Amicus curiae, repercussão geral e o projeto de código de processo civil
Descrição do Produto
AMICUS CURIAE, REPERCUSSÃO GERAL E O PROJETO DE CÓDIGO DE PROCESSO CIVIL FELIPE DE MELO FONTE1 E NATÁLIA GOULART CASTRO2
Sumário: *OUSPEVÎÍP " SFQFSDVTTÍP HFSBM Amicus curiae OP EJSFJUP CSBTJMFJSP VNB CSFWF BCPSEBHFN %FCBUF DPOTUJUVDJPOBM EFNPDSÈUJDP F B GVODJPOBMJEBEF EPT amici na TJTUFNÈUJDB EB SFQFSDVTTÍP HFSBM 0 JODSFNFOUP EB RVBMJEBEF EP SFDVSTP FYUSBPSEJOÈSJP QPSNFJPEPBMBSHBNFOUPEBBUVBÎÍPEPamicus curiae%JTDVTTÜFTTPCSFBiDBVTBEFQFEJS BCFSUBwEPSFDVSTPFYUSBPSEJOÈSJP0amicus curiaeOPQSPKFUPEFOPWP$ØEJHPEF1SPDFTTP $JWJM$PODMVTÍP 3FGFSÐODJBTCJCMJPHSÈëDBT
1. INTRODUÇÃO. 0PCKFUJWPEFTUFBSUJHPÏEFTUBDBSPQBQFMTJOHVMBSFYFSDJEPQFMPamicus curiae OPTQSPDFTTPTBGFUBEPTËTJTUFNÈUJDBEBSFQFSDVTTÍPHFSBM EJGFSFODJBOEPP EBRVFMF FYFSDJEP OP DPOUSPMF DPODFOUSBEP EF DPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBEF OP RVBMQSFWBMFDFNQPTJÎÜFTSFTUSJUJWBTBPJOHSFTTPFQBSUJDJQBÎÍPEPTSFGFSJEPT BHFOUFT 1PTUVMBTF P SFDPOIFDJNFOUP EF NBJPSFT EJSFJUPT BPT SFGFSJEPT BUPSFTQSPDFTTVBJT DPNPGPSNBEFJODSFNFOUBSBMFHJUJNJEBEFEFNPDSÈUJDBFB DPOTJTUÐODJB KVSÓEJDB EBT EFDJTÜFT BEPUBEBT QFMP 4VQSFNP5SJCVOBM 'FEFSBM "OUFBQPTJÎÍPSFTUSJUJWBEPUSJCVOBM DPOGPSNFTFWFSÈBTFHVJS TVTUFOUBTF RVFPBEWFOUPEPOPWP$ØEJHPEF1SPDFTTP$JWJM BUVBMNFOUFFNUSBNJUBÎÍP OB$ÉNBSBEPT%FQVUBEPT SFWFMBFYDFMFOUFPQPSUVOJEBEFQBSBSFRVBMJëDBSP amicus curiae OPTJTUFNBKVSÓEJDPCSBTJMFJSP
.FTUSFFEPVUPSaOEPFNEJSFJUPQÞCMJDPQFMa6OJWFSTJEade do Estado do Rio de JaOFJSP1SPDVrador do Estado do Rio de JaOFJSP FNFYFSDÓDJPOP4VQSFNP5SJCVOal FederaM DPNP"ssessor de .JOJTUSP$POUaUPGFMJQFGPOUF!HMPCPDPN &TQFDJalistaFNEJSFJUPDPOTUJUVDJPOaMQFMP*OTUJUVUPEF%JSFJUP1ÞCMJDP#SaTJMJFOTFo*%1"EWPHada no Distrito FederaM$POUaUP/$aTUSP!NaDIaEPNFZFSDPNCS
869
'&-*1& %& .&-0 '0/5& & /"5«-*" (06-"35 $"4530
1SPGVOEBTBMUFSBÎÜFTPDPSSFSBNOPDPOUSPMFEJGVTPEFDPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBEF EFTEFRVFBBENJTTJCJMJEBEFEPTSFDVSTPTFYUSBPSEJOÈSJPTQBTTPVBTFSëMUSBEB QFMPJOTUJUVUPEBSFQFSDVTTÍPHFSBM JOUSPEV[JEPQFMB&NFOEB$POTUJUVDJPOBM nº.BJTRVFVNSFRVJTJUPEFQSPDFEJCJMJEBEF NPEJëDPVTFBMØHJDB EPTJTUFNBQSPDFTTVBMSFDVSTBMOPRVFUBOHFËQBSDFMBEFKVSJTEJÎÍPFYFSDJEB QFMP4VQSFNP5SJCVOBM'FEFSBM4FBOUFTDBCJBBP4VQSFNP5SJCVOBM'FEFSBM KVMHBS UPEPT PT SFDVSTPT FYUSBPSEJOÈSJPT BENJUJEPT OB PSJHFN BTTJN DPNP PT SFTQFDUJWPT BHSBWPT DPOUSB BT EFDJTÜFT EFOFHBUØSJBT OP TJTUFNB FSJHJEP QFMB SFGPSNB EF DBCF BP USJCVOBM QSJNFJSBNFOUF BWBMJBS TF B RVFTUÍP Ï EPUBEB EF TVëDJFOUF SFMFWÉODJB QBSB B JOTUBVSBÎÍP EB KVSJTEJÎÍP EB DPSUF $BTP B SFTQPTUB TFKB QPTJUJWB FOUÍP PT EFNBJT SFDVSTPT FOWPMWFOEP P UFNB ëDBNTPCSFTUBEPT BHVBSEBOEPBNBOJGFTUBÎÍPEFëOJUJWBEPUSJCVOBMTPCSFB NBUÏSJBEFGVOEP "SFQFSDVTTÍPHFSBMOBTDFVDPNPPSFHJNFRVFMFWBSÈP4VQSFNP5SJCVOBM 'FEFSBM B FYFSDFS FTTFODJBMNFOUF P QBQFM EF $PSUF $POTUJUVDJPOBM BCBOEPOBOEPBDPNQFUÐODJBEF5SJCVOBMSFWJTPSBCBSSPUBEPEFSFDVSTPTQFOEFOUFT EFKVMHBNFOUP/VNBTQFDUP FSJHJVOPWBDPODFQÎÍPEFKVSJTEJÎÍPFQSPDFTTP DPOTUJUVDJPOBJTEFGPSNBBDPMFUJWJ[BSMJUÓHJPTEFJHVBMGVOEBNFOUP QSJNBOEP QFMB JHVBMEBEF F TFHVSBOÎB KVSÓEJDB OB JOUFSQSFUBÎÍP EB $POTUJUVJÎÍP %F PVUSP MBEP CVTDPV SBDJPOBMJ[BS P UFNQP FTDBTTP EB $PSUF BNQMJBOEP TVB DBQBDJEBEFEFKVMHBSUFNBTSFBMNFOUFSFMFWBOUFTQBSBPQBÓT $PN UBM QSPQØTJUP FN WJTUB P TJTUFNB BDBCPV QPS TVQSJNJS B QBSUJDJQBÎÍP RVFS TFKB OB TVTUFOUBÎÍP PSBM PV NFTNP OB JOUFSQPTJÎÍP EF OPWPT SFDVSTPT OPÉNCJUPEB4VQSFNB$PSUF EBTQBSUFTDVKPTQSPDFTTPTOÍPGPSBN EFTUBDBEPTDPNPQBSBEJHNB/FTTBØUJDB HBOIBSFMFWÉODJBPQBQFMEFTFNQFOIBEPQFMPamicus curiaeOPKVMHBNFOUPEPSFDVSTPFYUSBPSEJOÈSJPFTDPMIJEP DPNPleading caseEFVNUFNBFTQFDÓëDP"EFTQFJUPEFBEFDJTÍPQSPGFSJEB QSPEV[JS FGFJUPT BQFOBT FN SFMBÎÍP ËT QBSUFT MJUJHBOUFT Ï JOEVCJUÈWFM RVF B UFTF BTTFOUBEB BDBCBSÈ QPS BMDBOÎBS UPEB B DPMFUJWJEBEF EF QFTTPBT BT RVF BHVBSEBN KVMHBNFOUP DPN PT SFTQFDUJWPT SFDVSTPT TPCSFTUBEPT o NFEJBOUF TJNQMFTBQMJDBÎÍPEPBSUJHP# ffº e 4ºEP$ØEJHPEF1SPDFTTP$JWJM o CFN DPNP PT EFNBJT JOEJWÓEVPT RVF QPSWFOUVSB WFOIBN B TF TVKFJUBS Ë BQMJDBÎÍPDPODSFUBEBUFTFKVSÓEJDBBTTFOUBEB "ÓSFTJEFBJEFJBEFRVFPiBNJHPEBDPSUFwQPEFTFSBëHVSBSFQSFTFOUBOUFEFTTBDPMFUJWJEBEFRVFOÍPQBSUJDJQBEBSFMBÎÍPQSPDFTTVBM NBTRVFUFN JOUFSFTTF FNTFOUJEPMBUP OPSFTVMUBEPEBBUJWJEBEFJOUFSQSFUBUJWBEB$PSUF %FDFSUBGPSNB PTJOUFSFTTBEPTOPEFTGFDIPEPleading case RVFOÍPQVEFSBN TFGB[FSQSFTFOUFTFBUVBOUFTOBDBVTB TÍPSFQSFTFOUBEPTQPSNFJPEPTamici,
870
AMICUS CURIAE 3&1&3$644°0 (&3"- & 0 130+&50 %& $»%*(0 %& 130$&440 $*7*-
PTRVBJTDPNQBSFDFNOÍPBQFOBTQBSBGPSOFDFSTVCTÓEJPTUÏDOJDPT NBTUBNCÏNQBSBSFGPSÎBSBMFHJUJNJEBEFEBEFDJTÍPBMDBOÎBEB30Tamici FYTVSHFN JHVBMNFOUF DPNP WJB EF DPOUSPMF EP HSBV EF JOGPSNBÎÍP F UFTF MFWBOUBEBT OP SFDVSTP FYUSBPSEJOÈSJP QBSBEJHNB PV TFKB BUVBN OP TFOUJEP EF TVQSJS BTMBDVOBTEFFMFNFOUPTQPSNFJPEBDPODSFUVEFBSHVNFOUBUJWBQSPDFTTVBM4 5PEBWJB BKVSJTQSVEÐODJBBUVBMEP4VQSFNP5SJCVOBM'FEFSBMÏEFWFSBT SFTUSJUJWBSFMBUJWBNFOUFBPTQPEFSFTQSPDFTTVBJTSFDPOIFDJEPTBPamicus curiae &NJOÞNFSBTEFDJTÜFTQSPGFSJEBTFNDPOUSPMFBCTUSBUPEFDPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBEF B$PSUFSFBëSNBBGBMUBEFMFHJUJNJEBEFEBTFOUJEBEFTRVFBUVBNDPNPamicus OÍPTØQBSBSFDPSSFSDPNPUBNCÏNQBSBDPOUFTUBS BEJUBSBQFÎBSFDVSTBMPV SFDMBNBS RVF TVBT SB[ÜFT TFKBN DPOTJEFSBEBT *OPCTUBOUF TFS FTTB B QPTJÎÍP BEPUBEBQFMB$PSUFRVBOEPEPTKVMHBNFOUPTEBTBÎÜFTEFDPOUSPMFDPODFOUSBEP EF DPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBEF OÍP TF EJGFSFODJBOEP RVBOEP TF USBUB EB WJB EJGVTB JOFWJUÈWFMPQFOTBNFOUPEFRVFPmodus operandiEBSFQFSDVTTÍPHFSBMEFTBëB P EJSFJUP QSPDFTTVBM F TFVT JOUÏSQSFUFT JODJUBOEP B BNQMJBÎÍP EB JOìVÐODJB do amicus curiaeOBTEFMJCFSBÎÜFTEBTUFTFTDPOTUJUVDJPOBJT
2. A REPERCUSSÃO GERAL. 0 JOTUJUVUP EB SFQFSDVTTÍP HFSBM FTUÈ QSFTFOUF OP f º EP BSU EB $POTUJUVJÎÍP 'FEFSBM EF JOTFSJEP QFMB &NFOEB $POTUJUVDJPOBM Oº 45 EF%JTQÙTPDPOTUJUVJOUFSFGPSNBEPSRVFiPSFDPSSFOUFEFWFSÈEFNPOTUSBSBSFQFSDVTTÍPHFSBMEBTRVFTUÜFTDPOTUJUVDJPOBJTEJTDVUJEBTOPDBTPwQBSB RVFB$PSUFFYBNJOFBBENJTTÍPEPSFDVSTPOBTDPOEJÎÜFTQSFWJTUBTQPSMFJ
