Complete genome sequence of Nocardiopsis dassonvillei type strain (IMRU 509)

May 18, 2017 | Autor: Alla Lapidus | Categoria: Marine Sediment
Share Embed


Descrição do Produto

Standards in Genomic Sciences (2010) 3:325-336

DOI:10.4056/sigs.1363462

Complete genome sequence of Nocardiopsis dassonvillei type strain (IMRU 509T) Hui Sun1, Alla Lapidus1, Matt Nolan1, Susan Lucas1, Tijana Glavina Del Rio1, Hope Tice1, Jan-Fang Cheng1, Roxane Tapia1,2, Cliff Han1,2, Lynne Goodwin1,2, Sam Pitluck1, Ioanna Pagani1, Natalia Ivanova1, Konstantinos Mavromatis1, Natalia Mikhailova1, Amrita Pati1, Amy Chen3, Krishna Palaniappan3, Miriam Land1,4, Loren Hauser1,4, Yun-Juan Chang1,4, Cynthia D. Jeffries1,4, Olivier Duplex Ngatchou Djao5, Manfred Rohde5, Johannes Sikorski6, Markus Göker6, Tanja Woyke1, James Bristow1, Jonathan A. Eisen1,7, Victor Markowitz3, Philip Hugenholtz1, Nikos C. Kyrpides1, and Hans-Peter Klenk6* 1

DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, USA Los Alamos National Laboratory, Bioscience Division, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA 3 Biological Data Management and Technology Center, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA 4 Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA 5 HZI – Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany 6 DSMZ - German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany 7 University of California Davis Genome Center, Davis, California, USA 2

*Corresponding author: Hans-Peter Klenk Keywords: Gram-positive, aerobic, pathogen, mesophile, non alkaliphilic, zig-zag-shaped mycelium, actinomycetoma, conjunctivitis, cholangitis, Nocardiopsaceae, GEBA Nocardiopsis dassonvillei (Brocq-Rousseau 1904) Meyer 1976 is the type species of the genus Nocardiopsis, which in turn is the type genus of the family Nocardiopsaceae. This species is of interest because of its ecological versatility. Members of N. dassonvillei have been isolated from a large variety of natural habitats such as soil and marine sediments, from different plant and animal materials as well as from human patients. Moreover, representatives of the genus Nocardiopsis participate actively in biopolymer degradation. This is the first complete genome sequence in the family Nocardiopsaceae. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. The 6,543,312 bp long genome consist of a 5.77 Mbp chromosome and a 0.78 Mbp plasmid and with its 5,570 protein-coding and 77 RNA genes is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Introduction

Strain IMRU 509T (= DSM 43111 = ATCC 23218 = JCM 7437) is the type strain of Nocardiopsis dassonvillei, which in turn is the type species of the genus Nocardiopsis. Currently, N. dassonvillei is one of 40 validly published species belonging to the genus. The genus name derives from the Greek name opsis, appearance, and from Edmond Nocard, who first described in 1888 the type species of the genus Nocardia, N. farcinica [1,2]. Nocardiopsis means “that which has the appearance

of Nocardia”. The species epithet is chosen in honor of Charles Dassonville, a contemporary French veterinarian [3]. The genus Nocardiopsis was first described by Meyer in 1976 [4] for bacteria that were previously classified as either Streptothrix dassonvillei (Brocq-Rousseau 1904) [3], Nocardia dassonvillei [5], or Actinomadura dassonvillei [6] on the basis of their morphological characteristics and cell wall type [4]. The strain IMRU 509T is the neotype of the species N. The Genomic Standards Consortium

Sun et al.

