humour and jazz mags; moody gits whose primary focus is how to get a snog (*pash) with Jenny Tinker at the next School Disco-‐ at least I was. So I guess we should be wary of their juvenile tastes in music too, right? So it is with some trepidation I choose to rescue a band that was my obsession as a pubescent fifteen-‐year-‐old boy growing up in a southern English town during Maggie Thatcher’s 1980s... Simple Minds. Simple Minds, in my opinion, are two bands: 1. Cool, art-‐rock, wonky, atmospheric, experimental pioneers. 2. Posing, excessive, session-‐muso, stadium-‐preachers. Most casual music listeners are probably more familiar with the second version. The ‘Hey! Hey! Hey! Hey!’ of the mega-‐hit synonymous with the John Hughes brat pack teen-‐movie The Breakfast Club. The global smash ‘Don't You Forget About Me’ and the stadium posturing that proceeded. The predominant reason for this Album Rescue is to highlight the far more interesting version of the band. The band who, influenced by Bowie, Roxy Music and avant-‐garde European bands, created a number of truly great, lesser-‐known recordings; light-‐years away from Molly Ringwold. I have sympathy with those of you who dislike this band. I too abandoned them when I realised they’d become a parody, an embarrassment and a bunch of pretentious poseurs. In the late eighties, they came across as self-‐righteous, cause-‐ fighting, pseudo political preachers-‐ and worst of all, they were labelled as the “Scottish U2”!! So my love affair had to end abruptly when the stadia started filling. Their angular take on synth pop turned into sing-‐a-‐long choruses and fist pumping. I sold my records and gave away my cassettes. I didn't decide to listen to them again until very recently. How would they sound to me in 2015?
103
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) My tastes have changed quite a lot over the years. As a young keyboard player, I was intrigued by The Eurythmics and Howard Jones. During my later teens, I was seduced by The Smiths and then The Pixies. Keyboards (and keyboard players) became deeply unfashionable and I switched from being a bad keyboard player to a worse guitarist. American noisy stuff filled my ears during my 20’s. Folky-‐twee indie and Northern Soul soothed me through my 30s and now, well I’m quite open to anything; especially if it makes me feel relevant and down with the kids. So maybe it’s ok to start looking back again. Simple Minds were a Glaswegian band that formed from the remnants of Scottish punks Johnny and The Self Abusers. They emerged from the nascent punk scene in a mid-‐70s Glasgow shocked into action by touring bands such as Buzzcocks and The Damned. Vocalist Jim Kerr, guitarist Charlie Burchill and drummer Brian McGee moved on from their punk beginnings to construct a new type of band, inspired by the emerging new-‐wave scene. Joined by synth player, Michael MacNeil and bassist Derek Forbes (and naming themselves after a line in Bowie’s ‘The Jean Genie’) they formed the first (and best) incarnation of Simple Minds. They recorded their 1979 debut album, ‘Life In A Day’ which drew heavily on their Roxy Music and Velvet Underground influences. The release received little attention with poor sales and scant critical success. Disappointed by the overproduced sound of their debut (Kerr thought it sounded like The Boomtown Rats!), the band immediately returned to the studio and followed up with the much more experimental ‘Reel To Real Cacophony’. Expanding on the use of synthesizers and atmospherics, this was to set the template for the next few recordings. This Album Rescue could conceivably take on any of Simple Mind’s early albums as each has its own merit. But it is their 1981 album ‘Sister Feelings Call’ that most resonated with my young self. It was officially the band’s fifth studio album. The record was made during the same recording sessions as the album ‘Sons and Fascination’, both albums were initially released, shrunk-‐wrap together at a discounted rate. ‘Sister Feelings Call’ was a 7 track, 35 minute “bonus” album given away free with the first 10,000 copies of ‘Sons and Fascination’. The band had recently signed a new deal with Virgin Records (after three albums with Arista). Virgin were eager to pander to their fresh signings extravagant demands, so released both albums simultaneously (BBC, 1989). Kerr states (Sunderland, 1981): "We never saw it as any double album kind of thing…. but once we'd done 10 to 12 backing tracks, it was obvious it wouldn't all fit on one album yet no-‐one could make up their minds which to leave out.”
104
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) A few months after its initial release, both albums were sold separately (‘Sister Feelings Call’ at a budget price of £2.99). It was this cut-‐price vinyl version that I became familiar with. ‘Sons and Fascination’, the ‘big brother’ of ‘Sister Feelings Call’ was deemed by the band and label to contain the ‘stronger’ material. Though I propose that the work on ‘Sons and Fascination’ is safer and a little blander than the wilder, less considered ‘Sister Feelings Call’. I love the fact that the tracks are unfinished sketches. Under-‐ cooked arrangements go nowhere... songs often culminate in a never-‐ending loop, fading forever. The band also opted to work with a new producer (having previously only recorded with John Leckie). Their new choice, Steve Hillage was considered by many in the industry at the time to be the antithesis of post-‐punk. Hillage was tainted by his work as guitarist with 70’s prog-‐rock dinosaurs Gong, who in 1981, were the furthest from cool. But Simple Minds had a soft spot for the more flamboyant pre-‐punk progressive rock sounds of bands such as Genesis, so maybe hippie Hillage wasn’t such an odd choice. They also bonded over a mutual fondness for 70’s German rock (affectionately christened by the music-‐press as ‘Krautrock’). With its use of repetitive simple drum-‐patterns, driving bass lines, atmospheric effect-‐laden guitars and synth, sparse vocals and simplistic arrangements. Artists such as Neu, Can and Harmonia had pioneered a new approach to hypnotic minimalism and were hugely influential on early Simple Minds (BBC, 1989). The band had been touring Europe extensively and had developed a strong localised following, but they weren't yet known widely beyond the pages of the niche music press. Thematically and visually, Simple Minds were evolving. Kerr had developed his unique style, dressing flamboyantly with mascara and a ‘Blackadder’ bowl haircut. The band's previous few albums had been described as “European travelogues”; abstract audio postcards documenting their touring life. Their sleeves assumed a pseudo Eastern Bloc aesthetic, incorporating Russian fonts and imagery in their artwork. These Euro influences in music and look, together with a rhythm section who knew how to make an audience move, were creating an odd mixture of dark and danceable music, “transplanting their traveller's impressions into rich disco epics” (Bohn, 1981). Sister Feelings Call looks further afield than Europe and hints at Simple Minds’ future across the Atlantic and the world beyond. The lyrics remain mostly cryptic with hints at urban and modernist themes. Song titles such as ‘Careful in Career’ and ‘Wonderful In Young Life’ are meaningless slogans yet in the context of the record
105
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) make perfect sense. New Musical Express (NME) accused them of reading “like a set of particularly obtuse crossword anagrams” (Bohn, 1981). The opening track on ‘Sisters Feelings Call’ is the delightful instrumental ‘Theme For Great Cities’. For a band so recognizable by the voice of their front man, it's a bold move to start the album without his presence. It is arguably the standout track of the album. With its Kraftwerk-‐influenced melody and funk bass backbone, future remixers would sample and rework this track numerous times. Drummer Brian McGee’s shuffle dance-‐beat pre-‐empted the indie-‐sound of Madchester by ten years. The only single taken from the album, ‘The American’ failed to reach the UK Top 50. Reviews at the time weren’t too agreeable. The NME were confused by their direction claiming it was “inexcusably laboured”. The track, however, was quite rightly embraced by the burgeoning New Romantic club scene and played at fashionable London venues such as Soho’s Blitz club. The slap bass swagger, pulsing synth and wild guitar squeaks were still meant for the left-‐field fans rather than chart buying teens. Kerr’s lyrics were deliberately non-‐narrative; preferring ambiguous repetitive short phrases, with his vocals daubed in echo and reverse reverb effects, hiding the meaning and intelligibility in the atmospherics of the music. Here comes the shake The speed-‐decade wake I see you wake Shake Fit on those overalls What do you know about this world anyway? (The American) The sonics of this album are dominated by the pads and arpeggios of MacNeil, whose collection of analogue synthesizers are showcased throughout the record. The ambient moments are reminiscent of the Harmonia and Brian Eno collaborations. This was the era prior to MIDI sequencing, so a synth player was expected to record his parts live. For me, this adds to the freedom of the performances with an authenticity, soon to be hijacked by the precision of programmers and samplers.
106
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) Forbes’ bass is also indispensable. ‘20th Century Promised Land’ and ‘Wonderful in Young Life’ move away from the dance-‐floor with clanking bass guitar and pounding snare hammering relentlessly. ‘League Of Nations’ returns to the punk funk. The instrumental groove and drum-‐machine loop reminiscent of Talking Heads with slap bass, oriental keyboard melody and Jim Kerr's faux gothic minimal vocals. The album’s most challenging listen is ‘Careful In Career’. Hillage’s production tricks such as reverse drum effects and backwards reverb attempt to add interest but the idiosyncratic vocal melody makes for an awkward tune that takes a few listens to digest. The album closes with another vocal-‐less track, the ‘Sound of 70 Cities’. The electronic fog-‐horn fades into the distance signalling the final time this original line-‐ up would appear on record together. At the time, Kerr himself was not a huge fan of the album stating in an interview with UK’s Melody Maker magazine (Kerr 1981): "it’s a bit one-‐paced and samey. A lot of the songs on this album, and the last album, have been based upon repetition as opposed to drama. I feel the new album's the end of a phase for us...I think we were subconsciously clearing everything out so that next time we go in to record, I'm sure -‐ though I've no idea what it will be just now -‐ it'll be on a totally different level altogether." To me this implies Kerr was already anticipating their “bigger” sound. It disappoints me to read this, as it seems he is missing the point. For me, the repetition is the drama. It’s the club sound, it’s the hypnosis and it’s the amphetamines. Kerr’s premonition of their future sounds comes with the lure of America. The band saw ‘Sons and Fascination/Sister Feelings Call’ as a chance to purge themselves of the “old” Simple Minds material; a new incarnation was on its way. In my opinion, it was the quest to be loved by the USA that took Simple Minds into the mediocre phase of their career. On successive records, some core players (McGee, Forbes and McNeil) would quit the band to be replaced with session musicians. The band abandoned the synth and bass backbone replacing it with more traditional guitar rock licks and soul backing vocals. As Kerr’s style developed, he moved closer towards the messianic poses of his rock peers, INXS and U2... without the rock-‐star good looks of Hutchence or the ego of Bono! Here I suggest that one event key event finally put the end to the “old” Simple Minds; the 1985 Live Aid concert. Simple Minds performed a set at the American leg
107
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) of the event, showcasing their rockier persona; the puffy shirts, postures and their recent huge number one hit. I’m not the first person to suggest that Geldof’s Live Aid charity event was responsible for many great travesties in music. Writer and Punk, John Robb suggested it was a day when “the pastel shades of corporate pop were now back in control with a whole host of pop stars old and new celebrating the mullet mundane of the mid eighties” (2005) and Adam Ant (a performer on the day) claimed, “it was the day that Rock ’n’ Roll died”. It did however expose the day’s performers to an estimated global audience of 1.9 Billion viewers! Bands such as Simple Minds, U2 and INXS would no longer tour club venues. Music had turned “Stadium.” Ensuing shows by the likes of Genesis, The Rolling Stones, Pink Floyd, U2 and Simple Minds meant sports venues, such as London’s 76,000 capacity Wembley Stadium, were being used almost as much for music as they were for sport (Paphides, 2015). Musician, David Byrne discussed his theories on the way architecture influences music. I concur with him when he suggests that tunes that sound great in sweaty clubs don’t translate well to large arenas. Therefore the composing and production must change to adapt to the new environment. The snare reverbs get bigger, the tempos slow, and the lighters come out. For Simple Minds, the audience changed too; the cool club-‐goers of the early Eighties turned into yuppies with Sade and Enya ‘coffee-‐table’ CD collections. Simple Minds could just have easily been interchangeable with fellow simpletons, Simply Red. Game over. Though the band still tour and make new records, today they are left with only two original members: Kerr and Burchill. In 2012, Simple Minds returned to performing some of their early material, opting to only play songs from their first five albums. When discussing this decision to showcase their vintage work, guitarist Burchill stated, "People think (Simple Minds) is all anthems and big gestures, and I'd love to redress that side of it" (Thomson, 2012). Unfortunately, this redemption came too late… During the process of revisiting this album again, I have realised that I am not only rescuing Simple Minds reputation for you, but I am predominantly rescuing them for myself. Rediscovering this band again after such a long gap actually makes me feel a bit stupid for having left them in the first place. I for one am pleased that I’ve re-‐ experienced this album. Perhaps my love has been reignited because essentially I am still that fifteen-‐year-‐old boy. Under-‐developed brain, crude humour etc... And I never did get to snog Jenny Tinker at the school disco...
108
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) References Bohn, C 1981, Reviews -‐ Sons And Fascination/Sister Feelings Call. New Musical Express. Byrne, D 2010, How architecture helped music evolve. [online] Ted.com. Available from: . [12 August 2015]. Cornwell, S 2015, dream giver redux | discography | albums | sister feelings call. Available from: . [10 August 2015]. Kerr, J, Burchill, C, MacNeil, M, Forbes, D & McGee, B 1981, Sister Feelings Call. [LP] Virgin Records. Paphides, P 2015, How Live Aid reinvented pop music. Available from: . [15 August 2015]. Reynolds, S 2005, Rip it up and start again. Chapter 21 -‐ New Gold Dream. Faber, London, UK. Robb, J 2005, Live Aid -‐ the day that the music died. -‐ Louder Than War. Available from: . [15 August 2015]. Robb, J 2011, Adam Ant brands Live Aid a "mistake" and a "waste of time" and the end of 'rock n roll'. Available at: . [16 August 2015]. Simple Minds -‐ The Street Fighting Years, 1989, [Radio programme] Radio 1: British Broadcasting Corporation. Sutherland, S 1981, The Impossible Dream -‐ Steve Sutherland gets a hard dose of reality from Simple Minds. Melody Maker. Thomson, G 2012, Simple Minds: 'Maybe we shouldn't have cashed in'. Available at: . [16 August 2015].
109
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) WhoSampled, (n.d.). Theme for Great Cities by Simple Minds on WhoSampled. Available at: . [19 August 2015].
110
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘Ultravox!’ Ultravox By Tim Dalton Some people know about my two-‐part life, but most don’t. The two halves are cycling and music which are similar to oil and water; it's very rare that the two mix. In early 2015 bicycle company Swift Carbon, who named their top of-‐the-‐range racing bicycle Ultravox, invited me to the launch of their new carbon fiber racing bikes. It was an interesting event held in a posh, spotless, boutique style bicycle shop in St Kilda, an über hip and trendy suburb of Melbourne. At this launch I met South African company owner Mark Blewett and I asked him about why he hadn’t named these bicycles something more cycling orientated e.g. Mistral or Sirocco (both hot winds that blow across the Mediterranean from the North African desert). It turned out that Mark was a big fan of 80s synth-‐pop and in particular the UK band Ultravox, what he didn't know was there were two very different versions of this band. The lessor known but more adventurous Ultravox (version one) ran from 1974 to 1979 and then the more commercially successful Midge Ure fronted version two ran from 1980 onwards. The version that most people are familiar with is version two; due to mega hits like ‘Vienna’ and ‘Dancing With Tears In My Eyes’. For me this is a problem as the latter more commercial and insipid work throws a long shadow over version one. It’s the February 1977 debut album, Ultravox! that I am rescuing here. The exclamation mark is a sign of their origins. When the band formed in 1974 the Krautrock band Neu! heavily influenced them. Originally the band went by the name Tiger Lilly and drew their influences from The Velvet Underground, Roxy Music, Bowie, Steve Harley and The New York Dolls. Though not really a performing unit at this stage, other than the odd pub gig, they did write a lot of material some of which makes it onto this album. This album was recorded cheaply at Island Record’s studio in Hammersmith, west London in only 17 days. Production work was undertaken by up and coming producer Steve Lillywhite, who would later find fame with U2, Simple Minds, and Roxy Music’s Brian Eno. On the 2003 compilation release, The Best Of Ultravox, there isn’t a single track from this debut album. I would argue that Ultravox were at their most vital, and did their best work, on this debut album. But why is this piece of excellent music largely ignored? Anyone expecting this album to be similar to the Midge Ure fronted Ultravox (version two) of the Vienna era is in for something of a shock. The Ultravox of the late 1970s were a much stranger, much more interesting and engaging outfit. The music on this album is as idiosyncratic as anything that made it onto vinyl during that era. The list of influences is long: Neu!, Berlin-‐era Bowie and Eno-‐era Roxy Music
111
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) are perhaps the most obvious on this record. Forming in 1974 and signing to Chris Blackwell’s Island label in 1977 put the band into a liminal state; a bit too late for punk rock and a bit too early for the New Romantics. Their sound on this record is a combination of post punk, glam rock, electronica, new wave, classical and reggae, which is probably Chris Blackwell’s influence. Gary Numan, who was heavily influenced by Ultravox, said that they were, “conventional but with another layer on top”. There’s a real sense of this music not belonging, it’s disconnected, doesn’t fit and not of its time. Looking back at it through a 38 year long telescope it all starts to make sense, it’s all about perspective. In the same way that cheap electric guitars defined the sound of the 1960s, cheap synthesizers defined the sound of the late 1970s and early 1980s, Ultravox were suspended in 1977 between the bold influences of Bowie and Roxy on one hand and a vision of new wave and early 1980s synth-‐pop on the other. Ultravox was a band out of sync with the times. I first discovered this album when a schoolmate stole it from a local record shop and offered it to me for £5. As a 15 year old I was probably the only person in my whole school that the music thief could possibly sell this record too. In retrospect my schoolmate was probably thirty years ahead of the time by stealing music when everyone else was still paying for it. Some would call him a thief; I would call him a visionary. What initially attracted me to this album was the fabulous high quality gatefold cover. The five members of the band dressed predominantly in black PVC against a black brick wall with a vivid bright red neon sign spelling out ‘Ultravox!’ This photograph is a pre-‐computer one, so there is no Photo Shop manipulation here. The huge neon sign was real and I’m guessing it’s languishing in a north London garage somewhere awaiting a TV makeover show when some heavily tattooed guy called Rick will bring it back to its former glory. When the gatefold opens, staring out are Stevie Shears (guitar), Warren Cann (drums/vocals), Billy Currie (violin/keyboards) and Chris Cross (bass/vocals). The back cover is a backlight picture of John Foxx in a TV studio dressed in a black suite with his shirt collar and cuffs burnt off. It's a powerful image, a kind of digital Jesus Christ like figure? The cover artwork and design is credited to Dennis Leigh, which I didn’t realize at the time is John Foxx’s real name. This was a piece of luxury design and packaging, Art Into Pop strikes again. The music press of the day, yes we actually had a music press back in the late 1970s, did not treat this album kindly upon its release. Ultravox!'s sales were disappointing, and neither the album nor the associated single ‘Dangerous Rhythm’ managed to enter the UK charts. The band’s debut as Ultravox was after they had signed to Island Records and had made this album. The press found this problematic, as it seemed to contravene some unwritten punk rock rule of the day. The band walked
112
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) directly into the lion’s den by playing their first show as Ultravox at the Nashville Room, 171 North End Road, London, W6. At the time the Nashville Room was the home of the booming pub rock scene (101ers, Duck Deluxe, Dr Feelgood, Kilburn and The Highroads, etc.) and not somewhere a contrived alternative art school band complete with violin, synthesizer and newly signed record contract should be playing. The gig very quickly turned into a ‘hyped’ event, rammed to the rafters with self important gonzo music journalists determined to pull the band apart. In the 19 century Charles Sanders Pierce defined the theory of semiotics as the "quasi-‐ necessary, or formal doctrine of signs" and it's quite feasible that one of the issues at the Nashville Room that night was one of semiotics. The red neon sign, from the album cover, caused the most offence when it was used as the backdrop on the stage. I wasn’t there but I’ll speculate it looked very impressive. However, the journalists who were viewing this through the lens of punk rock interpreted it as a sign of arrogance. It’s very rare for a debut album to be damaged because the band had a strong visual image, which they wished to communicate to their audience. All high school media studies students would see this as a classic case of what Umberto Eco terms aberrant decoding. th
What about the music on this album? There aren’t any bad tracks, it sounds much bigger than its environment. The joint production work between the technically savvy Lillywhite and the cerebral Eno is sonically top notch. I would propose that one of the issues the music press had with this album is that it did not adhere to the strict three minute, three chord, shouty aesthetics of punk that was popular at the time, it was all together a much more complex piece of work. During the 1970’s the music press wielded their immense power quite irresponsibly and to a large extent it was them that inflicted unwarranted damage on Ultravox! the album and the band. The sound of this album is unique and was just too different for most listeners at the time, which is possibly why it alienated the band from their potential following. At times the lyrics are a little overblown and art school pretentious e.g. track eight ‘The Wild, The Beautiful and The Damned’, "I'll send you truckloads of flowers. From all the world that you stole from me. I'll spin a coin in a madhouse. While I watch you drowning". For me though this is all part of the fun. The first track ‘Satday [sic] Night In The City Of The Dead’ possesses the same no-‐ nonsense attitude that The Clash would display. It also captures the edgy noir mood that pervades the entire album. Track two ‘Life At Rainbow’s End’ is an upbeat future gazing tune about living the good life. This fascination with Futurism is the core theme of this album and it is most prominent on track four’s ‘I Want To Be A Machine’. Relations within the band were occasionally on a tenuous footing during this time as Foxx declared that he intended to live his life devoid of all emotions, a
113
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) sentiment expressed explicitly here. This track excels because it culminates in a startling reverb laden violin-‐fest. Track five’s ‘Wide Boys’ bares its influences openly when it kicks off with a Bowie-‐ish ‘Rebel Rebel’ Mick Ronson sound-‐a-‐like guitar riff before settling down into a Spiders From Mars’ groove. On track six’s ‘Dangerous Rhythm’ John Foxx starts aping Roxy Music’s Bryan Ferry but set against a catchy Island Records house style reggae beat. The anthemic track eight, ‘The Wild The Beautiful And The Damned’, with its experimental and avant-‐garde themes draws heavily on Bowie’s 1977 Low album, which was only released one month before Ultravox! The album closes with track nine’s haunting ‘My Sex’, a spares piano driven composition with bare disarming vocals overlaid with electronic heartbeat and eerie distancing synth strings. After this debut album two more albums followed, Ha!-‐Ha!-‐Ha! (1977) and Systems Of Romance (1978) neither of which sold well nor were particularly exciting. With three poorly selling albums under their belt, Island Records pulled the plug and dropped the band in 1979. Despite being dropped, the band went on an unsuccessful self-‐financed USA tour the same year. By this point the writing was well and truly on the wall for Ultravox version one. Guitar player Stevie Shears was fired after the USA tour and John Foxx’s professional relationship with Billie Currie was well and truly broken. With the extra strain of financial bankruptcy facing the band, John Foxx left to pursue a solo career. Ultravox version one was well and truly terminated by the end of 1979. When I’m out on my bicycle and ride over a bridge in a river valley it's virtually impossible to comprehend the structure’s engineering elegance and architectural beauty. As you ride along all you can see is the road ahead and it’s not until you put some distance between you and the structure that you can you look back and admire its beauty and elegance. Maybe this visual metaphor holds true when considering this album? Ultravox! was an album bridging the gorge between punk and new romantics/synth pop. At the time we couldn’t see this because we were right on top of it but in retrospect it's becomes fairly obvious of the form and function of this album. Dave Thompson, writing for AllMusic, opinionated, "It was Ultravox! who first showed the kind of dangerous rhythms that keyboards could create. The quintet certainly had their antecedents -‐ Hawkwind, Roxy Music and Kraftwerk to name but a few, but still it was the group's 1977 eponymous debut's grandeur, wrapped in the ravaged moods and lyrical themes of collapse and decay that transported '70s rock from the bloated pastures of the past to the futuristic dystopias predicted by punk”. This CD makes me grateful and proud that when I was young, my youth was not wasted in fact it was rocked by this album.