" TPMVÎÍP QSPQPTUa aQFOaT NJUJHa P QSPCMFNa OÍP P SFTPMWF 0 EJSFJUPaP DPOUSaEJUØSJP QSFTTVQÜFPSFDPOIFDJNFOUPEPEJSFJUPaJOGMVFODJaSPDPOUFÞEPEPQSPWJNFOUPKVSJTEJDJPOaMGJOaMQPS NFJP Ea aQSFTFOUação de ra[ÜFT "o se aQMJDar a TPMVÎÍP FODPOUSada OP QaraEJHNa aPT SFDVSTPT sobrestaEPT DFSUaNFOUF SFTUa SFTUSJOHJEa a FGJDÈDJa EP SFGFSJEP QSJODÓQJP DPOTUJUVDJPOaM 4PCSF P UFNa W ,3*4-07 4aNVFM i5IF aNJDVT DVSJaF CSJFG GSPN GSJFOETIJQ UP aEWPDaDZw Yale Law Journal Qi5aMWF[PNaJTTJHOJGJDante elaTUFDJNFOUPEaGVOÎÍPEPamicus curiae tenhaTJEPTPMVÎÍPQaSDJal aVNEPTNais sérios FQFSTJTUFOUFTQSPCMFNas aPTJTUFNa EF DPOUSaEJUØSJP iadversaSZ TZTUFNw 0 QSPCMFNa da SFQSFTFOUaÎÍP EF UFSDFJSPT OaT EFNandas PSEJOÈSJaTOÍPQFSNJUFVNaTPMVÎÍPTJNQMFTPVGÈDJM F UaNCÏNOFTTFQPOUP OPTQSPDFEJNFOUPT voltados às aÎÜFTDPMFUJWas, nas quaJTVNHSaOEFOÞNFSPEFQFTTPas é aGFUaEP 1FMPDPOUSÈSJP a EJGJDVMEaEFWFNQFSTJTUJOEPaPMPOHPEPTTÏDVMPT FEJTQPTJUJWPTDSJaEPTQaraNJUJHaSPQSPCMFNa, aPJOWÏTEFSFTPMWÐMP UÐNTJEPaSFHSaw 4FHVOEP4*..0/4 0NaSJ4DPUU i1JDLJOHGSJFOETGSPNUIFDSPXEaNJDVTDVSJaFQaSUJDJQation aTQPMJUJDaMTZNCPMJTNw Connecticut Law Review i"MHVNas daTQFUJÎÜFTEF amicus curiaeUÐNaJNQPSUaOUFGVOÎÍPEFQSPWFSPSJFOUação à Corte quaOEPGalta taMFOUPKVSÓEJDP aPMJUJHaOUFQSJODJQaM"TQFUJÎÜFTEFamicus, FTQFDJaMNFOUFaquelaTSFEJHJEaTQFMP(PWFSOP QPEFN AaQPJaSVNa aQSFTFOUaÎÍPSVJNEaQarte e ainda aQSFTFOUaSVNaSHVNFOUPOÍPFNQSFHaEPQFMas QaSUFTw
871
'&-*1& %& .&-0 '0/5& & /"5«-*" (06-"35 $"4530
0MFHJTMBEPSSFTPMWFV BJOEB RVFBSFDVTBEBSFQFSDVTTÍPTØQPEFSÈPDPSSFS NFEJBOUFPWPUPEFPJUPEPTPO[FNJOJTUSPT5 "ëNEFSFHVMBNFOUBSPEJTQPTJUJWPTVQSBDJUBEP GPJEFDSFUBEBFTBODJPOBEBB-FJOº EFEFEF[FNCSPEF RVFBDSFTDFOUPVPTBSUJHPT " F # BP $ØEJHP EF 1SPDFTTP $JWJM F QPS TVB WF[ P NFDBOJTNP EF JODJEÐODJB EB SFQFSDVTTÍP " MFJ UBNCÏN BUSJCVJV BP 4VQSFNP5SJCVOBM 'FEFSBMBDPNQFUÐODJBQBSBPSJFOUBSBBQMJDBÎÍPEFTTFJOTUJUVUPOBGPSNBEF TFV SFHJNFOUP JOUFSOP " NBUÏSJB FODPOUSBTF BUVBMNFOUF EJTDJQMJOBEB OPT BSUJHPTBEPEJQMPNB "QFTBS EB FYQFDUBUJWB P DPODFJUP EF iSFQFSDVTTÍP HFSBMw OÍP GPJ EBEP QFMPMFHJTMBEPSPSEJOÈSJP)PVWFUÍPTPNFOUFEJSFDJPOBNFOUPOPTFOUJEPEF WFSTBSBMJEFTPCSFRVFTUÜFTRVFUSBOTDFOEFNPVOJWFSTPTVCKFUJWPEBDBVTB i"SU " f º 1BSB FGFJUP EB SFQFSDVTTÍP HFSBM TFSÈ DPOTJEFSBEB B FYJTUÐODJB PV OÍP EF RVFTUÜFT SFMFWBOUFT EP QPOUP EF WJTUB FDPOÙNJDP QPMÓUJDP TPDJBM PV KVSÓEJDP w " UBM SFTQFJUP PCTFSWBN 'SFEJF %JEJFS +S F -FPOBSEP $BSOFJSP EB $VOIB RVF B $POTUJUVJÎÍP USPVYF VN iDPODFJUP BCFSUPw BTFSDPNQMFUBEPQPSOPSNBJOGSBDPOTUJUVDJPOBM6 RVFTFBQPTTPVEF iPVUSPTDPODFJUPTKVSÓEJDPTJOEFUFSNJOBEPTwQBSBHBSBOUJSVNMFRVFBNQMJBEP EFDPNQSFFOTÍPEFTTBFYJHÐODJB"ëSNBN BJOEB RVFTVBFTQFDÓëDBEJNFOTÍP Ï WFSEBEFJSBNFOUF EFMJNJUBEB QFMB JOUFSQSFUBÎÍP DPOTUJUVDJPOBM EBEB QFMB 4VQSFNB$PSUF7 4PCSF P NFTNP UFNB BEV[ 4DBSQJOFMMB #VFOP RVF P JOTUJUVUP EB SFQFSDVTTÍP HFSBM EFWF TFS DPNQSFFOEJEP DPNP P iJNQBDUP TJHOJëDBUJWP RVF
872
*OUFSFTTaOUFSFDPSEar, naTQalavras de BernaSEP1JNFOUFM4PV[a, aQSJODJQaMEJGFSFOÎa entre a ultraQassada aSHVJÎÍPEFSFMFWÉODJa e aSFQFSDVTTÍPHFSal: “" aOUJHa aSHVJÎÍPEFSFMFWÉODJa eraKVMHada FNTFTTÍPTFDSFUaFTFNGVOEaNFOUação aMHVNa+Èa novaSFQFSDVTTÍPHFSaMEFWFTFSKVMHadaFN TFTTÍPQÞCMJDa e aSFTQFDUJWaSFDVTaEFQFOEFEFGVOEaNFOUação, a quaMQPEFTFSDPODJTa Nas deve TFSFYQMÓDJUaw&DPOUJOVa: “enquaOUPOPTJTUFNa aOUFSJPS QaraRVFPSFDVSTPFYUSaPSEJOÈSJPGPTTF KVMHaEP QFMa $PSUF 4VQSFNa, a SFMFWÉODJa da aSHVJÎÍP QSFDJTava TFS DPOIFDJEa QPS QFMP NFOPT quaUSP .JOJTUSPT OP SFHJNF atuaM P SFDVSTP FYUSaPSEJOÈSJP TØ QPEF EFJYaS EF TFS DPOIFDJEP TF a JSSFMFWÉODJa da RVFTUÍP DPOTUJUVDJPOaM GPS EFDMarada QPS QFMP NFOPT PJUP .JOJTUSPTw 406;", BernaSEP 1JNFOUFM Introdução aos Recursos Cíveis e à Ação Rescisória FE 4ÍP 1aulo: Saraiva, Q &NCPSa PT DSJUÏSJPT TFKaN TVCKFUJWPT FN SFHSa IÈ VNa IJQØUFTF PCKFUJWa QSFWJTUa na -FJ O º IÈSFQFSDVTTÍPHFSal quando o aDØSEÍPSFDPSSJEPFTUÈFNEJWFSHÐODJaDPNKVSJTQSVEÐODJa QSFEPNJOaOUF EP 4VQSFNP5SJCVOal FederaM RVF QPEF FTUaS DPOTPMJEada FN TÞNVMa da $PSUFPVOÍP %*%*&3+S 'SFEJFF$6/)" -FPOardo José Carneiro daCurso de Direito Processual CivilMeios de Impugnação às Decisões Judiciais e Processo nos Tribunais a FE4alvaEPS+VT1PEWJN WPM Q
AMICUS CURIAE 3&1&3$644°0 (&3"- & 0 130+&50 %& $»%*(0 %& 130$&440 $*7*-
BEFDJTÍPSFDPSSJEBBTTVNFPVUFNBQUJEÍPEFBTTVNJSwOPDPOUFYUPOÍPTØ KVSÓEJDP DPNPUBNCÏNFDPOÙNJDP QPMÓUJDPFTPDJBM VMUSBQBTTBOEPPTEJSFJUPT FJOUFSFTTFTEBTQBSUFTOPDBTPDPODSFUP 8$POUJOVBPQSPGFTTPSBSHVNFOUBOEP BDFSDBEBFYJHJCJMJEBEFEBSFQFSDVTTÍPOPTFOUJEPEFTFSFMBSFTQPOTÈWFMQFMB FMBCPSBÎÍP EF VNB NJOVDJPTB MJTUB EF DBTPT RVF UFSÍP iBOÈMJTF EFSSBEFJSBw EP4VQSFNP5SJCVOBM'FEFSBM DVKBNBOJGFTUBÎÍPQSFWBMFDFSÈTPCSFBTEFNBJT PSJVOEBTEBTJOTUÉODJBTJOGFSJPSFT5PSOBTF QPSUBOUP JNQSFTDJOEÓWFMVNFTUVEPDSJUFSJPTPEBiRVBMJEBEFwFiRVBOUJEBEFwEPTDBTPTRVFMIFTÍPFOWJBEPT QFMBWJBFYUSBPSEJOÈSJB 1BSB5BÓT 'FSSB[ B SFQFSDVTTÍP HFSBM iQBTTPV Ë DPOEJÎÍP EF WFSEBEFJSP JOTUSVNFOUP QSPDFTTVBM HBOIBOEP FGFJUPT USBOTDFOEFOUFT TFNFMIBOUFT NBT BJOEBNBJTBCSBOHFOUFTwRVFPTRVFKÈWJOIBNTFOEPQSPEV[JEPTQFMBTEFDJTÜFTEB$PSUF4VQSFNB10/PNFTNPUSBCBMIP BBVUPSBBëSNBRVFPleading caseOÍPÏQSPDFTTPDVKBGVOÎÍPGPSBTFSWJSEFQBSÉNFUSPQBSBPTEFNBJT&N PVUSBTQBMBWSBT EJGFSFOUFNFOUFEPRVFBDPOUFDFOPTQSPDFTTPTPCKFUJWPT PTEF OBUVSF[BTVCKFUJWBOÍPTÍPPSEJOBSJBNFOUFDPOEV[JEPTEFNPEPBQSFQBSÈMPT QBSB TFSWJS EF NPEFMP EF VOJGPSNJ[BÎÍP EF EFUFSNJOBEB UFTF NBT TFSWFN BOUFT ËTPMVÎÍPEPDPOìJUPEBWJEBOFMFWFJDVMBEP²OBUVSBM QPSUBOUP RVF PTUFOUFN EFëDJÐODJBT EJWFSTBT RVF QPEFN TF SFìFUJS J OB RVBMJEBEF DPN RVFPTBSHVNFOUPTTÍPBQSFTFOUBEPT JJ OBEFWJEBBOUFDJQBÎÍPEFUPEBTBT JNQMJDBÎÜFTKVSÓEJDBTEPDBTPPV BJOEB JJJ OBBVTÐODJBEFFMFNFOUPTGÈUJDP QSPCBUØSJPTRVFFWFOUVBMNFOUFQPTTBNTFSSFMFWBOUFTQBSBBDPSSFÎÍPTPMVÎÍP EPUFNBKVSÓEJDPDPOTUJUVDJPOBM/FTTFDPOUFYUP TPCSFTTBJBJNQPSUÉODJBEPT amici curiae OBSFQFSDVTTÍPHFSBM KÈRVFPSPMFTUSJUPEFMFHJUJNBEPTËEFìBHSBÎÍPEPDPOUSPMFDPODFOUSBEPEFDPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBEFGB[QSFTTVQPSRVFB BUVBÎÍPQSPëTTJPOBMQFSBOUFB$PSUFDPOTUJUVDJPOBMTFSÈBMUBNFOUFRVBMJëDBEB PRVFOÍPPDPSSFOPÉNCJUPEBSFQFSDVTTÍPHFSBM ² CFN WFSEBEF RVF P SFMBUPS BP BOBMJTBS B RVFTUÍP DPOTUJUVDJPOBM TVTDJUBEBFNEJWFSTPTSFDVSTPT QPEFFTDPMIFS EFOUSFUPEPTEJTQPOÓWFJT BRVFMF RVFKVMHBNBJTBEFRVBEPËSFQSFTFOUBÎÍPEBDPOUSPWÏSTJB SFTTBMWBEPTPTDBTPT FNRVFP5SJCVOBMJOGFSJPS QPSBUVBÎÍPQSØQSJB TFMFDJPOBPSFQSFTFOUBUJWP
#6&/0 $aTTJP4DaSQJOFMMaCurso Sistematizado de Direito Processual CivilRecursos. Processos e Incidentes nos Tribunais. Sucedâneos Recursais: técnicas de controle das decisões jurisdicionaisFE São Paulo: Saraiva Q #6&/0 $aTTJP4DaSQJOFMMaop. cit Q FERR"; 5aÓT 4IJMMJOH Repercussão Geral – muito mais que um pressuposto de admissibilidade 1VCMJDaEPFNRepercussão Geral em Recurso Extraordinário. Estudos em homenagem à Ministra Ellen Gracie-JWSaria do "EWPHado: Porto "MFHSF Q
873
'&-*1& %& .&-0 '0/5& & /"5«-*" (06-"35 $"4530