dassonvillei (Brocq-Rousseau 1904). Databases provide contradictory speculations on the ecological and geographical origin of strain IMRU 509T (e.g., soil from Paris, France; mildewed grain of unspecified geographical origin), however, solid information could not be extracted from the original literature [4,5,7-9]. Members of this species can be isolated from a variety of different habitats, including mildewed grain and fodder [3], different soils [10-13], antartic glacier [14], marine sediments [10,15], actinoryzal plant rhizosphere [16], gut tract of animals [17], active stalactites [18], cotton waste and occasionally in hay [19], air of a cattle barn [20], atmosphere of a composting facility [21], salterns [22] and from patients suffering from conjunctivitis [23] or cholangitis [8]. N. dassonvillei strains were also isolated from nodules and draining sinuses associate with an actinomycetoma of the anterior aspect of the right leg below the knee of a 39year-old man [24]. A microorganism identical to Streptothrix dassonvillei was isolated two years later, but was placed in the genus Nocardia and designated N. dassonvillei [23]. Subsequently, the genus Actinomadura was described to harbor, among other species, also N. dassonvillei (BrocqRousseau) Liegard and Landrieu [4,8]. Further analysis supplied evidence that A. dassonvillei is not related to nocardiae [7]. Therefore, a new genus was created for A. dassonvillei on the basis of the characteristic development of spores, including the specific zig-zag formation of aerial hyphae before spore dispersal and the lack of madurose [4]. In 1976, A. dassonvillei was transferred to this new genus and was designated Nocardiopsis dassonvillei [4]. Also, N. dassonvillei is an earlier heterotypic synonym of N. alborubida [25]. The species epithet alborubida was considered as orthographically incorrect and corrected by Evtushenko to albirubida [10]. Subsequently, the species N. dassonvillei has been divided into three subspecies, namely subsp. prasina [26], subsp. albirubida (Grund and Kroppenstedt 1990) [10] and subsp. dassonvillei (BrocqRousseau 1904) [4,27], which is an earlier heterotypic synonym of Streptomyces flavidofuscus Preobrazhenskaya 1986 [28]. DNA-DNA hybridization data, as well as the results of biochemical tests, indicated that N. alborubida DSM 40465, N. antarctica DSM 43884, and N. dassonvillei DSM 43111 represent a single species designated N. dassonvillei [25]. Here we present a summary http://standardsingenomics.org

classification and a set of features for N. dassonvillei strain IMRU 509T, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

The 16S rRNA gene sequences of the strain IMRU 509T share 95.9 to 99.5% sequence similarity with the 16S rRNA gene sequences of the type strains from the other members of the genus Nocardiopsis [29] The 16S rRNA gene of the strain IMRU 509T also shares 99% similarity with an uncultured 16S rRNA gene sequence of the clone AKIW919 from urban aerosol in USA [30], but none of the sequences in metagenomic libraries (env_nt) shares more than 89% sequence identity, indicating that members of the species, genus and even family are poorly represented in the habitats screened thus far (as of November 2010). A representative genomic 16S rRNA sequence of N. dassonvillei was compared with the most recent release of the Greengenes database [31] using NCBI BLAST under default values and the relative frequencies of taxa and keywords, weighted by BLAST scores, were determined. The three most frequent genera were Nocardiopsis (91.1%), Streptomyces (7.1%) and Prauseria (1.8%). The species yielding the highest score was N. dassonvillei (including hits to N. dassonvillei subsp. dassonvillei, formerly also known as Streptomyces flavidofuscus [9,28]). The five most frequent keywords within the labels of environmental samples which yielded hits were 'soil(s)' (15.4%), ‘algeria, nocardiopsis, saccharothrix, saharan' (5.7%), 'source' (2.0%) and 'alkaline' (2.0%). These keywords fit to the morphology of the type strain as well as to the ecology of habitats from which the type strain and also other members of the species were isolated. The single most frequent keyword within the labels of environmental samples which yielded hits of a higher score than the highest scoring species was 'desert/soil' (50.0%). Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of N. dassonvillei strain IMRU 509T in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the five 16S rRNA gene copies in the genome differ from each other by up to ten nucleotides, and differ by up to eight nucleotides from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence (X97886). 326

Nocardiopsis dassonvillei type strain (IMRU 509T)

Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of N. dassonvillei strain IMRU 509T relative to the type strains of the other species within the genus and to the type strains of the other genera within the family Nocardiopsaceae. The trees were inferred from 1,442 aligned characters [32,33] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [34] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy [35]. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 750 bootstrap replicates [36] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [37] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold [38]. Note that the tree is more in accordance with the view of Grund and Kroppenstedt (1990) [39] to treat N. alborubida as a species of its own, rather than with the view of Yassin et al. (1997) [25] and Evtushenko et al. 2000 [10] to regard it as a subspecies of N. dassonvillei based on a 71% DDH value [10].