114
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) References O’Sullivan, T, Hartley, J, Saunders, D, & Fiske, J 1983, Key Concepts In Communication, Routledge, London, UK.
115
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘Niandra LaDes & Usually Just a T-‐Shirt’ John Frusciante By Matt Bangerter In my youth, like most teenage boys trying to impress girls, I decided to take up playing guitar as being a flautist doesn’t quite give you the same street cred as a guitar or drum sticks do when hanging out in the band room at high school. My guitar teacher introduced to me to a lot of popular music during this period, but the one band that I discovered on my own was the Red Hot Chili Peppers. I started playing guitar approximately when the Californication album cycle was coming to an end. I really enjoyed this album and their back-‐catalog was well suited to teenage boys, so much so, that I rushed out and tried to buy as many albums as I could. This rush caused me to stumble upon their newly returned guitarist, John Frusciante, first solo effort that was released in 1994. At this time, John Frusciante had just released his third album, but wanting to experience his music in the intended order, I picked up his first album; Niandra LaDes & Usually Just a T-‐Shirt (henceforth referred to as Niandra LaDes). After spending most of my time listening to the Chili Peppers, Foo Fighters, Smashing Pumpkins, Nirvana, Pearl Jam and an assortment of other ‘90s heavyweights in the American alternative rock scene, this album was a big awakening. Filled with streams of consciousness, guitar-‐laden, lo-‐fi experimentation, this album sounds nothing like the style of song found on the Red Hot Chili Peppers’ BloodSugarSexMagik (BSSM). BSSM was written and recorded in 1991 at approximately the same recording time as Niandra LaDes. BSSM is arguably Red Hot Chili Peppers’ best album release. Frusciante had a large role in BSSM’s success and was clearly a very creative time for Frusciante, allegedly due to his copious amounts of drug use in combination with his youthful exuberance, being 21 at the time of recording. There is a tonal cohesion throughout Niandra LaDes attributed to most tracks being recorded onto a small cassette recording deck. Layers of guitar parts and vocals make up the majority of the sounds. There is some piano work and a number of instances of reversed guitars. This trick involves turning the cassette over in the recorder and recording while the same song is being played backwards (this trick was made famous by Eric Clapton on ‘While My Guitar Gently Weeps’ by The Beatles) in addition to other tape manipulation techniques.
116
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) Niandra LaDes’ production seems unconcerned with noise and distortions. As the album moves through its more ‘structured’ first half, usually referred to the “Niandra LaDes half”, many of these tracks are conventional songs, constructed with verses and choruses. However, there are no stringent rules with how they are applied in the songs’ construction. It opens with Frusciante counting in the first song. This definitely gives the album a demo-‐recording feel or even a journal entry. This is made more apparent by the scribbling of song lyrics on the album art. Through many songs, Frusciante sings about what he is or has been. “I’m as happy as can be” (As Can Be). “I’ve been insane, well the time slow” (Been Insane). “I’ve got blood on my neck from success” (Blood on My Neck from Success). These song lyrics from the first half of the album start happy and then descend to a darker place. The untitled songs of Usually Just a T-‐Shirt (the second half of the album) become frantic, more experimental and definitely strange. Frusciante isn’t concerned with the album’s production; there is no ‘cleaning up’ of the ‘making of’ as done in the first half of the album. Frusciante’s work continues to remain bare and exposed, but increasingly as the surrealism and experimentation continues. This switch from titled and mostly structured songs to a series of untitled and inconsistent pieces almost reflects his switch from one of the biggest bands in the world, Red Hot Chili Peppers, to his hermit like self-‐seclusion. It feels very symbolic, with the first half of the album’s penultimate track ‘Blood on My Neck from Success’. Just from the titles, it is clearly a criticism of the fame and celebrity exposure Frusciante experienced during his time with the Red Hot Chili Peppers. After one more song in the first half, there is an immediate change to ‘Untitled #1’, which is a 30 second preview of the madness that will follow in this second half of the album. This song is abrupt, strange and sudden; much like Frusciante’s departure from Red Hot Chili Peppers. There are some song-‐like moments, but many tracks are instrumental and lacking any specific structure. Sections with lyrics seem to crop up through the noise of looped and layered guitar parts. The album ends in a cacophony of noise, where you are lead to believe that the album is literally dissolving in the CD player. Frusciante resurrects his profile in 1994 for an interview, presumably for Niandra LaDes’ release. Watching this famous VPRO 1994 interview with Frusciante, he appears disheveled and just a shell of the person that he was years ago when he wrote the album. 117
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) Niandra LaDes acts as his diary, documenting his descent into the dark. Watching the Red Hot Chili Peppers documentary, titled Funky Monks, that captures the making of BSSM, we see a young and exuberant Frusciante with incredible focus and determination to create great music. Three years later, this youthful exuberance is gone replaced with a darker persona. Niandra LaDes foreshadows this descent. The track ‘Mascara’ features this dark descent where the song ends with multiple lead vocals sung over one another, using lyrics and melodies from songs yet to be heard until later in the album including ‘Been Insane’ and ‘Your Pussy’s Glued to a Building on Fire’. The most tangible aspect of this album is the catharsis that Frusciante seems to be going through. It sounds as though he is exorcising his inner demons. However, unlike other artists, this is not art for others. It is his own exorcism. So, why does this album need rescuing? For those, who like me, have come to this album from listening to the Red Hot Chili Peppers, Niandra LaDes could easily be discarded as a piece of noisy nonsense. Where are the drums? Where are the ‘normal’ songs? Why does it sound like this? These are questions friends of mine asked on their first listening to this album. Oddly enough, the album is not about the music or the production value. The album is about understanding the context of Frusciante’s time in the limelight with the Red Hot Chili Peppers and his abrupt departure from the band while on tour to support BSSM. This resulted in Frusciante’s subsequent spiral into drug addiction and self-‐ imposed exile from public life. While he was urged by those around him to release Niandra LaDes to showcase his musical genius to the world, Frusciante preferred to hide away in obscurity so that he could make his music. Niandra LaDes is a musical journey of an artist, bursting at the seams with creative energy while simultaneously struggling against the grain of fame. On this album you can almost hear Frusciante burrowing away, withdrawing within as he attempts to exorcise his demons. This album is the epitome of DIY. It is all Frusciante. If music is created to have meaning for people, then this album wasn’t made for an audience; rather Niandra LaDes was created only for Frusciante himself. This album is like reading a journal or watching a documentary; although a very surreal one. The album is not a literal interpretation of Frusciante’s life; rather we infer his dark descent from the lyrics, the sound and the music.
118
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) This album was my first musical purchase that sounded genuine to me; it sounded real. It has been 15 years since I first listened to Niandra LaDes and it still leaves a lasting impression on me to this day. To reiterate, this album is not about the production or the performance. Niandra LaDes is Frusciante’s diary and should be listened and treated as a historical narrative. This album is a challenging listening experience, but one to be enjoyed. This album articulates Frusciante’s creative process, that is, a release of his thoughts and feelings into a work of art. It just so happens that this album is a much more confronting work of art. By all appearances, Frusciante made this album for himself as a demo or as a life journal. If this is so, then by definition this album is not for everyone. But it should be. References Van Splunteren, B. (Director). (1994). John Frusciante VPRO '94. Netherlands: VPRO
119
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘Give ‘Em Enough Rope’ The Clash By Tim Dalton Some albums are born classics while others need a much more revisionist approach. The Clash’s second album Give ‘Em Enough Rope is definitely in the latter category. If any album was in need of a critical rescue 37 years after its release then it’s this one. Back when this album was released I was 15, just about to turn 16, and I’d played their eponymous 1977 debut album, The Clash, to death. Every single track on the first album, according to my young ears, was amazing. At the time I’d worked hard to earn the money to buy this album by having two paper rounds, one early morning and another one in the evening. In complete contrast to today; music back then was an expensive commodity. I worked hard, saved my money and rushed out to my local record store to buy this album. When I got it home and first played Give ‘Em Enough Rope I was pretty disappointed. Where was the anger, where was the aggression and where was the confrontation? In fact, where was the punk rock? This album sounded like some mid Atlantic over-‐produced pro-‐rock band? Retrospectively there seems to be some social and economic parallels between the UK today and the late seventies. It was a time of economic depression, the working class were still down trodden by the conscienceless political rulers and moneyed elite, racial tensions simmered and a generation of young people with no future prospects were ready to lash out a wave of destruction in the form of riots in protest at the injustices of the world they find themselves in. We’re not quite there with the youth riots yet, Brixton and Toxteth style, but they are definitely on the horizon if things don’t change. The Clash released their second eagerly awaited album Give ‘Em Enough Rope on 10 November 1978. When all the other major British punk bands died in 1978 and were replaced by tepid New Wave acts, CBS (the Clash’s label) tried to push the band into the US market whether they liked it or not. Ideally CBS would have loved The Clash to have become a band similar to The Police, who were a bunch of aging musicians posing as punks. Posers they might be, but they sold their album on both sides of the Atlantic by the truck load and were compliant to all of their record company’s requests. In preparation for the recording of Give ‘Em Enough Rope the band undertook a ‘secret’ mini tour of the UK Midlands. Bernie Rhodes, the band’s manager, and the record company had settled on Sandy Perlman, a heavy metal producer with a commercial track record with bands like Blue Öyster Cult, to produce their second album. He was described as the, “Hunter S. Thompson of rock, th
120
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) a gonzo producer of searing intellect and vast vision”, in the Billboard Encyclopedia of Record Producer’s (1998: p.233). Between 24 and 26 January 1978 The Clash played in Birmingham (Barbarellas), Luton (Queensway Hall) and Coventry (Lanchester Polytechnic). According to Paul Simonon (2008), “The record company had this idea that they wanted a big name American producer for the second album”. The record company felt that the band’s first album was just too raw and not radio friendly enough for American audience’s refined taste. Pearlman attended all three shows to audition the proposed material for the album. At the last show at Lanchester Polytechnic in Coventry (26/1/78) Perlman tried to get backstage just before the show to meet the band. Mick Jones’s old school friend, Robin Crocker (AKA Robin Banks), was taking care of backstage security and he didn’t know who Pearlman was. Crocker wasn’t a man you messed with. Some heavy duty manners were employed to keep Perlman from going backstage resulting in the long haired American record producer lying prostrate on the floor blood pouring from his nose as the band stepped over him to take to the stage. As normal The Clash don’t play by the rules, what a great introduction to your new record producer. Pearlman must have been keen because this incident did not dampen his enthusiasm to make their second record. th
th
As 1978 wore on an exasperated record company desperately wanted a follow up album to capitalize on the quick and cheap first album. CBS did not release the first album in the USA; it was only available via import, as they thought the quality was not high enough for American audiences. To compound matters, the once wholly supportive music press were also starting to view The Clash with suspicion amid claims that they were lazy and not pulling their weight. Strummer and Jones de-‐ camped to Jamaica for two weeks to write new material prior to recording. The whole band reconvened to undertake initial multi-‐track recording at Wessex Sound Studios, and Basing Street Studios in London. Wessex Sound Studios would become The Clash’s studio of choice for future recordings while Basing Street would see Mick Jones return there with Big Audio Dynamite. The Clash, Sandy Pearlman and engineer Corky Stasiak spent many weeks recording the tracks for Rope. This was is in complete contrast to the first album, which was recorded and mixed in CBS’s own basic Whitfield Street Studios, London. The first album had urgency to it; it was recorded and mixed over a three-‐week period working Thursday to Sunday each week. The band, and in particular drummer Nicky ‘Topper’ Headon and bass player Paul Simonon, complained about the nitpicking way that Perlman recorded. Both complained bitterly about the lack of spontaneity during these recording sessions. Once recording was complete Mick Jones and Joe Strummer claimed to have been virtually kidnapped and taken to San Francisco for overdubs and mixing. Jones and
121
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) Strummer probably went to San Francisco without Headon and Simonon quite willingly but their claims aid the myth and legend of The Clash. What is known is that Headon and Simonon where very pissed off about not being involved in the USA overdub and mixing sessions. CBS Records, The Clash’s record company, initially owned The Automatt studios in San Francisco but by 1978 it was sub leased to ex-‐CBS employee David Rubinson. The studio complex was known for its top-‐notch equipment and for the radio friendly hit records it produced. Between September and October 1978, singer Joe Strummer and guitarist Mick Jones worked with Pearlman at The Automatt to record overdubs for the album. Flying in from the UK, Jones and Strummer stayed at the Holiday Inn in Chinatown, and almost every night they went to see punk bands play at the Mabuhay Gardens, known locally in the punk scene as "The Mab". Between takes at The Automatt, Strummer and Jones listened for the first time to the Bobby Fuller Four version of ‘I Fought the Law’ on one of Rubinson's studio lobby jukeboxes. When they returned to England this song was re-‐made into a Clash classic which would make its first appearance in March 1979 on their short, five date, London Calling Tour. Then in May 1976 it would become the standout track on The Cost Of Living. The results of Give ‘Em Enough Rope are not nearly as good as they could have been and there are perceived to be three major flaws. First of all, Pearlman hated Strummer’s voice and buried it disastrously low in the mix. Secondly, he packed the sound with distortion, booming drums, and overdubbing, making all the songs sound similar and muddying the impact of The Clash’s considerable guitar fury. Thirdly, the lyrics Strummer wrote came under attack because they were considered histrionic, esoteric and soaked in melodrama: they look unkindly on British punk. Strummer’s lyrics are self critical of the band, his own career and the world at large. Mixing the drums so loud on this record is probably a testament to the abilities of Topper Headon. This is one of the few albums in the Album Rescue Series where I largely blame the production of the album needing a rescue. In this instance I would opinion that Pearlman was a bad choice as producer for this record. It could have been much worse though. At the time there was no digital audio workstations (DAW) or software, which allows for the manipulation of audio. If this DAW software and technology have been around at the time of recording and had Pearlman used it as un-‐compassionately as he did an analogue recording technology available at the time then this album would probably be un-‐savable. The Clash were not in a pleasant situation during 1978; they were being accused by the music press of selling out, of being phonies and being pushed, by their record
122
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) company, for a more commercial, clean, mainstream, sound which they apparently loathed. The music falls apart under the war between producer and band; commerciality and creativity never sit well together. In abstract form the songs written by Joe Strummer are fantastic, and would have been truly world-‐class had a more sympathetic production been employed. ‘Safe European Home’ is a great mixed paean to Kingston Jamaica, a reggae-‐punk rock hybrid, the theme’s of which pick up where ‘White Man In Hammersmith Palais’ left off. ‘Tommy Gun’ is a chilling take on terrorism; ‘Drug Stabbing Time’ has an undeniable rock groove. ‘Stay Free’ is a world-‐class romantic history of the band, written in true Mott The Hoople style by Mick Jones about his childhood mate Robin ‘Banks’ Crocker (he of the Pearlman punching incident pre recording of Give ‘Em Enough Rope). I would agree that these songs aren’t punk songs; correct they aren’t. This is Strummer developing as a lyricist, in the same way that Jones was developing as a superb studio arranger. This is the sound of The Clash leaving punk behind and moving into much more interesting territory. Give ‘Em Enough Rope is a transitional album. These facts should be celebrated because without Give ‘Em Enough Rope we would not have the undeniable classic London Calling or the equally impressive Sandinista. Give ‘Em Enough Rope is The Clash and in particular the creative talent of Strummer/Jones developing and serving notice on what’s to come. The album cover features a painting in stark flat colours of a Chinese horseman looking down at an American cowboy’s body being picked at by vultures. The album art was designed by Gene Greif and is based on a 1953 postcard titled ‘End of the Trail’. The original postcard was photographed by Adrian Atwater, and featured the dead cowboy Wallace Irving Robertson. Joe Strummer and Mick Jones had come across a painting titled ‘End of the Trail for Capitalism’ by Berkeley artist Hugh Brown that was on display at San Francisco’s punk rock hangout the Mabuhay Gardens. Strummer and Jones would have seen this picture many times during their three-‐week stay in San Francisco while attending gigs at ‘The Mab’. It obviously made a lasting impression as the album cover and picture have a striking resemblance. Maybe 37 years is enough time for us to re-‐evaluate this largely ignored album and accept it into the cannon of The Clash’s work? In many ways this album is like a set of rough sketches of ideas and concepts, which would be employed on further work. On the first album, The Clash stuck to their guns and insisted on Mickey Foote mixing it despite opposition from the record company. On Give ‘Em Enough Rope they caved in to CBS and their decision led them to having Sandy Pearlman as producer. In actual fact this gave them a good position to bargain from, insisting that Guy Stevens produce London Calling. The other noticeable fact is that the last gang in
123
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) town were split into two factions, Strummer/Jones and Simonon/Headon, during the writing, recording and mixing of Give ‘Em Enough Rope. Strummer/Jones are probably the beating creative heart of the band but they needed the Simonon/Headon lungs to function. I’d love to hear a Mick Jones re-‐mixed and remastered version of this album from the original multitrack tapes (if they still exist). Maybe we should think of this album not for what it is but for what it could have been? Despite the inappropriate and unsympathetic production this is a great album and is well worthy of rescuing. References Gray, N 1995, Last Gang In Town: The story and myth of The Clash, Fourth Estate, London, UK. Olsen, E Verna, P & Wolfe, C 1998, The Encyclopaedia of Record Producers, Billboard Books, Los Angeles, USA. Savage, J 2011, England’s Dreaming: The Sex Pistols and Punk Rock, Faber and Faber, London, UK.