OB GPSNB EP BSUJHP # f º EP $ØEJHP EF 1SPDFTTP $JWJM 11 &NCPSB B FMFJÎÍP MFWF FN DPOTJEFSBÎÍP BT EJTDVTTÜFT F BQPOUBNFOUPT PDPSSJEPT BP MPOHPEPQSPDFTTP OÍPTFQPEFBëSNBSRVFBFTDPMIB OFDFTTBSJBNFOUF TFKB TFNQSF B NBJT BDFSUBEB *OFYJTUFN HBSBOUJBT PCKFUJWBT EF RVF P leasing case TFKBBRVFMFOPRVBMUPEPTPTBSHVNFOUPTQFSUJOFOUFTËTPMVÎÍPEBDBVTBUFOIBN TJEP BQSFTFOUBEPT EB NFMIPS NBOFJSB QPTTÓWFM 1PS UBM SB[ÍP SFHJTUSB 'FSSB[ B SFMFWÉODJB EB BUVBÎÍP EPT amici curiae OP TFOUJEP EF EBS BP DBTP DPODSFUPFMFNFOUPTOPWPT DPOUVOEFOUFTFOFDFTTÈSJPTËEJTDVTTÍPEBRVFTUÍP DPOTUJUVDJPOBM MFWBOEP P5SJCVOBM JODMVTJWF TF GPS P DBTP B FYUSBQPMBS BT SB[ÜFTSFDVSTBJT12 "-FJOPBVUPSJ[BBQBSUJDJQBÎÍPEPamicus curiae nas sessões EFKVMHBNFOUPEFSFQFSDVTTÍPHFSBM OBGPSNBBCBJYPUSBOTDSJUB i"SUo"04VQSFNP5SJCVOBM'FEFSBM FNEFDJTÍPJSSFDPSSÓWFM OÍPDPOIFDFSÈEPSFDVSTPFYUSBPSEJOÈSJP RVBOEPB RVFTUÍPDPOTUJUVDJPOBMOFMFWFSTBEBOÍPPGFSFDFSSFQFSDVTTÍP HFSBM OPT UFSNPT EFTUF BSUJHP f º 0 3FMBUPS QPEFSÈ BENJUJS OB BOÈMJTF EB SFQFSDVTTÍP HFSBM B NBOJGFTUBÎÍP EF UFSDFJSPT TVCTDSJUBQPSQSPDVSBEPSIBCJMJUBEP OPTUFSNPTEP 3FHJNFOUP*OUFSOPEP4VQSFNP5SJCVOBM'FEFSBMw
"PTBEWPHBEPTDPOTUJUVÓEPTQPSUFSDFJSPTÏGBDVMUBEBBBQSFTFOUBÎÍPEF NFNPSJBJT B TVTUFOUBÎÍP PSBM FN TFTTÍP QMFOÈSJB P RVF BHSFHB BP EFCBUF GVOEBNFOUPTSFMFWBOUFT NVJUBTWF[FTJOÏEJUPT&TTBÏBFYUFOTÍPEBBUVBÎÍP dos amicus curiae TFHVOEPBKVSJTQSVEÐODJBQSFEPNJOBOUFEP4VQSFNP.BT IÈ EF TF PCTFSWBS RVF P QBQFM EFTFNQFOIBEP QPS UBJT BUPSFT QSPDFTTVBJT Ï QFRVFOP GSFOUF ËT QPTTJCJMJEBEFT EF KVMHBNFOUP OPT DBTPT FOWPMWFOEP B SFQFSDVTTÍPHFSBM
3. AMICUS CURIAE NO DIREITO BRASILEIRO: UMA BREVE ABORDAGEM. 0 QBQFM EP amicus curiae DPNQPSUB EJGFSFOUFT JOUFSQSFUBÎÜFT 1PEF TFS UJEPQPSBRVFMFRVFBQFOBTJOGPSNBB$PSUFOBRVJMPRVFFMBOÍPFTUÈIBCJ 04VQSFNP5SJCVOal FederaMUFWFQPSQSaxe, naHFTUÍPEP.JOJTUSP"ZSFT#SJUUP TPMJDJUar aos tribunais JOGFSJPSFTRVFFODaNJOIFNTFNQSFUSJOUaSFDVSTPTFYUSaPSEJOÈSJPTSFQSFTFOUativos daDPOUSPWÏSTJa, QFSNJUJOEP QPSUaOUP RVFDadaNJOJTUSPSFDFCa aPNFOPTUSÐTFYFNQMaSFT$POTPaOUFWFSJGJDado QFMa1SFTJEÐODJa PFODaNJOIaNFOUPEFQPVDPTSFDVSTPTQPEFPDasionar situações inusitadaT DPNP quaOEPPSFQSFTFOUaUJWPOÍPÏDPOIFDJEPQPSGaltaEFQSFTTVQPTUPTSFDVSTaJT0TPCSFTUaNFOUPFN JOTUÉODJaTJOGFSJPSFTQFSNaOFDFTFNRVFPUFNa tenha qualquer leading case OP4VQSFNPQara ser KVMHaEP FERR"; 5aÓT4IJMMJOHop. cit.,Q
874
AMICUS CURIAE 3&1&3$644°0 (&3"- & 0 130+&50 %& $»%*(0 %& 130$&440 $*7*-
MJUBEB DPNP QPSFYFNQMP BTQFDUPTUÏDOJDPTOFDFTTÈSJPTBPEFTMJOEFEFVN DPOìJUPoPFYFNQMPNBJTGBNPTPEFBUVBÎÍPOFTTBMJOIBÏPBrandeis Brief13 o CFN DPNP QPS BRVFMF RVF MJUJHB FN GBWPS EB QBSUF14 BTTFNFMIBOEPTF B VNBTTJTUFOUFQSPDFTTVBM EBÓBFYQSFTTÍPOPSUFBNFSJDBOBiBNJHPMJUJHBOUFw 4PCSF UBM UFSNP $BTTJP 4DBSQJOFMMB #VFOP BSUJDVMB DPN B QSFNJTTB EF RVFFTTBFWPMVÎÍPDPODFJUVBMEFNPOTUSBRVFBëHVSBOFVUSBMFJNQBSDJBMEP amicus USBOTGPSNPVTF EF DFSUP NPEP FN iJOUFSFTTBEBw F iQBSDJBMw QFMFKBOEPQPSTVBJOUFSWFOÎÍPOPQSPDFTTPiNVJUPNBJTQBSBBUVUFMBEFEJSFJUPT TFVTwEPRVFQBSBNBOUFSPKVÓ[PJOGPSNBEP$PODFJUVBOEPPQSPDFTTPDPNP AEFGPSNBÎÍPEPamicus curiae BTTFWFSBi%FVNamicusAOFVUSPQBTTPVTFB VNamicusAMJUJHBOUFw 15 %BNBSFT.FEJOB FNFTUVEPTPCSFPUFNB TFSWJVTFEFBOÈMJTFFNQÓSJDB EBBUVBÎÍPOP4VQSFNP5SJCVOBM'FEFSBMFDPODMVJVTFSPamicus curiaeiVN UFSDFJSPRVFJOUFSWÏNFNVNQSPDFTTP EPRVBMFMFOÍPÏQBSUF QBSBPGFSFDFS ËDPSUFTVBQFSTQFDUJWBBDFSDBEBTRVFTUÜFTDPNQMFYBTDVKPEPNÓOJPVMUSBQBTTF PDBNQPMFHBMPV BJOEB EFGFOEFSJOUFSFTTFTEPTHSVQPTQPSFMFSFQSFTFOUBEPT OP DBTP EF TFSFN EJSFUB PV JOEJSFUBNFOUF BGFUBEPT QFMB EFDJTÍP B TFS UPNBEBw16%FOUSPEFTTFDPODFJUPUSB[JEPQFMBDJUBEBBVUPSBÏRVFTFBSUJDVMB DPNPTFGFJUPTRVBOUPËGVOÎÍPFYFSDJEBQPSFMF J JOGPSNBEPSF QPSUBOUP DPOUSJCVJOUFOPQSPDFTTPEFGPSNVMBÎÍPEFTPMVÎÜFTQBSBPDBTPDPODSFUP JJ GPSNBEPSEFPQJOJÍPBSFTQFJUPEFVNBQPTTÓWFMJOUFSQSFUBÎÍPDPOTUJUVDJPOBM JJJ QFÎBFMFNFOUBSOBTEJTDVTTÜFTEFUFNBTEFHSBOEFJNQBDUP F JW BJOEB iJOTUSVNFOUPEFEFGFTBQPSQBSUFEFJOUFSFTTBEPTOBUFNÈUJDBEJTDVUJEBw 17
O relaUØSJP #SaOEFJT GPJ aQSFTFOUaEP QFSante a 4VQSFNa Corte dos EstaEPT 6OJEPT FN F SFQSFTFOUaVNNaSDPOaIJTUØSJa da atuação dos amici curiae QPJT EaTNaJTEFDFNQÈHJOas, aQFOas duas eraNEFWPUadas a aSHVNFOUPTEFÓOEPMFKVSÓEJDa /FTTF TFOUJEP atuaM EFDJTÍP EP .JOJTUSP .aSDP "urélio aP JOEFGFSJS QFEJEP GPSNVMado no RE QFMPTaEWPHados EduaSEP4FJOP8JWJVSLaF/FMTPO-VJ[(PNF[QaraJOHSFTTaSFNOPGFJUP DPNPamici curiaei0TJNQMFTGaUPEFPTSFRVFSFOUFTTFSFNQSPGJTTJPOais da aEWPDaDJa não viabiliza a aENJTTÍP OP QSPDFTTP OP RVaM FTUÈ FN KPHP P EFOPNJOado ExaNF EF 0SEFN DPNP UFSDFJSPT Indispensável é que surja do contexto o interesse na vitória de uma das partes e, sob o ângulo jurídico, isso não ocorre. Indefiro o pedido formuladow%FDJTÍPQVCMJDadaFN (SJGaNPT
#6&/0 $ÈTTJP 4DaSQJOFMMa Amicus Curiae no Processo Civil Brasileiro. Um terceiro enigmático São Paulo: Saraiva Q .&%*/", DaNaSFTAmicus Curiae: Amigo da Corte ou Amigo da Parte? -&"- 4aVM5PVSJOIP i" JOGMVÐODJa do aNJDVT DVSJae naT EFDJTÜFT USJCVUÈSJaT EP 45'w Revista Dialética de Direito Tributário, n o 181, 1aFEJÎÍP
875
'&-*1& %& .&-0 '0/5& & /"5«-*" (06-"35 $"4530
/PPSEFOBNFOUPKVSÓEJDPCSBTJMFJSP BFYQSFTTÍPamicus curiaeFTUÈQSFTFOUFFNVNBÞOJDBFTQÏDJFOPSNBUJWB3FTPMVÎÍPOº EFEFTFUFNCSP EF EP $POTFMIP EB +VTUJÎB 'FEFSBM RVF EJTQÜF TPCSF P 3FHJNFOUP *OUFSOP EB5VSNB /BDJPOBM EF 6OJGPSNJ[BÎÍP EF +VSJTQSVEÐODJB EPT +VJ[BEPT&TQFDJBJT'FEFSBJT 18FNCPSBTFKBFYUFOTBNFOUFVUJMJ[BEBQFMBMJOHVBHFN KVSÓEJDB1PSPVUSPMBEP ÏQPTTÓWFMJEFOUJëDBSBëHVSBEPTamiciFNWBSJBEBT MFJT PSEJOÈSJBT RVF EJTDJQMJOBSBN B QBSUJDJQBÎÍP o F OÍP JOUFSWFOÎÍP o EF UFSDFJSPT &YFNQMPT FTUÍP OP BSU EB -FJ O º EF EF EF[FNCSP EF RVFBENJUFBJOUFSWFOÎÍPEB$PNJTTÍPEF7BMPSFT.PCJMJÈSJPTFN QSPDFTTPTJOUFSTVCKFUJWPT OPTRVBJTTFEJTDVUBNRVFTUÜFTEFEJSFJUPTPDJFUÈSJP TVKFJUBT OPQMBOPBENJOJTUSBUJWP ËDPNQFUÐODJBEFTTBBVUBSRVJB²FYFNQMP de amicus curiaeQÞCMJDP )ÈRVFNEFGFOEBRVFB-FJOº EFEFKVOIPEF RVFEFV BP $POTFMIP EF "ENJOJTUSBÎÍP F %FGFTB &DPOÙNJDB $"%& P iTUBUVTw EF BVUBSRVJBGFEFSBM QPSNFJPEPBSU USPVYFPJOTUJUVUPEP amicus, senão WFKBNPT "SU o /PT QSPDFTTPT KVEJDJBJT FN RVF TF EJTDVUB B BQMJDBÎÍP EFTUB-FJ P$"%&EFWFSÈTFSJOUJNBEPQBSB RVFSFOEP JOUFSWJSOPGFJUPOB RVBMJEBEFEFBTTJTUFOUF5PEBWJB GPJDPNBFEJÎÍPEB-FJOº EF EF OPWFNCSP EF RVF TF EFV DPODSFUVEF Ë QBSUJDJQBÎÍP EPT amici no EFTFOWPMWJNFOUPQSPDFTTVBMDPOTUJUVDJPOBM²PfºEPBSUº: “O relator, DPOTJEFSBOEPBSFMFWÉODJBEBNBUÏSJBFBSFQSFTFOUBUJWJEBEFEPTQPTUVMBOUFT QPEFSÈ QPSEFTQBDIPJSSFDPSSÓWFM BENJUJS PCTFSWBEPPQSB[PëYBEPOPQBSÈHSBGPBOUFSJPS BNBOJGFTUBÎÍPEFPVUSPTØSHÍPTPVFOUJEBEFTw "EFTQFJUPEBMFJTVQSBDJUBEBSFHVMBSBÎÜFTEFDPOUSPMFBCTUSBUPEFDPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBEF FNQSFTUBTFBTJTUFNÈUJDBBPTJTUFNBEBSFQFSDVTTÍPHFSBM BOUF BDSFTDFOUFFTJHOJëDBUJWBQBSUJDJQBÎÍPEPamicus curiaeOPTKVMHBNFOUPTEPT SFDVSTPTFYUSBPSEJOÈSJPT/PEFCBUFSFGFSFOUFËDPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBEFEPFYBNF EF PSEFN RVF PDPSSFV QPS NFJP EP 3& QPS FYFNQMP QBSUJDJQPV DPNPUFSDFJSPJOUFSFTTBEPB"TTPDJBÎÍPEPT"EWPHBEPTEF4ÍP1BVMPo"44120