327

Standards in Genomic Sciences

Sun et al. T

Table 1. Classification and general features of N. dassonvillei strain IMRU 509 according to the MIGS recommendations [40]

MIGS ID

Property

Term Domain Bacteria Phylum Actinobacteria Class Actinobacteria

Current classification

MIGS-22

Gram stain Cell shape Motility Sporulation Temperature range Optimum temperature Salinity Oxygen requirement Carbon source Energy source

MIGS-6

Habitat

MIGS-15 MIGS-14

Biotic relationship Pathogenicity Biosafety level Isolation Geographic location Sample collection time Latitude Longitude Depth Altitude

MIGS-4 MIGS-5 MIGS-4.1 MIGS-4.2 MIGS-4.3 MIGS-4.4

Order Actinomycetales Family Nocardiopsaceae Genus Nocardiopsis Species Nocardiopsis dassonvillei Type strain IMRU 509 positive zig-zag shaped mycelium none yes mesophile, up to 42°C, but not 45°C about 28°C probably 0% NaCl, no growth at 20% NaCl aerobic carbohydrates L-arabinose, D-xylose, D-mannose, D-glucose, Lrhamnose, maltose, lactose, adonitol, dulcitol, Dmannitol, i-inositol, D-fructose, sucrose, raffinose, and glycerol. soil, mildewed grain, and clinical materials of animal and human origin free-living actinomycetoma, conjunctivitis, cholangitis 2 not clearly reported probably Paris, France not reported 48.85 2.35 or other (see text) not reported not reported

Evidence code TAS [41] TAS [42] TAS [43] TAS [43-46] TAS [9,46,47] TAS [4,48] TAS [4,48] TAS [4] TAS [4] NAS [4] NAS TAS [4] TAS [9] IDA NAS TAS [4] TAS [4] TAS [4]

TAS [4] NAS TAS [8,23,24] TAS [49] NAS NAS TAS NAS NAS NAS

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [50]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

The cells of strain IMRU 509T are aerobic and Gram-positive [4]. (Table 1). Aerial mycelia are long, moderately branched, and, at the beginning of sporulation, more or less zig-zag-shaped (Figure 2). Later, the hyphae are straight or somewhat coiled [4]. They then divide into long segments which subsequently subdivide into smaller spores of irregular size [4]. Spores are elongated and smooth. http://standardsingenomics.org

Depending on the medium used, the color of the substrate mycelium is either yellowish-brown or olive to dark brown [4]. The aerial mycelium varies from a sparse coating to a thick, farinaceous to woolly cover of the colonies on oatmeal agar, oatmeal-nitrate agar, Bennett agar, Czapek-sucrose agar, inorganic salt-starch agar, yeast extract-malt extract agar, and complex organic medium 79 [4] of 328

Nocardiopsis dassonvillei type strain (IMRU 509T)

Prauser and Falta [51]. The color of the aerial mycelium is white or yellowish to grayish [4]. Colonies of substrate mycelia have dense filamentous margins [4]. Hyphae of the substrate mycelium fragment into coccoid elements after 3 to 4 weeks, depending on the medium used [4]. Soluble pigment is not produced [4]. Melanoid pigments are not produced on ISP 6 or tyrosine agar [4]. Growth of strain IMRU 509T was tested on basal medium with and without carbohydrates. No growth was detected in the absence of carbohydrates. Strain IMRU 509T was able to use N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, parbutin, D-galactose, gluconate, D-maltose, Dribose, salicin, D-threalose, maltitol, putrescine, 4aminobutyrate, azelate, citrate, fumarate, DLlactate,L-alanine, β-alanine, L-aspartate, L-leucine and phenylacetate as sole carbon sources, but not α-D-melibiose, acetate, propionate, glutarate, Lmalate, mesaconate, oxoglutarate, pyruvate, suberate, L-histidine, L-phenylalanine, L-proline, Lserine, L-tryptophan and 4-hydroxybenzoate [52]. However, L- arabinose, D-xylose, D-mannose, Dglucose, L-rhamnose, maltose, D-mannitol, Dfructose, sucrose and glycerol are the main carbohydrates used [4]. Acid is produced from Larabinose, galactose, mannitol, sucrose and D-