124
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘The Golden Echo’ Kimbra By Raghil Nordset Our lives consist of moments; many of them simply fleeting and forgettable like the act of lifting a cup of coffee towards your mouth or mindlessly digesting the latest bland piece of pop, concocted with no other aim than to sound familiar enough for us not to question its dull dance in and out of existence. We seem to be very comfortable with things not making a difference. Then there are other types of moments; the ones that stand out and deviate from this monotonous pattern of familiarity. These moments jolt our senses into action and create a sudden sense of awareness, like when you wake up somewhere you do not recognise. These are moments of discovery and they occur when our senses are confronted rather than conformed. My first taste of the candy Pop Rocks, my first feel of moving forward riding a bike, quickly followed by my first experience of falling off the very same bike, the first time I got punched in the face and the first time I heard my father’s vinyl spin Tom Waits’ voice beautifully crawling its way through the song ‘Martha’. All these were equally exhilarating and significant as moments of discovery, moments I felt like I was waking up in a strange place. On the 14th of August 2014, the album The Golden Echo sees the light of day in Australia and New Zealand after having been conceived and concocted at a hidden-‐ away farm somewhere in Los Angeles. Released by Warner Bros Records, this is the second album by New Zealand’s Kimbra, (renowned for her emotive performance on Gotye’s 2012 hit Somebody That I Used to Know). The album sees guest performances and collaborations with names such as John Legend, Van Dyke Parks, John JR Robinson, Matt Bellamy, Thundercat, Omar Rodriquez-‐Lopez, Michael Shuman, Daniel Johns and Bilal. The Golden Echo is not lacking in talented writers and performers, with their influences craftily layered and saturated within every beat, idea and harmonic layer of this production. This has not been overlooked by the critics, with the album reaching a normalised score of 70% on the website Metacritic, consequently suggesting that The Golden Echo does not need a rescue. However, as someone who truly believes in the importance of moving with, living through and learning from music, I see rather little value in critically acclaimed craft, if it fails to spread beyond the elite of the critics. Within the realm of Pop music, the tendency seems to be to strive for simplicity and good writing craft would mean working something complex into a minimal frame,
125
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) like a pop song, to maximise on its 3 to 4 minute impact. With that we can see that something simple does not necessarily negate the complex. Take Stevie Wonder or Michael Jackson as examples as their musical landscapes are filled with shifts and layered with detail. Yet, this complexity is delivered with the aid of musical repetition which creates a structure and the illusion of familiarity which allows our minds to recognise the musical theme of the song several times during the very first listen. This structural simplification has been considered and recognised as good pop writing. However, at what point did simple come to mean the same? Looking at what has been saturating our charts for some time, it seems most of our largest media channels for music have become increasingly bland, the musical landscapes less diverse. Arguably, what sounds the same and represents less of a challenge to the listener would be both easier to make and to sell, and is therefore understandably prioritised by commercially driven platforms. Looking at these tendencies, it would certainly not hurt to challenge such platforms more often. The Golden Echo is not short of catchy, melodic treats and both Miracle and Nobody But You are examples of quality earworms, likely to stay with you from first listen. Yet, Kimbra’s creations are layered and complex, and cannot be said to sound like everybody else, nor does she blend easily with much of the music currently inflating our western pop cloud. I would argue that our prevailing pop platform should be challenged by artists like Kimbra, who are pushing the creative envelope forward into the unknown inviting audiences to engage with something new. This challenge, however, is not always as welcome as one would hope. As a society, we strive to put things in boxes and work hard to define everything we encounter. By compartmentalising information we feel our lives become simpler and easier to live. William James, The author behind A Pluralistic Universe (1908), explains our need for fixity in order to not remain in a state of confusion. James (1908) reasons that what is new and what is different confuses us, makes us uncomfortable and unless we can compartmentalise new information, match it with what we already know, we will simply avoid it or even aggressively reject it. To fit Kimbra into one box is difficult. In juxtaposition, she can fit into several boxes simultaneously whilst also fitting into none, which according to James (1908) could cause some distress. In line with William James’ (1908) proposed negative reaction to things we cannot understand, let us visit Igor Stravinsky in 1913, when his piece Rite of Spring was first performed at the Theatre Des Champs-‐Elysees in Paris. Rite of Spring caused confusion, and even disgust, for both critics and audiences due to it being different
126
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) to the musical norm at the time. One of the most prominent reviews of Stravinsky’s Rite of Spring claimed the composer would have needed to have forgotten all his musical knowledge or to be no more than two years of age as “It bears no relations to music as most of us would understand the word” (E.W. White, 1913). We now know this musical piece as Fantasia, adapted and manifested through animation by Walt Disney in 1940. Ironic how something so unrecognisable on release, is now one of our most recognised classical works. Perhaps the challenge Stravinsky’s piece represented can in retrospect be seen as a form of growth where something new over time was accommodated for, recognised and accepted. My intension is not to directly compare Igor Stravinsky to Kimbra; they are of different times, of different worlds. However, within the often dumbed down and monotonous demographic of pop music, one could argue that she represents a more challenging listen than what is so narrowly considered appropriate, commercial pop music. Not unlike the unorthodox sounds and musical patterns of Stravinsky’s Rite of Spring, Kimbra’s comprehensive and edgy soundscape could, perhaps represent a similar challenge to current pop music. I believe her continuously shifting musical attire may be perceived as a challenge and therefore discarded prematurely by too many, as it is not immediately recognisable. Too often people dismiss artists, songs and styles of music because they do not fit what they already know. When it comes to our musical taste, we are reluctant to learn. The Golden Echo has many recognisable components; yet, it is not created to align with what we know. It invites us, instead, to discover something a little different. As Kimbra leaps from the highly edgy and dissonant 90s Music to the intimate and vulnerable As You Are, she is constantly inconsistent in her approach to style. Having said that, the curiously beautiful and raw tones of her voice do create a sense of wholeness and though we travel through styles, we are always traveling with Kimbra. The musical complexity and honesty of her work is elegantly delivered through classic pop structures and she allows us to get to know her world through timely repetitions and lush, infectious melody lines. The Golden Echo is indeed a polished production, but, even more so, an unpolished explorations of emotion and musical expression. Kimbra explains in The Making Of The Golden Echo (2014) how she wanted no fillers and everything to have its own personality and its own intention. She wanted to move away from comfortable and let us therefore consider the potential implications of that. When our ears invite sound our mind does not recognise it initiates an analytical race to make sense of what is new and we are finding ourselves within a moment of
127
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) discovery. As William James (1908) pointed out, we do not like this state; the unknown makes us uncomfortable. The British academic Keith Grint (2007) explained how we are all like drunks who have dropped their keys at night; only searching for it under the light, justified by the fact that we cannot see in the dark and therefor avoid it. Allow me to propose that Kimbra is waving us into the dark and we need to follow her to experience and accommodate for new discoveries. If it was not for artists like her, pushing our perception of melody and sound, making us a little uncomfortable, where would music go? We have enough imitators, enough of the same. We need artists who venture into the grey and darker zones, taking us to places we have not been. I believe we need these moments in the dark to challenge our senses and our minds, so we can recognise music as alive; as a subject, not an object and as something still to discover. “Expect the unexpected, or you will not find it, as it is trackless and unexplored” Heraclitus (Heraclitus and Kahn, 1979, pp. 31)
128
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘Harlan County’ Jim Ford By Tim Dalton Discovering new music is always great fun and one of life’s greatest pleasures. It gets even better when you are pointed towards or discover an album totally unexpectedly. This is how I found out about Jim Ford’s wonderful, but largely ignored album, Harlan County. I received an out of the blue email from my good friend and professional cycling team manager John Herety who directed me towards this record with the explicit instructions that, “you must listen to this album, it will kick your ass and blow your mind”. Thanks John for pointing me towards this superb, but largely forgotten, gem of Southern funky rumpus. Music is similar to a giant wilderness, it’s there for us to explore. Intentionally limiting yourself to one, two, or three genres is akin to self-‐enforced segregation at its very worst. This expansive musical wilderness is a gigantic history lesson. If you are a true music fan or a musician, you should explore as much of it as humanly possible. In these times, it's never been so easy to source and purchase seriously cool music cheaply. This is a phenomenon that should be extensively exploited and I do. Almost twenty years ago I worked for a small Nashville record company and on our payroll we had a couple of part time workers listed as “rack monkeys”. It turned out this role was filled by two young women who went out to the local record stores to make sure our CDs and vinyl records where in the right genre racks e.g. ‘Rock’, ‘Country’ or ‘Soul’. But more importantly they made sure that our releases sat right at the front of these racks. People will only buy what they can see and we made sure, via our rack monkeys, that our artists where the first ones a potential buyer would spot in the store. Occasionally we had a new release that didn’t neatly fit into a single genre, this would result in one of the rack monkeys calling the office and asking which genre rack to place it in. Normally this would be resolved fairly quickly but occasionally it would require extensive dialogue to define and classify the exact genre of the release. To quote Danish philosopher Søren Kierkegaard from the book Sygdommen til Døden (The Sickness Unto Death) (1849), “what labels me, negates me”. Kierkegaard’s position was that once you label someone or something, it cancels out its individuality and places it within the confines of the applied label. This is definitely one of the biggest problems with Jim Ford’s 1969 release Harlan County; it does not fit neatly into one, two or even three specific genres; in fact it never adopts a label, and that's a big problem for some people. The other major issue facing this album was the year it was released.
129
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) 1969 was an exceptional year, if not the best ever, for album releases; The Beatles Revolver, Led Zeppelin II, King Crimson In The Court of King Crimson, The Velvet Underground and Nico, The Who Who’s Next, Captain Beefheart Trout Mask Replica, The Band, Nick Drake Pink Moon, Sly and the Family Stone Stand and The Rolling Stones’ Let It Bleed, the list goes on. Harlan County was arguably the strangest but most compelling album of 1969 and was Jim Ford’s first and only album. How on earth could Jim Ford, an unheard of artist from the back hills of Kentucky, with this unique blend of country, funk, soul and rock ‘n’ roll ever get noticed in the company of these esteemed artists? At his best, Jim Ford was a clever songwriter, capable of reworking rock ‘n’ roll, R&B, soul and country clichés into fresh, funny funky southern swamp rock. At his worst Ford was cutesy and unfocused, pulling great songs into awkward, contorted inaccessible genre defying shapes. In part this was due to his overuse of mind-‐altering drugs and excessive alcohol abuse; well it was 1969. Harlan County captures Ford at both of these extremes. The laid-‐back, rootsy, gleeful sound of Harlan County comprising equal parts country-‐rock, soul, funk and rock ‘n’ roll, is an unlikely catalyst for igniting the 1970’s British pub rock scene. Early pioneers Brinsley Schwarz recorded excellent cover versions of Ford's ‘JuJu Man’ and ‘Niki Hoeke Speedway’. Brinsley Schwarz’s chief songwriter, vocalist and bass player, Nick Lowe, later recorded Ford’s ‘36 Inches High’. These three songs don’t appear on the Harlan County album; they're from an aborted 1971 UK recording session that featured Brinsley Schwarz as Ford's backing band. These three songs would deservedly become classic pub rock staples, which can be still heard belting out of UK pubs to this day. Harlan County sounds fantastically dynamic with its crazy energetic full-‐on performances by Ford and his associated ‘A list’ session musicians (including James Burton on guitar, Dr John on keys, Gerry McGee on bass and drum ace Jim Kiltner). Ford produced the record himself; his production techniques are crude but effective and wholly appropriate. The ten songs captured on this album are superbly written paeans to the Deep South of America. These are songs of dirt roads, love, corn bread, truck driving, extended family, honest hard manual work and leaving the Deep South for a better life out west. If this album where a classic American novel, it would be John Steinbeck’s The Grapes Of Wrath (1939). This is an album of music that occupies the land where R&B meets country, Kentucky meets Tennessee and the Mississippi Delta meets Appalachia. It's a geographical album of songs as much rooted in its landscape, as it is in the author’s journey through life. Zeitgeist, a frequently employed word in Album Rescue Series, can also be applied here as this album unequivocally catches the spirit of the times. Forty years later all
130
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) of the above themes would be adopted by the genre that we now call Americana. The lyrical keynote of this album, hitting the road and leaving home behind for a brighter better place, is well traversed territory by artists such Steve Earle, Rodney Crowell, Lucinda Williams and Guy Clark. Ford’s versions of these narratives are grim but they do give a unique, if somewhat raw, account of his experience. Maybe Ford was a southern soothsayer whose cathartic music was simply forty years ahead of its time? The masterpiece of this album is the opening title track and album theme setter, Harlan County. This track in particular is a semi-‐autobiographical story of leaving Kentucky and seeking out a better life out west in California. This song could easily be considered the signature tune of Ford’s entire career, if you could classify it as a ‘career’? The moment this track kicks in with its stunning but unconventional arrangement of rib breaking fat beats, snaky guitar riffs, swampy piano lines, honking funky horns and all topped off with Ford’s Hillbilly soul vocals you know what’s in store from the rest of the album. The wonderful off-‐kilter second track ‘I'm Gonna Make Her Love Me (Till The Cows Come Home)’ is a song of sharp humor and hooks pointy enough to catch a Southern catfish. Ford bears his soul for all to see against a greasy rock ‘n’ roll beat that’s high as a kite and as tasty as fried chicken. Up next is ‘Changing Colors’, which is a soulful ballad where we can clearly hear Ford’s voice nearly quivering with naked sincerity and self-‐awareness against a gentle rhythm and slow building beautiful orchestral arrangement. In hindsight the lyrics are hauntingly prophetic “What makes you think that I won’t ever make it, when the chips are down?” It’s well over 3,000 arduous miles from Kentucky to California but track six; ‘Long Road Ahead’ makes it sound like the archetypal great American road trip and something to embrace. As Jack Kerouac quite rightly noted in On The Road (1957: p.183), “Nothing behind me, everything ahead of me, as is ever so on the road”. If you didn’t know better then this track could easily be mistaken for a Rolling Stones track from their 1971 Sticky Fingers album, with its parping Bobby Keys Texan styled horns, southern funky guitar riff, gospel driven piano and loud three part soul backing vocals. The central theme of travelling and finding oneself is heavily reinforced on track eight’s ‘Working My Way To LA’. This is a song full of optimism, heading for California, and in equal part regret in leaving the beloved family home in Harlan County, Kentucky. One can only guess at the mixed emotions Ford was feeling during the writing and recording of this song. One of only two songs not authored by Ford on this album is track nine’s blues standard ‘Spoonful’. This is stark and haunting tune penned by Willie Dixon and first recorded by Howlin Wolf in 1960. Unlike the
131
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) 1966 insipid and uninspired dirge recorded by overrated UK ‘blues’ merchants ‘Cream’, Ford’s version is a proud and blatant reaffirmation of his Southern roots. Ford takes complete ownership of this song and confidently deconstructs it before he re-‐constructs it in a new(ish) form. It breathes, it sweats, its bumps drunkenly into honkytonk walls and yet like every other song on this album it’s wonderfully chaotic and loose, yet it never unravels. This version of the song knows where it’s going, it’s aspirational, and the place it’s heading is out west to the drug friendly, free loving haze and sunshine of 1969 southern Californian Nirvana. The closing tearjerker ballad is a cover of Thomas ‘Alex’ Harvey’s 1959 song, ‘To Make My Life Beautiful’. Ford, and studio band, treat this song with the respect it deserves and deliver a subtle, a word not normally associated with this album, and respectful rendition. It's an appropriate choice and serves as a calming influence, like a cold beer, to herald the end of the journey. The words of John Steinbeck’s travelogue Travels With Charley (1962: p.4) ring very true here, “A journey is a person in itself; no two are alike. And all plans, safeguards, policing, and coercion are fruitless. We find that after years of struggle that we do not take a trip; a trip takes us”. There are a couple of possible factors that contributed to this album almost disappearing into complete obscurity. One of those was Ford’s difficult artistic personality and lifestyle choices; the other was signing to the wrong record company. Sundown Records was a small-‐underfunded southern Californian outfit, which was formed in partnership with White Whale Records specifically to release this album. White Whale Records was home to The Turtles, a few coveted psych rock records, but not much else, and it wasn’t really fit for purpose to market Harlan County. Legend has it that if Jim Ford had waited a day or two before signing this record deal, he would have been on Ahmet Ertegün’s Atlantic Records and produced by Jerry Wexler. That might not have guaranteed him success, but it would have put him somewhere a little more secure and loaded the cards heavily in his favor. Atlantic Records would have definitely provided the financial and marketing clout to ensure this album had the best possible chance of mass sales instead of the Viking funeral that it actually awaited. With Atlantic, there was also the possible opportunity of Ford becoming a pop, soul, or country singer or carving out a career as an often-‐ recorded songwriter. Ford had a good track record as a writer having contributed songs to Motown Records for The Temptations and solo artists such as PJ Proby, Bobbie Gentry and most famously the 1973 hit ‘Harry The Hippie’ for Bobby Womack. In the 2011 re-‐issue liner notes there’s an enlightening quote from Bobby Womack, “Jimmy was a beautiful cat, one of the most creative people that I’ve ever met”. Those royalties would have certainly made Ford’s life a lot more comfortable
132
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) in later life. By the early 1980s, Ford had completely disappeared into a haze of drug abuse and erratic behaviour. Jim Ford definitely walked it like he talked it, a singer-‐songwriter who found his inner talents through the hardships of abject poverty and economically conscripted labour. If he hadn’t escaped this kind of life his future would have being one of hard toil and possible pneumoconiosis like his former coal miner colleagues. His early life bears a striking resemblance to Loretta Lynn’s, as portrayed in the 2003 film Coal Miner’s Daughter. Ford’s roots are in the coal mining villages in the hills of Harlan County, Kentucky, and those early years of poverty and hardship definitely shaped his worldview as expressed through his music. When you expect that life will hand you absolutely nothing and your favour turns around, even if it is only temporary, then intuitively you grab the opportunity like it’s never coming back. Jim Ford didn't lead a very glamorous life, he saw out his days until his lonely death on 18 November 2007 in a Californian trailer park in Mendocino County. At least he did fulfil his ultimate dream and make it out of Harlan County. As an album, Harlan Country is evidence that Jim Ford had no equal in his day, he sat on his own cloud in the great American wilderness, cross-‐legged, wild-‐eyed and wiry, a figure too dangerous to approach but much too alluring to be ignored. Jack Kerouac captured his type of spirit in On The Road (1957: p.5) when he wrote, “the only people for me are the mad ones, the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time, the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn like fabulous yellow roman candles exploding like spiders across the stars”. th
133
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘Aerial’ Kate Bush By Dr Ian Dixon In 1886, Vincent Van Gogh painted a pair of workman’s boots placed on a rustic table; a work of intimate beauty, which achieves transcendence where the subject matter appears so lacklustre (Hall, 2001). Similarly, Kate Bush’s Aerial (2005), complete with themes of washing machines, clothes wavering in the breeze, the movement of ocean tides and birdsong in scat scansion electrifies the domestic mundane. Aerial, the album whose release was ‘imminent’ from the year 2000 and whose opening track ‘King of the Mountain’ was composed as early as 1996 (Moy, 2007), manifests Kate Bush’s sophisticated musicality in a manner which exalts the commonplace. This she achieves: not through soaring themes of tragic love or Houdini-‐esque escapism, not through the microtonal discordance of the Bulgarian women’s choir nor her brother Paddy Bush’s teeth-‐jangling guitar riffs, not through threatening to swap places with god nor dancing to death in the same red shoes David Bowie decried, nor releasing a plethora of fiendish critters from underneath her skirts, but through the meditative beauty of domesticity and the natural world. Like Van Gogh’s boots, the album elicits mysticism through simplicity rendering the material sublime. If anyone can grow up to sing airy odes to washing machines and to her tiny son Bertie (b. 1998), Kate can. If anyone can feature the didgeridoo-‐ appropriating Rolf Harris on themes, which reference French impressionism and English pastoral music for a full six minutes about gentle rain smudging an artist’s canvas causing ‘all the colours [to] run’, Kate can (Bush, 2005). The album’s work is homespun organic (rather than rock extravaganza): transcendental (rather than chart topping) and delicately orgasmic (rather than attention-‐seeking pageantry as with Kate Bush prior to 2005). As Kate (2005) states in ‘Joanni’: “All the banners stop waving And the flags stop flying And the silence comes over” Thus, in Aerial, there is quietude and contemplation, even behind its rock anthems. Despite the demeaning claims of cynical reviewers, Aerial (her first album ‘doubling’ since Hounds of Love (1985)) represents the artistic maturation of Kate Bush, thereby re-‐emphasising her continuing relevance to the ‘adult’ market (Moy, 2007: p. 124).