“"SU"TQaSUFTQPEFSÍPaQSFTFOUaSNFNPSJaJTFGazer sustentação oraMQPSEF[NJOVUPT QSPSSPHÈWFJTQPSaUÏNais dez, aDSJUÏSJPEPQSFTJEFOUFfº0NFTNPTFQFSNJUFa eventuais interessados, a entidaEFT EF DMasse, aTTPDJaÎÜFT PSHanizaÎÜFT OÍP HPWFSOaNFOUaJT FUD Oa GVOÎÍP EF iamicus curiaew Dabendo aPQSFTJEFOUFEFDJEJSTPCSFPUFNQPEFTVTUFOUação oraMw (SJGaNPT
#*/&/#0+. (VTUaWP " EJNFOTÍP EP aNJDVT DVSJaF OP QSPDFTTP DPOTUJUVDJPOal brasileiro: SFRVJTJUPT QPEFSFT QSPDFTTVais e aQMJDabilidaEF OP ÉNCJUP FTUaduaM 4alvador: Revista Eletrônica de Direito do Estado, nº Q %FDJTÍPEP.JOJTUSP.aSDP"urélio, relator, aENJUJOEPË"441PJOHSFTTPOPGFJUP130$&440 46#+&5*70o3&$6340&953"03%*/«3*0o&9".&%&03%&.o&9*45³/$*" DE 3&1&3$644°0(&3"-3&$0/)&$*%"o*/5&37&/±°0%&5&3$&*30o"DMISSI-
876
AMICUS CURIAE 3&1&3$644°0 (&3"- & 0 130+&50 %& $»%*(0 %& 130$&440 $*7*-
/P NFTNP TFOUJEP PVUSP FYFNQMP B TFS TVTDJUBEP Ï B FOUSBEB EF amici curiae EFTTBWF[QFTTPBTKVSÓEJDBTEFEJSFJUPQÞCMJDP RVBJTTFKBN &TUBEPTEB GFEFSBÎÍPFP%JTUSJUP'FEFSBM OPKVMHBNFOUPEP3& DVKBNBUÏSJB DPOTUJUVDJPOBMGPJBPCSJHBUPSJFEBEFEFPQPEFSQÞCMJDPGPSOFDFSNFEJDBNFOUP EFBMUPDVTUP.BJTEFRVJO[F21VOJEBEFTGFEFSBUJWBTTVCTDSFWFSBNBQFÎBEF SFRVFSJNFOUP EF BENJTTÍP OP QSPDFTTP DPNP JOUFSFTTBEPT RVF GPJ EFGFSJEB QFMP.JOJTUSP.BSDP"VSÏMJP SFMBUPSEPDBTP
4. DEBATE CONSTITUCIONAL DEMOCRÁTICO E A FUNCIONALIDADE DOS AMICI NA SISTEMÁTICA DA REPERCUSSÃO GERAL. /P FOUFOEJNFOUP EF (VTUBWP #JOFOCPKN B -FJ Oº 22, de 10 de OPWFNCSP EF JOPWPV FN EVQMP TFOUJEP B QFMB QSJNFJSB WF[ PCKFUJWPVTF B QBSUJDJQBÎÍP EP amicus curiae DPNP JOUFSWFOJFOUF OP QSPDFTTP EF
#*-*%"%& 0 (aCJOFUF QSFTUPV aT TFHVJOUFT JOGPSNações: " "TTPDJação dos "EWPHados de São Paulo – ""SP requer a aENJTTÍPOPQSPDFTTPDPNPJOUFSFTTada4VTUFOUaDPOUar atuaMNFOUF DPNDFSDa de oitentaFOPWFNJMaTTPDJados, entre aEWPHados e estaHJÈSJPT OÍPaQFOaTNJMJUantes no Estado de São PaVMP NaTFNUPEPP#SaTJM"GJSNa haWFSNaOJGFTUaEP FNWÈSJaTPDasiões, a QSFPDVQação quanto aPQSFQaro dos baDIaréis, tanto no aTQFDUPUÏDOJDPDPNPOPÏUJDP QPSRVanto, TFHVOEPaMFHa OVNFSPTas entidaEFTEFFOTJOPKVSÓEJDPOÍPFTUariaNDVNQSJOEPDPNaGVOÎÍPTPDJal EFGPSNar, adequadaNFOUF PQSPGJTTJPOaMQaraPFYFSDÓDJPEFUÍPJNQPSUante atividaEF"ssevera RVFPUFNa versado no extraPSEJOÈSJPQPTTVJHSaOEFSFMFWÉODJaQaraPFYFSDÓDJPEa aEWPDaDJaFQara a atuaÎÍPEP+VEJDJÈSJP"QSFTFOUaQSPDVSaÎÍPFDØQJaEPSFTQFDUJWPFTUaUVUP05SJCVOaM FN EFEF[FNCSPEF SFDPOIFDFVaFYJTUÐODJaEFSFQFSDVTTÍPHFSal daNatéria versadaOPSFDVSTP extraPSEJOÈSJPoaDPOTUJUVDJPOalidade do aSUJHPº, § 1º, da-FJOºFEPT1SPWJNFOUPT nºFEP$POTFMIP'FEFSal da0SEFNEPT"EWPHados do BraTJM OPRVFDPOEJDJPOaN PFYFSDÓDJPEa aEWPDaDJaËQSÏWJa aQSPWação no ExaNFEF0SEFN0QSPDFTTPFTUÈOP(aCJOFUF 2. É notória a representatividade da requerente. O tema de fundo versado no extraordinário possui repercussão maior TVSHJOEP aTTJN P JOUFSFTTF Ea "TTPDJação dos "EWPHados de São Paulo – ""41Admito-a como terceira interessada, recebendo o processo no estágio em que se encontra 1VCMJRVFN #SaTÓMJa o SFTJEÐODJa o EF PVUVCSP EF ËT I .JOJTUSP M"RCO "63²-*0o3FMaUPS (SJGaNPT
4VCTDSFWFN a QFÎa PT QSPDVSadores do Distrito Federal e dos Estados do "DSF "laHPas, "NaQÈ "Nazonas, Bahia &TQÓSJUP4aOUP (PJÈT .ato Grosso do Sul, Minas Gerais, PaSÈ 1araÓCa, ParaOÈ PiaVÓ 3JP(SaOEFEP4VM 3POEÙOJa, Santa CatarinaF4FSHJQF+ÈUJOIaNTJEPaENJUJEPTPTFTUados de São Paulo e Rio de JaOFJSP'JHVSavaOPQPMPQassivo o estado de Rio GraOEFEP/PSUF 7ÈMJEPJMVTUSar aJOUFOÎÍPEPMFHJTMaEPSQPSNFJPEa&YQPTJÎÍPEF.PUJWPTEPQSPKFUPEa-FJi TrataTFEFQSPWJEÐODJaRVFDPOGFSFVNDaSÈUFSQMVSalista aPQSPDFTTPPCKFUJWPEFDPOUSPMFabstrato EFDPOTUJUVDJPOalidaEF QFSNJUJOEPRVFP5SJCVOaMEFDJEaDPNQMFOPDPOIFDJNFOUPEPTEJWFSTPT aTQFDUPTFOWPMWJEPTOaRVFTUÍP%aNFTNaGPSNa, aGJHVSaTFEJHOa de reaMDFaQSPQPTUaGPSNVMada DPNPTFOUJEPEFQFSNJUJSRVFPSFMaUPS DPOTJEFSando aSFMFWÉODJa daNatéria e aSFQSFTFOUatividaEFEPTQPTUVMantes aENJUa aNaOJGFTUaÎÍPEFPVUSPTØSHÍPTPVFOUJEades (aSUT fº, e 18, § 2º 1PTJUJWa-se, aTTJN aGJHVSa do aNJDVTDVSJaFOPQSPDFTTPEFDPOUSPMFEFDPOTUJUVDJPOalidade, FOTFKando a QPTTJCJMJEade de o TribunaM EFDJEJS aT DausaT DPN QMFOP DPOIFDJNFOUP EF UPEas as
877
'&-*1& %& .&-0 '0/5& & /"5«-*" (06-"35 $"4530
DPOUSPMFEFDPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBEF BQFTBSEFP45'KÈBENJUJSJOGPSNBMNFOUFB FOUSFHBEFNFNPSJBJT FC EFVTFBPiØSHÍPPVFOUJEBEFwBQPTTJCJMJEBEFEF BQSFTFOUBSBTVBWJTÍPTPCSFPUFNBFNEFCBUF JOUFSGFSJOEPOBJOUFSQSFUBÎÍP DPOTUJUVDJPOBM DPNP iQBSUÓDJQF BUJWP EB TPDJFEBEF BCFSUB EF JOUÏSQSFUFT EB $POTUJUVJÎÍPw #JOFOCPKNEFGFOEF BJOEB RVFPMFHJTMBEPS JOUFODJPOBMNFOUF QPTJUJWPV BQMVSBMJ[BÎÍPEFEFCBUFDPOTUJUVDJPOBMBPQPTTJCJMJUBSRVFB$PSUFUPNFOPUB EFFMFNFOUPTJOGPSNBUJWPTFSB[ÜFTDPOTUJUVDJPOBJTEBRVFMFTRVF BEFTQFJUP EFOÍPFTUBSFNMFHJUJNBEPTBBUVBSOPQSPDFTTP iTFSÍPEFTUJOBUÈSJPTEJSFUPT PV NFEJBUPT EB EFDJTÍP B TFS QSPGFSJEBw & BDSFTDFOUB i7JTBTF BEFNBJT B BMDBOÎBSVNQBUBNBSNBJTFMFWBEPEFMFHJUJNJEBEFEBTEFMJCFSBÎÜFTEP5SJCVOBM$POTUJUVDJPOBM23 RVFQBTTBSÈGPSNBMNFOUFBUFSPEFWFSEFBQSFDJBSF EBSBEFWJEBDPOTJEFSBÎÍPËTJOUFSQSFUBÎÜFTDPOTUJUVDJPOBJTRVFFNBOBNEPT EJWFSTPTTFUPSFTEBTPDJFEBEFw$PNQBSUJMIBEFTTBPQJOJÍPPDJFOUJTUBQPMÓUJDP 1BVM$PMMJOTQPSFOUFOEFSRVFBBVTÐODJBEFJOUFSBÎÍPDPNBPQJOJÍPQÞCMJDB RVFTFNBOJGFTUBQPSNFJPEBQBSUJDJQBÎÍPEPTamici curiae QPEFHFSBSQFSEB EFMFHJUJNJEBEFEB$PSUFDPNPJOTUJUVJÎÍPEFNPDSÈUJDB24 *OPCTUBOUF FTUB TFKB VNB DPNQSFFOTÍP RVF TF SFGFSF BP DPOUSPMF DPODFOUSBEP EF DPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBEF IÈ RVF TF EJ[FS RVF P DPOUSPMF EJGVTP EF DPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBEF SFRVFS BUFOÎÍP FTQFDJBM EPT amici &NCPSB OÍP QPTTVB FëDÈDJB erga omnes F FGFJUPT WJODVMBOUFT UÓQJDPT EBT EFDJTÜFT QSPGFSJEBT FN DPOUSPMFDPODFOUSBEP PTBDØSEÍPTQSPGFSJEPTDPNGVOEBNFOUPOBTJTUFNÈUJDB EBSFQFSDVTTÍPHFSBMUFSÍPJOFRVÓWPDPJNQBDUPTPCSFPTQSPDFTTPTTPCSFTUBEPT RVF WFSTFN TPCSF B NFTNB DPOUSPWÏSTJB " SJHPS BJOEB OÍP IÈ NFDBOJTNP JOTUJUVDJPOBMBEFRVBEPRVFQFSNJUBP4VQSFNPSFWFSBQSØQSJBUFTFBTTFOUBEB EF NPEP RVF P KVMHBNFOUP EP leading case Ï VN NPNFOUP TJOHVMBSNFOUF SFMFWBOUF