xylose [8]. Moreover, adonitol, dulcitol, i-inositol are not utilized [4]. L-alanine, proline and serine are also used as sole carbon as well as nitrogen sources, although proline and serine are weakly utilized [25]. Strain IMRU 509T was found to hydrolyze p-nitrophenyl α-D-glucopyranoside, pnitrophenyl β-D-glucopyranoside, p-nitrophenyl phenylphosphonate and L-alanine p-nitroanilide, but not aesculin, bis-p-nitrophenyl phosphate, pnitrophenyl phosphorylcholine, L-glutamate-γ-3carboxy-p-nitroanilide and L-proline p-nitroanilide [52]. Meyer (1976) reported that IMRU 509T was not able to liquefy gelatin [4], while Yassin et al. reported in 1997 the opposite [25]. Strain IMRU 509T is able to hydrolyze starch, to peptonize milk, to decompose esculin and to reduce nitrate to nitrite [4]. Strains of N. dassonvillei show positive tests of the decarboxylation of lactate, oxalate and propionate [8]. They also decompose casein, tyrosine and Tween 85. They show optimal growth at mildly alkaline conditions of pH 8, and at a salinity of 0% NaCl [8]. No growth is observed at 20% NaCl or at 45°C [8]. The catalase test is positive [4]. Strain IMRU 509T hydrolyses adenine, xanthine and hypoxanthine [25].

Figure 2. Scanning electron micrograph of N. dassonvillei strain IMRU 509T

329

Standards in Genomic Sciences

Sun et al.

Chemotaxonomy The cell wall of the strain IMRU 509T belongs to the chemotype III, which corresponds to the peptidoglycan type A1γ [53], i.e., N-acetyl-muramic acid, Nacetyl-glucosamine, alanine, glutamic acid, and meso-2, 6-diaminopimelic acid [4,8]. The products of the degradation of the cell wall are glycerol and glucose [8]. Strain IMRU 509T is susceptible to lysozyme [4]. The polar lipids found in strain IMRU 509T are phosphatidylinositol mannosides (PIM), phosphatidylinositol (PI), phosphatidylcholine (PC), monomannosyl diglyceride (MDG), phosphatidylglycerol (PG), phosphatidylmethylethanolamine (PME), monoacetylated glucose (AG), diphosphatidyl-glycerol (DPG), unknown phospholipids specific for Nocardiopsis, β-lipids of unknown structure (PL) [8]. The menaquinone type 4C2 was detected [8]. The menaquinone patterns of the strain IMRU 509T contain menaquinones from MK-10 to MK-10(H8) and sugar type C [8]. Small amounts of the MK-9 and /or MK-12 series are also found [8].

The main fatty acids detected in the strain IMRU509T were, iso-C16:0 (26.7%), anteiso-C17:0 (19.8%) and C18:1 (18.3%). Minor fatty acids detected included C18:0 (5.8%), C17:1 (5.2%), anteisoC15:0 (3.2%), C16:0 (2.2%), iso-C17:0 (2.1%), C16:1 (1.2%) and iso-C15:0 (0.8%) [10].

Genome sequencing and annotation Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [54], and is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project [55]. The genome project is deposited in the Genome OnLine Database [37] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Genome sequencing project information MIGS ID Property Term MIGS-31

Finishing quality

MIGS-28

Libraries used

MIGS-29

Sequencing platforms

ABI3730, 454 GS FLX Titanium, Illumina GAii

MIGS-31.2

Sequencing coverage

9.0 × Sanger; 19.8 × pyrosequence; 22.3 × Illumina

MIGS-30

Assemblers

Newbler version 1.1.03.24, phrap

MIGS-32

Gene calling method

Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP CP002040 chromosome CP002041 plasmid

INSDC ID

MIGS-13

Finished Genomic libraries: one Sanger 8 kb pMCL200 library, one fosmid (pcc1Fos) library, one 454 pyrosequence standard library and one Illumina standard library

Genbank Date of Release

June 4, 2010

GOLD ID

Gc01339

NCBI project ID

19709

Database: IMG-GEBA

646564557

Source material identifier

DSM 43111

Project relevance

Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation N. dassonvillei strain IMRU 509T, DSM 43111, was grown in DSMZ medium 65 (GYM Streptomyces medium) [56] at 28°C. DNA was isolated from 0.51 g of cell paste using Qiagen Genomic 500 DNA Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufachttp://standardsingenomics.org

turer, with modification st/DALM for cell lysis as described in Wu et al. [55].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Sanger and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequenc330