134
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) Pete Townsend once dissented, “Stop judging us by what we did when we were stupid, stupid kids”. Although referring to The Who’s wild antics (culminating with the death of Keith Moon), Townsend’s protest applies to the band’s rock juvenilia as well, becoming the catchcry of ‘aging rocker[s]’ who survive the 1970s (Bowie in Parkinson, 2002). In the wake of 70s excess, performing greats such as Townsend, Bowie, Freddie Mercury (R.I.P.) and Suzi Quatro find themselves battling a public, which, while forgiving their transgressions, will not allow their musical acumen to evolve. Add to this the confronting reality of growing up astoundingly beautiful in the public eye and you have the indefatigable Kate Bush: as T.S. Eliot (1920) muses, “some infinitely gentle, Infinitely suffering thing”, but with a generous dollop of Lindsay Kemp-‐inspired sassiness. Like so many 70s/80s rock heroes, critics compare Kate’s more recent work to the ‘Wuthering Heights’ (1978) of her early career while simultaneously making no secret of their dirty obsession with her eccentric sexuality (Vermorel, 1983). As Ron Moy illustrates, these ‘over-‐deterministic’ analyses usually tell us more of the critics’ psyches than Kate Bush’s contribution to thematically insightful music (2007: p. 1). In the Freudian (1986) sense, Kate is championed and punished simultaneously: her very attractiveness entrapping her. As one (bombastic) biographer notes (Vermorel, 1983: p. 63): “Kate Bush is our goddess Frig. And like the Saxons we both revere and fear her. Shroud her in the mystery of her power and the power of her mystery.” These critics yearn for Kate’s peculiar mix of angry femme noir and high art with the same vehemence that schoolboys draw lascivious parallels from her surname. There is no doubt the Bexleyheath pariah, Kate Bush, known for pop, art rock and neo-‐ baroque composition, creates fame partly based on her remarkable sensuality, but more importantly makes significant contribution to the progression of serious pop music. Aerial is a prime example of such artistry as evinced though: Kate’s sublimated sexuality; mysticism; repetition as motif; the pastoral tradition; and her pervasive musicality. The finally released 2005 album, Aerial, went platinum the following year and was awarded a BRIT nomination for Best British Album. In examining Aerial, which sold 90,000 copies in its first week of release and peaked at number three in the British charts, we must also acknowledge Kate’s significance as sexualised female and the ways in which critics have positioned her in the decades leading up to this album (Bush, 2015). In modern (fourth wave) feminist vein, trading on sex appeal is not a transgression, but an asset. Indeed, even the 1978, neck-‐to-‐ankle-‐gowned Kate Bush strategically used her sexuality for notoriety and deserves due respect for doing so.
135
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) To what degree Kate was able to control the rapid trajectory of her fame (as Sinead O’Connor, Lady Gaga or Miley Cyrus decades later) is debatable. In this age of pop-‐pornification, Kate Bush seems relatively tame, but no one forgets the carnal expressionism of ‘black widow’ doll making love to a double bass in ‘Babooshka’ (1980); no one forgets the skyrocketing voice effortlessly emerging from the willowy sensuality of ‘Wuthering Heights’ (an effect found contemporaneously in popular Bollywood theme songs rather than in Western pop music). The retiring, yet brazen and Elvin voice from the ghostly Goth who became ‘every schoolboy’s fantasy’: Kate Bush, the seventeen-‐year-‐old nymphette discovered and initially financed by Pink Floyd’s virtuoso guitarist Dave Gilmour, represents a mystical and mesmeric contradiction (Moy, 2007). Kate is the quintessential English rose, whose sprightly face and lithe body arrest global attentions. Here lies one of the abiding prejudices of pop music: that the serious, female, pop composer must be vigorously objectified rather than appraised solely for her artistry. Even seasoned critics elide Kate’s phenomenal talent as they gaze into those magical eyes. Entire biographies have been dedicated to unravelling the shamanic mystery of Kate’s beauty, rather than serious studies of her groundbreaking musical experimentation. This is where the problem with Aerial lies: not with Kate Bush’s visionary genius, but with shallow commentators insisting she perform pop music to a hard beat, which shows off the litheness of her body rather than her vision as an artist. Those critics ought also acknowledge that in 1978 Kate Bush became the first woman ever to top the British charts with a self-‐written song (Thomson, 2010). This is no small achievement in the misogynist world of rock charting: “an industry that still largely conforms to stereotypes of patriarchy” (Moy, 2007: p. 3). In the U.K., an artist once championed for such a hit generally remains in the popular zeitgeist for the rest of their career (which is not the case in the USA or Australia, where tearing down icons becomes the norm). We should acknowledge, therefore, that while Kate Bush clearly earned the right to her sexualisation, her sexuality followed her artistic success. We might also understand that Kate (like so many pop artists denied the opportunity) deserves the right to grow up, to mature: she has surely earned her capacity to say what she wishes in the manner she wished to say it. Curiously, it is not so much Kate’s fan-‐base who rebukes the impressionistic bricolage of Aerial, but the critics who make retroactive comparison to The Kick Inside (1978), Never For
136
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) Ever (1980), The Dreaming (1982), Hounds of Love and The Sensual World (1989). As one commentator opines, in lambasting the 2005 album, the pop song requires intense build up of tension through verse and middle eight then explodes with the expected ‘orgasm’ of sound into the chorus. Bowie knew this in ‘Starman’ (1973), Queen knew it in ‘Bohemian Rhapsody’ (1975): just as Kate knew in ‘Wuthering Heights’. In this career-‐defining song, inspired by the 1967 BBC mini-‐series based on Emily Brontë’s eponymous novel, the screaming passion of, “Cathy, it’s Heathcliff, I’ve come home now, so co-‐ho-‐ho-‐hold, let me in your windo-‐ho-‐ho-‐ow”, leads to the repeated intoning of, “Wuthering, Wuthering, Wuthering Heights, Heathcliff!” which climaxes the chorus bringing shivers to the spine some four decades later. In ‘Babooshka’, the simmering tension of clandestine infidelity, “She signed the letter…” literally busts into the vengeful refrain: “Aye-‐yi, Babooshka, Babooshka, Babooshka, yi-‐yi!” (Bush, 1980). The augmentation of such pop clichés in Aerial represents the album’s point of difference, its strength as impressionistic musing and the fruition of a significant artist. Trading as her newly formed company, Noble and Brite, under EMI Records Ltd., Aerial includes long-‐time collaborators Del Palmer, Paddy Bush, Stuart Elliott and Michael Kamen (R.I.P.) conducting the London Metropolitan Orchestra at Abbey Road Studios. The album exploits musical mesmerism, which dovetail into the soundscape with bridging passages between songs and features rhythmic, human laughter and scat singing paralleled with birdsong harmonies. In a lyrical echo of this, the prologue opens with a voice recording of Kate’s son Bertie inquiring, “Mummy? Daddy? The day is full of birds. Sounds like they’re saying words,” followed by Kate musing, “We’re going to be laughing about this” (as subsequently she does with characteristic bird-‐like capriciousness). The inner cover design by Kate and Peacock proscribes washing blowing vigorously in the wind before rows of redbrick two-‐up/two-‐downs: patterns forming at the interface of domesticity and sensuality as they merge with the near indiscernible doves flapping in their midst thanks to John Calder-‐Bush’s decisive photography. On closer inspection, the inner sleeve reveals Kate’s famous ‘Elvis’ suit pegged up and blowing about on the clothesline: a visual joke, which also betrays an ingrained sadness: the performative mask rejected, the histrionics passed, the pop icon hung out to dry, but also a musing on the nature of celebrity (Moy, 2007: p. 124). The design work is littered with clouds, pigeons, blackbirds, seagulls, gannets with eyes under their wings, Randy Olson’s Indus Bird Mask and digital sonic waveforms. These visuals promise the listener a collage of musical secrets: a message to her fans and reference to past songs as if pleading, “Please, let me off the commercial hook.”
137
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) The boat named ‘Aerial’, from James Southall’s painting ‘Fisherman’ in the album’s centrefold, is forced into the ocean: a delightful visual paradox playing upon the elements of water and air; sea and sky resonant within the music. With this image, Kate Bush invites us to muse upon the definition of the word ‘Aerial’ as ‘existing, happening, or operating in the air’, ‘performed mid-‐air’ (Oxford Dictionary, 2015). The double album is appropriately divided into two parts: A Sea of Honey and A Sky of Honey. With Aerial, the surging inevitable of ‘Wuthering Heights’’ crowd-‐pleasing chorus is mostly usurped by simple, melodious poetry. Indeed, Aerial bears more in common with Brian Eno’s ambient music and the themes of House and Garden than with Emily Brontë’s gothic word-‐scape. Aerial features finessed lyrical observations drawing comparisons to painterly colours and the night sky in Italy. Like the painter in An Architect’s Dream: “Yes, I need to get that tone a little bit lighter there, maybe with some dark accents coming in from the side there” (Rolf Harris in Bush, 2005). Kate Bush muses upon the infinitesimally small separation between thoughts: a hypnagogic, Zen-‐like appreciation of organic life. As Rod McKie (2014) opines, “somewhere in between… an inner-‐space, like a vast landscape in some computer game, which seems to be timeless”. In fact, the album culminates Kate’s abiding thematic collapsing of opposing binaries: you/me; object/I; Other/self; empathetic references to, “I could feel what he was feeling” and multiple “in between” states (2005): “Somewhere in between The waxing and the waning wave Somewhere in between What the song and the silence say Somewhere in between The ticking and the tocking clock Somewhere in a dream between Sleep and waking up Somewhere in between Breathing out and breathing in, Like twilight is neither night nor morning.” Indeed, somewhere in between the pastoral and impressionistic lies Kate Bush’s Aerial: somewhere in between art rock and tonal poetry. Kate Bush’s musicality steps from the nineteenth century folk song and English traditions of pastoral poetry, but no one has synthesised them into palatable art pop quite like Kate. Her earthiness and spiritual nature steps from a sadly antiquated world, bringing strains of occultism and romance in its wake. Her sensibilities visit subjects elided by rock
138
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) music’s current obsession with hard porn: as delicate as a poem or washing on a clothesline or the ‘flick’ of an artist’s wrists and hips (Bush, 2005). Famously incorporating English and Irish folk music in her music, Kate evokes mysticism in her music: in particular English eccentricity and bird imagery described in Shakespeare’s (1595) Midsummer Night’s Dream as: “Every elf and fairy sprite, Hop as light as bird from brier, And this ditty after me, Sing and dance it trippingly.” Apart from literary references, numerous tonal and lyrical references to Irish Banshees abound throughout her milieu and Aerial is no exception. Citation of British, early twentieth century composer Vaughan Williams’ ‘The Lark Ascending’ might seem pretentious coming from less accomplished pop artists, but the simmering Kate, manages the reference both musically and lyrically with utter panache. The pastoral muse is the tradition, which truly couches this album. From Beethoven’s pastoral symphony (no. 6) to Vaughan Williams’ improvisations on themes from Thomas Tallis, the European obsession with the ‘innocent’ countryside is infused within this album. Formalism may be a lesser known quantity in pop music, but as the album cover for Aerial betrays with its digital sound wave forming the dividing horizon between the two elements of the album the sky of honey and the sea of honey, the lush unfolding of long time collaborator Del Palmer’s “trademark slithering fretless bass” (Dwyer, 2005), the rhythms undulate like a lapping tide; and this is but one of the many references to water, ocean and rain in the album. As ‘An Architect’s Dream’ spills mellifluously into ‘The Painter’s Link’, Kate Bush has provided a sumptuous pastoral meditation: Bosco D’Oliveira’s percussion unfolding like the wheels of a country squire’s cart. The album is positively dripping with British jingoism: Kate’s personal Lionheart (1978). Sunset announces that ‘all the colours run’ as the texture literally melts thematically, lyrically and musically from one statement into the next. Gone is the R & B formula and screaming nightmare of ‘Hounds of Love’; gone the unbridled passion of ‘Wuthering Heights’ and as ‘The Kick Inside’ morphs into the birth of her son, Bertie (a child Kate clearly cherishes). Indeed, the adulation of innocence in the form of children harks back to former compositions, ‘The Infant Kiss’ (1980) and ‘The Man
139
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) With the Child in his Eyes’ (1978) (the latter reputedly written when Kate was just thirteen (Moy, 2007)). In ‘A Sea of Honey’ Kate’s voice wavers like lapping water. The elemental creeps from the dulcet tones and characteristic soft ‘R’s of her eccentric pronunciation. She sings of colours and makes biblical references: “Where sands sing in crimson red and rust, then climb into bed and turn to dust.” Like Bowie, Kate Bush represents shamanic and animistic proportions (Hunt, 2014). Through projected religiosity with Celtic proportions and fascination for nature, Kate invokes the natural world: a near psychotic projection of animism in the significance of the inanimate, like washing machines and the serendipity of rain on oil painting. Indeed, in reference to Aerial, it should be noted that poet, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, proves more popular with youth audiences than his protégé William Wordsworth, mainly due to the latter’s sublimation of sexual imagery within nature (as Freudian (1990) analysis illustrates): a practice the later Victorian poets knew well. How much like Kate Bush’s lyrics does Alfred, Lord Tennyson’s Lady of Shalott (1832) seem? Especially regarding the mourning maidens of ‘Wuthering Heights’ and ‘The Man with The Child in his Eyes’? Indeed, the absence of palpable sexuality might explain the lesser success of the singles from Aerial than the album (Moy, 2007), given youth culture’s fascination with the single market. Indeed, sublimated sexuality also explains the preponderance of repetition in the album. While R & B formula (and Kate herself) is no stranger to repetition, Aerial embraces a gentle Freudian ‘compulsion to repeat’ in numerous ways (1983). Where ‘Wuthering Heights’ repeats the eponymous title in a mantra, which batters our sensibilities, ‘Mrs. Bartolozzi’s’ gentle, non-‐pop repetition, “Washing machine… Washing machine…” allows the phrase and music to die and resonate between iterations. The effect is mesmeric. The music itself, rather than constantly announcing noise, announces a right to gentility and silence as in the repetition of ‘π’s’ numeric formula (Bush, 2005): “Sweet and gentle and sensitive man With an obsessive nature and deep fascination For numbers… In a circle of infinity 3.1415926535 897932….” The song, like so many others on the album, evokes an animistic joy in things unseen, but uncannily perceived as Freud (1986) illustrates in Totem and Taboo. Further, Kate allows repetition to enhance her experience of the ‘panoramic’ divine
140
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) (Bush, 2005): that contradiction Kristeva (1982) describes as sublime, the awe of mountainous beauty combined with ingrained fear of the divine (Bush, 2005): “We went up to the top of the highest hill and stopped Still It was just so beautiful It was just so beautiful It was just so beautiful.” The repetition sung in her upper register infuses with an awe-‐inspired timbre of delicacy; Kate Bush at her most divine, which invites the listener to gaze through the eyes of the artist, effecting greater agency than pop and rock’s mind-‐battering insurgence (which Kate still demonstrates unique aptitude for). Poetic repetition echoes in ‘Prelude’, where the keyboard matches the cooing of pigeons and ends on the dominant rather than resolving the chord structure as the birds repeat their meditative phrase. The final song (as if to remind audiences that she can still generate a rock anthem wall of sound), Aerial, rises to a repetitive climax then instantly ends with the gentle cooing of pigeons, bringing the album to a close with both an unexpectedly orgasmic ‘bang’ and a repetitive ‘whimper’ (Eliot, 1925). In Aerial, Kate’s lifelong fascination for themes such as innocence, nature, the divine, the Celtic and mystical, breathing, dreaming and romantic passion all repeat in this album in tandem with a new experience of the world: maturity – both artistic and personal. Decline this invitation at your peril, critics. Where detractors see only imitation and pretension, Kate Bush’s soaring talent as gentle musing in Aerial sits proudly within her established lexicon. Aerial represents the maturation of Kate Bush, which compliments and outgrows her mesmerising, youthful compositions. Aerial celebrates simplicity in domesticity as only a true master such as Van Gogh might render it. It would be fair for critics and fans alike to allow Kate Bush’s sexuality to evolve also: from mystical nymphette to maternal recluse. The stigmas of the past do not pass easily, especially in British pop where, once exalted, the star remains on the pedestal for the duration of their lives and beyond. It seems the flipside of this convention is to tear them down with cold,
141
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) judgemental ownership. Kate Bush, the critics declare, has no right to experiment, no right to grow and supersede rock cliché. To the contrary, the investigative artistry of Aerial should be considered a significant contribution to the canon of Kate Bush and to the progression of popular music: through simplicity rather than histrionic excess. Kate has created a textual smorgasbord with this album; served to a rarefied palette. Thank-‐you Kate. The album is breathtaking. Mwah!