suaTJNQMJDaÎÜFTPVSFQFSDVTTÜFTw.&/%&4 (JMNar FerreiraDireitos fundamentais e controle de constitucionalidade QApud#6&/0 $aTTJP4DaSQJOFMMa, op cit QF .FTNPQFOTaNFOUPNPTUSPVP.JOJTUSP$FMTPEF.FMMPFNWPUPQSPGFSJEPOa Medida Cautelar na "%* 4$ i a aENJTTÍP DPNP UFSDFJSP Oa DPOEJÎÍP EF aNJDVT DVSJaF OP QSPDFTTP PCKFUJWPEFDPOUSPMFOPSNativo abstrato, quaMJGJDaTFDPNPGaUPSEFMFHJUJNaÎÍPTPDJal daTEFDJTÜFT do TribunaM$POTUJUVDJPOal, viabilizaOEP FNPCTÏRVJPaPQPTUVMaEPEFNPDSÈUJDP a abertura do QSPDFTTP EF GJTDalizaÎÍP DPODFOUSada EF DPOTUJUVDJPOalidaEF FN PSEFN a QFSNJUJS RVF OFMF TF realize aQPTTJCJMJEaEFEFQaSUJDJQação de entidaEFTFEFJOTUJUVJÎÜFTRVFFGFUJWaNFOUFSFQSFTFOUFN PTJOUFSFTTFTHFSais daDPMFUJWJEaEFPVRVFFYQSFTTFNPTWaMPSFTFTTFODJais e relevaOUFTEFHSVQPT DMasses ou extraUPTTPDJaJTw $0--*/4 1aVM.+SFriends of the Court: Examining the Influence of Amicus Curiae Participation in U.S. Supreme Court Litigation-aX4PDJFUZ3FWJFX WPM/CS %FDFNCFS Q
878
AMICUS CURIAE 3&1&3$644°0 (&3"- & 0 130+&50 %& $»%*(0 %& 130$&440 $*7*-
/FTTFQMBOP PTKVSJTEJDJPOBEPTWVMOFSÈWFJTËEFDJTÍPQSFUPSJBOB PVTFKB UBOUPPTMJUJHBOUFTRVBOUPQBSUFEBTPDJFEBEFJOEJSFUBNFOUFBGFUBEB QPEFN GB[FSTFSFQSFTFOUBSQFMPamicus curiaeOPEFTFOSFEBSQSPDFTTVBM7BTUPTTÍP PTJNQBDUPTEPQSPOVODJBNFOUPëOBMEP5SJCVOBM BëOBM NJMIBSFTEFDBVTBT TFSÍP EFëOJEBT JNFEJBUBNFOUF NFEJBOUF TJNQMFT BQMJDBÎÍP EB EFDJTÍP ëOBM EP 4VQSFNP & NBJT VNB WF[ OÍP TØ BT RVF KÈ FTUÍP FN USÉNJUF DPNP BT RVFOPGVUVSPTVSHJSÍP UFOEPDPNPQBSÉNFUSPBEJTDVTTÍPEPleading case 0UFNBEBSFQFSDVTTÍPHFSBMDPNPWJBEFFDPOPNJBFDFMFSJEBEFQSPDFTTVBJT BMÏNEFiCPBHFTUÍPKVEJDJÈSJBw JNQÜFBP4VQSFNP5SJCVOBM'FEFSBMP EFWFSEFQFSNJUJSFEBSÐOGBTFËTEFMJCFSBÎÜFTFEJTDVTTÜFTQÞCMJDBT.FTNP QPSRVFBFTTÐODJBEPSFRVJTJUPEBSFQFSDVTTÍPSFTJEFOBTVQFSBÎÍPEPTMJNJUFT EBQSØQSJBMJEFoi.e. OBUSBOTDFOEÐODJBEBDPOUSPWÏSTJBDPOTUJUVDJPOBMOFMF TVTDJUBEB0SFDVSTPFYUSBPSEJOÈSJPleading caseOBEBNBJTÏRVFVNDPOìJUP QBSUJDVMBSab initioFNDVKPEFTMJOEFFTUBSÈBTPMVÎÍPEFNVJUPTPVUSPTDBTPT TJNJMBSFT"QSØQSJBOPÎÍPEFrepercussão geral FYJHFRVFBTTJNTFKB 1BVM $PMMJOT BSHVNFOUB RVF EP QPOUP EF WJTUB EPT KVMHBEPSFT P GBUP EF VN HSBOEF OÞNFSP EF DPOTJHOBUÈSJPT BQPJBSFN VN MJUJHBOUF QBSUJDVMBS QPEFTFSWJSDPNPWFSEBEFJSPiCBSÙNFUSPwEBPQJOJÍPQÞCMJDB$PNQMFNFOUB UFSFNFTUVEJPTPTPCTFSWBEPRVFKVÓ[FTOÍPTÍPJNVOFTËTQSFTTÜFTFYUFSOBT &EFTBëBFYQMJDBOEPPQPSRVÐPTNBHJTUSBEPTOÍPRVFSFNWFSSFGPSNBEBTBT TVBT EFDJTÜFT PV QSFGFSFN OÍP TF EJTUBODJBS EB PQJOJÍP QÞCMJDB25 "WBMJB UBM QBSUJDJQBÎÍPDPNPFTTFODJBMQBSBPEFTMJOEFQSPDFTTVBM OPTFOUJEPEFRVFPT iBNJHPTEBDPSUFwSFWFMBNBPQJOJÍPEPTJOUFSFTTBEPTOBRVFMFDBTPDPODSFUP DPNFOGPRVFFTQFDÓëDPBDFSDBEFDBEBQPOUPEBEJTDVTTÍP26 4DBSQJOFMMB#VFOP FNBSUJHPJOUJUVMBEPi3FQFSDVTTÍP(FSBMOPQSPKFUP EFOPWP$ØEJHPEF1SPDFTTP$JWJMw BTTFWFSBBJNQPSUÉODJBEBJOJDJBUJWBEP amicus curiae OP TFOUJEP EF WJBCJMJ[BS VN iBNQMPw F iQSÏWJPw EFCBUF TPCSF BPDPSSÐODJBPVOÍPEBSFQFSDVTTÍPHFSBMBQBSUJSEBQBSUJDJQBÎÍPEFTFUPSFT FTQFDÓëDPT EB TPDJFEBEF DJWJM F BUÏ NFTNP EP QSØQSJP &TUBEP & BDFOUVB i5SBUBTFEFGPSNBRVFJODMVTJWFUFNPDPOEÍPEFSFEV[JSPRVFWFNTFOEP
$0--*/4 1aVM.+Sop. cit. Q/PNFTNPTFOUJEP $aTT4VTUFJOFOUFOEFRVFÏQPTJUJWP Qara aQSPEVÎÍPEPEJSFJUPRVFa$PSUFDPOTJEFSFPTSJTDPTEaSFQFSDVTTÍPEaEFDJTÍPFEa eventuaM DSÓUJDa OFHativa EP QÞCMJDP "HJOEP aTTJN FMFT GJDarão alertas quaOUP Ë QSØQSJa Galibilidade F QPSUaOUP NFOPT TVTDFUÓWFJT aP DPNFUJNFOUP EF FSSPT KVEJDJais (A constitution of many minds, QQ $0--*/4 1aVM.+Sopcit. Q
879
'&-*1& %& .&-0 '0/5& & /"5«-*" (06-"35 $"4530
DIBNBEPEFAEÏëDJUEFNPDSÈUJDPEBRVFMF5SJCVOBMFEFTVBTEFDJTÜFTw27"JOEB OPRVFUBOHFËPJUJWBEPamicus #VFOPBOPUBRVFBBUVBÎÍPEPTAUFSDFJSPT SFWFTUFTFOBDPOTUSVÎÍPEFQSFDFEFOUFTRVFTFKBNGBWPSÈWFJTBPTTFVTQSØQSJPT JOUFSFTTFTPV BNQMBNFOUF FNQSPMEPTJOUFSFTTFTJOTUJUVDJPOBJT TFNQSFKVÓ[P EPTBSHVNFOUPTMFWBEPTQFMBTQBSUFTOPSFDVSTPFYUSBPSEJOÈSJPQBSBEJHNB28
5. O INCREMENTO DA QUALIDADE DO RECURSO EXTRAORDINÁRIO POR MEIO DO ALARGAMENTO DA ATUAÇÃO DO AMICUS CURIAE 0CTFSWBEPT PT JNQBDUPT EB SFQFSDVTTÍP HFSBM TPCSF PT KVSJTEJDJPOBEPT DIFHBTF BP DFSOF EP QSFTFOUF FTUVEP B BNQMJBÎÍP EPT QPEFSFT QSPDFTTVBJT dos amiciQBSBBUVBSOPDVSTPEBMJEFÏJNQSFTDJOEÓWFMBPJODSFNFOUPEBRVBMJEBEFEPSFDVSTPFYUSBPSEJOÈSJPFTDPMIJEPDPNPleading case FËMFHJUJNBÎÍP EBEFDJTÍPQSPEV[JEBOPSFTQFDUJWPKVMHBNFOUP /PKVMHBNFOUPEBBSHàJÎÍPEFEFTDVNQSJNFOUPEFQSFDFJUPGVOEBNFOUBM "%1' OP EF SFMBUPSJB EP .JOJTUSP $FMTP EF .FMMP OP EJB EF KVOIP EF FN RVF TF EJTDVUJB B MJCFSBMJ[BÎÍP EF FWFOUPT DIBNBEPT i.BSDIB EB .BDPOIBw P 4VQSFNP5SJCVOBM 'FEFSBM SBUJëDPV TFV FOUFOEJNFOUP RVBOUP ËT SFTUSJÎÜFT QSPDFTTVBJT EBEBT BP amicus curiae OP DPOUSPMF BCTUSBUPEFDPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBEF"PSFBëSNBSRVFFMFOÍPÏQBSUF SFBëSNPVTF BQSPJCJÎÍPEFQSÈUJDBEFRVBJTRVFSBUPTEFOUSPEPQSPDFTTPRVFOÍPTFKBN QSFTUBSJOGPSNBÎÜFT "JOEB OBT SJDBT MJÎÜFT EP FNJOFOUF .JOJTUSP QPEFTF FYUSBJS EP WPUP QVCMJDBEP OB "%* Oº 4$ TPCSF B BUVBÎÍP QSPDFTTVBM EP amicus ainEB RVBOEP OÍP MIF FSB QFSNJUJEB B TVTUFOUBÎÍP PSBM o OPUFTF B QSPHSFTTÍP EP QFOTBNFOUP KVSJTQSVEFODJBM TPCSF B JOìVÐODJB EPT UFSDFJSPT OPT EFCBUFT DPOTUJUVDJPOBJT i FOUFOEPRVFBBUVBÎÍPQSPDFTTVBMEPamicus curiae não EFWFMJNJUBSTFËNFSBBQSFTFOUBÎÍPEFNFNPSJBJTPVËQSFTUBÎÍPFWFOUVBMEFJOGPSNBÎÜFTRVFMIFTWFOIBNBTFSTPMJDJUBEBT$VNQSFQFSNJUJSMIF FNFYUFOTÍPNBJPS PFYFSDÓDJPEF EFUFSNJOBEPT QPEFSFT QSPDFTTVBJT DPNP BRVFMF DPOTJTUFOUF OPEJSFJUPEFQSPDFEFSËTVTUFOUBÎÍPPSBMEBTSB[ÜFTRVFKVT-
#6&/0 $ÈTTJP 4DaSQJOFMMa 3FQFSDVTTÍP (FSaM OP QSPKFUP EF OPWP $ØEJHP EF 1SPDFTTP $JWJM In P"6-4&/ -FaOESP Repercussão Geral no Recurso Extraordinário &TUVEPT FN IPNFOaHFN Ë Ministra Ellen GraDJF-JWSaria do "EWPHado: Porto "MFHSF Q #6&/0 $ÈTTJP4DaSQJOFMMaop. cit Q
880
AMICUS CURIAE 3&1&3$644°0 (&3"- & 0 130+&50 %& $»%*(0 %& 130$&440 $*7*-
UJëDBSBNBTVBBENJTTÍPGPSNBMOBDBVTB"TTJNQFSNJUJOEP P 45' OÍP TØ HBSBOUJSÈ NBJPS FGFUJWJEBEF F BUSJCVJSÈ NBJPS MFHJUJNJEBEFËTTVBTEFDJTÜFT DPNP TPCSFUVEP WBMPSJ[BSÈ TPC QFSTQFDUJWBFNJOFOUFNFOUFQMVSBMÓTUJDB PTFOUJEPFTTFODJBMNFOUFEFNPDSÈUJDPEFTTBQBSUJDJQBÎÍPQSPDFTTVBM FOSJRVFDJEB QFMPTFMFNFOUPTEFJOGPSNBÎÍPFQFMPBDFSWPEFFYQFSJÐODJBT que o amicus curiaeQPEFSÈUSBOTNJUJSË$PSUF$POTUJUVDJPOBM OPUBEBNFOUFOVNQSPDFTTPDPNPPEFDPOUSPMFBCTUSBUPEF DPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBEF DVKBT JNQMJDBÎÜFT TPDJBJT FDPOÙNJDBT KVSÓEJDBT F DVMUVSBJT TÍP EF JSSFDVTÈWFM JNQPSUÉODJB F EF JORVFTUJPOÈWFMTJHOJëDBÎÍPw