Nocardiopsis dassonvillei type strain (IMRU 509T)

ing can be found at the JGI website [57]. Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler version 2.1-PreRelease (Roche). Large Newbler contigs were broken into 6,356 overlap ping fragments of 1,000 bp and entered into assembly as pseudo-reads. The sequences were assigned quality scores based on Newbler consensus q-scores with modifications to account for overlap redundancy and adjust inflated qscores. A hybrid 454/Sanger assembly was made using the PGA assembler. Possible mis-assemblies were corrected and gaps between contigs were closed by by editing in Consed, by custom primer walks from sub-clones or PCR products. A total of 462 Sanger finishing reads were produced to close gaps, to resolve repetitive regions, and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. Illumina reads were used to improve the final consensus quality using an in-house developed tool (the Polisher ) [58]. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together, the combination of the Sanger and 454 sequencing platforms provided 28.77 × coverage of the genome. The final assembly contains 68,385 Sanger reads and 1,376,163 pyrosequencing reads.

Genome annotation Genes were identified using Prodigal [59] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [60]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [61].

Genome properties

The genome consists of a 5,767,958 bp long chromosome with a 73% GC content, and a 775,354 bp long plasmid a 72% GC content (Table 3 and Figure 3a and Figure 3b). Of the 5,647 genes predicted, 5,570 were protein-coding genes, and 77 RNAs; 73 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (69.6%) were assigned with a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.

Table 3. Genome Statistics Attribute Value Genome size (bp) 6,543,312 DNA coding region (bp) 5,543,886 DNA G+C content (bp) 4,758,935 Number of replicons 2 Extrachromosomal elements 1 Total genes 5,647 RNA genes 77 rRNA operons 5 Protein-coding genes 5,570 Pseudo genes 73 Genes with function prediction 3,930 Genes in paralog clusters 1,055 Genes assigned to COGs 3,793 Genes assigned Pfam domains 4,204 Genes with signal peptides 1,686 Genes with transmembrane helices 1,337 CRISPR repeats 8

331

% of Total 100.00% 84.73% 72.73%

100.00% 1.36% 98.64% 1.29%2 69.59% 18.68% 67.17% 74.45% 29.86% 23.68%

Standards in Genomic Sciences

Sun et al.

Figure 3a. Graphical circular map of the chromosome (not drawn to scale with plasmid). From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 3b. Graphical circular map of the plasmid (not drawn to scale with chromosome). From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

http://standardsingenomics.org

332

Nocardiopsis dassonvillei type strain (IMRU 509T) Table 4. Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories Code value %age Description J

180

4.1

Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis

A

1

0.0

RNA processing and modification

K

518

11.9

L

173

4.0

Replication, recombination and repair

B

1

0.0

Chromatin structure and dynamics

D

38

0.9

Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning

Y

0

0.0

Nuclear structure

V

103

2.4

Defense mechanisms

T

279

6.4

Signal transduction mechanisms

M

190

4.4

Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis

N

3

0.1

Cell motility

Z

2

0.1

Cytoskeleton

W

0

0.0

Extracellular structures

U

35

0.8

Intracellular trafficking and secretion, and vesicular transport

O

115

2.6

Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones

C

266

6.1

Energy production and conversion

G

371

8.5

Carbohydrate transport and metabolism

E

354

8.1

Amino acid transport and metabolism

F

102

2.3

Nucleotide transport and metabolism

H

210

4.8

Coenzyme transport and metabolism

I

184

4.2

Lipid transport and metabolism

P

212

4.9

Inorganic ion transport and metabolism

Q

144

3.3

Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism

R

578

13.3

General function prediction only

S

295

6. 8

Function unknown

-

1,854

32.8

Not in COGs

Transcription

Acknowledgements We would like to gratefully acknowledge the help of Marlen Jando for growing cultures of N. dassonvillei and Susanne Schneider for DNA extraction and quality analysis (both at DSMZ). This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program, and by the University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contract

No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC5207NA27344, and Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-06NA25396, UT-Battelle and Oak Ridge National Laboratory under contract DEAC05-00OR22725, as well as German Research Foundation (DFG) INST 599/1-1.