142
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘Broken English’ Marianne Faithfull By Tim Dalton Like a lot of people, my earliest recollections of Marianne Faithfull is of a 17-‐year-‐old pale waif princess singing the Jagger/Richards 1964 composition of ‘When Tears Go By’ from a flickering black and white TV in the corner of the living room. It was a mesmerizing image that will be forever ingrained in my brain. Marianne Faithfull was one of the most photographed women in the world during her youth. With her angelic English looks, long blonde hair, large breasts and long legs, she was the physical embodiment of the sexiest part of the 1960s, particularly when draped around the rock stars who made up her inner circle of lovers such as David Bowie, Gene Pitney, Brian Jones and Mick Jagger. She was the original 1960’s blueprint for the quintessential rock star girlfriend, the beautiful sophisticated young exotic woman who was envied by everyone, men wanted to fuck her and women wanted to be her. Marianne Faithfull was born the daughter of an idealistic British gentleman, army officer and professor of English literature Major Robert Glynn Faithfull. Her mother was Eva von Sacher-‐Masoch, the Baroness Erisso, whose family had originally hailed from Vienna. During the Second World War the von Sacher-‐Masoch family had secretly opposed the Nazi regime in Vienna and helped to save the lives of many Jews. This is the same family line as Leopold von Sacher-‐Mascoh who lends his name to the Masochism part of Sadomasochism. Major Faithfull's work as an Intelligence Officer for the British Army brought him into contact with the von Sacher-‐Masoch family where he met Eva. This bizarre family background reads like a combination of narratives from Blackadder meets the Von Trapp family. Faithfull is probably the only daughter of an Austro-‐Hungarian Baroness to ever spend time in the west Lancashire town of Ormskirk, while her father undertook his PhD in English Literature at the nearby University of Liverpool. She was largely schooled at a north London Catholic convent school that temporarily sheltered her from the outside world. With such a family background, Faithful’s life should have being one of middle class privilege, comfort and free of celebrity notoriety. Had she followed the rules she would have married a rich merchant banker, produced a couple of beautiful children and lived her days out very comfortably in the stockbroker belt. All that went out the window when she was sucked into the blossoming 1960’s rock 'n' roll scene via the irrepressible gravitational pull of the black hole created by The Rolling Stones. Andrew Loog Oldham is one of last century's most radical and mysterious musical Svengali icons. His pivotal role and contribution in creating the popular culture,
143
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) which we inhabit, cannot be underestimated. He was only 19 years old in 1963 when he commenced his four year tenure managing the world’s greatest rock ‘n’ roll band. The Rolling Stones are shrouded in myth and legend, which makes it virtually impossible to identify what is fact and truth. According to Loog Oldham’s 2001 autobiography Stoned, he understood that the Stones would not get rich as an R&B covers band. So he took the radical and unconventional step of locking the Glimmer Twins into their kitchen and would not let them out until they had penned some original material. His instructions were, "I want a song with brick walls all around it, high windows and no sex" (2001: p.143), and as instructed, the Glimmer Twins deliver to specification with ‘As Tears Go By’. Originally it was called ‘As Time Goes By’ but Loog Oldham changed its title and probably claimed a hefty writing credit in the process. Its pure conjecture but its quite possible that Loog Oldham had an inferiority complex and as such he measured himself harshly against people like The Beatles’ manager Brian Epstein. The less flashy but more business savvy Epstein had a stable of talent to whom The Beatles contributed material, e.g. Cilla Black, Billy J. Kramer and The Fourmost. When Loog Oldham re-‐titles and re-‐appropriates ‘As Tears Go By’ and sends it in Marianne’s direction he gives it a totally new meaning; pure genius. Once Faithfull had entered the orbit of The Rolling Stones it proved almost impossible for her to break free. Originally the girlfriend of Stones’ guitarist Brian Jones, Faithfull strategically shifted her allegiance to Mick Jagger in 1966, then had a very brief fling with Keith Richards, before a well publicized split with Mick in 1970. After this split her life went into a nosedive with heroin addiction, anorexia nervosa and her son (Nicholas), from her first husband (John Dunbar), was taken into care. Rock ‘n’ roll always has had an appalling non-‐existent duty of care policy; one with no support network. Becoming homeless, she lived rough on the streets of Soho, London for a few years. This lifestyle of heroin addiction and ill health irreparably changed and damaged her voice. Her career was resurrected in the late 1970s when she met and then married Ben Brierly, the guitarist of punk band The Vibrators. Between 1970 and 1979 Faithfull made a few attempts to return to music including an album with producer Mike Leander, Rich Kid Blue, started in 1971 but not completed until 1985. There was also a country sounding single Dreamin’ My Dream that made a zero impression. After a lengthy absence, Faithfull resurfaced in 1979 with Broken English, which took the edgy and brittle sound of punk rock and gave it a shot of studio-‐smooth disco fusion. Faithfull had shed all but the diehard fans of her previous audience long before Broken English was released; hence it was never a commercial success only achieving number 75 in the UK and 83 in the USA charts. She had been a hit-‐making
144
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) folk-‐pop singer with beautiful good looks and an angelic singing voice, who had quickly become a wash-‐up junkie, largely due to The Rolling Stones. Part of the myth and legend of The Rolling Stones is their apparent Faustian bargain with their collaborators and entourage which has a devastating and sometimes fatal effect, e.g. Gram Parson, Mick Taylor, Jimmy Miller, Bobby Keys, Andrew Loog Oldham and the death of the Peace and Love generation at Altamont. Those years of homelessness, heavy drinking, smoking and drug taking had taken their toll on her already frail voice. One of Faithfull’s key personal traits is being able to adapt and survive, on numerous occasion she’s proved that she possess the knack of turning disadvantages to her advantage. On Broken English, her voice underwent a significant transformation from the pre-‐Stones records; it was far stronger but dirtier, harsher, more worldly, adult and was now capable of expressing her inner being. Probably one of the greatest perceived issues with this album is the one of authorship. In essence Broken English is a multi-‐authored piece and many consumers consider that Faithfull is not the auteur of Broken English. Of course I would dispute this. Just because Faithfull only co-‐wrote three of the eight tracks doesn’t mean that this isn’t a great album. Her linchpin role on this record is as interlocutor, as the voice positioned within the narrative. This is a narrative record, a collection of disjointed and unconnected narrative granted, but still it is a collection of narratives that works cohesively to express her innermost thoughts and feeling. She may not posses the expressive tool of being a solo writer but she still manages to make herself heard through what tools she did have at her disposal. To quote Sylvia Plath from The Unabridged Journals (1962: p.5), “Some things are hard to write about”. Essentially, Faithfull is the curator of other people’s material on this album ranging from Shel Silversteins’ superb ‘The Ballard Of Lucy Jordan’ (originally recorded by Dr Hook in 1974) Heathcote Williams’ ‘Why D’Ya Do It?’ and John Lennon’s ‘Working Class Hero’. These days, curators of another author’s material are highly celebrated e.g. DJ’s such as David Guetta, Skrillex, Deadmau5 and Moby. Back in 1979 Faithfull was at the vanguard of musical curation, yet another reason to rescue this album? What truly makes this a great album and worthy of a rescue is the way that Faithfull identifies a suitable channel to expresses her agency and subjectivity. As a masterful performer Faithfull fully understands that via complete and total immersion in the narrative of the material that she’s performing, she can make her presence felt on this album in the role as interlocutor. In each song, Faithfull takes on the role of the lead character and narrator in much the same way as a character actor would. English musician and performer Kate Bush employs exactly the same tools and she’s often declared a genius; and rightly so. Faithfull does this so well that the songs feel like she owns each and everyone of them. Her sneering cover of John Lennon's
145
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) anthem ‘Working Class Hero’, which is sang as though she lived through it personally is totally convincing. Faithfull cannot be described as working class by any stretch of the imagination. I would propose that the main purpose of this song was to smash the Andrew Loog-‐Olham Kewpie doll version of Faithfull once and for all. Her interpretation of ‘working class’ could be the homeless, broke junkie that she had become. The fact that she came from a money privileged background has very little bearing at this point in her career. Every song on Broken English serves a purpose and they stand out in their own right, there are simply no fillers on this album. Read Shel Silverstein’s original poem ‘The Ballard of Lucy Jordan’, or ‘Jordon’ as he wrote it. Then compare it to Faithful’s version; where she delivers a totally absorbing and believable performance of what if she had become Mrs. Gene Pitney. I've always adored the outrageous ‘Why'd Ya Do It?’ which sees Marianne playing a bitter pissed off harpy who is delivering a fierce, graphic rant to her husband's infidelities. Most people presume the lyrics are direct towards Mick Jagger, they are not, you need to listen to Carly Simon’s ‘You’re So Vain’ for that. The shock value is in Faithfull’s perfectly pronounced English enunciation, “Every time I see your dick I imagine her cunt in my bed”. The lyrics were far too rude for radio and caused a walkout by female packing staff at the EMI pressing plant. In Dave Dalton’s (1994: p.337) book Faithfull, there’s a great account of how Faithfull went to visit poet Heathcote Williams (who for some unknown reason use to refer to himself as ‘Jasper’) to claim this song. Williams came from the Jack Kerouac school of disembodied poetics, which makes him a near perfect match for Faithfull. Record producer Denny Cordell claims this song was originally destined for Tina Turner. This makes me laugh as I really can’t see Turner delivering these lyrics or taking ownership of this song as convincingly as Faithfull does. Faithfull was married to guitarist Ben Brierly of English punk band The Vibrators during the making of Broken English. In Dalton’s book she claims it was the affair that Brierly was having at the time that drove her to seek out this song and record it (1994: p.341). The Joe Maverty guitar riff that propels the lyrics is a Jimmi Hendrix copy of ‘All Along The Watchtower’ and it’s the perfect postmodern portmanteau of poetry and music. The opening track, Broken English, comments upon the rise of the German 70’s terrorist group Baader Meinhof, forerunner of the Red Army Faction, and their leader Ulrike Meinhof. I also like the idea that this track is a self referenced comment upon the bastardization and purposely distressing of her own voice through the negative lifestyle choices of the last decade. Part of the credit for this album must go to Chris Blackwell who signed Faithfull to his Island Records’ label and could probably be considered the executive producer, even
146
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) if he wasn’t credited on the album as such. Blackwell has a wonderful uncanny knack for sniffing out the bizarre, unusual and off-‐kilter artists. Only a label such as Island Records would and could ever release a record like Broken English and be totally comfortable with it. Just as George Harrison’s Handmade Films had a sort of house style so did Island Records, there’s always this implied reggae feel or beat. Compare Broken English to Grace Jones’ Island Life, another record that only Island would and could release. Sonically this album is superb, a testament to the quality of Maxis Studios in North London which had some of the most up-‐to-‐date 24 track recording equipment available. The arrangements and production work by Mark Miller Mundy are absolutely impeccable. I don’t know how much time was spent recording or how much time Ed Thacker spent mixing this album at Roundhouse Studios but my educated guess is a lot, an awful lot, because this album sounds amazing. One reason this album sounds so good is that the core backing band of Barry Reynold (rhythm guitar), Steve York (bass), Joe Maverty (lead guitar) and Terry Stannard (drums) had played together and with Faithfull for two years prior to the recording session (1994: p.341). In addition to this core band is a superb collection of additional supporting cast premier league players. Its interesting that Faithfull’s husband, Ben Brierly who is a competent guitar player, is not included on the album; possibly due to his infidelities? A sound engineer friend of mine once provided some very vocal opposition to me playing this album over the PA while I was sound checking the system. His objection was “it's music to slit your wrists too”. He was totally wrong, this is an album NOT to slit your wrists too. This is an album that celebrates surviving not dying. When discussing music production with my audio students I tell them that you know when a record is well produced because you can’t hear the production; it becomes transparent. According to my own metric, the studio production, arrangements and engineering are perfect because they blend seamlessly and are totally transparent. The Dennis Morris photographed and designed album cover of Faithfull as the ravishing, disheveled wreck is absolutely perfect and is the final piece of the complex Broken English jigsaw. It's a strong image and according to Morris it's a shot that took a considerable amount of time, red wine, cigarettes and self-‐restraint to produce. The husky croak of Broken English rescued Faithfull's image from the inaccurate risible urban myth of fur coats and Mars bars, as a background figure in the history of The Rolling Stones and as a homeless hopeless junkie. It thrusts her back into contention as a credible solo artist. Bob Dylan loves this album because it is so on point for post-‐punk 1979. The main reason I want to rescue this album is because Broken English rescued Marianne Faithfull. Without this wonderful album Marianne Faithfull might not be with us today.
147
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) References Dalton, D 1994, Faithfull, Penguin Books, London, UK. Loog-‐Oldham, A 2004, Stoned, Vintage Books. London, UK. Plath, S 1962, The Unabridged Journals, Anchor Books, London, UK.