"TTJNDPNPOPDPOUSPMFDPODFOUSBEPEFDPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBEF OPDPOUSPMF EJGVTP RVF PDPSSF QSJODJQBMNFOUF QFMB WJB EPT SFDVSTPT FYUSBPSEJOÈSJPT B QBSUJDJQBÎÍPEPTamiciUBNCÏNÏMJNJUBEB%FNBOFJSBHFSBM SFTUSJOHFTFË FOUSFHBEFNFNPSJBJTFËTVTUFOUBÎÍPPSBMFNQMFOÈSJP BNCBTOPJOUVJUPEF JOUFHSBSBFTGFSBEFJOUFSMPDVUPSFTOPEFCBUFDPOTUJUVDJPOBM"MÏNEPTRVJO[F NJOVUPT SFHJNFOUBJT30 F EB QPTTJCJMJEBEF EF EJTUSJCVJÎÍP EF NFNPSJBJT BP amicusOÍPFTUÈQSFWJTUBMFHBMNFOUFBMFHJUJNJEBEFSFDVSTBM "PNFOPTBEPVUSJOBFBKVSJTQSVEÐODJBEP5SJCVOBMUÐNBENJUJEPSFDVSTP DPOUSBBEFDJTÍPRVFEFOFHBPJOHSFTTPOBMJEFDPNPamicus curiae314PCSFUBM MFHJUJNJEBEF 4DBSQJOFMMB#VFOPFOUFOEFTFSJOFSFOUFBPTamici VNBWF[RVF UBMEFDJTÍPEFOFHBUØSJBiBGFUB EJSFUBFFTQFDJëDBNFOUF BTVBQSØQSJBFTGFSBEF EJSFJUPT MFHJUJNBOEPP QBSB B BQSFTFOUBÎÍP EP SFDVSTP DPOTFRVFOUFNFOUFw 32 /B FTUFJSB P QSPOVODJBNFOUP EB $PSUF OP KVMHBNFOUP EB "%* 1# 3FM.JO$ÈSNFO-ÞDJBo%+ i"KVSJTQSVEÐODJBEFTUF 4VQSFNP5SJCVOBM 'FEFSBM Ï BTTFOUF RVBOUP BP OÍP DBCJNFOUP EF SFDVSTPT JOUFSQPTUPTQPSUFSDFJSPTFTUSBOIPTËSFMBÎÍPQSPDFTTVBMOPTQSPDFTTPTPCKFUJWPT EFDPOUSPMFEFDPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBEF&YDFÎÍPBQFOBTQBSBJNQVHOBSEFDJTÍP EFOÍPBENJTTJCJMJEBEFEFTVBJOUFSWFOÎÍPOPTBVUPTw
STF, "%* .$ 4$ SFM .JO $FMTP EF .FMMP %+6 0 45' OÍP QFSNJUJa a sustentação oral do aNJDVT DVSJae aUÏ P KVMHaNFOUP Eas "%*T 1& EF SFMatoria EP .JO CaSMPT7FMMPTPF41 TFOEPSFMaUPSP.JO$F[ar Peluso, que aDPOUFDFVOPTEJas 26 e 27 de OPWFNCSPEF SFTQFDUJWaNFOUF"QSPQØTJUP W%*%*&3+S 'SFEJF #3"G", Paula Sarno e 0-*7&*3", RaGaFMAspectos processuais da ADIN (Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade) e da ADC (Ação Declaratória de Constitucionalidade)*O%*%*&3+S 'SFEJF"ÎÜFT$POTUJUVDJPOaJTFE SalvaEPS+VT1PEJWN Q RISTF – "SU$adaVNa daTQaSUFTGalaSÈQFMPUFNQPNÈYJNPEFRVJO[FNJOVUPT fº Se IPVWFSMJUJTDPOTPSUFTOÍPSFQSFTFOUaEPTQFMPNFTNPaEWPHaEP PQSa[P RVFTFDPOUaSÈFNEPCSP TFSÈEJWJEJEPJHVaMNFOUFFOUSFPTEPNFTNPHSVQP TFEJWFSTaNFOUFFOUSFFMFTOÍPTFDPOWFODJPOaS -&"- 4aVM5PVSJOIPControle de Constitucionalidade Moderno/JUFSØJ¶NQFUVT Q #6&/0 $ÈTTJP 4DaSQJOFMMa Amicus curiae no processo civil brasileiro: um terceiro enigmático FESFW atuaMFaNQM4ÍP1aulo: Saraiva Q
881
'&-*1& %& .&-0 '0/5& & /"5«-*" (06-"35 $"4530
"JOEBRVFTFUFOIBGBMBEPEPDPOUSPMFDPODFOUSBEPEFDPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBEF DVKBMFHJTMBÎÍP BOUFDJQBEBNFOUF QSFWJVBQBSUJDJQBÎÍPEFUFSDFJSPTOP QSPDFTTP IÈRVFTFSFTTBMUBSPGFOÙNFOPEBiBCTUSBUJWJ[BÎÍPEPDPOUSPMFEJGVTP PVEPSFDVSTPFYUSBPSEJOÈSJPw SFTQPOTÈWFMQPSBQSPYJNBSPTEPJTTJTUFNBTEF DPOUSPMFFYJTUFOUFTOP#SBTJM5BMGFOÙNFOPÏBQPUFODJBMDBVTBEPQBSBMFMJTNP OP USBUBNFOUP EBEP BPT BNJHPT EB DPSUF &N PVUSBT QBMBWSBT FMF OBEB NBJTÏRVFBEJTDVTTÍPEFVNBUFTF FNWF[EFVNDBTPDPODSFUP QPSNFJP EFVNSFDVSTPFYUSBPSEJOÈSJP DVKPKVMHBNFOUPUFSÈJNQBDUPTOBTQSFUFOTÜFT GPSNBMJ[BEBT QPS UPEBT BT QFTTPBT 4VSHJV DPN PT JOTUJUVUPT EB SFQFSDVTTÍP HFSBM EBTÞNVMBWJODVMBOUFFEBNPEVMBÎÍPEFFGFJUPT33 ²QPTTÓWFMDPHJUBSRVF FNTFOUJEPQSÈUJDP PTFGFJUPTEBEFDJTÍPQSPGFSJEB no leading caseTFKBNBJOEBNBJPSFTRVFPTPSJVOEPTEBEFDJTÍPQSPGFSJEBFN RVBMRVFS VNB EBT NPEBMJEBEFT EP DPOUSPMF DPODFOUSBEP EF DPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBEF *TTP QPSRVF BMÏN EF OÍP IBWFS DPNP SFHSB OP QSPDFTTBNFOUP EBT BÎÜFTEJSFUBT PTPCSFTUBNFOUPEPTEFNBJTQSPDFTTPTDPSSFMBUPT PEFTGFDIPEP KVMHBNFOUPEFVNBBÎÍPDPNPFTTBOÍPJNQPSUBBFYDMVTÍPEFBQSFDJBÎÍPEF PVUSB DPNUFNBTJNJMBS/PDBTPEBSFQFSDVTTÍPHFSBM PTQSPDFTTPTEFJYBSÍP EFTFSSFNFUJEPTBP4VQSFNPNFEJBOUFBQMJDBÎÍPEPQSFDFEFOUFQFMPT5SJCVOBJT FTUBEVBJT*TTPTJHOJëDBEJ[FSRVFP5SJCVOBMOÍPWPMUBSÈBBOBMJTBSPUFNB %JBOUF EFTTF RVBESP JOFWJUBWFMNFOUF JOTFSJEP OP EJSFJUP DPOTUJUVDJPOBM QSPDFTTVBM34 OÍP IÈ EF TFS EFTDBSUBEB B IJQØUFTF EF TF BNQMJBS P HSBV de atuação do amicus curiae DPNP GBUPS EF J JODSFNFOUP EB RVBMJEBEF EP KVMHBNFOUPEFëOJUJWPEPSFDVSTPFYUSBPSEJOÈSJPF JJ FMFNFOUPEFSFGPSÎPEF MFHJUJNBÎÍPEBEFDJTÍPëOBMQSPGFSJEB 0SB BEFDJTÍPëOBMQSPGFSJEBFNVNSFDVSTPEPUBEPEFSFQFSDVTTÍPHFSBM JOEJDBBQPTJÎÍPBTFSTFHVJEBQFMPT5SJCVOBJTa quo EFNBOFJSBRVFUPEPTPT KVMHBNFOUPTTFKBNVOJGPSNJ[BEPTF DPNJTTP TPMVDJPOBEPTPTEFTDPNQBTTPT OBT FTGFSBT KVEJDJBJT 4F OP FOUBOUP P 4VQSFNP5SJCVOBM 'FEFSBM FYBNJOB B DPOUSPWÏSTJB EF GPSNB JODPNQMFUB JTUP Ï EFJYBOEP EF DPOTJEFSBS BMHVN BSHVNFOUP KVSÓEJDP PV DPOTFRVÐODJB EB EFDJTÍP PT USJCVOBJT BOBMJTBSÍP B
882
-&"- 4aVM5PVSJOIPPp. cit Qo "lexandre FreitaT$ÉNaraEJGFSFODJPVPDPODFJUPEFi%JSFJUP$POTUJUVDJPOaM1SPDFTTVaMwEFi%JSFJUP 1SPDFTTVaM$POTUJUVDJPOaMw atribuindo aPQSJNFJSPaEFGJOJÎÍPEFiDPOKVOUPEFOPSNaTEFÓOEPMF DPOTUJUVDJPOaMDVKaGJOalidaEFÏHaraOUJSPQSPDFTTP aTTFHVSaOEPRVFFTUFTFKa, tanto quaOUPQPTTÓWFM VNQSPDFTTPKVTUPwFaPTFHVOEPiDPOKVOUPEFOPSNaTEFÓOEPMFQSPDFTTVaMRVFTFFODPOUSaNOa $POTUJUVJÎÍPDPNPGJNEFHarantir a aQMJDação e aTVQSFNaDJaIJFSÈSRVJDa da Carta MaHOa OPSNaTRVFSFHVMaN FOUSFPVUSPT PNandaEPEFTFHVSança PSFDVSTPFYUSaPSEJOÈSJPFPNandado EFJOKVOÎÍPw
AMICUS CURIAE 3&1&3$644°0 (&3"- & 0 130+&50 %& $»%*(0 %& 130$&440 $*7*-
questão não debatida no leading caseDPNQPTTJCJMJEBEFEFSFUPSOPEPTBVUPT BP 4VQSFNP QBSB P EFTMJOEF EP QPOUP OÍP WFOUJMBEP BOUFSJPSNFOUF "TTJN EFëOJSBN$IFDDIJBF-FBMi/ÍPIÈSBDJPOBMJEBEF"$PSUFTFWFSÈOBDPNQMJDBEB TJUVBÎÍP EF SFKFJUBS B BOÈMJTF EP SFDVSTP TPC P BSHVNFOUP EF RVF B NBUÏSJBKÈUFWFVNQSPOVODJBNFOUPëOBMPVQSPNPWFSOPWPKVMHBNFOUPEP UFNB SFBOBMJTBOEPBNBUÏSJBBOUFSJPSNFOUFEFDJEJEBFNTFEFEFSFQFSDVTTÍP HFSBMFNSB[ÍPEPOPWPBSHVNFOUPTVSHJEPw 35 "TQFTTPBTEJSFUBPVJOEJSFUBNFOUFBGFUBEBTOÍPEFWFNëDBSBMIFJBTBP KVMHBNFOUP EP SFDVSTP FN RVF TF EFDJEJSÈ NBUÏSJB EF TFV JOUFSFTTF /FN NVJUPNFOPTTFSJBKVTUPRVFGPTTFNQSFKVEJDBEBTFNWJSUVEFEFVNQBUSPDÓOJP EFëDJUÈSJP RVF QPS VNB SB[ÍP PV PVUSB QPEF OÍP SFDPSSFS EF VN BDØSEÍP RVF OÍP UFOIB FYBNJOBEP VN EPT QPOUPT EB DPOUSPWÏSTJB /BT QBMBWSBT EF 4DBSQJOFMMB #VFOP B BUVBÎÍP EPT amici curiae OP QSPDFTTP DPOTUJUVDJPOBM TJHOJëDBOEPPJUJWBQSÏWJBEBTPDJFEBEFDJWJMPSHBOJ[BEBFEPQSØQSJP&TUBEP SFTVMUB OB DPOTUSVÎÍP EF VNB KVSJTQSVEÐODJB MFHÓUJNB iP RVF PT5SJCVOBJT EFDJEFNIPKFWJODVMBQSPDFEJNFOUBMNFOUFFTVCTUBODJBMNFOUFPRVFTFEFDJEJSÈBNBOIÍw 36
6. DISCUSSÕES SOBRE A ‘CAUSA DE PEDIR ABERTA’ DO RECURSO EXTRAORDINÁRIO 3FDFOUFNFOUF NBJTVNBWF[ P1MFOÈSJPEP4VQSFNP5SJCVOBM'FEFSBM EFQBSPVTFDPNVNJNQBTTFTFSJBBCFSUBBcausa petendiEPSFDVSTPFYUSBPSEJOÈSJP /B BQSFDJBÎÍP EP 3& %' FN JOUFSQPTUP QFMP FY HPWFSOBEPSEP%JTUSJUP'FEFSBM +PBRVJN%PNJOHPT3PSJ[ OBQSFUFOTÍPEF UFSEFGFSJEPPQFEJEPEFSFHJTUSPEFTVBDBOEJEBUVSB B$PSUF$POTUJUVDJPOBM BQSFDJPV B -FJ $PNQMFNFOUBS Oº B UÍP DPOIFDJEB -FJ EB 'JDIB -JNQB 1PSPDBTJÍPEPTEJÈMPHPTBSFTQFJUPEBDPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBEFEBMFJFNSFGFSÐODJB GPJQSPQPTUBRVFTUÍPEFPSEFNBDFSDBEPUFNBoDBVTBEFQFEJS&N SFTVNPP.JOJTUSP1SFTJEFOUF $F[BS1FMVTP DFSUPEFRVFP4FOBEP'FEFSBM QSPDFEFV B VNB FNFOEB NPEJëDBUJWB OP QSPKFUP BQSPWBEP OB $ÉNBSB EPT %FQVUBEPT OÍPPUFOEPEFWPMWJEPQBSBOPWBBQSPWBÎÍP BQPOUPVWÓDJPGPSNBM EF JODPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBEF 0 .JOJTUSP SFMBUPS $BSMPT "ZSFT #SJUUP UPEBWJB OÍPDIFHPVBWFOUJMBSUBMRVFTUÍPOBQSPNVMHBÎÍPEFTFVWPUPQPSFOUFOEFS