References 1.

333

Buchanan RE, Gibbons NE. 1974. Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 8th Edition. 1,246 p. The Williams and Wilkins Company. Baltimore, Maryland.

2.

Lechevalier MP. 1976. The Biology of Nocardiae, p. 517. In M. Goodfellow, G. H. Brownell, and J. A. Serrano (ed.). Academic Press, London.

Standards in Genomic Sciences

Sun et al. 3.

Brocq-Rousseu D. Sur un Streptothrix. Rev Gen Bot 1904; 16:219-230.

4.

Meyer J. Nocardiopsis, a new genus of the order Actinomycetales. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1976; 26:487-493. doi:10.1099/00207713-26-4-487

5.

Gordon RE, Horan AC. Nocardia dassonvillei, a macroscopic replica of Streptomyces griseus. J Gen Microbiol 1968; 50:235-240. PubMed

6.

Lechevalier HA, Lechevalier MP. 1970. A critical evaluation of the genera of aerobic actinomycetes. In H. Prauser (ed.), The Actinomycetales. VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena p. 393-405.

7.

Goodfellow M. Numerical taxonomy of some nocardioform bacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1971; 69:33-80. PubMed

8.

Kroppenstedt RM, Evtushenko LI. 2006. The family Nocardiopsaceae. In: M Dworkin, S Falkow, E Rosenberg, KH Schleifer E Stackebrandt (eds), The Prokaryotes, 3. ed, vol. 3. Springer, New York, p. 754-795.

9.

Rainey FA, Ward-Rainey N, Kroppenstedt RM, Stackebrandt E. The genus Nocardiopsis represents a phylogenetically coherent taxon and a distinct actinomycete lineage: proposal of Nocardiopsaceae fam. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1996; 46:1088-1092. PubMed doi:10.1099/0020771346-4-1088

10. Evtushenko LI, Taran VV, Akimov VN, Kroppenstedt RM, Tiedje JM, Stackebrandt E. Nocardiopsis tropica sp. nov., Nocardiopsis trehalosi sp. nov., nom. rev. and Nocardiopsis dassonvillei subsp. albirubida subsp. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50:73-81. PubMed 11. Jiang C, Xu L. 1998. Actinomycete diversity in unusual habitats. In: C. Jiang and L. Xu (Eds.) Actinomycetes Research. Yunnan University Press. Yunnan, China. 259-270. 12. Wang Y, Zhang ZS, Ruan JS, Wang YM, Ali SM. Investigation of actinomycete diversity in the tropical rainforests of Singapore. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 1999; 23:178-187. doi:10.1038/sj.jim.2900723 13. Xu LH, Tiang YQ, Zhang YF, Zhao LX, Jiang CL. Streptomyces thermogriseus, a new species of the genus Streptomyces from soil, lake and hot spring. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1998; 48:1089-1093. doi:10.1099/00207713-48-4-1089 14. Abyzov SS, Philipova SN, Kuznetsov VD. Nocardiopsis antarcticus, a new species of actinomycetes, isolated from the ice sheet of the central http://standardsingenomics.org