148
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘13 Blues for Thirteen Moons’ Silver Mount Zion Mat Caithness When Tim Dalton asked me to contribute to ARS, and upon hearing the criteria for album selection, it took perhaps 5 minutes to identify the band I would review, and another thirty seconds to pick the album from their catalogue that would be the focus of my work. I’ve been a Silver Mt. Zion fan now for somewhere in the vicinity of four years, and let me tell you…. it’s a lonely business. Aside from my beautiful wife who happily endures whatever raucous noise I decide to play, I do not know another person who likes this band, let alone has heard of them. They are not a band that is going to cross your path on commercial radio, and even those given to playing music from the sonic fringes don’t seem to have these guys in their catalogues. As for my discovery of them, it started with a friend handing me a copy of Mogwai’s Young Team, way back at the turn of this century. My musical taste has always been diverse, however, my love of instrumental music was limited to soundtracks and classical. There’s certainly nothing wrong with that, but Mogwai gave my music palette a much-‐needed boost. The term that describes Mogwai’s genre is Post Rock; that is, music that uses rock instrumentation, but ignores the norms associated with typical rock song structure. In addition to this, there is significant absence of vocals, something to which I responded at the time with an enthusiasm that was absolute. While the genre description is often maligned and rejected by the bands to which it is applied, I am a simple creature, and the phrase gave me a crucial compass bearing. Once I find a new thing that resonates with me, I will follow the rabbit hole obsessively. The following journey of discovery uncovered a wealth of instrumental gold. Explosions In The Sky, Mono, Dirty Three (I still cannot believe I missed these guys), Do Make Say Think, Pelican, Tortoise and Sigur Ros (vocals excused on the grounds that I speak neither Icelandic nor Hopelandic) all revealed themselves as I turned over musical stone after musical stone. After some years of collecting and loving this diverse branch of music, a work colleague one day nonchalantly asked if I had ever listened to Godspeed You! Black Emperor. I had not. Another stone was turned over and my mind was blown wide open, yet again. The majority of my musical discoveries are a result of just mooching around. The vast majority of bands that fit into the Post Rock category have unusual names, as do their song titles. Quite often, it’s the band’s name that has attracted me, with albums purchased and fingers crossed (the return has been in my favour and is one of the key reasons why I do not gamble). However, it has not been uncommon for 149
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) me to follow the hallowed path of the band in question’s associated acts. Godspeed’s associated acts included the likes of Set Fire to Flames, Fly Pan Am, HRSTA, Esmerine, and of course, A Silver Mt Zion. Currently trading as Thee Silver Mt. Zion Memorial Orchestra, they were known prior as (the aforementioned) A Silver Mt. Zion, Thee Silver Mt. Zion Memorial Orchestra and Tr-‐La-‐La Band and Choir, and Thee Silver Mountain Reveries. Pretentious? Perhaps. I dutifully did my homework, and looked into the available catalogue, and cast my eyes with interest across the track list for their fifth studio album titled 13 Blues for Thirteen Moons. Tracks 1 through to 12 were an enigma, all titled ‘Untitled’, and ranging from 4 seconds in length to 11 seconds. It was tracks 13, 14, 15 and 16 (the average length of which is a quarter of an hour long) that caught my attention. It is the often-‐protracted length of post rock music that has perhaps kept me so hopelessly enamoured; the opportunity to fall into a musical arrangement that has searing loud/quiet/loud guitar riffs, relentless marching band drums, and complete ownership over the music’s narrative as the listener. No squawking vocals telling you how to feel. Pure bliss! Here was an album that promised four tracks over an hour with Godspeed’s DNA all over it from the mystifying album and song titles, to (most importantly) the involvement of Efrim Menuck. Album purchased, I sat down for my first listen, and was, within minutes, absolutely mortified. What the bloody hell was Menuck doing singing? My entire criteria for purchasing the album had collapsed upon itself after the initial 12 untitled tracks made way for the album opener. I listened to the album in its entirety, and then, unfairly, shelved it. It was some time later when I was compiling a playlist of albums that I gave it the attention it deserved. My obsessive tendency is to include one album from each artist in my playlist (always depending upon whatever kooky criteria I arrive at for playlist selection), and on this occasion 13 Blues for Thirteen Moons was included. With the music playing on random, I found myself checking who was playing on various occasions. This was due to the diversity of sounds from the thundering, repetitive riffs of the opening track to the gradual build and explosion of the Zeppelin-‐like blues riff throughout the title track. The arrival of the sweeping arrangement five minutes into ‘Black Waters’ and the plaintive, but cautiously hopeful conclusion to ‘BlindBlindBlind’. The album, having been unceremoniously dumped and forgotten, had decided it wanted to be heard. In and amongst a
150
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) collection of other songs, it managed bit by bit to grapple my attention, and before long, we started a long, and very trying courting period. I won’t lie to you. This was a bloody hard album to love! The opening 12 tracks are nothing more than a series of varied high-‐pitched drones with no apparent relationship to the rest of the album. Given the album’s title, starting the music proper at track 13 was a decision that the folks at Pitchfork considered a conceit. Were it of a significant length, I may have agreed, but they simply get us to where we need to be in a timely fashion, and I’m OK with that. Music for me is all about enjoyment. Some bands have underlying complexities through which you can dig if you choose, and then there are bands like the Ramones, who are exactly what you see and hear. Thee Silver Mt. Zion is in the former camp, and it is clear that Menuck and co. have something to say. I have never been one to punch the air chanting in political, religious or anti-‐establishment fervour. It is just too much spent energy. If the music grabs me, I’ll go along for the ride sans associated ideologies. And this is very much the case here. Menuck’s yowling vocals are an acquired taste, but he does angry well, underpinned by the smooth voices of violinists Sophie Trudeau and Jessica Moss. The vocal arrangements are repetitive, almost chant like, and hypnotic, but do not allow you to become complacent. They are, in the early stages of the album, urgent. As ‘1,000,000 died to make this sound’ winds itself down, we are afforded a brief reprieve, as the band resets for the onslaught of 13 Blues for Thirteen Moons. Menuck’s vocals have been criticised on this album for coming so prominently to the fore. It is on 13 Blues for Thirteen Moons that the extent of his fury and frustration is realised. Uncompromising calls for action are accompanied by stop/start drums that hit home like blows from a sledge hammer, finally giving way to the slow build of the blues riff that explodes before regrouping for one final assault. This is awesome stuff! Menuck noticeably reaching his vocal limits screaming, “no heroes on my radio”, as his vocal chords sound close to rupturing. While there are those who have criticised him for his self-‐absorbed approach, and pretentious arrangements, it is the sheer scope of this song that, for me, makes this essential listening. There is brief respite as it all but flat lines before a final torrent, galloping through the final minutes towards Menuck’s fractured coda, bleating, “We-‐will-‐not-‐sing-‐at-‐your-‐ damn-‐pa-‐rade”. I’ve always considered this album to be arranged in acts, or movements, rather than songs. The first two acts are aggressive and angry, ultimately making way for a melancholy third act. ‘Black Waters Blowed/Engine Broke Blues’ starts with Menuck’s cacophonous wails alternating with a wall of dissonance, all strings and
151
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) drums, clutching and clawing for supremacy. From this emerges a bruised and beautiful harmony, both music and vocals finally finding balance with Menuck sounding fragile, almost vulnerable. As the song’s title suggests, there is a shift in theme. Menuck’s singing resembles Roger Waters, dismantled and put back together, slightly out of order, broken, but still painting a vivid picture, and telling us a story. The resemblance nagged at me a long time before I finally drew the comparison. The album closes with ‘BlindBlindBlind’, a marked shift in pace, and a welcome one at that. While the vocals more coherently convey Menuck’s anarchic tendencies, the music arrangement is far gentler, ebbing and flowing in intensity, but never reaching the aggressive levels reached earlier in the album. Where earlier tracks were lit with fuses, this one treads cautiously, daring to offer hope. Scepticism and paranoia are still present, but in closing, Menuck dares to believe that, “some hearts are true”. There are a number of A Silver Mt. Zion songs that are superior to those on offer here. ‘Piphany Rambler’ and ‘What We Loved Was Not Enough’ are both amazing tracks. This is A Silver Mt. Zion’s most complete album, and one I never play on shuffle. We have all probably had the conversation that starts something like, “you’re stranded on a desert island and can only have three albums”. Well the three albums bit is bullshit. No true music lover could only pick three albums; not in my opinion anyway. I’d need ten. The albums that always find there way back onto my playlist, after a long period of time, are usually the ones that took the most getting to know. It took a long time for me to fall in love with 13 Blues for Thirteen Moons, and if I ever find myself on that desert island, I’ll be sure this is one of the ten that is keeping me company. As for my fellow music lovers out there, grab a copy, be patient with it, and give it a listen. Let it be done. Let it be soon…
152
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘Voodoo Lounge’ The Rolling Stones By Tim Dalton So do one of the biggest and longest surviving bands on the planet, and self proclaimed “the world’s greatest rock ‘n’ roll band” really need Tim Dalton to rescue one of their 24 studio albums? Probably not, but I’ll have a go anyway. Voodoo Lounge was released in July 1994 to mixed reviews by the world’s press and relatively poor sales, by Rolling Stones standards. The album was recorded over a six-‐month period with multi Grammy award winning producer Don Was at the legendary Windmill Lane Studios in Dublin, Ireland. Just before recording commenced in January 1993, bassist Bill Wyman announced he’d be leaving the band. Since the mid 1970s Wyman had tired of the complete monopolisation of songwriting and production decisions by Jagger and Richards and had felt marginalised for years. This creative isolation had been simmering for years as witnessed by Wyman’s numerous commercially unsuccessful solo projects. This album features Wyman’s replacement Darryl Jones who had been Miles Davis’ protégé and had also worked with Herbie Hancock. Jones’ jazz music pedigree would have definitely appealed to aficionado and rhythm section partner Charlie Watts. I wonder how much time they spent discussing obscure ⅝ time signature in between takes? It pure conjecture but Jones was probably originally hired only for the recording of this album. It was the way he clicked with the group during these recording sessions that cemented his role as bass player to the present day. This core version of The Rolling Stones; Mick Jagger, Keith Richards and Charlie Watts had been together in this format since Brian Jones was fired from the band in summer of 1969. A quarter of a century together is some achievement especially when you consider that the band almost collapsed in the mid 1980 due to the Jagger/Richards fall out. The biggest problem with The Rolling Stones, and it’s a problem most other bands would love to have, is the sheer amount of ‘product’ that they have released into the market since 1962. Most of it good and some of it absolutely exceptional, such as Some Girls (1978), Exile On Main Street (1972), Sticky Fingers (1971), Let It Bleed (1969) and Beggars Banquet (1968). Personally I can’t decide, which is The Rolling Stones’ Magnum Opus album, as I continually shift between Some Girls and Exile On Main Street, depending on the time, place and my mood. Both albums are damn near perfect examples of what a rock ‘n’ roll album should be. Granted all Rolling Stones albums are of their time but that’s not a criticism. Which brings me to this album the ones the critics hailed as one of their
153
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) not so good albums. Most bands would be happy to release an album of the quality of Voodoo Lounge. Being The Rolling Stones must be like being a world famous architect in that people will always remember your signature capital city building but not the functional bus depot you built in Doncaster. Indeed “functional” is probably the best way to describe Voodoo Lounge; it does its job exceedingly well and exactly to specification. The question is, what was its exact job? You might not think of The Rolling Stones as cutting edge any more in terms of music, but they certainly redefined the way a band could conduct business on an international scale. Thanks to Prince Rupert of Lowenstein (Rupie the Groupie) they are the epitome of a band turning them selves into a global brand. I guess those years Mick Jagger spent studying at the London School of Economics weren’t wasted after all? The Rolling Stones were one of the first bands to notice that selling ‘product’, CDs and records to you and me, maybe wasn’t the main revenue stream after all. They predated many of their contemporaries by about 20 years when they realised that album sales could be the main point of leverage for ticket sales. When they kicked off their year long Voodoo Lounge Tour in July 1994 it was the highest grossing tour of all time of $320 million US. Even by today’s figure that's an impressively eye-‐watering amount of money and it still rates as one of the all time top ten grossing tours. I know it’s vulgar and crass to talk about money but in the words of Bobbi Fleckman, “Money talks and bullshit walks”. But what about those fifteen tracks on the album, yes fifteen, count them. Selling truckloads of tickets for shows does not make a great rock ‘n’ roll album. The album kicks off with the classic Glimmer Twins composition of ‘Your Love Is Strong’, familiar Rolling Stones territory here. Giant riffs abound from Keith, typical misogynistic lyrics from Mick, Ronnie Wood weaves his perfectly appropriate lead guitar lines in, under and around Keith’s chops. Charlie and Daryl keep the rhythm simple and functional, like a diesel engine just like it should be. The classic Rolling Stones architectural blueprint is followed through this album and it’s great. Track three ‘Sparks Will Fly’ follows the Phil Spector receipt for a great rock and roll track e.g. 1: it must be insanely repetitive, 2: have a primeval beat and 3: be about sex, check all three boxes. Mick and Keith are definitely playing by the rules here, even though their past squabbles aren’t fully behind them yet. By track four the boundaries get well and truly pushed, when Keith pens and sings ‘The Worst’, an acoustic song with a distinct country twinge about little bits of Keith’s life that come back to haunt him from his subconscious. The lyrics are deeply regretful but there’s no clue as to whom they are directed towards. With a history like Keith Richard’s there are numerous likely candidates. Voodoo Lounge comes only two years after Keith’s superb solo record
154
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) Main Offender (1992). Maybe Mick is still feeling threatened because Keith’s solo records are infinitely better that his own 1987 solo record Primitive Cool. As I mentioned in Chapter 1 of Album Rescue Series, ‘Main Offender’ by Keith Richards, I can’t and won’t defend Mick’s record, as it really does suck. Track fourteen and Keith gets another shot with the superb ‘Thru and Thru’, which I was delighted to hear one night while watching The Sopranos on TV. Track nine, ‘Brand New Car’, is the only vaguely embarrassing track on the album. I suppose 14 out of 15 isn’t bad? Mick lays it on much too thick with the ridiculous double entendres on this track; it’s like the Sid The Sexist from Viz comic (minus the comedy). I guest at the age of 51, Mick’s age when recording this album, such behaviour is seen as subversive and risqué e.g. middle-‐aged millionaires shouldn’t behave like that. All is redeemed and order is restored with ‘I Go Wild’, a track of awesome simplistic power and beauty, and a track, which The Rolling Stones kick out while barely breaking into a sweat. So what’s wrong with Voodoo Lounge? In my opinion absolutely nothing at all, the critics made a wrong call with this album hence this rescue. It contains all the classic Rolling Stones’ elements plus a few surprises. Its got rock, funk, soul, blues, country and even a tiny bit of folk, variety is good because variety is the spice of life. The Glimmer Twins might not have fully sorted out their differences, but they are at least collegiate and demonstrate that it is possible for them to work together again. Production is credited to Jagger and Richards (The Glimmer Twins) with Don Was simply listed as co-‐producer, but this is probably highly understating his true role. Don Was is one of the world's most prolific, respected and prodigious talented record producers having previously worked with Bob Dylan, Elton John, Carly Simon, Michael McDonald, Iggy Pop, Paula Abdul, Willie Nelson, David Crosby, Lyle Lovett, Jackson Browne and Neil Diamond to name check only a few. Jagger and Richards have past form when it comes to destructive one-‐upmanship and it’s highly likely Don Was acted as some kind of objective creative adjudicator? As a creative conduit the producer’s role is to bring out the best material and Don Was does this perfectly on this album. He does stray into familiar Was (Not Was) territory on track 11, ‘Suck On The Jugular’, which is a close facsimile to his Was (Not Was) 1987 hit ‘Walk The Dinosaur’. His reputation is now such that, to quote the New York Times (1994), “he bridges a gap. He takes people that were good all along and distils them into the best versions of themselves". Don Was sounds more like a sonic divinity then the co-‐ producer of the album. To offer up some evidence to support this statement I suggest listening to Iggy Pop’s 1990 most commercially successful album Brick By Brick. Shy, quiet, semi reclusive, cat loving Californian Bob Clearmoutain provides the absolutely perfect holy trinity mix of place, space and bass. In fact, the unsung
155
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) superstar on this record is without doubt Bob Clearmoutain and his technically perfect 10 out of 10 mix. This album is worthy or an album rescue for this mix alone. The technical choices and creative approach that Don Was took to create this album are well worth examining here because they make a significant contribution to the sound and aesthetics of the album. The 1989 album Steel Wheels is often cited as The Rolling Stones great comeback album, but there is a strong argument that this accolade should really be applied to Voodoo Lounge. Steel Wheels was The Rolling Stones first digitally recorded album, produced by Chris Kimsey, and is the album where the Glimmer Twins initially kiss and make up (sort of) after a decade long feud. Steel Wheels is without contention a fantastic Rolling Stones album but it’s very technical, somewhat synthetic and possibly over produced. The true beauty of Voodoo Lounge is that it captures some of the organic sounds and feel of the incontestable classic Stone’ albums such as the exceptional 1972 double album Exile On Main Street. Further intertextual links with the past include the ‘Lady Jane’ like harpsichord arrangement of track five ‘New Faces’ and Keith's classic trademark ‘Honky Tonk Woman’ type riff on the intro to the opening track ‘Love Is Strong’. Could the sonic properties of this album be the result of technological determinism? Possibly, because Don Was was/is an analogue producer and built Voodoo Lounge from the ground up with the classic, but aging, tools of 24-‐track two inch tape. I am definitely not going to enter into a futile who can piss up the wall the highest debate here about analogue recording versus digital recording. What might have made a difference here are the distinctly different operational practices of each medium. Working with analogue tape is a linear affair; tracks are laid onto the multi-‐ track tape and it’s virtually impossible to cut and paste parts around. In the digital audio workstation (DAW) environment only small snippets of audio are needed to construct tracks cut ‘n’ paste style. DAW produced albums tend to be of the hyperreality variety as opposed to the analogue organic variety. Hyperreality is an aggregate of audio artefacts and simulations, which either distorts the reality it purports to depict or does not in fact depict anything with a real existence, at all, but which nonetheless comes to constitute a version of reality. The Chris Kimsey produced Steel Wheels (1989) album is The Rolling Stones first hyperreal simulacrum artefact, while the Don Was produced Voodoo Lounge is their last organic performance album. Chris Kimsey constructed a hyperreal simulacrum of The Rolling Stones, while Don Was captured a band performance. The overlap here is very important.
156
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) Even though Don Was is known as a ‘groove’ merchant he unsuspectedly delivers a solid traditional rock ‘n’ roll album steeped in the myth, legend and inter-‐textuality of previous Rolling Stones albums. According to Keith Richards’ autobiography, Life (2011), Don Was’ approach to recording harkened back to the traditional days of recording where everyone was in the same room playing together as a stripped down band. It would appear that Don Was walked the advocate’s tightrope and masterfully steered Jagger away from making a groove Prince type album full of cut ‘n’ paste drum machines, electronic artefacts and synthesisers and rooted the album in The Rolling Stones tradition of Keith’s riffs, songs and playing as a band again. As well as being a superb technical producer, Don Was made great use of his advanced creative talent management skills. As a musical curator Don Was was instrumental in protecting The Rolling Stones heritage and was responsible in re-‐building their heritage brand. Don Was made a stand against postmodernism and made a salient connection to the past, something that he is not recognised for on this album; but he should be. Only the most callow of rock fans would be surprised to learn that by 1994, the release date of this album, that the band was fundamentally an international creative business. The wild excesses and seat-‐of-‐your-‐pants lifestyle as documented in Robert Frank’s unreleased hard to find, and unauthorised, documentary Cock Sucker Blues (1972) are long gone. As a young developing industry the 60s and 70s proved to be the research and development laboratory of the industry, as we know it today. If one were to remake that film today, it could well be called Gimme Tax Shelter. Maybe The Rolling Stones headed to Dublin because of tax breaks, or so Ronnie Wood could go home each night for his tea, or maybe it was the Guinness or simply the craic? Simply listening to the music on this album it’s impossible to tell what contextual issues contributed to the making of this album, but that doesn’t stop us hypothesizing. Voodoo Lounge was an album born out of a major long running disagreement by two supersized creative talents (Jagger and Richards). This is a great album because Don Was brings together all the super-‐sized egos and provides a form of conflict resolution through collective creative endeavour and delivers an album of fantastic music. This album is like the long married feuding couple that undertake marriage guidance, go on holiday and produce a baby upon their return. The only way to appreciate this album is not to listen to it in its solitude but consider it as an essential part of the canon of work that The Rolling Stones have gifted to us over the last forty years. As Keith Richard’s said of this album on The Rolling Stones web site, “There are songs that people won’t understand for years . . . and then suddenly they realise
157
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) what we’ve been doing”. The complete works of The Rolling Stones are neither good nor bad, it’s just their work. They are entitled to make exactly what they want, when they want too and how they chose too. If anything Voodoo Lounge is similar to a software update e.g. its Exile On Main Street version 2.0 and that makes it suitable for an album rescue. References Richards, K 2010, Life, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London, UK. Available from: . [31 August 2015].