CHECCHI" #SVOP5PMFEPF-&"- 4aVM5PVSJOIPop. cit #6&/0 $ÈTTJP4DaSQJOFMMaop. cit Q9997***
883
'&-*1& %& .&-0 '0/5& & /"5«-*" (06-"35 $"4530
RVFBNFTNBOÍPGPJTVTDJUBEBOBTSB[ÜFTEPSFDVSTP PRVFPSFTUSJOHJSJBË FYUFOTÍPEPTBSHVNFOUPTUSB[JEPTBPTBVUPT 'PSNBMJ[BEPPEFTDPNQBTTPEFJEFJBT DBEBNFNCSPEB$PSUFSFHJTUSPVB TVBQFSDFQÎÍPTPCSFPTSFìFYPTEFVNBEFDJTÍPQSPGFSJEBFNTFEFEFSFDVSTP FYUSBPSEJOÈSJPOBBUVBMTJTUFNÈUJDB FNRVFTFEJTDVUFNUFTFTDPOTUJUVDJPOBJT OÍPNBJTDPOìJUPTinter partesGPSNBMNFOUFEJUPT "DPNQBOIBOEP P .JOJTUSP 1SFTJEFOUF PT .JOJTUSPT (JMNBS .FOEFT F .BSDP "VSÏMJP .FMMP TVTDJUBSBN P QSPDFTTP EF PCKFUJWBÎÍP QFMP RVBM UFN QBTTBEPPSFDVSTPFYUSBPSEJOÈSJP1POEFSPVPQSJNFJSPi*TTPBOUFT NVJUP BOUFTEPBEWFOUPEB&NFOEB$POTUJUVDJPOBMOº RVFDPOTBHSPVBSFQFSDVTTÍPHFSBM)PKF OØTUFNPTFOGBUJ[BEPDBEBWF[NBJTFTTBQPTTJCJMJEBEFw37 &BDSFTDFVTPCSFBKVSJTQSVEÐODJBRVBOUPËcausa petendi aberta: i )È QPTTJCJMJEBEF QBSB RVF QPTTBNPT UBOUP NBOUFS P BDØSEÍPQPSPVUSPGVOEBNFOUPDPNPFWFOUVBMNFOUFTVQFSÈMP QPSVNPVUSPGVOEBNFOUP&VDJUP BRVJ P"HSBWP3FHJNFOUBM OB 4FOUFOÎB &TUSBOHFJSB EB SFMBUPSJB EP .JOJTUSP 4FQÞMWFEB1FSUFODF FP3& EBSFMBUPSJBEP.JOJTUSP .BSDP "VSÏMJP F UBNCÏN P 3& EB SFMBUPSJB EP .JOJTUSP4FQÞMWFEB1FSUFODFw 38
"P ëOBM SFHJTUSPV P .JOJTUSP $F[BS 1FMVTP i Ï GVOÎÍP EB $PSUF RVBOEPTFBSHVJBJODPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBEF PVTFQÜFFNEÞWJEBBDPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBEFEBMFJ DPNPHVBSEJÍPEB$POTUJUVJÎÍP FYBNJOBSBMFJQFSBOUFUPEB B $POTUJUVJÎÍPw &TTB Ï B QSFNJTTB RVF OPSUFJB P BOEBNFOUP EP EJSFJUP DPOTUJUVDJPOBMQSPDFTTVBM ²DFSUPRVFUBMFNCBUFOÍPSFQSFTFOUPVBQSJNFJSBWF[FNRVFB$PSUF EFMJCFSPVBRVFTUÍPEBDBVTBEFQFEJSOPQSPDFTTPTVCKFUJWP FTQFDJBMNFOUF OPSFDVSTPEPRVBMTFGBMB$PNPGPJPQPSUVOBNFOUFNFNPSBEPQFMPJMVTUSF .JOJTUSP(JMNBS.FOEFT OPKVMHBNFOUPEP3& RVFBCSJHPVNBUÏSJB USJCVUÈSJB JNQPTUPEFSFOEBEFQFTTPBKVSÓEJDB EFSFMBUPSJBEP.JOJTUSP.BSDP "VSÏMJP P4VQSFNP5SJCVOBM'FEFSBMIBWJBëYBEPFOUFOEJNFOUPTFHVOEPP RVBMPTMJNJUFTEBDPOUSPWÏSTJBOÍPJNQFEFNRVFP1MFOÈSJPEFDMBSFBJODPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBEF EB MFJ PV BUP BUBDBEP DPNP VN UPEP WF[ RVF Ï P HVBSEJÍP QSJNFJSPEB$POTUJUVJÎÍP"TTJNGPJFNFOUBEPPBDØSEÍP
45' .JO(JMNaS.FOEFT/a2VFTUÍPEF0SEFNTVTDJUadaQFMPQSFTJEFOUFOP3&%' QVCMJDadaFN Idem Idem
884
AMICUS CURIAE 3&1&3$644°0 (&3"- & 0 130+&50 %& $»%*(0 %& 130$&440 $*7*-
i3&$6340&953"03%*/«3*0o"50/03."5*70 %&$-"3"%0*/$0/45*56$*0/"-o-*.*5&4"MJDFSÎBEPPFYUSBPSEJOÈSJPOBBMÓOFBbEPJODJTP***EPBSUJHP EB$POTUJUVJÎÍP'FEFSBM BBUVBÎÍPEP4VQSFNP5SJCVOBM 'FEFSBMGB[TFOBFYUFOTÍPEPQSPWJNFOUPKVEJDJBMBUBDBEP0T MJNJUFTEBMJEFOÍPBCBMJ[BN OPRVFWFSJëDBEBEFDMBSBÎÍPEF JODPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBEFRVFPTFYDFEFSBN"MDBODFEBBUJWJEBEF QSFDÓQVBEP4VQSFNP5SJCVOBM'FEFSBMoEFHVBSEBNBJPSEB $BSUB1PMÓUJDBEB3FQÞCMJDBw 40
/PUBEBNFOUF KÈOBRVFMBÏQPDB PVUVCSPEF PKVÓ[PBRVFDIFHBSBN PT DPNQPOFOUFT EB 4VQSFNB $PSUF QBSFDF P NBJT BDFSUBEP "OUFT NFTNP EF TF QFOTBS OP JOTUJUVUP EB SFQFSDVTTÍP HFSBM WJTMVNCSPVTF VN QSPDFTTP BNQMJëDBEPEFEJTDVTTÍP DBQB[EFBCBSDBSUPEPTPTQPOUPTSFMFWBOUFTQBSBP EFTMJOEFEPDPOìJUP EFNPEPBTBMWBHVBSEBSUPEBBTPDJFEBEFEFRVBMRVFS PCFEJÐODJBËJODPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBEF 41 $PNCBTFOFTTFQSFDFEFOUF ÏEFTFRVFTUJPOBSBUÏPOEFWBJPFNQFDJMIP QBSB RVF QPTTB P amicus curiae OB DPOEJÎÍP EF DPODSFUJ[BEPS EP QSPDFTTP DPOTUJUVDJPOBMEFNPDSÈUJDP JOBVHVSBSFMFNFOUPTEJTDVUÓWFJTOPFYUSBPSEJOÈSJP BOUFBBCFSUVSBOBDBVTBEFQFEJS 1PSRVFBCTUFSVNBEBTGPSNBTEFTFDIFHBS ËQSFTUBÎÍPKVSJTEJDJPOBMFëDJFOUFOBGPSNBEBSFQFSDVTTÍPHFSBM "FWPMVÎÍP QBSB B BCFSUVSB EB causa petendi DPN B PCKFUJWBÎÍP SFDVSTP FYUSBPSEJOÈSJP OÍPUSBSJBVNBDPOTFRVFOUFBNQMJBÎÍPEBMFHJUJNJEBEFQSPDFTTVBMEPamicus 1BSFDFOPTRVFBSFTQPTUBÏQPTJUJWB
45' 3&4$ SFM.JO.aSDP"VSÏMJP %+6FN Q 0QPSUVOPUSaOTDSFWFSQaSUFEPWPUPEPFNJOFOUF.JOJTUSPante o destaque dado aPQSJODÓQJPEa razoabilidaEF JOUSÓOTFDP F OFDFTTÈSJP a toda EFDJTÍP KVSÓEJDa i &TDMareço que a razão de ser deste voto abraOHFOUF FNCPSa a lide envolva UÍPTPNFOUF a situaÎÍP KVSÓEJDa EF TPDJFEaEF QPS quota EF SFTQPOTabilidaEF MJNJUada FTUÈ Oa DJSDVOTUÉODJa de a $PSUF EF PSJHFN IaWFS EFDMarado aJODPOTUJUVDJPOalidade do aSUJHP UantaTWF[FTSFGFSJEP DPNPVNUPEP PVTFKa, no que nele SFTJEFNUSÐTOPSNas diversas sobre aEJTDJQMJOaoÏDFSUP TPCaNFTNaJOTQJSaÎÍPoEPEFTDPOUP na GPOUF SFMativaNFOUF aP TØDJP DPUJTUa, ao aDJPOJTUa e ao titular da FNQSFTa individuaM "TTJN PTMJNJUFTEa lide não revelaNPTQaSÉNFUSPTEa atuação desta$PSUF QPSRVFGPSaNFYDFEJEPTOa QSPMação do aDØSEÍPataDaEPCabe, ultrapassada a barreira do conhecimento do extraordinário, avançar, em atuação condizente com a atividade precípua que a Constituição Federal impõe ao Supremo – de Guarda Maior dela própria. IndaHaTF P RVF PDPSSFSÈ a não ser entender dessa GPSNa -JNJUada a aQSFDJaÎÍP Ë Qarte envolvida na MJEF o EFTDPOUP Oa GPOUF RVanto aos DPUJTUaToQFSNaOFDFSÈTFNPDSJWPEP4VQSFNP5SJCVOal FederaMPQSPWJNFOUPEP5SJCVOal ReHJPOal FederaM OP RVF EFDMara, taNCÏN a JODPOTUJUVDJPOalidade do aSUJHP RVanto ao aDJPOJTUa e ao titular daFNQSFTa individuaMCumpre, na espécie, construir, atento o Plenário ao princípio da razoabilidadew45' 3&4$ SFM.JO.aSDP"VSÏMJP %+6FN Q F (SJGaNPT
885
'&-*1& %& .&-0 '0/5& & /"5«-*" (06-"35 $"4530
7. O AMICUS CURIAE NO PROJETO DE NOVO CÓDIGO DE PROCESSO CIVIL /P QSPKFUP EF OPWP $ØEJHP EF 1SPDFTTP $JWJM 1SPKFUP EF -FJ O º
FNUSBNJUBÎÍPOB$ÉNBSBEPT%FQVUBEPT IÈEJWFSTPTEJTQPTJUJWPTRVFEJTDJQMJOBNBBUVBÎÍPEPTamici curiae.0BSUJHPEPQSPKFUP DVJEB EB QBSUJDJQBÎÍP EF UFSDFJSPT OP JODJEFOUF EF SFTPMVÎÍP EF EFNBOEBT SFQFUJUJWBT OPWPJOTUJUVUPDVKBUFMFPMPHJBÏNVJUPBTTFNFMIBEBËEBSFQFSDVTTÍPHFSBM+ÈPBSUJHP fºEPQSPKFUPUSBUBEBBENJTTÍPEFUFSDFJSPTOB BOÈMJTFEBFYJTUÐODJBPVOÍPEBSFQFSDVTTÍPHFSBM$POUVEP PNBJTJNQPSUBOUF EFMFTÏPBSUJHPFSFTQFDUJWPQBSÈHSBGPÞOJDP RVFBTTJNUSBUBBRVFTUÍP "SU 0 KVJ[ PV P SFMBUPS DPOTJEFSBOEP B SFMFWÉODJB EB NBUÏSJB B FTQFDJëDJEBEF EP UFNB PCKFUP EB EFNBOEB PV B SFQFSDVTTÍP TPDJBM EB DPOUSPWÏSTJB QPEFSÈ EF PGÓDJP PV B SFRVFSJNFOUPEBTQBSUFT TPMJDJUBSPVBENJUJSBNBOJGFTUBÎÍP EFQFTTPBOBUVSBMPVKVSÓEJDB ØSHÍPPVFOUJEBEFFTQFDJBMJ[BEB DPN SFQSFTFOUBUJWJEBEF BEFRVBEB OP QSB[P EF RVJO[F EJBT EBTVBJOUJNBÎÍP 1BSÈHSBGPÞOJDP"JOUFSWFOÎÍPEFRVFUSBUBPcaput OÍPJNQPSUBBMUFSBÎÍPEFDPNQFUÐODJB OFNBVUPSJ[BBJOUFSQPTJÎÍP EFSFDVSTPT