Antarctic glacier. Izv Akad Nauk SSSR Ser Biol 1983; 4:559-568. 15. Dixit VS, Pant A. Hydrocarbon degradation and protease production by Nocardiopsis sp. NCIM 5124. Lett Appl Microbiol 2000; 30:67-69. PubMed doi:10.1046/j.1472-765x.2000.00665.x 16. Boivin-Jahns V, Bianchi A, Ruimy R, Garcin J, Daumas S, Christen R. Comparison of phenotypical and molecular methods for the identification of bacterial strains isolated from a deep subsurface environment. Appl Environ Microbiol 1995; 61:3400-3406. PubMed 17. Vasanthi V, Hoti SL. Microbial flora in gut of Culex quinquefasciatus breeding in cess pits. SE Asian J Trop Med Pub Health 1992; 23:312-317. 18. Laiz L, Groth I, Schumann P, Zezza F, Felske A, Hermosin B, Saiz-Jimenez C. Microbiology of the stalactites from Grotta dei Cervi, Porto Badisco, Italy. Int Microbiol 2000; 3:25-30. PubMed 19. Lacey J. The ecology of actinomycetes in fodders and related substrates: Proceeding of the Warsaw symposium on Streptomyces and Nocardia. Zentralbl Bakteriol Parasitenkd Infektionskr Hyg Abt 1 Supp 1977; 6:161-170. 20. Andersson MA, Mikkola R, Kroppenstedt RM, Rainey FA, Peltola J, Helin J, Sivonen K, Salkinoja-Salonen MS. The mitochondrial toxin produced by Streptomyces griseus strains isolated from indoor environment is valinomycin. Appl Environ Microbiol 1998; 64:4767-4773. PubMed 21. Kämpfer P, Busse HJ, Rainey F. Nocardiopsis compostus sp. nov., from the atmosphere of a composting facility. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:621-627. PubMed 22. Chun J, Bae KS, Moon EY, Jung SO, Lee HK, Kim SJ. Nocardiopsis kunsanensis sp. nov., a moderately halophilic actinomycete isolated from a saltern. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50:19091913. PubMed 23. Liegard H, Landrieu M. Un cas de mycose conjunctivale. Ann Ocul (Paris) 1911; 146:418-426. 24. Sindhuphak W, Macdonald E, Head E. Actinomycetoma caused by Nocardiopsis dassonvillei. Arch Dermatol 1985; 121:1332-1334. PubMed doi:10.1001/archderm.121.10.1332 25. Yassin AF, Rainey FA, Burghardt J, Gierth D, Ungerechts J, Lux I, Seifert P, Bal C, Schaal KP. Description of Nocardiopsis synnematafomans sp.nov., elevation of Nocardiopsis alba subsp. prasina to Nocardiopsis prasina comb. nov., and designation of Nocardiopsis antarctica and No334

Nocardiopsis dassonvillei type strain (IMRU 509T) cardiopsis alborubida as later subjective synonyms of Nocardiopsis dassonvillei. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:983-988. PubMed doi:10.1099/00207713-47-4-983

16S rRNA-based phylogenetic tree of all sequenced type strains. Syst Appl Microbiol 2008; 31:241-250. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.syapm.2008.07.001

26. Miyashita K, Mikami Y, Arai T. Alkalophilic actinomycete, Nocardiopsis dassonvillei subsp. prasina subsp. nov. isolated from soil. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1984; 34:405-409. doi:10.1099/0020771334-4-405

36. Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Moret BME, Stamatakis A. How many bootstrap replicates are necessary? Lect Notes Comput Sci 2009; 5541:184-200. doi:10.1007/978-3-64202008-7_13

27. Hill LR, Skerman VBD, Sneath PHA. Corrigenda to the approved lists of bacterial names edited for the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1984; 34:508-511. doi:10.1099/00207713-34-4-508

37. Liolios K, Mavromatis K, Tavernarakis N, Kyrpides NC. The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2007: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36:D475-D479. PubMed doi:10.1093/nar/gkm884

28. Tamura T, Ishida Y, Otoguro M, Hatano K, Suzuki K. Reclassification of Streptomyces flavidofuscus as a synonym of Nocardiopsis dassonvillei subsp. dassonvillei. Int J Syst Evol Bacteriol 2008; 58:2321-2323. 29. Chun J, Lee JH, Jung Y, Kim M, Kim S, Kim BK, Lim YW. EzTaxon: a web-based tool for the identification of prokaryotes based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2259-2261. PubMed doi:10.1099/ijs.0.64915-0 30. Brodie EL, DeSantis TZ, Parker JP, Zubietta IX, Piceno YM, Andersen GL. Urban aerosols harbor diverse and dynamic bacterial populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:299-304. PubMed doi:10.1073/pnas.0608255104 31. DeSantis TE, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie E, Keller K, Huber T, Dalevi D, Hu P, Andersen G. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006; 72:50695072. PubMed doi:10.1128/AEM.03006-05 32. Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 2000; 17:540-552. PubMed 33. Lee C, Grasso C, Sharlow MF. Multiple sequence alignment using partial order graphs. Bioinformatics 2002; 18:452-464. PubMed doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/18.3.452 34. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Syst Biol 2008; 57:758-771. PubMed doi:10.1080/10635150802429642 35. Yarza P, Richter M, Peplies J, Euzeby J, Amann R, Schleifer KH, Ludwig W, Glöckner FO, RossellóMóra R. The All-Species Living Tree project: A 335