158
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘Big Thing’ Duran Duran By Nick Wilson The intersection of pop and art is a razor’s edge fraught with accusations, compromises and betrayal. Many would say the two concepts are diametrically opposed. In the 1960s artists like Warhol and Liechtenstein brought us the concept of ‘pop art’ but in hindsight it was more an appropriation of pop imagery by high art rather than any true synthesis of the two. In the field of rock and pop music, artists have attempted to adopt high art concepts to enrich their work or to give it some extra allure. Notable examples are the 1970s work of David Bowie or Roxy Music. But how are we to judge the worth of a band who claim to synthesise art and pop but have been derided throughout their career as lacking any kind of artistic credibility whatsoever? Duran Duran emerged out of the post-‐punk era not just as a successful pop band, but the biggest pop band of the era. Referred to by the press to as “the Fab Five”, their first four albums were Platinum sellers in the UK and the US. ‘Is There Something I Should Know?’, ‘The Reflex’ and ‘A View To A Kill’ were among a string of hits which made it to number #1 on at least one side of the Atlantic. It’s hard now to comprehend just how huge Duran Duran were during this period. If you want to get an idea of just how big a cultural phenomenon they were track down the ‘Sing Blue Silver’ documentary for a glimpse behind-‐the-‐scenes of a different era in the music industry. Today, Duran Duran have been accorded some amount of grudging respect by many of those who once jeered at them. Their first three albums are, if not always agreed-‐ upon as classics, at least acknowledged as emblematic pop albums of the era. Second album Rio (1982) is generally accepted as a quintessential new wave pop masterpiece. But it is not hard to see why they haven’t been taken seriously in the past, with the marketing of the band rivalling the most manufactured bands of history in terms of merchandising (Duran Duran boardgame anyone?), self-‐indulgent lifestyles and an obsession with image. Their female teenager fan demographic didn’t always inspire respect from serious male music critics (but does the term ‘teenybopper’ sound a little condescending now though?) Another alienating factor was their sheer pretension. As a pop band they didn’t exactly go in for traditional songs about unrequited love. Listen to the 1983 hit ‘Union of the Snake’ as you
159
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) watch the video clip of them wandering around a post-‐apocalyptic landscape and tell me what the hell that’s all about…. But can we really say that Duran Duran are a post-‐punk band? They definitely emerged out of that time and place. Between the band’s initial forming in 1978 and the release of their first album in 1981, a string of line-‐up changes and solid gigging meant that they were a tightly-‐honed outfit by the time they reached the public’s consciousness, with much of the experimenting in sound and style having been done out of view. Listen to their first self-‐titled album now and there is a clear stylistic association with other post-‐punk acts of the time, particularly those who were making the transition into the new wave era. The sound of synthesizers blended with treated guitar, a solid rhythm section and enigmatic, slightly-‐overwrought, vocals on top would be a description that applies to Simple Minds, Magazine and Japan just as much as Duran Duran. On their first two albums the use of new technology such as synthesizers, arpeggiators, sequencers and drum machines should have led to them being as acclaimed as the afore-‐mentioned acts. However they didn’t quite have Simple Minds’ experimental edge, the punk pedigree of Magazine or the melancholic quality of Japan. What did they have instead? Certainly their music was super-‐ charged with adrenaline. In John Taylor and Roger Taylor they had a formidable disco-‐influenced rhythm section. Andy Taylor was a solid rock guitarist who was adaptable enough to modify his style to fit a new wave context where it was blended perfectly with Nick Rhodes’s bedrock of atmospheric synthesizer. And in Simon Le Bon they had a singer whose stage presence, soaring melodies and inscrutable lyrics tied the whole thing together into the perfect new wave pop package. Nick Rhodes and John Taylor, who originally formed the band, often namedropped their heroes as being The Velvet Underground, Bowie and Roxy Music. In this they are no different from the post-‐punk artists mentioned above. But John Taylor also stated his aim for Duran Duran to be “Chic meets the Sex Pistols”. This seems slightly laughable when looking at their early androgynous image and teenaged girl fanbase, however, it is undeniable that the band had an effective dance groove and that a rock edge lay beneath the surface of shimmering synths. If you were already a fan of Cabaret Voltaire or Gang of Four by the time the first Duran Duran records came along, you were probably not going to get too excited by this new pop manifestation of the post-‐punk sound. But the combination of experimental post-‐punk sonics with solid funk grooves, disco momentum, rock energy and pop sensibility heard in songs such as ‘Girls on Film’ or ‘Hungry Like the Wolf’ deserves respect for its uniqueness and attitude. It is interesting to compare Duran Duran’s classic ballad ‘Save a Prayer’ with Spandau Ballet’s ‘True’. While
160
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) Spandau Ballet jettisoned all their new wave baggage to achieve their mega-‐hit, Duran Duran’s wobbly synthesizer arpeggiation helps it retain an aura of sonic otherworldliness. And it does seem unfair that they weren’t able to earn critical respect during this era with tracks as innovative as ‘To the Shore’ from their first album or ‘The Chauffeur’ from Rio. In truth, Duran Duran are an exemplar of the phenomenon whereby an artist emerges from an underground, left-‐field musical movement who is able to rework its stylistic elements in such a way that it becomes accessible to a mass audience. Often this mass audience has no understanding of the underground musical movement from whence their new idols come and usually they don’t care. Elvis, The Beatles and the Rolling Stones are among the most obvious examples of this same phenomenon. However, those who live by the charts die by the charts. The pop business is a brutal and unforgiving one. As a famous record company publicist once said, “Money talks and bullshit walks”. Duran Duran entered troubled waters in the mid-‐80s. Knives had been well and truly sharpened by the critics for many years, however, mass adulation insulated them from any need to care. The cracks started showing though when the band splintered into two high-‐profile, stunningly self-‐indulgent side projects, The Power Station (a rock/funk collaboration with Robert Palmer and Chic’s Tony Thompson and Bernard Edwards) and Arcadia (an über-‐artsy atmospheric project). The 1985 Bond theme ‘A View to a Kill’ was a good attempt at putting the pieces back together but the cracks ultimately couldn’t be plastered over. Roger Taylor and Andy Taylor bailed amidst artistic differences and recriminations. The remaining three members, Simon Le Bon, John Taylor and Nick Rhodes, regrouped and released a new album Notorious in 1986. While it was a passable effort, Andy Taylor’s arrangement skills were missed and session drummer Steve Ferrone’s contributions were somewhat leaden compared to the propulsive disco beats on previous albums. Like a lot of new wave synth players of the mid-‐80s, Nick Rhodes seemed to have traded all his analogue synths in for newer digital models so the band just didn’t have the same sound. Most of all, Notorious lacks the organic cohesiveness of a real band, with producer Nile Rodgers seemingly patching the whole thing together and contributing most of the guitar parts. Although there are some appealing tracks, the vibe is no longer that of a British new wave record, instead more akin to the sound of an American corporate funk project, an impression furthered with their new touring lineup augmented with a brass section. In interviews surrounding the release of the album, the band railed against the lack of critical respect they had received, suggesting that with this release they were
161
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) moving into a more adult-‐oriented direction. John Taylor, for example, claimed that Notorious was just as good an album as U2’s The Joshua Tree. And although Notorious certainly had respectable sales figures, the chart placing and sales weren’t so impressive when held up against the previous releases, the album being their first to not achieve Platinum in the UK. This brings us to their album Big Thing, released in 1988. As discussed previously, part of Duran Duran’s modus operandi from the start was to take stylistic elements from underground post-‐punk musical aesthetics and rework them within a more accessible pop context. Notorious, however, suggested that the band were moving away from art and towards AOR funk, in a search for respect as credible musicians. In the history of pop music, this has largely proven to be a misguided move, leading to the demise of artists such as contemporaries Spandau Ballet or Ultravox, both of whom blanded out into oblivion. Big Thing continued the slide in sales and chart position that had begun with Notorious. However it is an intriguing album for how it successfully manages to take Duran Duran’s music into new directions, reinventing their sound while remaining true to the aesthetic principles that had originally animated the band. As noted previously, Duran Duran were inspired by the avant-‐garde sonic experimentation of post-‐punk, the disco and funk grooves of Chic and the direct rock energy of the Sex Pistols, with the gift of being able to pull these elements together into a coherent pop package. In the late 80s however, times had changed. The new wave era had blanded out with the adoption of digital synthesizers such as the Yamaha DX7. Rock had become worthy and po-‐faced post-‐Live Aid. And most importantly dance music was rapidly evolving into a completely new movement with the influence of Chicago house and the early stirrings of techno in Detroit. Despite the scepticism of the serious rock press, Duran Duran fancied themselves as both sonically innovative and inspired by the latest in musical trends. So it was natural that they would seek to incorporate these new elements into their work in a push to find new inspiration and relevance. Mid-‐1988 in Europe has been called the ‘Second Summer of Love’ (although this title has also been used to describe mid-‐1989), where acid house was the music of the time, rave parties were the place to be and ecstasy the drug of choice. When the first taster from Duran Duran’s new album was released, the single ‘I Don’t Want Your Love’, it was clear that they had been listening to these new sounds.
162
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) Whenever a successful and established act adopts a new cutting edge musical style there is the temptation to snigger and wonder who has been advising them. The question really is whether the artist is able to effectively integrate the new influences into their own style. In the case of ‘I Don’t Want Your Love’ the track gave a new twist on familiar aspects of Duran Duran’s style. The groove was certainly infectious and funky, with some inspiration gained from Prince’s recent work. However it was machine-‐driven, taking it away from a loose funk feel into the realm of the most modern new dance music, played by sequencers and drum machines with quantized precision. Also notable was a new sparseness in their sound. No longer were Duran Duran misguidedly chasing an elusive goal of musical credibility by filling out their tracks with the noodlings of session musos. Rather than filling the track with brass and funk guitar, as per the Notorious album, or layers of synth like their earlier albums, the groove was constructed from the minimal elements of bass, drums and vocals. When guitars and keyboards enter in the chorus as Le Bon’s vocals jump into a higher register the track adopts classic Duran Duran tropes but with a new injection of club modernity. The lyrics explored a typical dance music theme -‐ that of the club lifestyle as a substitute for conventional human relationships, but Le Bon’s delivery, with multi-‐part harmonies, is convincing. Interestingly, despite it not being hugely successful as a single in the UK, it was a massive hit in Italy, long a bastion of the latest disco and house styles. The second single from Big Thing, ‘All She Wants Is’, continued with the stripped-‐ back modern club sound. The dark synth-‐bassline and rolling TR909 hand-‐claps provided another minimal groove but this time the sound was clearly aligned with the emerging acid house style. The backing vocals were triggered from a sampler, cut-‐up and rendered proudly artificial, with sampled breaths and vocalisations used as drum and percussion sounds. Here Duran Duran continued to back away from the sterile AOR musicianship of Notorious, their experiments with new technology and styles producing something genuinely arresting. And rather than ramp it up in the chorus, the musical elements are stripped back to the bare minimum before the layers of sound are brought back in. Yes, the chorus was sung in a monotone rather than the usual soaring Duran melody, but this was club music after all, with classic club music arrangement principles. It is worth noting the timeline of other artists whose names are forever linked with British house music of this time. ‘I Don’t Want Your Love’ was released in September 1988, with the Big Thing album coming out the following month. Yes, this was four months after S’Express released ‘Theme From S’Express’ and two months after Yazz’s ‘The Only Way Is Up’ but it preceded Humanoid’s ‘Stakker Humanoid’ by a couple of months while Soul II Soul’s run of hits didn’t begin until the following year.
163
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) Nobody would claim that Duran Duran invented acid house, but this was a credible demonstration that the band were inspired by and absorbing influences from the vanguard of new musical styles. As we have seen with their earlier new wave records, the band’s strength was its ability to be at the forefront of new musical movements hitting the mainstream consciousness. Exploring club music also gave the band the opportunity to integrate those elements which the band had always been exploring, i.e. sonic experimentation, the latest music technology and club grooves derived from black urban music. The other track on Big Thing with a clear house music sound is ‘Drug’. Here Duran Duran took on the Chicago House style straight without much in the way of filtering or reworking. It is the most American-‐sounding track on the album, with house piano and backing vocals propelling it forward with high-‐energy momentum. It works but is one song on Big Thing, which hasn’t aged so well. It is worth checking out the alternative Daniel Abrahams mix of this track, which was reportedly preferred by the band but rejected by the record label, as an indicator of Duran Duran’s overall intentions with the Big Thing album. This version is a lot more stripped-‐back with a chunky synth-‐bass line brought to the fore. The house sound is however, only one element of what is possibly the most multi-‐ faceted album of the band’s career. Big Thing opens with the title track -‐ a call-‐and-‐ response anthem which is catchy and attention-‐grabbing even if we’re not sure quite what it’s all about. In some ways it provides a bridge between listener expectations derived from their previous work and the new club styles to follow. As the track moves to a conclusion, the guitar work becomes steadily more discordant with sliding feedback tones howling in the background. Here is one of the first notable contributions from Warren Cuccurullo who would become a pivotal element in the Duran Duran story for the next decade. Warren Cuccurullo was an acolyte of Frank Zappa, joining his band in the late 70s to tour extensively and play on several of his albums from that era. Later Cuccurullo formed the New Wave band Missing Persons, today most remembered for their hit ‘Words’. Fancying himself a more interesting guitarist than Andy Taylor, Cuccurullo jumped at the chance to join Duran Duran, believing that the band hadn’t as yet achieved its true potential in experimental approaches to pop music production. Initially contributing session work on Notorious, his playing is a major feature of Big Thing and he subsequently joined the band as a full-‐time member. In addition to the title track, Cuccurullo’s guitar is heard to excellent effect on ‘All She Wants Is’, where the guitar solo is a feature yet somehow doesn’t detract from the track’s club credentials, and the album’s closing instrumental ‘Lake Shore Driving’, where a
164
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) feedback-‐driven freakout over a mid-‐tempo funk jam-‐out suddenly cuts out mid-‐ beat. So these are the two extremes of Big Thing, the acid and Chicago house influences of the lead singles and tracks which explore sonically-‐driven experimental rock. The beauty of the album is that these styles sit comfortably under a creatively reinvigorated Duran Duran banner. There is however a third strand to the album. ‘Too Late Marlene’, ‘Palomino’, ‘Land’ and ‘The Edge of America’ are beautiful and haunting ballads, evocative and restrained, full of atmosphere, melancholia and space. The adventurous sonic details, such as the atonal synth solo in ‘Palomino’, stop them from ever veering too far into easy-‐listening territory. There is also a maturity evident in these tracks which the band had been searching for recently but only glimpsed fleetingly on Notorious. These tracks are weighted towards the second half of the album, so there is a clear vinyl-‐format conceptual structure; a natural flow from the high-‐energy club sounds on Side A to the introspective come-‐down of Side B. As a lyricist Simon Le Bon has certainly had his fair share of detractors. He comes from the new wave era’s surrealist-‐inspired school of lyric-‐writing and the words often don’t hold up to closer scrutiny. But mention should be made of Big Thing’s third single ‘Do You Believe in Shame?’ Certainly it’s not great poetry, but it is poignant and heart-‐felt, as the best pop lyrics can be, and one of Le Bon’s finest hours. Big Thing also marks perhaps Duran Duran’s last album where Le Bon was able to effortlessly breathe great melodies. Although there were still some great moments ahead of him, later Duran Duran releases seem to be intermittently grasping and scratching for the right vocal hooklines. Big Thing is unlikely to win over those who never liked Duran Duran in the first place. But to those who have a fondness for the classic Duran Duran days and missed this release, I’d urge you to check it out, similarly if you are interested in the acid house era of British dance music and its permeation into pop music. Is Big Thing great art or great pop? That really depends on whether you believe pop can be a vehicle for experimentation, risk and a search for new ways of expressing ideas sonically. We can at least agree that a mainstream pop act risks its position in the charts when it rejects its tried-‐and-‐true formula to explore something new. It is easy to overlook Big Thing as a blip in the decline of just another pop band. The arc of pop music is generally seen as one of rapid rise and fall. At this point in British pop history artists of even more ruthlessness and cunning, such as Bros and the Stock-‐Aitken-‐Waterman juggernaut, were circling. With Big Thing Duran Duran, one
165
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) of the hugest of all pop bands now written off as on their downward trajectory, made a surprisingly inspired record of innovation and beauty, taking in new influences, reinventing their style for a new era and challenging themselves and their audience in the process.
166
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘This Is Big Audio Dynamite’ Big Audio Dynamite By Tim Dalton Its 1985: Ronald Regan is president; Margret Thatcher is Prime Minister, monetarism rules, capitalism is king, the miners are on strike, rubbish is piled high in the streets and This Is Big Audio Dynamite. Despite what many people think, Joe Strummer wasn’t the perfect human being. Joe made some huge mistakes in life, no one’s perfect. Probably his biggest mistake was firing Mick Jones from The Clash. Later in life Joe did admit that the one great regret he had in life was firing Mick Jones as he fully appreciated that this single action effectively finished the band. Like exiting any bad relationship the sense of release can be overwhelming and often results in extreme experimentation. In Mick’s case this led to a very brief period with The Beat’s Ranking Roger and Dave Wakeling’s new band, General Public. My ex-‐ classmate of Kelvin Hall High School (Hull), Roland Gift, was responsible for taking bassist David Steele and guitarist Andy Cox from The Beat to form his new band The Fine Young Cannibals. A classic case of one door closing and another one opening. The analogy here is that it’s very similar to dating a young inappropriate girlfriend after a long marriage. It’s great fun for a couple of hot dates but it’s certainly not going to constitute a long-‐term meaningful relationship. After this short affair Jones formed Top Risk Action Company (TRAC) with some former collaborators including Clash drummer Nicky ‘Topper’ Headon. This collaboration soon fizzled out partly due to that old uninvited guest, heroin. The antecedents of This Is Big Audio Dynamite’s experimental funk elements were beta tested on The Clash's Sandinista and Combat Rock albums. Working collaboratively with Jones on B.A.D. were video artist and long time Clash associate, friend and filmmaker Don Letts (samples and vocals), Greg Roberts (drums), Dan Donovan (keyboards), and Leo ‘E-‐Zee Kill’ Williams (bass). Another important ingredient of the mix was Basin Street Studio’s sound engineer Paul ‘Groucho’ Smykle, B.A.D.’s very own ‘dread at the controls.’ Smykle had a serious dub mentality, having previously worked with the likes of Black Uhuru and Linton Kwesi Johnson. Adding samplers, dance tracks, and movie sounds to Jones' concise pop songwriting, B.A.D. debuted on record with the single ‘The Bottom Line’ in September 1985 and the album This Is Big Audio Dynamite later that year. The singles ‘E=MC ’ and ‘Medicine Show’ became sizable hits in England, and reached the dance charts in America. The album did not sell well, only reaching number 27 in the UK charts and a lowly 103 in the USA. 2
167
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) This Is Big Audio Dynamite is a futurist piece of modernist audio art terrorism. As is often the case with modernism, what was once forward-‐looking seems inextricably tied to its time. It had one foot in the present and the other firmly in the future. The clanking electro rhythms, Sergio Leone samples, chicken-‐scratch guitars, bleating synths, and six-‐minute songs of This Is Big Audio Dynamite evoke 1985 in a way few other records do. This is definitely not a criticism; on the contrary 1985 is a good year for me as my son was born this year, definitely the single greatest significant event of my life. Any record that captures the zeitgeist of 1985, by my reckoning, is a good one. Big Audio Dynamite’s (B.A.D.) boldness remains impressive, even visionary, pointing toward the cut and paste post-‐modern masterpieces of the late 1980’s and early 1990’s. Breaking new ground opens up the creative highway for other artists to follow. One reason that this album took some flak is that it doesn’t sound like The Clash. B.A.D. could never fully escape from the long shadow cast by The Clash. We shouldn’t think badly of this album for that reason. If anything Jones builds on the foundations he laid with the Clash, he was prepared to move on and develop. At the time of its release This Is Big Audio Dynamite sounded like the future, it was a soothsayer for what to expect for the next two decades. B.A.D.’s philosophy was to utilize all the elements of the media to create a fuller sound and write songs that were about something. A combination of New York beats, Jamaican bass, English rock ‘n’ roll guitars and dialogue from spaghetti westerns and Nick Roeg films all found a place on this album. Mick Jones did not abandon his innate gift for hooks, if anything, he found new ways to create rhythmic hooks as well as melodic ones, it’s quite accessible for an album that is, at its core, a piece of modernist avant-‐garde rock. This Is Big Audio Dynamite is the album that The Clash should have released as the follow up to their last album Combat Rock but didn’t. It certainly stands as a monument to the times and as a musical signpost for the way things were heading. Mick Jones and film/documentary maker Don Letts are both visual artists to varying degrees. Jones always had a keen eye for fashion and visuals, his influence upon The Clash, and in particular the notoriously scruffy Joe Strummer, was instrumental in their look. Letts’ scopophilic regime was to view the world as though it was through a movie camera lens. In an article for The Sabotage Times (2011), Letts recounts that during the writing of the album (and with Jones’ guidance) he had thrown himself into co-‐writing lyrics, which he approached in the same way as writing a script or treatment for a film. With Jones’ wide-‐screen vision for the band, the songs soon took on a cinematic quality. The songs featured heavy sampling of film dialogue. A good example is the 6 minute 31 second opening track ‘Medicine Show’ which effectively sets the scene of the rest of the album, "Wanted in fourteen counties of 168
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) this State, the condemned is found guilty of crimes of murder, armed robbery of citizens, state banks and post offices, the theft of sacred objects, arson in a state prison, perjury, bigamy, deserting his wife and children, inciting prostitution, kidnapping, extortion, receiving stolen goods, selling stolen goods, passing counterfeit money, and contrary to the laws of this State, the condemned is guilty of using marked cards. . . Therefore, according to the powers vested in us, we sentence the accused before us, Tuco Benedicto Pacifico Juan Maria Ramirez ('Known as The Rat') and any other aliases he might have, to hang by the neck until dead. May God have mercy on his soul. . . Proceed". This whole scene is re-‐appropriated from the 1966 film The Good, The Bad And The Ugly. As writer, arranger and producer of this album, Jones is aware that the songs must be able to support this heavy use of sampling. Songs on this album are constructed in such a way that in the words of Bob Dylan (Heylin, 2010), “a song is anything that can walk by itself”. Jones brings at least one Clash track with him; track four, ‘The Bottom Line’. In its Clash form this song was called ‘Trans Clash Free Pay One’, much better with it’s re-‐ titling. Rick Rubin loved this track so much that he produced a 12” re-‐mix, which was released on his Def Jam label. I am sure that The Clash’s 1981, 17-‐day residency in support of their Sandinista album at Bonds Warehouse in New York City provided Jones with material aplenty. Jones is the classic autodidactic, someone who has learned a subject without the benefit of a teacher or formal education. Jones took much of the same raw material that influenced hip-‐hop artists, such as The Beastie Boys, and processed it in his own special way. I don’t think there’s anyone who would dispute the claim that the Clash where musical pioneers. This Is Big Audio Dynamite could be offered as evidence in support of the argument that B.A.D. were far more forward thinking, cutting edge and perhaps more of their time, than Jones's previous band. They were much less confined by the Stalinist constraints of punk rock and were determined to try and shake off The Clash's formidable legacy. Mick Jones, the member who brought hip-‐hop beats into the Clash’s repertoire and wrote their sole No. 1 hit single, set out to create a new sound that employed the emerging technologies used by dance and rap music. He could have simply formed a crap Clash cover band, like Joe Strummer did, but he made a decisive decision not to. Spoken in the best spaghetti western voice of Clint Eastwood, “For this reason, consider this album well and truly rescued”.