0QSPKFUPEFOPWP$ØEJHPEF1SPDFTTP$JWJMUFNPNÏSJUPEFDPOGFSJS USBUBNFOUPHFSBMQBSBBNBUÏSJB IPKFSFHVMBEBFNMFJTFTQBSTBT"MÏNEJTTP BP EJTDJQMJOBS B SFQFSDVTTÍP HFSBM F P JODJEFOUF EF SFTPMVÎÍP EFNBOEBT SFQFUJUJWBT PQSPKFUPTFHVFUFOEÐODJBTBMVUBSBPEJSFJUPCSBTJMFJSP DPOTJTUFOUF FNEFTBGPHBSPTUSJCVOBJTTVQFSJPSFT QFSNJUJOEPRVFGPRVFNPTFTGPSÎPTOB SFTPMVÎÍPEFUFTFTKVSÓEJDBTFOÍPEPTDBTPTRVFMIFTTVCKB[FN$POUVEP DPOTPBOUFEFGFOEJEPBPMPOHPEPUFYUP BMFHJUJNJEBEFEFUBJTEFDJTÜFTEFQFOEF GPSUFNFOUF EBaberturaEFUBJTQSPDFTTPTo leading cases o Ë QBSUJDJQBÎÍP EB DPNVOJEBEFKVSÓEJDB FPJOTUSVNFOUPBQUPBUBOUPÏBQFSNJTTÍPEFJOHSFTTP dos amici curiae/FTTFTFOUJEP VSHFBSFGPSNVMBÎÍPEPQBSÈHSBGPÞOJDPEP BSUJHP QBSBRVFTFKBFYQSFTTBNFOUFSFDPOIFDJEBBMFHJUJNJEBEFSFDVSTBM EFUBJTBUPSFTQSPDFTTVBJTFBQPTTJCJMJEBEFEFBEJUBSDBVTBTEFQFEJS RVBOEP FNTFEFEFSFQFSDVTTÍPHFSBM $PNP WJTUP BP DPOUSÈSJP EP RVF PDPSSF OP DPOUSPMF DPODFOUSBEP EF DPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBEF PSFDVSTPFYUSBPSEJOÈSJPFTDPMIJEPQBSBTFSWJSDPNPQBSBEJHNBOBBQMJDBÎÍPEBSFQFSDVTTÍPHFSBMOÍPOFDFTTBSJBNFOUFÏBRVFMFNFMIPS BQBSFMIBEP B UBOUP " NFTNB DPOTJEFSBÎÍP Ï WÈMJEB RVBOUP BP QSPëTTJPOBM EBBEWPDBDJBQPSFMFSFTQPOTÈWFM4FFTUFQSPëTTJPOBM QPSFYFNQMP QFSEFSP QSB[P QBSB B JOUFSQPTJÎÍP EF FNCBSHPT EFDMBSBUØSJPT o e.g. QBSB SFRVFSFS B
886
AMICUS CURIAE 3&1&3$644°0 (&3"- & 0 130+&50 %& $»%*(0 %& 130$&440 $*7*-
NPEVMBÎÍPEPTFGFJUPTEBEFDJTÍPEP4VQSFNP42oQPEFSFTVMUBSFNQSFKVÓ[P JODBMDVMÈWFMBUPEBBTPDJFEBEF
8. CONCLUSÃO 0EJSFJUPDPOTUJUVDJPOBMQSPDFTTVBMSFHFTFQFMBCVTDBEBFGFUJWJEBEFEB QSFTUBÎÍP KVSJTEJDJPOBM EP &TUBEP -JFCNBO KÈ EFGJOJB P EJSFJUP QSPDFTTVBM DPNPTFOEPSBNPEBDJÐODJBEPEJSFJUPEFTUJOBEPQSFDJTBNFOUFËUBSFGBEF HBSBOUJSBFGJDÈDJBQSÈUJDBFFGFUJWBEPPSEFOBNFOUPKVSÓEJDP"QBSUJSEFTTF DPODFJUP WJTVBMJ[BTF P QSPDFTTP DPNP JOTUSVNFOUP SFBM EF DPODSFUJ[BÎÍP EPEJSFJUPNBUFSJBM%JTTPDJBSBTSFHSBTQSPDFTTVBJTEBCVTDBQFMBQSFTUBÎÍP EB UVUFMB FTUBUBM EB KVSJTEJÎÍP Ï EJWPSDJBS P EJSFJUP EF TFV GJN %JBOUF EB OFDFTTJEBEF EF TF DPMPDBSFN QBSBMFMPT P EJSFJUP F P QSPDFTTP Ï RVF P GBUPS UFNQPUPSOPVTFPFMFNFOUPDBUBMJTBEPSQBSBPOBTDJNFOUPEPJOTUJUVUPEB SFQFSDVTTÍPHFSBM 6NBEBTQSJODJQBJTDPOTFRVÐODJBTBEWJOEBTEPiOPWPwSFRVJTJUPEFBENJTTJCJMJEBEFSFDVSTBMGPJBPCKFUJWBÎÍPEBDBSBDUFSÓTUJDBJOEJWJEVBMEPEFWJEP QSPDFTTP MFHBM NBJT QSFDJTBNFOUF DPN SFMBÎÍP BP SFDVSTP FYUSBPSEJOÈSJP P QSJODJQBMNFJPEFBDFTTPBP4VQSFNP5SJCVOBM'FEFSBMQBSBPDPOUSPMFDPODSFUP EFDPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBEF&TTBOPWBTJTUFNÈUJDBJOTUJUVÓEBQFMPTBSUJHPT" F # EP $1$ QFSNJUJV RVF RVFTUÜFT DPOTUJUVDJPOBJT EF MBSHP BMDBODF BTTJNEFëOJEPQFMBSFMFWÉODJBTPDJBM QPMÓUJDB KVSÓEJDBPVFDPOÙNJDB TFKBN BNQMBNFOUFEJTDVUJEBTQFMBTPDJFEBEFQPSNFJPEPTEFCBUFTRVFPDPSSFNOP 1MFOÈSJPEB$PSUF ²OFTTFBTQFDUPRVFBQBSUJDJQBÎÍPEPTamici curiaeHBOIBSFMFWP4FBT EJTDVTTÜFTEFOUSPEFVNBEFUFSNJOBEBMJEFVMUSBQBTTBNPTMJNJUFTEBDBVTB QBSB BMDBOÎBS PVUSPT NVJUPT QSPDFTTPT RVF BHVBSEBN TPCSFTUBEPT QPS RVF OÍPBNQMJBSPHSBVEFFOWPMWJNFOUPEBTPDJFEBEFBGFUBEB 2VBMBSB[ÍPQBSB PCTUBS P DPODSFUP FYFSDÓDJP QSPDFTTVBM EPT JOUFSFTTBEPT OB NFEJEB FN RVF o leading caseFTDPMIJEPOÍPOFDFTTBSJBNFOUFSFQSFTFOUBPSFDVSTPNBJTCFN BQBSFMIBEPBPEFTMJOEFEBDPOUSPWÏSTJB /FTTFDPOUFYUP IÈRVFTFQFOTBSFBWBMJBS JODMVTJWF BDBQBDJEBEFSFDVSTBM do amicus curiaeOPTFOUJEPEFOÍPUPSOBSTFNFGFJUPBDMÈVTVMBEFBDFTTPË KVTUJÎBHBSBOUJEBDPOTUJUVDJPOBMNFOUFBPTKVSJTEJDJPOBEPTOPTDBTPTEFSFQFS-
Sobre taMQPTTJCJMJEaEF DPOGJSa-se: BOD"35 #SVOP7JOÓDJVT%a3ØTi&NCaSHPTEFEFDMaração DPNP NFJP QSPDFTTVal adequado a TVTDJUar a NPEVMaÎÍP EPT FGFJUPT UFNQPSaJT EP DPOUSPMF EF DPOTUJUVDJPOalidaEFw Revista de Processo W Q
887
'&-*1& %& .&-0 '0/5& & /"5«-*" (06-"35 $"4530
DVTTÍPHFSBM QPTTJCJMJUBOEPPTGPSOFDFSFMFNFOUPTBEJDJPOBJT EJGFSFOUFTEPT USB[JEPTBPTBVUPTOPSFDVSTPSFQSFTFOUBUJWPF DPNJTTP FWJUBSPFTNBFDJNFOUP EBTHBSBOUJBTQSPDFEJNFOUBJTEBTQFTTPBTRVFQPEFSÍPWJSBTFSBUJOHJEBTQFMBT DPOTFRVÐODJBTDPODSFUBTEBEFDJTÍP0QSPKFUPEFOPWP$ØEJHPEF1SPDFTTP $JWJM FNCPSBNFSJUØSJPBPDPOGFSJSUSBUBNFOUPHFSBMBPamicus curiae QPEFSJB UFS BWBOÎBEP OP SFDPOIFDJNFOUP EF QSFSSPHBUJWBT QSPDFTTVBJT BPT SFGFSJEPT BHFOUFT PRVFTFSFWFMBJNQSFTDJOEÓWFMQBSBBMFHJUJNBÎÍPEPOPWPNPEFMP 1BSBëOBMJ[BS DPODMVJTFRVFBQBSUJDJQBÎÍPEPamicus curiae,DVKBFOUSBEB ÏEFMJWSFFTDPMIBFDPOWFODJNFOUPEPSFMBUPS NFTNPOÍPTFOEPPCSJHBUØSJB OPQSPDFTTPDPOTUJUVDJPOBM UFNJNQPSUÉODJBDSVDJBMFJOEJTDVUÓWFM WJTUPRVF EFOPUBBJODMVTÍPEBTPDJFEBEFOBJOUFSQSFUBÎÍPEBTOPSNBTDPOTUJUVDJPOBJT
9. REFERÊNCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS. #*/&/#0+. (VTUBWPi"EJNFOTÍPEPamicus curiaeOPQSPDFTTPDPOTUJUVDJPOBMCSBTJMFJSP SFRVJTJUPT QPEFSFTQSPDFTTVBJTFBQMJDBCJMJEBEFOPÉNCJUPFTUBEVBMw4BMWBEPSRevista Eletrônica de Direito do Estado, nº #0%"35 #SVOP7JOÓDJVT%B3ØTi&NCBSHPTEFEFDMBSBÎÍPDPNPNFJPQSPDFTTVBMBEFRVBEP BTVTDJUBSBNPEVMBÎÍPEPTFGFJUPTUFNQPSBJTEPDPOUSPMFEFDPOTUJUVDJPOBMJEBEFw3FWJTUB EF1SPDFTTP W #6&/0 $BTTJP4DBSQJOFMMBAmicus Curiae no Processo Civil Brasileiro. Um terceiro enigmático 4ÍP1BVMP4BSBJWB @@@@@@ Curso Sistematizado de Direito Processual Civil Recursos. Processos e Incidentes nos Tribunais. Sucedâneos Recursais: técnicas de controle das decisões jurisdicionais FE 4ÍP 1BVMP4BSBJWB @@@@@@ 3FQFSDVTTÍP (FSBM OP QSPKFUP EF OPWP $ØEJHP EF 1SPDFTTP $JWJM In 1"6-4&/ -FBOESPRepercussão Geral no Recurso Extraordinário&TUVEPTFNIPNFOBHFNË.JOJTUSB &MMFO(SBDJF-JWSBSJBEP"EWPHBEP1PSUP"MFHSF $)&$$)*" #SVOP5PMFEPF-&"- 4BVM5PVSJOIP0Aamicus curiaeOBEJTQVUBUSJCVUÈSJB %JTQPOÓWFM FN IUUQXXXWBMPSDPNCSMFHJTMBDBPPBNJDVTDVSJBFOBEJTQVUBUSJCVUBSJB BDFTTPFN $0--*/4 1BVM.+SFriends of the Court: Examining the Influence of Amicus Curiae Participation in U.S. Supreme Court Litigation-BX4PDJFUZ3FWJFX WPM/CS %FDFNCFS %*%*&3+S 'SFEJFF$6/)" -FPOBSEP+PTÏ$BSOFJSPEBCurso de Direito Processual Civil Meios de Impugnação às Decisões Judiciais e Processo nos Tribunaisa FE4BMWBEPS+VT1PEWJN WPM %*%*&3+S 'SFEJFAções ConstitucionaisFE4BMWBEPS+VT1PEJWN
888
AMICUS CURIAE 3&1&3$644°0 (&3"- & 0 130+&50 %& $»%*(0 %& 130$&440 $*7*-
'&33"; 5BÓT4IJMMJOH3FQFSDVTTÍP(FSBMoNVJUPNBJTRVFVNQSFTTVQPTUPEFBENJTTJCJMJEBEF In 1"6-4&/ -FBOESP Repercussão Geral no Recurso Extraordinário &TUVEPT FN IPNFOBHFNË.JOJTUSB&MMFO(SBDJF1PSUP"MFHSF-JWSBSJBEP"EWPHBEP ,3*4-07 4BNVFMiɨFamicus curiaeCSJFGGSPNGSJFOETIJQUPBEWPDBDZw Yale Law Journal -&"- 4BVM5PVSJOIPi"JOìVÐODJBEPamicus curiaeOBTEFDJTÜFTUSJCVUÈSJBTEP45'wRevista Dialética de Direito Tributário, no 181, 1aFEJÎÍP @@@@@@Controle de Constitucionalidade Moderno/JUFSØJ¶NQFUVT .&%*/" %BNBSFTAmicus Curiae – Amigo da Corte ou Amigo da Parte? São Paulo: Saraiva, 4*..0/4 0NBSJ 4DPUU i1JDLJOH GSJFOET GSPN UIF DSPXE amicus curiae QBSUJDJQBUJPO BT QPMJUJDBMTZNCPMJTNw Connecticut Law Review 406;" #FSOBSEP 1JNFOUFM Introdução aos Recursos Cíveis e à Ação Rescisória FE 4ÍP 1BVMP4BSBJWB
889
Lihat lebih banyak...
Comentários