38. Lykidis A, Mavromatis K, Ivanova N, Anderson I, Land M, DiBartolo G, Martinez M, Lapidus A, Lucas S, Copeland A, et al. Genome sequence and analysis of the soil cellulolytic actinomycete Thermobifida fusca YX. J Bacteriol 2007; 189:2477-2486. PubMed doi:10.1128/JB.0189906 39. Grund E, Kroppenstedt RM. Chemotaxonomy and numerical taxonomy of the genus Nocardiopsis Meyer 1976. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1990; 40:5-11. doi:10.1099/00207713-40-1-5 40. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli SV, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:541-547. PubMed doi:10.1038/nbt1360 41. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:4576-4579. PubMed doi:10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576 42. Garrity GM, Holt JG. The Road Map to the Manual. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 1, Springer, New York, 2001, p. 119-169. 43. Stackebrandt E, Rainey FA, Ward-Rainey NL. Proposal for a new hierarchic classification system, Actinobacteria classis nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:479-491. doi:10.1099/00207713-47-2479 44. Buchanan RE. Studies in the nomenclature and classification of bacteria. II. The primary subdivisions of the Schizomycetes. J Bacteriol 1917; 2:155-164. PubMed Standards in Genomic Sciences

Sun et al. 45. Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. Approved lists of bacterial names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:225-420. doi:10.1099/00207713-30-1225

54. Klenk HP, Göker M. En route to a genome-based classification of Archaea and Bacteria? Syst Appl Microbiol 2010; 33:175-182. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.syapm.2010.03.003

46. Zhi XY, Li WJ, Stackebrandt E. An update of the structure and 16S rRNA gene sequence-based definition of higher ranks of the class Actinobacteria, with the proposal of two new suborders and four new families and emended descriptions of the existing higher taxa. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:589-608. PubMed doi:10.1099/ijs.0.65780-0

55. Wu D, Hugenholtz P, Mavromatis K, Pukall R, Dalin E, Ivanova NN, Kunin V, Goodwin L, Wu M, Tindall BJ, et al. A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea. Nature 2009; 462:1056-1060. PubMed doi:10.1038/nature08656

47. Zhang Z, Wang Y, Ruan J. Reclassification of Thermomonospora and Microtetraspora. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1998; 48:411-422. PubMed 48. Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. Approved lists of bacterial names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:225-420. doi:10.1099/00207713-30-1225 49. Classification of bacteria and archaea in risk groups. http://www.baua.de TRBA 466. 50. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 2000; 25:25-29. PubMed doi:10.1038/75556 51. Prauser H, Falta R. Phagensensibilitat, ZellwandZusammensetzung und Taxonomie von Actinomyceten. Z Allg Mikrobiol 1968; 8:39-46. PubMed doi:10.1002/jobm.3630080106 52. Kämpfer P, Busse HJ, Rainey FA. Nocardiopsis compostus sp. nov., from the atmosphere of a composting facility. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:621-627. PubMed 53. Schleifer KH, Kandler O. Peptidoglycan types of bacterial cell walls and their taxonomic implications. Bacteriol Rev 1972; 36:407-477. PubMed

http://standardsingenomics.org

View publication stats

56. List of growth media used at DSMZ: http://www.dsmz.de/microorganisms/media_list.p hp. 57. DOE Joint Genome Institute. http://www.jgi.doe.gov 58. Lapidus A, LaButti K, Foster B, Lowry S, Trong S, Goltsman E. POLISHER: An effective tool for using ultra short reads in microbial genome assembly and finishing. AGBT, Marco Island, FL, 2008. 59. Hyatt D, Chen GL, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 2010; 11:119. PubMed doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-119 60. Pati A, Ivanova N, Mikhailova N, Ovchinikova G, Hooper SD, Lykidis A, Kyrpides NC. GenePRIMP: A gene prediction improvement pipeline for microbial genomes. Nat Methods 2010; 7:455-457. PubMed doi:10.1038/nmeth.1457 61. Markowitz VM, Ivanova NN, Chen IMA, Chu K, Kyrpides NC. IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:2271-2278. PubMed doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp393

336

Lihat lebih banyak...

Comentários

Copyright © 2017 DADOSPDF Inc.