169
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) References Gray, M 1995, Last Gang in Town: The Story and Myth of The Clash. Fourth Estate, London, UK. Heylin, C 2010. Revolution in the air: The songs of Bob Dylan, 1957-‐1973. Constable & Robinson Ltd, London, UK. Letts, D & Jones, M 2011, Big Audio Dynamite's Notes From The Frontline. Sabotage Times. Available from: . [15 September 2015].
170
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
‘License To Ill’ The Beastie Boys By Tim Dalton It’s 1986 and I am a fresh-‐faced skinny 23 year old. I’m working for Roadstar PA Systems of Sheffield who are located in the Socialist republic of South Yorkshire (sic) in the UK. Roadstar are the new upstart audio hire company supplying large concert PA systems to international rock ‘n roll bands like The Eurythmics, The Alarm, Runrig and a host of other bands that have long since disappeared into obscurity. I’d only worked for this company for 18 months when I’m told my next tour will be a Def Jam Recordings’ package tour of Europe featuring; Run DMC, Whodini, LL Cool J and The Beastie Boys. Back in 1986 very few people, me included, had heard of Def Jam Recordings and I remember being very disappointed that my boss at Roadstar had assigned me to this tour. I was bottom of the heap on the audio crew, my job was to set up and pack down the audio equipment and I didn’t even get to touch a mixing console, never mind mix a band. On paper this wasn’t a very appealing gig, in fact it sucked big time. The ‘bands’ weren’t actual bands but one bloke playing some records, with one or two, or in the case of The Beastie Boys, three blokes shouting over the top of these beats. The first show was two nights at the Hammersmith Odeon in London on Friday 12th and Saturday 13th September 1986. Because I’d left school at the age of 16 my education was extremely limited and I didn't know that the name Odeon was the name used to describe ancient Greek and Roman buildings built specifically for music; singing exercises, musical shows and poetry competitions. With 39 years of hindsight, and lots of expensive education behind me, the name seems very apt. In Europe, back in the mid 80s, Hip Hop music was a relatively new phenomenon, and as with anything new, it was largely misunderstood and mistreated by the media. Rap music’s antecedents lie in various storytelling forms of popular music such as talking blues, spoken passages in gospel music, and the call and response of field music. Its more direct formative influences came from the 1960s, with reggae DJs toasting over strong bass beats, and stripped down styles of funk music, most notably James Brown’s use of ‘stream-‐of-‐consciousness’ raps over elemental funk beats. Initially this was part of New York’s dance scene where it had morphed out of block parties at which DJs played percussive breaks of popular songs using two turntables to extend the breaks. Black and Hispanic kids would competitively ‘rap’ over these breaks to gain kudos in their neighbourhoods. You can see the appeal of this music in Thatcher’s unfair, unjust urban locations. Zeitgeist; there’s that word again; it appears in almost every Album Rescue Series entry. Two sold out nights at
171
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) London’s 3,500 capacity rock venue; the Hammersmith Odeon, was pretty impressive by four new unheard of New York ‘bands’ signed to an unknown obscure niche record label. Due to trouble outside the venue before and after these shows, Hammersmith Odeon refused to host any more rap groups for several years afterwards. This is a pattern of events would follow us around the world for the next few years. At the production rehearsal, held early afternoon before the first show, we had a pretty big problem. Last band on the bill, The Beastie Boys, had taken an instant dislike to Roger ‘the Hippy’ who was supposed to be mixing their front of house sound. Roger came with the PA system and had a pretty impressive track record of mixing bands like Nils Lofgren and Katrina and The Waves. This palmares did not impress the Beastie Boys and it was obvious that Roger’s unfamiliarity of this new genre was problematic. Just before doors, The Beastie Boys hit the stage for their sound check. It was like a gigantic chaotic atom bomb going off. DJ Mix Master Mike was dropping some huge phat beats at a ridiculous high volume while the already sloppy drunk MCA, Ad Rock and Mike D start running around the stage screaming, “turn this shit up”. It was powerful, chaotic, and primeval, it was also kind of scary in an aggressive way and as a punk rocker I relished every single second of it. In complete opposition sound engineer Roger was not enjoying a single second of it and he tried to control this chaotic shambles by asking, “Could the lad in the red cap please give some level on the radio mic and the rest of you please shut up”? I stood at the side of the stage like a punk rock Aristotle watching this epic Greek tragedy unfold when Mike D (the lad in the red cap) grabs hold of me and screams, “Yo homie, you know how to mix mutha-‐fucking sound right?” Indeed I “mutha-‐fucking” did and on the spot they tumultuously fire Roger and promote me to front of house engineer. Result! I’m only 23 and now the front of house engineer for the most exciting band on the planet. A few months later, in 1987, I’m re-‐united with The Beastie Boys when we embark on their headline world tour to support the newly released debut album License To Ill. I guess these guys liked my attitude. I spent the next few years of my life touring the world as live sound engineer for The Beastie Boys and that made me very happy indeed. My personal mantra has always been “do what you love and love what you do”. It started that day and I’ve stuck to it. So why this album rescue; everybody loves this album and has fond memories of it? With over 10 million albums sold, it’s an undeniable retail success. Granted it took 30 years for the album to achieve its Diamond status, but that's a considerable number of albums to shift by anyone’s standards. Not only did the punters buy it by the truckload, but the music press loved it too as did lots of radio stations. Licenced to Ill was the first rap album to reach number one on the USA’s billboard charts and it’s
172
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) the eighth best selling rap album of all time (Music Times, 2015). This pattern repeated all over the world although huge sales do not constitute a great album alone. Surely all of these metrics prove that this album is not in need of an album rescue? OK, I’m pushing the boundaries here. This is not so much an album rescue, as a critical reappraisal, which is a rescue of sorts. With this album Mike D, Ad Rock, the late MCA and their record company, Def Jam Recordings, pulled off the greatest post-‐modern Rock ’n’ Roll Swindle of all time. Licensed To Ill remains the most creative and intelligent post modern parody ever created in any creative medium. There I’ve said it. When The Beasties Boys rap about drinking, robbing, rhyming, partying, fighting, pillaging and brass monkeys, we should really contextualise this subject matter through the lens of situation ethics. The father of situation ethics, Joseph Fletcher (1966) stated, “all laws and rules and principles and ideals and norms, are only contingent, only valid if they happen to serve love”. This album was definitely born out of love and I believe that it’s almost impossible to be critical of anything created out of love. In situation ethics, right and wrong depend upon the situation. There are no universal moral rules or rights, each case is unique and deserves a unique solution. As with other great parodies e.g. David Bowie’s (1967) The Laughing Gnome, a parody of Anthony Newley, the artist needs to fully understand and love the material that they are engaging with. Maybe the correct way to rescue this album is to re-‐imagine, re-‐evaluate and re-‐ contextualise it? Through this process we can construct an alternative discourse to the commonly miss held one. The buffoonery and cartoon controversy normally associated with this album can be dispelled and instead I’d like to reposition this album, as a deeply intelligent work of art, created by artists not fools. Granted the creators don’t do themselves any favours with their postmodern slapstick shtick parody. As with all postmodern texts it’s all about surface, hedonism and fun devoid of any substantial meaning, which is why most people don’t fully appreciate this album. Licensed To Ill is a remarkable ironic marriage of heavy metal guitars, funk beats and edgy poetic rap lyrics. Hand crafted under the tutelage of producer and Def Jam Recordings founder Rick Rubin, this album is a substantial ground-‐breaking piece of historical work. Rap music was not supposed to be made by rich privileged upper class Jewish kids. Had they played by the rules then they would have become the stereotypical doctors, lawyers, dentists, accountants or even presidential candidates. But their privilege and education provided the cultural capital fuel that ignites this album. Having an acute understanding and passion for different subcultures, pop culture,
173
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) jokes, music, fashion and art all provided the foundational material on which this album was built. The traditional elements of rap, such as guns, ghettos, money, hoes, sex and drugs are largely eschewed or at least re-‐appropriated via intoxicating creative wordplay. Their parody was so impenetrable and utterly convincing that it wasn't immediately apparent that their obnoxious, misogynistic, hedonistic patter was a consciously constructed part of their collective persona. Luckily for us the passing years have clarified that this album was a huge postmodern joke made all the funnier by those taken in by the joke or completely unaware of the joke. This album is a classic example of what French anthropologist Claude Lévi Strauss termed “bricolage” (Strauss 1962, p.13). This album is the sound of The Beastie Boys acting as classic bricoleurs. They are taking some very specific symbolic objects such as music, language, clothing, appearance and forming a unified signifying system in which these ‘borrowed’ materials take on a new and more powerful significance. Not only is the notion of bricolage at play in their music, but it’s also at play (literally) in items such as VW car badges, clothing and even their language e.g. the use of the word “homie” as a shortened version of “home boy”. Criticism about The Beastie Boys’ lack of conviction and authenticity abounded at the time. They were unfairly compared to the punk rockers that a decade before them had taken to the streets to hurl bricks at the riot police. They consciously understood that punk rock had achieved zero and that the youth of the mid 1980s was not prepared to face the tear gas and baton charges. Instead The Beastie Boys instigated a much more effective covert semiotic guerrilla war and it was all expertly delivered under the cloaking device of extreme parody. Their work on this album and every other album they have made is intellectual, inter-‐textual, is constantly in dialogue with other forms of cultural expression and it can only be fully appreciated when it is located in its original context, which is in the mid 1980s. Listening to the cajoling rhymes of this album in 2015, filled with clear parodies and absurdities, it's difficult to imagine the offense that many people took back in the 1980s. This is one of the funniest and most infectious albums ever made and it’s all articulated via the gonzo literation of some posh bratty Jewish kids from New York who in all probability are much cleverer than we are. The parody of this album is not offensive to the traditional black rappers; instead it points its undercover barb at frat college jocks and lager louts; the people who bought the album. Their hedonistic beer soaked version of life was intoxicatingly aspirational, in an alternative way, and made to look very appealing via their gleeful delivery. The subject matter of this album is completely contradictory to the dominant mid 1980’s monetarist aspirations because it celebrates the very conditions of its enforced leisure; namely boredom, meaninglessness, dehumanisation, commodity fetishism, repetition, 174
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) fragmentation and superficiality. Track seven, the huge worldwide mega hit of ‘Fight For Your Right (To Party)’, is the personification of their new worldview. The mid 1980s were a time of money, MTV, excess and spring break in warm sunny nirvanas such as Panama City and Daytona Beach. ‘Fight For Your Right (To Party)’ was originally intended to be a parody of popular party rock songs of the time like Twisted Sister’s ‘I Wanna Rock’, although that intent was seemingly lost on the audience. It’s as if The Beastie Boys where insider dealers (something that was also popular in the mid 1980’s) and were poking fun at their own kind. Just sampling and scratching Black Sabbath and Led Zeppelin to hip-‐hop beats does not make for an automatically good record, though there is definitely a visceral thrill to hearing those muscular riffs put into super serious overdrive. Their artistry wasn’t just confined to the writing and recording of the album but also in their exceptional understanding of the media as a conduit or delivery system for their powerful message. This debut album, and its subsequent tour, provoked moral panic and media outrage resulting in tabloid headlines across the world. The Beastie Boys instantaneously became the latest folk devils, the band that the media loved to hate. Popular myth would be fuelled by stories of the band’s controversial behaviour. The media and popular tabloid press amplified and greatly exaggerated events on this tour out of all proportion, which greatly increased album sales. In part this was due to the exuberant stage show that was purposefully designed to mimic the album. As a member of that tour, I saw none of this behaviour, what I saw was lots and lots of identical looking hotel rooms, airport lounges, venues and the inside of tour buses. I remember helping a very home sick MCA backstage in Germany make a collect call to his mum and dad back in New York. Album Rescue Series is no place for these antidotes but you will be able to read them in my forthcoming book Stop Me If You’ve Heard This One Before. The Beastie Boys and their producer Rick Rubin had read Stephen Davis’ version of Led Zeppelin’s hotel destroying tour exploits, Hammer of the Gods (1985), and it had made a big impression on them all. Not only is the album’s lyrical content heavily influence by this book and lifestyle, but the album cover’s artwork is also highly inter-‐textual. The smouldering aeroplane crashed into the side of a mountain cover illustration is a deceptively complex piece of work both artistically and semiotically. The image is darkly humorous, but not out of step with the times or the sonic content of the album. Artist David Gambale (aka World B. Omes) created a pre-‐Photoshop collage of various airplane parts then illustrated over it using water-‐soluble crayons. I’m not an artist but I’m guessing the process must have taken significant hours and the dramatic results are worth it. The plane on the album cover is an inter-‐textual 175
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) reference to the legendary Starship, a Boeing 720 airliner owned by Bobby Shering and converted into a kitsch rock-‐star flying tour bus. Led Zeppelin where the Starship’s most famous occupants and even wrote the song Stairway To Heaven about their on-‐board experience. The Starship would transport any rock band that could afford the exorbitant hire fee e.g. The Rolling Stones, Bad Company, Allman Brothers. Stripped of its reference, an aeroplane is not glamorous, it’s merely an ecologically unsound, inefficient and very expensive form of transport. Ever since “the day the music died” (McLean, 1972) back in 1959, when a chartered flight claimed the lives of Buddy Holly, Richie Valens, and the Big Bopper, plane crashes have ended the careers of some of music’s biggest names. Patsy Cline’s plane went down in 1963, silencing one of the greatest voices to ever crossover from country music to popular music. We lost the great Otis Redding to an airplane accident in 1967, and just a few years later, singer-‐songwriter Jim Croce’s career was terminated just as it was starting to take off. Perhaps none of the above was as startling as Lynyrd Skynyrd‘s horrific 1977 plane crash, which killed three members of the band, the assistant road manager, co-‐pilot and pilot. Airplanes are symbols of both extravagant rock star excess and sombre tragedy. What better way to announce a new young band to the world than to crash their jet into the side of a mountain before their career had even taken off? Just like a centre page fold out cartoon from the Mad comic, the fun is in the details. The plane’s tail number “3MTA3” spells “Eat Me” backwards. The Beastie Boys logo on the vertical stabilizer was intentionally designed to evoke the Harley-‐Davidson logo. Many people have commented about the connotations of how the smouldering plane resembles a stubbed out spliff. Via this album, The Beastie Boys are displaying an advanced understanding of semiotics that Roland or Ferdinand would be immensely proud of here. I am quite prepared to stick my neck out here and argue that The Beastie Boys have never made a bad album: Paul’s Boutique (1989), Check Your Head (1992), Ill Communication (1994), Hello Nasty (1998), To The 5 Boroughs (2004), The Mix-‐up (2007) and Hot Sauce Committee Part 2 (2011) are all masterpieces in their own right. Even their other parody album, The In Sound From Way Back (1998), which precisely parodies Perrey and Kingsley’s 1966 album of the same name, is another masterpiece. If we ignore the 10 million copies sold of License To Ill and listen to it minus the filter of parody then we are getting very close to rescuing this album. It isn't only the music or the rhymes that translate beyond the parody crime scene. License To Ill clearly shows The Beastie Boys didn’t give a fuck at exactly the time when the world desperately needed to be shown how not to give a fuck. Flying in the face of rampant yuppie materialistic capitalism they demonstrated that you
176
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1) could be ground-‐breaking, cutting edge, important, creative and relevant all at the same time yet still have no goals beyond getting drunk and partying hard. Licensed To Ill marks the turning point in cultural history when the slacker generation (the three members of band are born 1964, 65 & 66) start making music for the millennial generation. This album proved that you could live life as one giant inside joke, speaking in tongues and making hilarious obscure references to Chef Boyardee or Olde English 800 and no one outside your circle of jerks would be any the wiser. Oh how we laughed. License To Ill accurately predicted the future to the Millennials upon its release in 1986. The mantra bestowed on them was "follow your dreams" and because they were constantly being told they were special, this cohort tends to be over confident. While largely a positive trait, the Millennial’s confidence has been known to spill over into the realms of entitlement and narcissism. They are the first generation since the Second World War that is expected to be less economically successful than their parents. The Millennial’s optimism is founded in unrealistic expectations, which often leads to disillusionment. Most Millennials went through post-‐secondary education only to find themselves employed in low paid dead end jobs in unrelated fields to the ones they studied or underemployed and job-‐hopping more frequently than any previous generation. License To Ill soothsaid this bleak scenario but then also gave us a not too cryptic optimistic answer, which was, “Fight for your right to party”. I rest my case Homie. References Fletcher, JF 1966, Situation Ethics: The New Morality. John Knox Press, Westminster, UK. Music Times 2015, Available from: [11 August 2015] Strauss, C L 1962, The Savage Mind. Librarie Plon, Paris, France.
177
Album Rescue Series (Vol. 1)
178
Lihat lebih banyak...
Comentários